Could you then explain to me why it's taking a retired judge weeks to sift through the evidence to come to a conclusion if the NFL's case "is weak"? I will also ask you what do other cases have to do with watson? You seem to have this all figured out when even a retired judge is combing through the three days of testimony. It appears with the time being spent coming to a conclusion by Robinson it must not be as weak as you believe it is.
It seems as though you are pointing your fingers more towards the Texans for things they did because they felt watson may have been guilty than you are the man they felt the need to protect. That seems more than a little odd to me.
| 
