Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
1st String
Offline
1st String
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
jc

When discussing Lewis on ESPN John Clayton said that Lewis suffered from bone spurs then entire season which I believe he has or will have taken care of.


[Linked Image from img507.imageshack.us]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
I heard that too, and I beleive he has already had the surgery. I could be wrong though

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Yeah,,GM,,, He did make a stink about it,,but he did average about 20 carries a game..

Not equally spread over all the games but still,,

So what's wrong with giving him what he wants,, 25+carries a game,, sounds fine with me

Personally, I have no problem with him being our feature back.. aslong as he can carry the load,,, Let him.

I do think that a 2 or 3 year contract would be as far as I would go with him however,, If he does the job in 2007,, Great,, then you can go out and get a stud QB if needed or a Stud RB next season... Now your starting to build for today and the future,

You gotta like that


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
Quote:

So what's wrong with giving him what he wants,, 25+carries a game,, sounds fine with me





AS long as he's productive, no sence giving him 25 carries for 10 yards, if he can get the job done, no problem, if he cant and we have to throw, than we throw...

Last edited by ClayM57; 03/07/07 03:09 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

So what's wrong with giving him what he wants,, 25+carries a game,, sounds fine with me




Nothing wrong with giving him 25+ carries IF he can produce and IF we can get him for the right price


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

IMO IF we would sign Lewis he would have to have a change of attitude...




He needs to come from where he felt unwanted or at least underappreciated to a place where he is held in high regard and is the undisputed feature-back of the world. If he is regarded, treated and played as the feature-back, gets a complete change of mind and attitude as a result, then you'd have the Lewis of a couple of years ago. He'd put a hundred on the Rat's twice in '07. He'd be rejuvinated.

If not. If we run a game on him, he'll be discouraged, often disgruntled and likely to not have his heart fully in it. At this point of his career his heart has to be totally into the game and to being a team player.

Lewis could work if the conditions were right.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
j/c

Well, so long as people are trotting out stats, ponder these:

RD received 25+ carries only TWICE in 2006. The results:

100 yds vs OAK
125 and 1 TD vs NYJ

I think the truth about RD lies somewhere between the two extreme agendas around here. The bottom line is that you have to know how to use your personnel. RD is carries-eater. The more he gets, the more effective he becomes. Lewis is the same kind of back. If we dole out the coin to bring him in, then we better use him properly or he'll look a lot like RD did last season.


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

Lewis could work if the conditions were right.




I agree, but splitting carries with RD would not be the right conditions as many people were suggesting earlier in this thread.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Quote:

j/c

Well, so long as people are trotting out stats, ponder these:

RD received 25+ carries only TWICE in 2006. The results:

100 yds vs OAK
125 and 1 TD vs NYJ





True, but also, both teams were giving up a 130+ avg per game rushing, and the last 2 team sin rushing defense that we faced. So don't put too much stock into those numbers.

Last edited by FloridaFan; 03/07/07 03:37 PM.

We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,531
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,531
Quote:

RD received 25+ carries only TWICE in 2006. The results:

100 yds vs OAK
125 and 1 TD vs NYJ




Soup? Is that you?


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
1st String
Offline
1st String
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
True, but you also have to consider did we abandon the run because Droughns was being ineffective and that we were playing from behind.


[Linked Image from img507.imageshack.us]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
How can you judge effectiveness over 5 or 6 first half carries?

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
The point was (and still is) you have to know how to use your people. I'd be OK with either RD or Lewis. However, if we don't use them in a way they can be most effective, they aren't going to look any better running than RD did last season. Jamal Lewis and Droughns are bruisers who get better as they get more carries. If we're not going to use them that way, then they're just taking up roster space.


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,089
Quote:

The point was (and still is) you have to know how to use your people. I'd be OK with either RD or Lewis. However, if we don't use them in a way they can be most effective, they aren't going to look any better running than RD did last season. Jamal Lewis and Droughns are bruisers who get better as they get more carries. If we're not going to use them that way, then they're just taking up roster space.




Right on the button.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
A halfway decent O-line will also help wonders!!!! Shocking, I know.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,936
I'd say the Browns were in most of the games we ended up losing. There were only a few where we were so far out of the game that abandoning the run altogether was necessary.

Lack of identity is only one of many problems the Browns offense had last season. Good running teams don't always break off huge chunks of yardage early in the game. However, they keep hammering away at it and by the third quarter they often start chewing up yardage like mad. We'll never know, but I would be willing to bet that if the Browns committed to running the ball 25 - 30 times a game last year (and stuck to it), not only would the offense have looked better, but we probably would have beaten the Steelers and Ravens at home (and perhaps won another game or two besides).


