The way I read Arch's comments is pretty straight forward - and Arch feel free to correct me if I am off base - but it seems to be Arch is simply stating that Watson needs to carry this team to wins and the play ffs and to the SB. That was the expectation for Baker. It seems he wants to be sure Watson gets critiqued the same way Baker was - so that if the defense gives up a later 4thQ score and we lose, Watson still gets the blame for not being better for the other 90% of the game. I read Arch and presume he is thinking of so many posters who have judged Baker in the harshest of lights and simply indicated that no matter what else went on in the game, Baker should have carried the team. and other trades in past years - we won't know how this plays out for some time.
.
That's a fair assessment.
