Originally Posted by Damanshot
Originally Posted by jfanent
Originally Posted by Damanshot
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by FrankZ
When you believe rational basis is a reason for removing a right, no it isn't difficult. Allowing people to be free and understanding that freedom does not mean a guarantee of safety is difficult for people who need governmental control of their lives.

Quote
What "right" did anything I proposed "remove"? None.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What "Regulated Militia" did the Buffalo shooter belong too? How about any of the 198 Mass Shootings from this year. Did any of the shooters actually belong to a "regulated Militia"?

Read it again. A well regulated militia is the reason we shall not infringe on the pre-existing right to keep and bear arms. It is not the reason for granting the right.

OK,,, so what regulated Militia did he belong too?

Read it again. But this time all the words...and slower.