because we all are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Point of clarification: we are all innocent
in the eyes of the law until proven guilty. This only means that legal punishments cannot be handed down.
There is a SIGNIFICANT difference between "innocent" and "not guilty" and "not pursuing prosecution".
Stop trying to create a binary result from something that has nuanced definitions. That is NOT how it is.
He is Schroedinger's Cat, if anything. He is both guilty and innocent, and also not guilty and not innocent at the same time simply because those are definitions that happen as a result of opening the box and the Grand Jury chose to not open it.
He is "indeterminate", and in the absence of anything certain people WILL weigh in with their opinions and feelings and every last one, no matter which side it falls on, is as valid as the next.
