|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903 |
Ugh. Souless, hollow, empty, thin sounding, Casio keyboard produced bleh. Void of any instrumentation or heart.  But to each their own I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
The stuff I was listening to in the 70's has beaten the stuff I was listening too for much of any of the time groupings since.
The 80's, well, we can appreciate what came before it and what came after it for being more dynamic, because the 80's just didn't have enough gems of great music.
For every 99 luft balloons, there were 30!! songs about Vietnam and the political turmoil prior to the 80's. Now whether they came out in the 60's or 70's, I dunno, I just know when I was listening to them. You know, they used to tell a story, but then they didn't have the internet. (expletative) THEY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE CABLE! mostly. So, whatdaya expect, music's going to take a back seat.
Music was all people had back then. They changed the world with music.
"let's get physical, physical," ... what were they thinking?
Time is a terrible thing. We can't appreciate all of life because time is taking it away, the parts before I was born or after I die.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Science Proves: Pop Music Has
Actually Gotten Worse