Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903
Ugh. Souless, hollow, empty, thin sounding, Casio keyboard produced bleh. Void of any instrumentation or heart.
But to each their own I guess.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
The stuff I was listening to in the 70's has beaten the stuff I was listening too for much of any of the time groupings since.

The 80's, well, we can appreciate what came before it and what came after it for being more dynamic, because the 80's just didn't have enough gems of great music.

For every 99 luft balloons, there were 30!! songs about Vietnam and the political turmoil prior to the 80's. Now whether they came out in the 60's or 70's, I dunno, I just know when I was listening to them.
You know, they used to tell a story, but then they didn't have the internet. (expletative) THEY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE CABLE! mostly.
So, whatdaya expect, music's going to take a back seat.

Music was all people had back then. They changed the world with music.

"let's get physical, physical," ... what were they thinking?

Time is a terrible thing. We can't appreciate all of life because time is taking it away, the parts before I was born or after I die.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Science Proves: Pop Music Has Actually Gotten Worse

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5