Even if he's suspended a year how is it not worth it?
I know you don't agree with this but the Browns had to do something at QB. They did not believe in Baker and were not committed to him long term. They needed a quarterback. They got a proven one who isn't even in the prime of his career yet.
And the Browns spent 20 years wasting first round draft picks. Sometimes multiple in the same year. The draft pick angle is being overplayed.
A one year suspension still makes this worth it. Anything beyond a year and now you can start to have that discussion.
The sucky part about a year is we are wasting talent this year. But if you have a good QB for 10 years after that you are still giving yourself a shot.
| 
