So in this regard, how is breaking down just 1 half of football (what Warner did) any different than cherry-picking plays over a longer period (what pretty much everyone else has done)? In fact, most of the time they put those same type of statements ("this is my argument and now let me show you evidence that backs it up") before they show snippets of film.
This is what I was responding to. That and your comment about cherry picking. From my perspective it seems as though you wish to site and claim validity to Warner's comments and while I do as well, I think it only covers one half of a game out of a three game stretch and it may very well not apply to the remaining games or even the other half of the game he broke down.
I did also cover the fact that there are sites that break down games in their totality. I'll try to be more clear over what I'm responding to so we don't have future miscommunications.
