What's the upside of the move? He's in the last year of a rookie deal, he's got tiny hands and no plus tools, and had the locker room problem red flag in Pittsburgh (wasn't going to stay to be the backup.)
When Mike Tomlin wants to get rid of a player he just used a first round pick on two seasons ago because he's not worth the headache, I want no part.
I'm so confused when I see a post like this. In PIT, "Tomlin wants to get of a player he just used a first-round pick on two seasons ago." Is this only in Pittsburgh that the HC has a say who stays or goes on a team? Here in Cleveland, many here will swear that Stefanski has no "say so" in player selection and thus should not be held accountable for the poor players he is told will be on the roster. Just wondering if Pittsburgh is the ONLY NFL team that considers the opinion or wishes of the HC.
