Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
I'm sorry but if you're part of a religious organization that in various countries of the world has declared religious war against your country then you should expect a certain amount of distrust to be directed your way in the fall out from it.

I think most muslims are peaceful, I'm just sayin' ^^


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
i know this thread is old, but i didn't want to keep posting stuff, as I guess we kind of just used this as a terror thread.

people REALLY need to read this article, posted by a white woman:

4 Ways America Has a (White) Terrorism Problem

Read more: http://www.cracked.com/blog/4-reasons-were-too-soft-terrorism-by-rich-white-ladies/#ixzz3SIy3vGYm

______________

in a nut shell, she's basically saying how America goes soft on white women, especially those back in the 70's, who now are very successful in life, while brown skin people are pretty much hunted when they try to convert to terrorist groups.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
I'm really struggling to see how the 2 examples given support the hypothesis that we are soft on white women terrorists.. we may be, I just don't see how this proves it.


You have a woman who was sentenced to the max, was serving that max, then was legally pardoned. On the other you have a woman who escaped from prison after just 2 years and fled the country.

You have a woman who was pretty much an accomplice to all of the crimes.. then you have a woman who actually shot and killed at least one person.

You have a woman who has denounced her actions... has Shakur ever done that?

But perhaps most importantly, you have a woman who was abducted and forced into doing what she did, on the other you have a woman who appears to have joined the cause and committed the acts by her own choice.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
So you decided to cling onto that one example person? Cause it's more than just the first woman that she brought up.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Really easy...execute all people involved in causing a murder. No worries about them endangering the public again. If it was proven the one woman was kidnapped and forced to take a life to save her own she still choose to kill and murder. Allowing that decision to be made just encourages more kidnappings and torture. Better to know that if you murder someone then you're as good as dead so you might as well not kill them.

Either way if you kill someone on purpose then the law should execute you immediately if found guilty IMHO.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
Really easy...execute all people involved in causing a murder. No worries about them endangering the public again. If it was proven the one woman was kidnapped and forced to take a life to save her own she still choose to kill and murder. Allowing that decision to be made just encourages more kidnappings and torture. Better to know that if you murder someone then you're as good as dead so you might as well not kill them.

Either way if you kill someone on purpose then the law should execute you immediately if found guilty IMHO.


What's up Judge Dredd??? LOL brownie


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Well, Shakur killed a trooper and it doesn't appear that she was labeled a "terrorist" until 40 yrs later... I'd have to dig up more on the story, but based upon this article, Shakur doesn't actually qualify as a 'terrorist"....

I do think Swish has a point here though. But I think it extends beyond just white women. I'm thinking Bill Ayers. How is that a man responsible for bombing police stations and killing cops becomes an associate of a man who eventually becomes President? But here's what I find interesting: politically and ideologically all these people are left wing. These people have contributed to or were the cause of the deaths of other people, yet are celebrated by the left and walking around! I wonder if there as many examples of 'right wing' terrorists walking the streets.. McVeigh isn't, Eric Rudolph isn't, the Unibomber isn't...

I don't know that I'd brake it down along gender, and maybe only a little on skin color, but I do agree with Swish's basic premise that terrorism is treated differently when it comes to different people.


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I'm sorry but if you're part of a religious organization that in various countries of the world has declared religious war against your country then you should expect a certain amount of distrust to be directed your way in the fall out from it.

I think most muslims are peaceful, I'm just sayin' ^^
I guess that goes for the Irish, Croatians, Russians....

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: rockdogg
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I'm sorry but if you're part of a religious organization that in various countries of the world has declared religious war against your country then you should expect a certain amount of distrust to be directed your way in the fall out from it.

I think most muslims are peaceful, I'm just sayin' ^^
I guess that goes for the Irish, Croatians, Russians....

Yes it does but for the most part, those other groups have not really tried to expand their fight into nations around the world..


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DevilDawg2847
Well, Shakur killed a trooper and it doesn't appear that she was labeled a "terrorist" until 40 yrs later... I'd have to dig up more on the story, but based upon this article, Shakur doesn't actually qualify as a 'terrorist"....

I do think Swish has a point here though. But I think it extends beyond just white women. I'm thinking Bill Ayers. How is that a man responsible for bombing police stations and killing cops becomes an associate of a man who eventually becomes President? But here's what I find interesting: politically and ideologically all these people are left wing. These people have contributed to or were the cause of the deaths of other people, yet are celebrated by the left and walking around! I wonder if there as many examples of 'right wing' terrorists walking the streets.. McVeigh isn't, Eric Rudolph isn't, the Unibomber isn't...


Sure there is. Right wing terrorism is usually built differently than left wing terrorists. This is where the whole "let's take something complex and make it way too simple" is a problem. Right wing terrorists would be considered the status quo. It's social conservatism in a nutshell. Right wing terrorists would be seen as people like Chris Kyle who snipes American citizens on the Superdome. Right wing terrorists are the people who still raise their "Southern pride" and Confederate flags. Right Wing terrorists are the people who celebrate Nazism. Right wing terrorism is alive and well, but it takes forms in our every day institution. It makes it much harder to see.

As far as Assata, she was found guilty by a trial of her peers, however medical experts back up her story.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Texas rally by Muslims seeking tolerance disrupted by protesters

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5