Well that's the only option left for some people isn't it?
At first it was said that the NFL really didn't have any evidence. If that were the case a decision would have been made by now. Since they still don't believe when the hearing took three days worth of testimony to conclude that there must have been a lot of evidence provided at the hearing, they have to come up with yet a different reason for it taking so long for Robinson to render a decision.
I mean it couldn't be that the NFL provided a lot of evidence that takes a lot of time to go through and provide an extensive written explanation for her decision, right?
Honestly, the amount of time that has elapsed kinda renders pretty much any guesses at this point silly. I get why you don't like to acknowledge the 'no evidence' snippet. That was reported by Florio, a guy that was pretty anti-Watson-abusing-massage-therapists... so if your goal is bury that you'd probably want to take it up with him. The rest of his reporting (sources/takes/insights) was being shared pretty heavily at the beginning without issue.
