Originally Posted by steve0255
Here’s how PFF works, the company grades each player on every play from a scale of negative two to two in 0.5 increments. Here’s how the company defines the benefits of their grading system.

“Taking every play into consideration allows for a larger sample size of data to tell the proper story rather than just a highlight reel of plays that we tend to remember, for better or worse. We also work to eliminate bias by not caring about the level of player who is being graded, so whether it’s the best tackle in the league missing a block or one of the worst, the same grade is given. Preconceived level of ability has no impact on the grading system. This style has worked well in unlocking undervalued gems through the years, while also not being swayed by player hype if it is undeserved.”

Each game players are graded on a scale from 1-100. 90-100 represents an elite grade, 85-89 represents an all-conference player, 70-84 is starter quality, 60-69 is backup quality and everything under 60 is replaceable.

https://dfshub.com/pro-football-focus-pff-player-grades/

I'm well aware how PFF grades a player for each play. I was one of the first, if not the first person here, regularly posting PFF grades on players as it related to the performance of Browns' players. Oddly enough, it was often dismissed but now it is common place. Funny how that works.

But this doesn't address my question re: the scale. This page isn't from PFF, it's from a daily fantasy sports site. And the source it refers to is not an active link. It seems at one point it might have come from this page or a variations of it: https://www.pff.com/grades

But nowhere does it reference this grading scale. I'm not sure they are using that.....they certainly aren't showcasing it on the page that has everything else.