Originally Posted by GraffZ06
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I am pretty sure that Flacco already hit his peak. Plus, I'm sure the FO knows that signing flacco would just cause a QB controversy that the team doesn't need.

Yeah heaven forbid we have a QB controversy. We'd rather finish dead last and keep losing with a bum. But hey, no controversies!

If having Flacco on the team created such a controversy, and we're SO hell bent on avoiding those (which is bunk) - then cut the bum Watson and move on.

You produce, you stay. You suck, you go. It's not rocket science. Except in Berea where we care more about avoiding bad press than winning games.


Your parting shot makes no sense. If they cared about bad press they wouldn't have signed Watson and would have signed Flacco. Fortunately, they want what's best for the team on the field rather than trying to placate emotional fanatics.