What's the difference on who taxes us. Federal, State or local. A tax to fix a road or a bridge is still a tax...
I don't think the government functions badly at all. Are there problems,sure. Are there things we could do better, you bet.
But in my dealings with the federal government (IRS, FBI, DOJ) I've found them to be pretty damned competent.
This entire country is NOT perfect. But there is nowhere else I'd rather be.
I don't mind paying taxes.
I've had a very different experience with the federal government. Last time I tried to go to the IRS for tax advice, the guy they gave me an appointment with had the same answer for every question. "Let me look." 15 minutes later. "Ummmm. I don't know." He was a nice enough guy. We traded military stories. We both had been down in Biloxi. As I was getting ready to leave, he told me I should try to get a job there. Said he was making $30 an hour. $30 an hour to tell people "I don't know" sounds like a pretty sweet gig if you can get it. (actually kind of soul crushing.) Our tax dollars at work.
Honestly, I think usage taxes make more sense for a lot of "infrastructure" things. Corporations can afford to chip in more on things like roads and bridges. Plus their heavy vehicles are likely responsible for the largest proportion of non-weather related damage (so scale the tax with vehicle weight.) Additionally, if corporations were paying for it, you can bet they'd be looking for ways to drive down costs. Hopefully, by doing repairs more effectively. I also think in many cases it makes more sense to produce things locally (mainly food.)
An undue burden is placed on individuals with corporations reaping undue reward. Taxpayer pays for medical research. Pharmaceutical company turns around and charges the taxpayer ridiculous prices as soon as possible. Why should we subsidize millionaires' profits?
Unfortunately, government is in the pocket of the rich.
Occasionally they throw out bread and circuses to appease the masses.