Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Originally Posted by FATE
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
You said you reviewed every single play against the Bengals. You said you did not see any negatives w/him. You mentioned the poor play design on a reach block. You said the Browns were protecting Watson. You are the one who moved the goal posts about trying to make this about Watson.

mac, why would the Browns bench Froholdt if he played as well as you claim he did?

mac, how were you able to examine each and every play? How did you get your hands on detailed video of each and every play that gave you great views on Froholdt's play against the Bengals? mac, did you get that video from Froholdt's attorney?

"Objection! You're badgering the witness!"

Your Honor, I would argue that Mr. mac is a hostile witness. His testimony is antagonistic to the legal case of my client. Thus, I request the right to ask leading questions that will result in this court discovering the truth of the matter.

[Linked Image from i.kym-cdn.com]