Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
I like Mewhort too, but we drafted a similar guy in similar range just 2 years ago and he's an above AVG NFL RT already. Why on earth should we invest ANOTHER high pick for that position and get rid/bench the young guy we have?

Sounds like more typical Browns lateral fumbling drafting: Draft Faine, when we have O'Hara. Draft Mingo, when we have Kruger/Sheard/Groves...


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
DjangoBrown #852756 02/21/14 10:42 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,301
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,301
Or,they feel that Schwartz doesn't fit what we'll be doing on the line and feel they can trade him (perhaps to KC so he can play with his brother, lol)?

It does seem odd, though, to use one of our interviews on a position we *should* be set at - on paper, at least.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
I've read several times about rumblings of Schwartz being a possible fit at right guard in Shanny's system.

What say you, Django?

Brownoholic #852758 02/21/14 10:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,301
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,301
Quote:

I've read several times about rumblings of Schwartz being a possible fit at right guard in Shanny's system.

What say you, Django?




My only thought on that is he'd be a REALLY tall Guard at 6' 5".

Other than that, I don't see why not as long as he can adjust to working inside a phone booth instead of in space.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Brownoholic #852759 02/21/14 10:59 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,593
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,593
Quote:

JC

Per WalterFootball these are the prospects we have meetings set up with....

Ted Bolser, TE, Indiana (EW)
Donald Hawkins, OT, Texas (EW)
Chandler Jones, WR, San Jose State (EW)
Devon Kennard, LB, USC (EW)
Jack Mewhort, OL, Ohio State (SR)

LINK




That list is the guys we talked to at the Senior Bowl and the Shrine Game back in January.

Last edited by dawg66; 02/21/14 11:03 AM.

#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,797
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,797
Eric Steinbach was 6'6", as was Ryan Tucker. I think that larger Guards can succeed.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Brownoholic #852761 02/21/14 11:13 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,761
I think he'd be a better LT than RG or LG. I don't see it at all. Keep him at RT and I think 2 years from now we're talking about how much we have to pay to re-sign one of the NFL's best RTs.

I think he's on a VERY similar career path as Mack. Both have struggled for half a season out of their first two. Both were slow starters. Now that Mack has become more consistent, he's a top C.

My point in all of this is: don't fix what's not broken. Could we have better RT play? Sure. Schwartz was "only" ranked the 13th best RT last season, but that was with the two horrible two games next to Cousins, where he struggled to adapt to Norv's "good luck OL" scheme and had an absolute bum next to him to make it worse. He got gradually better, but nobody cared anymore because we ended the season we did. But you will be hard pressed to find a much better young RT in the NFL.

I can't believe fans talk about replacing him with another draft choice, who probably gets questioned when he doesn't look as good as Joe Thomas after two seasons. Whoever you'd draft to play RT would have to have a monster rookie season just to give you what Schwartz already gives you. Let the guy be and let him grow. The OL is all about consistency and cohesiveness, don't mess to much with it. Keep Mack, keep Schwartz, bring in competition for Greco and Pinkston at OG and let them grow together. They're young, they won't get worse, only better and if the past two season was their "worst", well then we should look at other problem areas imho


#gmstrong

"Players come along at different points in time" - Ray Farmer
DjangoBrown #852762 02/21/14 11:13 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
I don't think as highly of MS as you do, and apparently the Browns don't either. I do think MS could make it as RG in a zone scheme so I would try to slide him over.


Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
dawg66 #852763 02/21/14 11:18 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Quote:

Quote:

JC

Per WalterFootball these are the prospects we have meetings set up with....

Ted Bolser, TE, Indiana (EW)
Donald Hawkins, OT, Texas (EW)
Chandler Jones, WR, San Jose State (EW)
Devon Kennard, LB, USC (EW)
Jack Mewhort, OL, Ohio State (SR)

LINK




That list is the guys we talked to at the Senior Bowl and the Shrine Game back in January.




Good, I thought it looked kind of lackluster. It was updated today, but obviously not for our team.

Brownoholic #852764 02/21/14 11:20 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,593
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,593
Yeah, They update it almost daily but it might be just for 1 team so its kind of deceiving.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
Brownoholic #852765 02/21/14 12:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Sweet. Chandler Jones is an underrated baller.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Quote:

I've read several times about rumblings of Schwartz being a possible fit at right guard in Shanny's system.