[color:"white"]"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."

-- Mark Twain [/color]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,363
j/c

Lewis is still a decent back who can carry the load, he did have over 300 carries last year and broke 1000 yds. Droughns looked slow last year and did suffer from a shoulder injury, but hitting the hole is something he seems very slow at. It was suggested above that his injury might have contributed to this. A shoulder injury slows his feet? GMAB.

Did anyone see Lewis behind their struggling Oline last year? He did more pitty patting than Willie Green. I can hear the bashing already.

The Oline has Steinbach now, but other than him it's still the same line. I'm not assuming they will be any better,YET.

IMO Droughns is what he is, a converted FB with no speed who in the past earned many yards punishing the defender. I believe those days are over. Lasy year he showed no spark or attitude, and definately looked as slow as molasses.
Lewis is slowing, but still effective. Anyone who believes he is the same back that ran all over us a few years ago is mistaken. He is better than Droughns as anyone can see, well maybe not Toad, but average is where they both rate at this point in their careers.

All the talk about the line improving makes me wonder how good guys like Wright and Harrison would look with some holes opening for them.

I don't want Lewis due to money and his time in the league, but between him and Rueben, it;s a no brainer, give me Lewis. He was said to have a bad year last year but still had 1000 yards. Rueben look below average last year, after he got his money , Lewis looked good, not great, but still did better than Droughns.

I like many want Thomas at #3, but if he's gone, give me Peterson and his abilities now rather than a few years from now after he too takes a beating,


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55
K
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55
dont want him.....past his prime.....draft the kid from Oklahoma


"There's a gleam men..."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
j/c:

As I've been saying for the last week or so, I would like to see Lewis here, provided we can sign him for a reasonable amount.

He's a good back and the injury did bother him two years ago. He played much better last year. He isn't what he once was but he would be an upgrade and allow us to concentrate on other needs in the upcoming draft.

Drafting Joe would help. Lewis could run behind our left side and pick up decent yardage. He also is more effective running to his left. He has good cutback ability and he does have quick feet. He has good power and better speed than he is given credit for.

In addition to allow us to fill other needs this year, we could postpone drafting a RB this year and grab one in next year's draft, which is going to have a strong RB class.

Provided he isn't too expensive, I see this as a good move.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
1st String
Offline
1st String
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 253
Quote:

How can you judge effectiveness over 5 or 6 first half carries?




It was a general observation and a question for thought. 6 carries to 25 is a big difference. Plus no one said we abandoned the run after 6 carries or in the first half or whatever.

I just remember there were plenty of games where we were throwing alot late in the game to come from behind and when we would throw on third and short because we didnt have faith in the run.

Droughns averaged just under 16 carries a game. Those extra 9 carries per would be late in the game, if we were wearing down the clock or if we were still running in the 4th quarter which we rarely did.


[Linked Image from img507.imageshack.us]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
"I don't think he would be happy sharing the load with RD, and he may be looking to go to a team that will make him the feature back."

I gurantee you we sign Lewis...there is no "SHARE" business. Lewis gets the ball till he needs that breather - in comes RD...one, two plays...Lewis comes back in. There also was a rumor that we were shopping RD. We are not happy about dishing out a 1.5 mil roster bonus come 3/15.

If we sign Lewis...that thing I said about Breather - well in comes Wright/Harrison...one, two plays - Cause RD ain't going to be here.

JMHO


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Agreed 100 percent.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,877
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,877
Quote:

In addition to allow us to fill other needs this year, we could postpone drafting a RB this year and grab one in next year's draft, which is going to have a strong RB class.




You are correct sir!! If we pick up Lewis and keep RD, which we should, we are set at RB until next year or possibly 2 years. That would allow us to ignore Peterson and take Big Joe. I hope.


"People who drink light 'beer' don't like the taste of beer; they just like to pee a lot."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
I honestly don't think savage takes Peterson anyway. That is more a ploy to drive some trade business. If we stick at 3, it will be one of Johnson,Quinn, or Thomas.

Which one...a good arguement could be made for any.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,877
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,877
The only reason I think he'd take Peterson is because it appears that he may have a "thing" for Okies.....But I think if we get Lewis and keep RD then the temptation to take AP if he's there would be gone. We could fill another need. Like LT.

