Yes - other than the question of whether more could have been done sooner to get 'value' for Baker in a trade, I have no issue with what the FO did. But the reality is we don't know how far they went and what they tried to do, especially as Baker is still recovering. The flip side of that is that I also have no issue with Baker not renegotiating to reduce his guaranteed income - it's a business and both sides are taking care of business.