What say you, Django?




My only thought on that is he'd be a REALLY tall Guard at 6' 5".

Other than that, I don't see why not as long as he can adjust to working inside a phone booth instead of in space.




There isn't any chance that Mitchell Schwartz can be a guard in the NFL. He'll be the RT (if the RG position is upgraded) or relegated to a backup tackle.

DjangoBrown #852767 02/21/14 02:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Quote:

I think he'd be a better LT than RG or LG. I don't see it at all. Keep him at RT and I think 2 years from now we're talking about how much we have to pay to re-sign one of the NFL's best RTs.

I think he's on a VERY similar career path as Mack. Both have struggled for half a season out of their first two. Both were slow starters. Now that Mack has become more consistent, he's a top C.

My point in all of this is: don't fix what's not broken. Could we have better RT play? Sure. Schwartz was "only" ranked the 13th best RT last season, but that was with the two horrible two games next to Cousins, where he struggled to adapt to Norv's "good luck OL" scheme and had an absolute bum next to him to make it worse. He got gradually better, but nobody cared anymore because we ended the season we did. But you will be hard pressed to find a much better young RT in the NFL.

I can't believe fans talk about replacing him with another draft choice, who probably gets questioned when he doesn't look as good as Joe Thomas after two seasons. Whoever you'd draft to play RT would have to have a monster rookie season just to give you what Schwartz already gives you. Let the guy be and let him grow. The OL is all about consistency and cohesiveness, don't mess to much with it. Keep Mack, keep Schwartz, bring in competition for Greco and Pinkston at OG and let them grow together. They're young, they won't get worse, only better and if the past two season was their "worst", well then we should look at other problem areas imho




I agree with this. I also have to say my interest was piqued in Chris Faulk. I really thought that guy, if healthy would have been an excellent addition to the Browns' OL. I guess it's still a "wait-and-see" at best.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
mac #852768 02/21/14 03:44 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,069
O
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
O
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,069
Quote:

Quote:

Would you feel more comfortable if Farmer had to run his selections by Banner first, rather than being the LONE WOLF and having carte blanche with our Browns 10 draft picks?




olskool...you can't be serious about Farmer's selections being run by Banner first...

I would simply ask you what sort of draft background/expertise does Banner have that would give you the impression he was qualified to judge Farmer's draft picks ?

Also, this "Lonewolf" scenario you fear...it does not exist..Farmer has help...matter of fact the Browns just hired Bill Kuharich, the former Saints general manager.

web page




I was never a fan of Banner and know that he isn't an evaluator of players.

Awhile ago many people were in agreement that selection by committee was preferable. With Butch, Savage, Mangini, etc... we have had some bad results with one guy being the decision maker.

Farmer... I'm the guy who was cautious, who really didn't like what he saw in the Chiefs Hard Knocks episodes. I've backed off. I don't want to be a hater, and I am willing to give him a chance and drop my concerns until I have specific reasons. But, to give him the reins, the keys, the finger on the button, to this entire draft without any sort of oversight.... No. Not good with it. If it was anyone with a track record of success, if he had a track record of success, then...

I'm not going to be a homer, for homer's sake, and act like he managed those drafts for the Chiefs. He didn't.

I wish him all the best. (With my fingers crossed, on my knees, praying)

My point is that he would have to at least answer to someone in direct authority. Now, all he has to do is answer to Jimmy, after the fact.

DjangoBrown #852769 02/21/14 05:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Quote:

I think he'd be a better LT than RG or LG. I don't see it at all. Keep him at RT and I think 2 years from now we're talking about how much we have to pay to re-sign one of the NFL's best RTs.




Your reasoning is sound here. Although I can't get the blur that was Cameron Wake out of my mind. I don't think Schwartz is a finished product at this point.

Ballpeen #852770 02/21/14 09:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,399
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,399
Quote:

but too many GM's treat it like engineering. Too many slide rules being used.



No doubt some of that plays in to the decision, but in the end, toss the pocket protecter and mechanical pencil. Just select the guy you think can do the job.


Picking players is a art more than a science....JMO





I agree Peen...

I don't watch the combine.. no interest in it .. I could care less how fast they run in the 40... how high they can jump or how many bench presses they can do...

