Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by DogNDC
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
The wording was not physical contact. It was that there was "no violence". And nothing was mentioned about coercion either way. Try again.

Your quoting the source from the judge.. mine was from the NFL's case which did not show any " violence, threat, force or coercion". So at the end of the day, the NFL out of all those so called women had a case with 4 women and had NONE of the things above... they had weak cards going in....

No it's not. This was something someone said to Florio. Other than the violence component nothing in the judges decision claims any of that and all you're going on and posted came from what someone said to Florio. If all of the things you said were actually accurate, watson probably wouldn't have been suspended at all.

If none of those things above happened, what do you think it is Robinson is calling egregious and why would she not allow watson to see any other massage therapists other than the teams appointed ones? You can't be serious here.

Do you love being WRONG ALL THE TIME!!!...
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...at-the-nfls-case-against-deshaun-watson/

This was WIDELY reported by everyone!!... the NFL did not have a good case.. right now, we dont have the written ruling from the judge yet. But when we do, we will get the full explanation and It will show the NFLs prior handling of suspensions plus the FACTS of the case. Not some B.S that Pit dawg is trying to say are the facts.

and yea, the NFL will go with that ruling