What kills me the most about this whole situation, is that two grand juries found no evidence that a crime was committed.
I can't believe that this has to still be said at this point, but that is not necessarily a true statement.
A lack of indictment is NOT an acquittal, it is NOT a statement of innocence. It simply means that they chose not to indict and it can be for a variety of reasons, and is often as simple as the prosecutor feels the case isn't strong enough to get a conviction.
I know it's strange for folks to think about, but people do bad things and get away with it ALL THE TIME. A lack of an indictment from the grand juries does NOT mean that this is not one of those instances.
