You don't need to read anything "into it". All you have to do is read it.....
Mr. Watson’s predatory conduct cast “a negative light on the League and its players,” sufficient proof that he violated this provision of the Policy
This isn't complicated nor do you need to read anything into it.
Some may argue that there is a distinct difference between the adjective "predatory" and the noun/ phrase "sexual predator". Especially since one is generally associated with violent acts. Insisting that Robinson called Deshaun a "sexual predator" is a bit of a stretch imo.
When she said he was guilty of sexual assault as defined by the NFL, then called his behavior predatory, she was saying exactly that; DW is a sexual predator.
I don't think so at all. She's saying that within the confines of the NFL's personal conduct policy, using his stature as an NFL QB to initiate contact with the therapists was predatory.
She also says that she is allowed NO OPINION on whether he committed sexual assault. If the NFL says winking at a house plant is sexual assault, she is "bound by their definition".
To take those two facts and come away with the opinion that she thinks he's a "sexual predator", as generally defined by society, is your prerogative. I don't think that's what she's saying, jmo.
