DawgTalkers.net
Posted By: jeepnstein Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 10:44 PM
Thomas Article

Hey, it's a slow news time. I thought this might be a bit interesting...

Mike Lucas: Unsigned, Thomas' patience being tested by Browns

Mike Lucas — 7/24/2007 9:19 am

When Alando Tucker, the leading scorer in University of Wisconsin men's basketball history, began evaluating various sports management teams, he talked with some NBA players who had working relationships with specific agents. One of his contacts was former Duke University guard Jason (now Jay) Williams, whose pro career was interrupted by a motorcycle accident. Williams had nothing but good things to say about BDA Sports Management and that helped sell Tucker on the firm and one of its reps, Kevin Bradbury.

In the end, Tucker wanted to be treated fairly as a person and player. Everything else, he figured, would take care of itself, including his first NBA contract. And so it all has, due in large part to the league's rookie scale. Tucker signed with the Suns less than 10 days after they drafted him in the first round (29th overall). According to the Arizona Republic, Tucker will make $776,600 his first year, $834,900 his second year, $893,100 his third year (team option) and $1.6 million on a fourth year (also team option).

Tucker gained additional financial security prior to the June 28th NBA draft when he signed a shoe contract with Converse. "That was big, that was big,'' Tucker admitted on draft night. "I met with Nike (which oversees Converse) and adidas and we were going back and forth. I just saw myself with the Converse marketing scheme because it provided the best opportunity. It felt good, too, to know that a company was willing to pay me to wear their shoes.''

While Tucker was still at Wisconsin, it was often suggested figuratively that he walked in the same shoes -- which would be the adidas brand in the UW context -- as Outland Trophy winner Joe Thomas, the All-American left offensive tackle. Tucker and Thomas were not only marquee players in their respective sports but they were priceless goodwill ambassador's for the athletic department, the school and the state of Wisconsin.

Upon embarking on pro careers, Tucker and Thomas anticipated being in a state of flux. But whereas Tucker is now working for his employer, Thomas is still unsigned and his NFL career is on hold. A recent headline in the Cleveland Plain Dealer -- "Trouble looms in signing Thomas'' -- spelled it out. A pre-training camp rookie orientation got under way Monday and the Browns were minus their top three picks: Thomas, the No. 3 selection overall in the draft; Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn (No. 22 in the first round) and UNLV defensive back Eric Wright, a second-round pick.

Thomas is represented by Denver-based All Pro Sports and Entertainment. When he was asked about his choice, he cited the role that his agent, Peter Schaffer, played in the decision-making. "One of the big things I really liked,'' Thomas said, "he (Schaffer) respected everyone, no matter how important or unimportant they were in the process. He never wanted anyone to feel like they were being taken advantage of. I think a lot of big-time agents go on power trips after they have big-time clients, but he has never done that. My goal was to find a firm that had top prospects, but yet hasn't turned into a super megafirm where you don't get the personalized service that you're looking for.''

Regarding Thomas and a potential hold-out -- the Browns open training camp on Friday -- Schaffer told the Plain Dealer on June 24, "We have a history of getting clients in on time and we have one (Thomas) that wants to be (signed and in camp). But it takes two to tango and it's only going to happen if a fair contract can be agreed to ... the numbers are pretty clear.''

Schaffer was referencing the contract numbers (the really big $$$) for the three previous athletes drafted in the No. 3 slot of the draft. "As much of a great advantage it was to win the coin toss (with Tampa Bay), we were also aware of the contract situation at that spot,'' Cleveland general manager Phil Savage told the Plain Dealer on Sunday. "It's not a pretty picture in terms of trying to negotiate an offensive lineman versus a quarterback and two top-echelon receivers who were thought to be by many to be the top players in their draft.''

A year ago, the Tennessee Titans drafted Texas quarterback Vince Young in the No. 3 hole and Young signed a five-year deal, with an option for a sixth year, for a reported $58 million, $25.7 guaranteed. Young signed on July 27, thereby avoiding a holdout.

Two years ago, the Cleveland Browns took Michigan wide receiver Braylon Edwards with the No. 3 pick and Edwards, who was represented by Lamont Smith and All Pro Sports and Entertainment (same as Thomas), missed the first 12 days of training camp before agreeing to a five-year deal, reportedly worth $40 million, $20 mil guaranteed.

Three years ago, the Arizona Cardinals used the No. 3 pick to take Pitt receiver Larry Fitzgerald, who signed an outrageous six-year deal, reportedly worth $60 million ($20 million guaranteed). Fitzgerald, who was represented by Eugene Parker, got more than the No. 1 overall pick (quarterback Eli Manning) and the No. 2 pick (offensive tackle Robert Gallery). Fitzgerald ended up missing only two practices. (Parker, it should be noted, is also the agent of the Green Bay Packers' first-round pick, defensive tackle Justin Harrell).

Before leaving the Madison campus, Thomas stressed the importance of showing up on time for his first pro training camp; a sentiment and a commitment that he passed along to his agent. However, such potentially tricky negotiations -- measuring Thomas' worth with skill position players like Young, Edwards and Fitzgerald -- could slow down the process. An avid fisherman, Thomas knows the value of patience, which may serve him well, especially since he's in such uncharted waters.
All I know is that I saw JT a couple of days ago here in Cleveland. Brady Quinn is in town too, which is also a good sign that something will be done here shortly. There are a lot of holdout across the league right now. I hope by the end of the week a deal is done and we can get to playing football.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 10:54 PM
Good read......not to mention the interest his team will have in the Quinn talks if it comes down to Joe being asked to take a discount from previous #3 picks...

The Browns want Thomas first as leverage on the Quinn talks. The Thomas camp wants the Quinn numbers first to see if they indeed can us that as leverage.

Thomas shouldn't sign first unless the team offers up the standard set for #3 money unless Quinn signs for less than #22 money.


I could be a slow process folks....and be ready to spend a big portion of the cap on these two guys.
Quote:

.and be ready to spend a big portion of the cap on these two guys.




The amount that can be spent for this year is set in stone.

With a maximum contract length of 6 yrs for Thomas and only 5 years for Quinn (I'll put money on it ending up as a 4 yr deal).... the numbers will be big, no doubt, but they won't be bank busters.

If nothing else, they must fit into this years rookie pool, and the year on year salary values cannot increase by more than 25%. That leaves roster/workout bonuses as the only way to beef it up to the astronomical levels, and those only hurt ya for one year.... though I would not be surprised to see a massive roster bonus thrown in for next year (or the year after) and come that time see a restructure that converts it to a signing bonus.

They'll get paid, but they won't hurt any worse than a Bentley or Steinbach at the absolute worst.... probably closer to a Baxter and an Edwards.
Posted By: Ammo Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:09 PM
Quote:

Good read......not to mention the interest his team will have in the Quinn talks if it comes down to Joe being asked to take a discount from previous #3 picks...

The Browns want Thomas first as leverage on the Quinn talks. The Thomas camp wants the Quinn numbers first to see if they indeed can us that as leverage.

Thomas shouldn't sign first unless the team offers up the standard set for #3 money unless Quinn signs for less than #22 money.


I could be a slow process folks....and be ready to spend a big portion of the cap on these two guys.




I usually agree with a lot of what Bruce Drennan says, however I completely disagree with him on the Joe Thomas negotiations. He says Thomas needs to remember he's an offensive lineman.

Um, