Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Quote:

With the ongoing investigation of bounty gate and the distinct possibility that Washington might lose a 1st this year or next, does St. Louis continue to court them if their offering is just a pig in a poke? Does Washington wait around for the shoe to drop or do they just go ahead and move on Manning?




Kinda thought this on my way into work this AM as I heard about the Colts releasing Manning. If there is a possibility that Washington loses a high draft pick over the next year or two .... do they wait to find out or do they just jump on Manning now to play it safe? If they sit back and let Manning sign elsewhere and then lose a #1 this year or next, then they lose out on RG3 as well.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,436
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,436
Why would they ditch Schaub, a QB at the top of his game, and really coming into his own, for a huge injury question mark like Manning? That seems like a rather foolish thing to me. Schaub fits that team quite well, and his ego is not so huge that he won't hand off when they get inside the 5 as the coaches want.

I'd happily take Schaub in Cleveland. He would be the best QB we've had in 20+ years, easily.

As far as Yates, he showed a little last year, but the biggest thing he showed was poise as a rookie. However, they managed him very, very carefully. He threw for an average of 158 yards in his 6 regular season starts. His 2 playoff starts were also s-so. (combined 28-55 for 343 yards, 1 TD and 3 INT)

He might have a future, then again, he might be just a guy they plugged into their system, who didn't blow up. I doubt that they are ready to make him their future after such a "fair" start to his career.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
I think the team that makes the most sense for Peyton is KC.

running game, OL, WRs intact. defense pretty good last year. no dominant team in the division.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,065
Miami makes a lot of sense as well.

- Franchise LT
- resurgent run game with Bush (who Manning would love running routes out of the backfield),
- Good defense (#6 scoring D in NFL)
- High draft pick to take an explosive offensive playmaker (Floyd?)
- #1 WR in Marshall

I personally think that's the best fit, in terms of winning. Although you could argue that the AFC West absolutely stinks, so KC is a more likely playoff team but Miami has more overall talent IMO.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
You know the networks would love Manning in Miami as he'd be guaranteed to play Brady at least twice a year. Also, playing the Jets would get all kinds of play, too.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
Quote:

You know the networks would love Manning in Miami as he'd be guaranteed to play Brady at least twice a year. Also, playing the Jets would get all kinds of play, too.




If he takes his talents to South Beach or Washington, it just makes things better for the O&B and the RG3 sweepstakes.


"My signature line goes here."
I_Rogue #660457 03/07/12 10:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Its been an exciting off season so far, and FA hasn't even started yet!

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Quote:

Quote:

You know the networks would love Manning in Miami as he'd be guaranteed to play Brady at least twice a year. Also, playing the Jets would get all kinds of play, too.




If he takes his talents to South Beach or Washington, it just makes things better for the O&B and the RG3 sweepstakes.




Which is why the Rams wanted to get the #2 pick traded last week. I think the Skin, Phins and Browns called each other and agreed to wait until Manning, Flynn and the other FA QBs settled in place to keep the trade up price low....like a three-team collusion.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
helps having those friendly WCO teams to call-on and discuss things with


#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

Miami makes a lot of sense as well.




I agree. It's whether Peyton wants to take the battle to Brady or whether he wants to make sure those battles are in the playoffs.

Washington makes little sense to me because while I think he is super-competitive with his little brother, I also think that he understands it's a no-win situation (either Peyton usurps his brother, making his life miserable; or Eli continues the Giants train rolling making Peyton's life miserable because he can't leapfrog over Eli).


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Im saying Arizona....Peyton goes to play with Fitz.....Probably brings along Wayne with him......49ers were the div winners last year with Alex Smith..... gets to stay in a dome....and this team was just in the Super Bowl a few years ago with Kurt Warner at the helm.


HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447
And who runs the offense , Manning or Schrmur ?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
But do you think the Cardinals are going to give up on Kolb so quickly?


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
retractable roof and real grass. they only close the lid in the hot months (wait, it's AZ, they are all hot months!) actually, by November, they are opening that bad boy since it's only in the upper 80s.

the real grass thing is the kicker though. not the artificial surface he is accustomed to playing with (precision for WRs cuts mostly)


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,546
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,546
Quote:

And who runs the offense , Manning or Schrmur ?