For myself it's all about game time... and the game they bring....Give them an interview...if you like them then try and get them...The combine is over rated and just another way for the NFL to make money...

DjangoBrown #852771 02/22/14 12:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,471
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,471
I am really impressed with the crop of OL this year .. We should be able get one nice pick , and I would hope for two ..

waterdawg #852772 02/22/14 02:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,030
I know we have Cameron, but I wouldn't mind taking a mid to late round pick on one of the TEs either. There is some really good prospects imo that are going to go mid to late in the draft. I wouldn't invest what it will take to Ebron or kid from Washington, but several of the lower rated kids in this class have potential.

I would love to get a mid/late round kid who would allow us to successfully run 2TE sets.


Against logic,the most effective armor is willful ignorance.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Generally disappointing showing by the TEs. A few good forty times, none great, just average route running and catching abilities. Ebron must have hurt his knee running the 40, he didn't participate in the drills.

OL looks deep.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Colt and AC would be great pickups if they can stay on the field. I feel like AC has paid his price, but Colt is just a head case. He said he had 1 week to prepare for the combine? Dude quit his team in like October and said he was going to go pro. Hell has he been doing since October?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
Since the Browns already have Cameron as a new style gig play tight end. I would like to see the Browns go after an old style blocking tight end with good hands and good body control in the red zone like CJ Fiedorowicz from Iowa. 3rd or 4th round.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
I know it's RB's and who cares about bench press, but seeing Dri Archer out lift Carlos Hyde.

Edit. Oh man, this Lombardi love is hilarious.

"There's our guy, Michael Lobardi. Freshly............ (This wasn't a three dot pause, it was an awkward pause) joining the Patriots."

Last edited by CHSDawg; 02/22/14 08:49 PM.
CHSDawg #852777 02/23/14 12:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
If anyone didn't get a chance to watch the combine today, here's my wrap-up. It's a three-pager so I'm posting a link instead of full-text.

http://cornerblitz.com/2014/Combine/OL1.aspx

clevesteve #852778 02/23/14 08:34 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 690
K
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 690
I was in and out all afternoon yesterday and I only saw bits and pieces of the combine. one of the few things I did see was an OL drill where the OL ended up pushing a DL straight back. they showed a close up shot and the eyes of the OL simply jumped out at me. it was like they were on fire. they looked pure evil. so I had to search bios this morning to find out who he was and found out it was jack mewhort. the only drill I saw of him showed me the intensity and mean streak that I crave in an OL. can anybody describe what they have actually seen this kid do on the field? I don't care about his combine stats. what does he look like in a game. also can he play multiple positions or just a pure tackle.


tradition can only carry you so far, then you have to start winning again.
clevesteve #852779 02/23/14 08:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,102
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,102
Couple of quick comments:

- Greg Robinson had an amazing showing Saturday- fast and very fluid.

- Morgan Moses showed poorly; no way a 1st or even 2nd/3rd pick.

- Mewhort looked choppy, stiff.

- Lindner, Richburg didn't hurt themselves.

- I didn't see Stork, OC; was he there?


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
clevesteve #852780 02/23/14 09:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,280
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,280
I laughed a couple times reading the second half of the second OL group.

It sounded like you started to get a little bored.


"I'll take your word at face value. I have never met you but I assume you have a face..lol"

-Ballpeen
clevesteve #852781 02/23/14 09:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,023
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,023
Quote:

If anyone didn't get a chance to watch the combine today, here's my wrap-up. It's a three-pager so I'm posting a link instead of full-text.

http://cornerblitz.com/2014/Combine/OL1.aspx




Strongwork, thanks.


The difference between Jesus and religion
Religion mocks you for having dirty feet
Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
clevesteve #852782 02/23/14 09:44 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I was very impressed w/what I saw of Xavier Su'a-Filo yesterday.

I also think Brandon Thomas will be moved to guard and he should be available in the middle rounds.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,102
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,102
Zach Martin may be moved to OG/C as he has short arms 32+". I agree with you on Su'a Filo...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
bbrowns32 #852784 02/23/14 10:11 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,557
I saw martin reaching a few times, he is gonna be inside.

Sua Filo has a little nasty to his game. I like guys that even doing these drills they want to go through the pad and deliver punishment to whomever may be holding it.

