And yet we still aren't better without him.
We certainly aren't any worse.... and for $15 million/year, if your absence has a net impact of 0, then we don't need him.
But in reality, he's been gone for 2 games... oddly enough probably our best and worst games of the year back to back.... so I would say the jury is still out on whether, in the long run, we are better with or without him.