I'm not as enamored of Quinn as Diam but BQ wouldn't be a bad pick. I'd rather have Jemarcus (more upside) but I doubt Oakland or Detroit are both dumb enough to let him pass. We'll see. The good thing is, I don't think we can screw this up. Whoever we get should be a big help immediately, or at the very least by mid season.


"People who drink light 'beer' don't like the taste of beer; they just like to pee a lot."
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
well overtoad as u insulted me last time... I see that Lewis did indeed visit.... and why would we want lewis and droughns if lewis is washed up as u said.. and droughns is an underacheiver.... so i say bring lewis in because on an off day he produces more yards than on a good day for droughns... and get peterson 3rd overall

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,961
The more I think about this, the more I think you hit the nail on the head Eo,,, I think your right.

doesn't it make you feel important to know that the Smartest person in the world thinks your correct about something?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Raven
Offline
Raven
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Hey GM, Everybody, Let me ask this ONE question to you all, As hard as you all were on J.Lewis and his "off-field problems", You know the drugs and the crack deal over the phone, etc...Now you will take him in a heart beat ???? Is that being just a wee bit hypocritical after all of the name calling he received from the Browns fans???? Please help me to understand this all of a sudden " forgive and forget" attitude......

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,996
Was I the only one who just did a doubletake when the announcer on ESPN just said that the Browns would be better off grabbing Lewis because he would be $10 million cheaper and would bring the same production as Adrian Peterson? Either he thinks that Lewis has alot left OR he thinks our line will be that bad again & it doesn't matter who you put back there.


[Linked Image from media.scout.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 974
H
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 974
some of us are a little pragmatic about the situation our team is in. It's a little hard to relate because your team is stacked with talent. really stacked. We have major holes from the outright retard drafting we've had here.

the way I see it is the guy seems to be clean now and he is an upgrade. why not improve your team?

sometimes the voice of the loudest is not the view of the majority.


We're trying to throw the ball downfield and he checked the ball down to Trent Richardson and the Indians on the choice.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Raven
Offline
Raven
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
I really wouldn't say we are stacked now, we are losing players now like Homer Simpson is losing his hair.. ...I don't know WHO is going to be on the team this season now other than Billick (the other chin)......

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
This may sound rather childish but I want to win now. We must win now. Lewis is an upgrade over Reuben Droughns. I don't care if you think I'm a hypocrite. I want him in Orange & Brown.

Eotab: I hope you're right about your guarantee. That was quite bold actually 'round these parts. Anyway, you said to put RD in there when JL needs a breather but then you go on to say RD won't be on the roster. Slight confusion on my part but I think I know ultimately what you're saying.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
Quote:

Hey GM, Everybody, Let me ask this ONE question to you all, As hard as you all were on J.Lewis and his "off-field problems", You know the drugs and the crack deal over the phone, etc...Now you will take him in a heart beat ???? Is that being just a wee bit hypocritical after all of the name calling he received from the Browns fans???? Please help me to understand this all of a sudden " forgive and forget" attitude......




It's easy to name call (and hate) when they are on the opposing team. Truth is.. the "coke deal" was a conversation he had for a friend on his cell phone. It was never FOR him. A stupid mistake hanging with the wrong person a half dozen years ago. Lets look at him for what he's been since entering the league.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Raven
Offline
Raven
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
I guess I wouldn't be a good Bengal fan than huh.......

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

I guess I wouldn't be a good Bengal fan than huh.......




Well that depends...do you like making it to the playoffs once in 15 years? Sorry refs too easy, I know this aint the shack.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Quote:

I guess I wouldn't be a good Bengal fan than huh.......




I would MUCH rather sign Jamal Lewis then sign someone, one toke away from a year suspention and pay him (probably) just as much.

(Travis Henry)

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
Dammit bigbaddawg! Now the karma police are coming after us. It'll be 2018 before the Browns even get a wild card berth. *I would use a smiley but it's really not funny*

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Quote:

Dammit bigbaddawg! Now the karma police are coming after us. It'll be 2018 before the Browns even get a wild card bid. *I would use a smiley but it's really not funny*




feel free to sacrifice me to the football gods if we don't get there by 2015


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
done.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 157
R
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 157
Read it on tthe OBR message board that Jim Donovan of WKYC is reporting that Lewis is still in town and has already taken a physical. We are in current contract negotiations with him and it could get done soon.
I'll try to confirm it..

Bye Bye Droughns!

Last edited by RoadDawg; 03/07/07 08:39 PM.
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Jamal Lewis - visiting Cleveland

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5