Robinson and Mathews gave the Rams every reason to trade down to 4 or 5 and still get their OT.

Overall, its a really deep OL class. that mid to late rounds 4-7 will have some steals for interior lineman. this class will make Farmer do a discount doublecheck on Mack and his contract.

Mourgrym #852785 02/23/14 10:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
jc:

This wide receiver class looks deep and very impressive.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

jc:

This wide receiver class looks deep and very impressive.




So, you don't think that the Browns will take Watkins at #4 then?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
This looks like a really good year to improve the offense thru the draft.

The Offensive line yesterday was deep and talented and this crop of wide receivers look very impressive also.

The QB class is decent. I think the running back group will not have true superstars but it will look deep.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

This looks like a really good year to improve the offense thru the draft.

The Offensive line yesterday was deep and talented and this crop of wide receivers look very impressive also.

The QB class is decent. I think the running back group will not have true superstars but it will look deep.




There are quite a few quality RBs in the draft. There are some nice TEs too and although the quality seems to drop off later in the draft, most of them could very well be solid contributors.

Olskool711 #852789 02/23/14 10:42 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Well you also mentioned his track record with the draft was not impressive. Did you mean strictly for the fact he was NEVER THE MAN IN CHARGE for the picks.

I can only assume he has been very instrumental in making the Board. Which is a big key feature in the draft.

I do know he had a big hand in making our board for this draft and actually the board is 90%+ complete just a few tweaks after the interviews and possibly a surprise or two.

So no he was never a GM before. Possibly one who did would have difficulties working with a HC that he didn't HIRE.

"I'm not going to be a homer, for homer's sake"

So if we happen to like and feel secure about Farmer as our new GM. Its not out of football intelligence or logic just blind homerism. That debate is lame


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
anarchy2day #852790 02/23/14 10:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
Quote:

Quote:

jc:

This wide receiver class looks deep and very impressive.




So, you don't think that the Browns will take Watkins at #4 then?




If Bridgewater, Manziel, and Bortles are gone? Maybe. But IF that scenario happens, I'd prefer to trade down to a team that likes Clowney and grab someone like CJ Mosely, Darqueze Dennard, or Justin Gilbert plus adding some picks in maybe 2nd/3rd rounds.

I'm interested to see Bortles throw today....he is climbing for me. Having someone like Hoyer would justify taking Bortles and letting him sit. This may sound crazy but I think Bortles may have the highest ceiling of the three QBs. I like him a lot and he should be there at #4. But then again, I'm no guru.

Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 02/23/14 11:06 AM.

At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,641
I agree with you. I think Bortles has the highest ceiling of the QB;s. With that said he currently is a little behind in development in comparision with Bridgewater and Manziel.

I would take him over the other 2 only if he proves to me he has an outstanding work ethic and has great study habits. If so I would draft Bortles if available. Play Hoyer for a year or even 2 and sign Rex Grossman for #3 and let hin know up front that he is #3 and his job is to mentor and school Bortles.

I do like the fact he is competing today. It shows he wants the ball in his hands and is not afraid to compete with on a big stage. Could be some insight into that work ethic question.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,683
Quote:

I do like the fact he is competing today. It shows he wants the ball in his hands and is not afraid to compete with on a big stage. Could be some insight into that work ethic question.




+1


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

jc:

This wide receiver class looks deep and very impressive.




So, you don't think that the Browns will take Watkins at #4 then?




If Bridgewater, Manziel, and Bortles are gone? Maybe. But IF that scenario happens, I'd prefer to trade down to a team that likes Clowney and grab someone like CJ Mosely, Darqueze Dennard, or Justin Gilbert plus adding some picks in maybe 2nd/3rd rounds.

I'm interested to see Bortles throw today....he is climbing for me. Having someone like Hoyer would justify taking Bortles are letting him sit. This may sound crazy but I think Bortles may have the highest ceiling of the three QBs. I like him a lot and he should be there at #4. But then again, I'm no guru.




Bortles is the only one that I would take of the three.

anarchy2day #852794 02/23/14 11:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
jc.

anybody watching the QB/WR drills this morning?

Bortles looks pretty good.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2014 NFL Season NFL Draft 2014 The Combine

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5