Who has more experience at winning as a play caller???.... hmmm

OCD #660466 03/07/12 12:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,199
Manning has more experience


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
V
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
V
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
Schaub hasn't exactly been the picture of durability but I would agree with you. Like I said several writers have pointed at Houston. The theory is that Schaub is good enough to get the Texans to the playoffs but Manning puts them over the top and makes them the favorites to win the superbowl. It hinges on wether Texans ownership feels the same way.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You know the networks would love Manning in Miami as he'd be guaranteed to play Brady at least twice a year. Also, playing the Jets would get all kinds of play, too.




If he takes his talents to South Beach or Washington, it just makes things better for the O&B and the RG3 sweepstakes.




Which is why the Rams wanted to get the #2 pick traded last week. I think the Skin, Phins and Browns called each other and agreed to wait until Manning, Flynn and the other FA QBs settled in place to keep the trade up price low....like a three-team collusion.




More like common sense ...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:

But do you think the Cardinals are going to give up on Kolb so quickly?




Yes I do...Kolb might be gone anyway....Word out of AZ was the team was very happy with Skelton....and would have started the year with him had they not just tied their wagon to Kolb. They hoped Kolb would come around as he learned more of the system.....when he went out with injury. The Cards were 1-6 with Kolb and 7-2 with Skelton.

Kolb is due a 7 mill roster bonus March 17th....I think I would cut him and go after Manning.

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

Quote:

But do you think the Cardinals are going to give up on Kolb so quickly?




Yes I do...Kolb might be gone anyway....Word out of AZ was the team was very happy with Skelton....and would have started the year with him had they not just tied their wagon to Kolb. They hoped Kolb would come around as he learned more of the system.....when he went out with injury. The Cards were 1-6 with Kolb and 7-2 with Skelton.

Kolb is due a 7 mill roster bonus March 17th....I think I would cut him and go after Manning.

HACK




Hack, first you have your numbers wrong.

5-2 w/ Skelton
3-6 w/ Kolb

Second, Skelton played worse than Kolb but the AZ defense played better as the year went along (they got healthy, Patterson became a shutdown corner, etc).

Skelton 55% 11TDs 14INTs 7.0 YPA 68.9QBrating
Kolb 58% 9TDs 8INTs 7.7 YPA 81.1QBrating

AZ will either sign Peyton or give Kolb another year. Kolb's numbers and play (including injury) were right on target with what he did in Philly. Anyone expecting greatly different numbers was fooling themselves.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
I stand corrected...although one of the wins for Kolb was a 1 pass effort against San Fran..so I give that to Skelton....6-2....Kolb 2-6

But everything I said about them liking Skelton more was said all season long in AZ...but after paying Kolb all that cash they were hoping he would play out of it.

Do you want to pay Kolb 7 mill...and hope he beats out Skelton for the starting QB?

I would not.

HACK

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

But do you think the Cardinals are going to give up on Kolb so quickly?




Yes I do...Kolb might be gone anyway....Word out of AZ was the team was very happy with Skelton....and would have started the year with him had they not just tied their wagon to Kolb. They hoped Kolb would come around as he learned more of the system.....when he went out with injury. The Cards were 1-6 with Kolb and 7-2 with Skelton.

Kolb is due a 7 mill roster bonus March 17th....I think I would cut him and go after Manning.

HACK




Hack, first you have your numbers wrong.

5-2 w/ Skelton
3-6 w/ Kolb

Second, Skelton played worse than Kolb but the AZ defense played better as the year went along (they got healthy, Patterson became a shutdown corner, etc).

Skelton 55% 11TDs 14INTs 7.0 YPA 68.9QBrating
Kolb 58% 9TDs 8INTs 7.7 YPA 81.1QBrating

AZ will either sign Peyton or give Kolb another year. Kolb's numbers and play (including injury) were right on target with what he did in Philly. Anyone expecting greatly different numbers was fooling themselves.




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,874
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,874
Yeah, but if they like Skelton so much, why bother blowing a big wad of dough on Manning.. It might actually be cheaper to keep Kolb.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
fair enough on the W/L.

still, Kolb played much better than Skelton. I wouldn't worry about him beating him out and $7mil is nothing for a starting QB these days though I think his cap number is $10mil including the bonus (also, wonder what the difference is in a cap hit since if they cut him they'd accelerate that bonus to now).

I think AZ's plan is to sign Peyton. If they don't, then they'll keep Kolb as starter and Skelton as backup (even if they go through a summer "competition").


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:

Yeah, but if they like Skelton so much, why bother blowing a big wad of dough on Manning.. It might actually be cheaper to keep Kolb.





Word is the like Skelton more than Kolb....Skelton more than Manning...totally different story.


Anyway...AZ is my guess.

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,111
Peyton's officially on the waiver wire. And we're off.


Crowded elevators smell different to short people...
Flap #660476 03/08/12 03:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Raiders expected to cut Wimbley barring “major change”

Posted by Evan Silva on March 8, 2012, 1:36 PM EST
ESPN.com’s Bill Williamson reports that the Raiders have not spoken to the agent for linebacker Kamerion Wimbley “in several days,” and are expected to release their top edge rusher barring a “major change.”

Wimbley, listed Monday among PFT’s top cap casualty candidates, appears no closer to reaching an adjusted contract with the Raiders. Despite Wednesday’s restructurings of safety Michael Huff and defensive tackle Richard Seymour, Oakland remains out of position to pay Wimbley’s scheduled $11 million base salary.

Williamson speculates that the San Diego Chargers “could be a favorite” to land Wimbley after he hits the free agent market. The Chargers are pursuing pass rushers this offseason, and Wimbley could be a more affordable target than top free agent Mario Williams.

All along, Wimbley has had little or no incentive to accept a pay reduction. As an unrestricted free agent, Wimbley would be a highly valued commodity around the NFL and can expect a first-year payment from his next team that dwarfs the $11 million Oakland would have paid him.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Quote:

Wimbley would be a highly valued commodity around the NFL and can expect a first-year payment from his next team that dwarfs the $11 million Oakland would have paid him.






Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
I always liked Wimbley. Thought he was a good guy who tried his hardest. Does that mean I'd want him back at that kind of salary? I don't think so.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
could be 5 years, $35 mil, $15 guaranteed, inc $10mil to sign.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
That's only 7ish a year... Oakland was set to pay him 11 and they're saying he can get more...


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
That said more than $11 mil this year, not per year.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
What's the difference? Barring a extremely front loaded contract... If they stat he's going to make more than the 11 mil this year Oak was going to have to pay him, then he'd make around that every following year of the contract...


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,480
L
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,480
Quote:

What's the difference? Barring a extremely front loaded contract... If they stat he's going to make more than the 11 mil this year Oak was going to have to pay him, then he'd make around that every following year of the contract...




No - because you get all the signing bonus in the first year. A 5 year $25 Million deal with $10M signing bonus gets you around $13M this year, with cap hits of $5M/year


~Lyuokdea
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
I base contract talks on my dealings with Madden. Because that's the only time I ever really care about cap numbers...

Wimbley is worth 5 mil a year. Production wise. I guess.

I just don't think he's a guy anyone should bring in to try to "solve" their pass rushing problems...

I could see him ending up in NE if they don't break the bank (do they ever?) for Mario..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
www.KFFL.com

Giants | Will release Brandon Jacobs
Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:55:40 -0800

The New York Giants will release RB Brandon Jacobs after the two sides were not able to agree on a restructured contract.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
He's a very unique running back.

As for us, we don't need a more worn-down, older version of Hillis.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
I always liked Jacobs, but I just have a feeling he's going to want bigger money than he's really worth. Some team out there will gamble on him, though.

I'd rather bring Hillis back than bring on Jacobs.


I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
cool, this should make Hillis cheaper and therefore more likely to be back.

Unless the Giants sign him.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

He's a very unique running back.

As for us, we don't need a more worn-down, older version of Hillis.





who doesn't catch many passes.


#gmstrong
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
V
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
V
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
My first thought on the way home from work when I heard of Jacobs release was that Hillis would probably fill his role in N.Y.

Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Cuts

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5