What? Teams were actually willing to trade for those guys and in the cases of Watson and Wilson, gave up a ton to acquire them.
And other teams were willing to discard the player(s)...and did so with no other viable QB on their roster(s). Drew Lock is a stud because another team traded for him? He's better than Wilson in the eyes of Seattle because that was the swap? That would be ridiculous to debate.
Picking ONE thing to beat the drum over is the issue...there are many things in play...hence the point of my post ^.
