Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 553
I think you have to take Okung in that scenario.

Has any team taken two #1 rated tackles within 5 years of each other? It's kinda intriguing. Spiller or JPP would be really tempting too. It's hard for me to see this as a bad thing.


A man is not old until regrets take the place of dreams.

John Barrymore
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Quote:

I think you have to take Okung in that scenario.




+1

Sure up the O-line.....it gives the QB more time, the RB gets better holes, and it keeps the opposing defense on the field longer (which means your defense is off the field more).

Okung FTW!

Or trade down. SOMEONE will want to trade up in the scenario.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 89
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 89
Quote:

There is enough talent in this draft that if we traded back into the the 12-32 range we would still get an impact player.




And teams in that range would just stay there and get an impact player instead of using another pick or two to move up to 7 to get someone margially better.


How does a league celebrating its 100th season only recognize the 53 most recent championships?

#gmstrong
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
This is such a weird year without a salary cap. It's so weird that I wouldn't completely object to drafting Okung. Lerner is a billionaire so he can afford the guaranteed money.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
I would take the guy that's being compared to Joe Thomas by some experts: Russell Okung.

That would make the ages of our line

25-29-24-29-22

giving us the best line in the NFL and Pashos the weak link and the rest of the line Pro-Bowl caliber.


[Linked Image from i190.photobucket.com]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Yup.....without a salary cap, you throw it all out the window. And that includes the Delhomme salary (who cares, it's irrelevant).

The way I see it, unless the BPA fits your biggest need.....draft to raise a strength. Not that we had a strong O-line last year, but we could have a crazy strong one with Thomas, Mack, & Okung. Build a strength and matchup problem.

I know we are super weak at the secondary but we have a ton of picks this year. Like WR's & RB's...you can find secondary later in the rounds. I'd rather spend the big money/high draft selections on O-line, Front-7, and QB.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Who is comparing him to Joe Thomas? I want to find them and revoke their expert status.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,831
Quote:

Who is comparing him to Joe Thomas? I want to find them and revoke their expert status.




From Matt McGuire of Walter Football

Quote:

Player Comparison: Joe Thomas. Thomas and Okung have very similar frames with very good intangibles and the upside to dominate at the next level. Both had polished pass protection skills in college.





NFL Touchdown

Quote:

NFL comparison:

Joe Thomas-Great footwork, experienced and hard working along with all the intangibles.




Hell, I don't know if the comparisons are right, but Okung looked great the few times I watched him play, and if he's anywhere near the level of JT, you can't go wrong with him.


[Linked Image from i190.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,225
Likes: 212
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,225
Likes: 212
Okung is the guy I see a lot of teams wanting to trade up for in this draft. I would bet Okung is gone well before our pick on draft day.

Personally I would prefer Trent Williams. I just think his game is a better fit for our team. He would come in and be the starting RT and the backup LT.


Don't blame the clown for acting like a clown.
Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
That would explain it.

I see Okung's best case as D'Brick.

Jester, I also would prefer Trent Williams. I think he's a dominant right tackle at worst.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Since you're my draft guru go-to guy, why wouldn't you want Rolando McClain? I don't know a lot about a lot of these guys, not as much as many of you, but I do know what I saw of McClain (limited amount) he struck me as pretty dominant.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
I just don't see a ton of upside there. I don't think he is explosive enough to be a dominant player. I see him as being solid, but not dominant. If I'm going linebacker in the top 10, I want a stud.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
What Changed your mind? Three or four months ago you were all over this guy as the browns' first.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Honestly, I watched more. When I was saying that I had only seen a couple of games. I've seen a lot more of him now.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
So he's the type of guy where if we trade down a couple of times like we did last year and we're sitting at 15-20, you take him?


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Heck yeah! I want the guy with our 7th pick! I'm kind of shocked by some of the other suggestions. Especially Jason Piere Paul, he's a guy whose not even played a full season, let alone a dominating season yet he's considered in the Top 10? He is all potential but so was Michael Johnson and he went in round 3. He relies solely on his athleticism and has no real moves. He also has motivation problems.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
JPP doesn't have motivational problems. He's proven he loves football and is a high motor guy.

79: If we trade back, he's one of the guys I expect us to be targeting, and I would have no problem with that.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
You're thinking of George Selvie.

A real hit (homerun) or miss type guy who was considered a first round lock prospect about two years ago.

Would love to use one of those 5th rounders on a flier on him.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Quote:

Jester, I also would prefer Trent Williams. I think he's a dominant right tackle at worst.




RT is a position I've been screaming about for awhile, and I really don't have the faith in this Tony Pashos that other people do. A strong RT can make or break our offense.

One thing I would be interested in doing is possibly the same thing you did in that Fake Draft on this board. Trading our early third to move up from early second to late first to possibly get a player we've been targeting, someone like Iupati(best-case) or Davis or Campbell.

I definitely would prefer a strong runblocker, but most importantly I want a real starting tackle. I don't think left or right is that big of a deal, a good one will figure it out. RT is a position that can make or break our offense. It affects every single position, and IMO the tackles are the most important positions on the line. Guards can be replaced, but good tackles are very difficult to find.

Otherwise Corner and Safety absolutely need to be addressed. And if we had the chance to draft Eric Berry and Earl Thomas, that wouldn't be a bad idea either.

As far as I'm concerned the third rounders are trade bait. We historically have had bad third round picks, and this year we have three. Give me three real starters, one a very good player, and I'll be happy. CB, S, RT. If we do not use our 1st round pick on a QB, these positions absolutely must be addressed if we hope to be successful.


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,626
Likes: 823
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,626
Likes: 823
I have every hope a couple of 3rd rounders turns in to a 2nd rounder...or maybe a 3rd and our 4th...

This is a deep draft. You can probably go 50 deep and find guys who would normally have a 1st round grade.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 344
W
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 344
Quote:

trade down and get Earl Thomas


This would be my scenario. Go Brownies!!!!


Who Let Da Dawgs Out? Woof, Woof, Woof!!!!!
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 323
C
1st String
Offline
1st String
C
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 323
in lieu of a trade down for thomas, i'd say okung. worst case, he'd be a trade-able commodity if the salary is too prohibitive to keep him once the cap comes back.

iupati would be nice, but i'd rather see pashos inside with a rookie holding down RT. morgan, JPP, cody, odrick should also be considered....

no way dez gets consideration....can't even remember his shoes for the biggest day of his life. poor conditioning and no understanding of the drills doesn't bode well for his motivation.....im thinking BE with better hands, all teh same head problems.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Okung could "help" the defense as much as McClain,...(see "PunchSmack,...)

Any of them would be good/OK with me. (Mac, Williams, Thomas,....)

We need a lot of help. Everywhere.

Don't throw the pick away -- we have too many to work with. A good thing.

Wait for McCoy/LeFevour/Tebow in the second, or maybe trade a couple to move back up and snatch,...??

Crapshoot.

What is Mikey thinking,...THAT's what we're gonna do.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Quote:

You're thinking of George Selvie.




No I'm not

Look up Selvies career stats then get back to me. Only played in 13 games and had 6.5 sacks.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Quote:

Quote:

You're thinking of George Selvie.




No I'm not

Look up Selvies career stats then get back to me. Only played in 13 games and had 6.5 sacks.




What?

Selvie is a two time first team all american who played at a stud level his first three years. Then he had a very strange senior year where he was mostly ineffective and people questioned his work ethic and motivation. That's why I think you have the motivation deal confused with JPP.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Sorry I assumed that you thought I was talking about Selvie.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2013 NFL Season NFL Draft (2013) Worst Case Scenario

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5