|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218 |
I brought this question up about 4-5 Months ago, if the Pro & College Scouting Departments need overhauled due to their poor performance since the Browns have rejoined the League.
However, it's nearly impossible to pinpoint a single person since the Browns have had a lot of changes over the 10 Years, and we as fans do not know who did what and who wanted this guy and ect.
But, personally I'm glad to see them reworking these departments.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167 |
Savage completely overhauled them in his first year here. He installed his system for grading, his people, etc... now we are doing the same thing with Heckert's people.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810 |
prpl...I believe Mangini added some people to personnel too. How much his people changed the system that Savage set up, no way to know the answer to that.
But, changes such as this are the nature of the business. If I were Heckert, I would want people I know and that I am comfortable with, knowing they have the same work ethic.
FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167 |
I was just replying to Hooter's question regarding whether or not they needed overhauled due to a decade's worth of failure..... by stating that it HAS been overhauled at least once (probably more) in that decade.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
Botch also overhauled things ,unfortuantely he set up his own staff and it wasn't worth much either. Which is what Phil cleaned out..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218 |
I still think Savage did an alright job here in Cleveland, but the biggest issues that I had with his style is giving away Draft Picks.
As for the Pro Personnel, Steve Sabo was the only guy that made it throughout all of the regimes except for the current regimes. Our scouting departments have always been lacking, which leads to poor scouting, free agents and poor drafts.
A few people have said they liked Mangini's draft, so why get rid of the guys responsible for that? That leads to the question, how much is the Coaches/GM's responsible for in the Draft.
My thought on the whole thing goes like this: The Coach/GM goes to the Scouting Department and says, "We want a guy that can do this, this and this. Create us a list and grading scale for each prospect that meets our needs".
So the scouts create this list with grades and ect, then ultimately the Coach or GM picks the guys they want in for the try outs or to trade.
That is the only reason why I can think of why moves or the draft under Mangini look better (Moore, Roth, Benard and ect) is because Mangini wanted those guys based on the information he received.
Or I could be completely off base here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
Quote:
I still think Savage did an alright job here in Cleveland, but the biggest issues that I had with his style is giving away Draft Picks.
It's hard to evaluate Savage's entire body of work and say he did anything but a poor job.
He flopped on every one of his efforts at the most important position on the field, and he gave away all the money and draft picks for an "all-in" effort to win now. As a result of those failures, we're in the position you see here.
Looking at some individual moves, one can say Savage had some hits. Looking at the overall big-picture, it's hard to say he was a success.
If he was viewed in that light, he'd have landed something more than a low-level job with one of the sorriest teams in the history of the NFL.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620 |
Quote:
A few people have said they liked Mangini's draft, so why get rid of the guys responsible for that?
Maybe I am misreading your comment, or you are replying to something different, but it was the pro personnel department that got the axe. They did not handle college scouting and the draft. These guys handled the free agents. Maybe Holmgren wanted some guys who know the names of the other 30 teams in the league.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858 |
Quote:
and he gave away all the money and draft picks for an "all-in" effort to win now.
the pressure to win in this league is incredible. Seems that when ever any team takes a win now "all in, damn the future" approach, they tend to fail the following year or at the very least, can't sustain winning seasons.
Butch Davis did that.. I think savage took that approach.. Does it ever really work?
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
It does, but only when you have a really good team already making it great. Think the Pats taking on Moss.
We didn't have a really good team. We had a marginal team. It was a poor decision on his part.
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 176
Practice Squad
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 176 |
Whew! A friend of mine is a scout and has been with the team through the past few regime changes. Every time I see news like this I worry/figure he'll be on the block (just b/c of the nature of the business) I honestly don't know who he's scouted/reccomended, since we don't chat much and he refuses to even tell his father/brother about those types of things... so I can't grade his choices I'm just glad for the time being that he's still got a job to support his family! And hope he makes it through this time too!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064 |
One reaction from my experience is that when you get people crowding each other and sharing (duplicating responsibilities), you may see really negative turf battles. These become entrenched and set lower effectiveness standards. But people get territorial; protect turf to protect jobs. Doesn't explain this type of "wipeout" but the past performance and records and lack of effectiveness justifies it apparently. New is not automatically better, but old is often more of the same. 
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 512 |
j/c
To me this seems like a common move when a new GM comes in. Just like anyone else, he wants to have people he knows and is comfortable with working for him. *shrug* Not a big deal to me.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns fire entire pro personnel
department...
|
|