Again, keep in mind who you are replying to. He argues just to argue. Twists things into stuff never intended.

He actually went ape over Rittenhouse taking a gun across state lines. Which never happened. Said a 17 year old shouldn't be able to carry a rifle. In WI, it's legal. That's why the judge dropped the charge, and the pa didn't argue. Made countless false claims, proven wrong by the jury. He wan'ts the judge in THIS case to be the one to blame, disregarding other facts. It's just him.

Now, watch. I'll get attacked, and the goalposts will change. I'll make a bet.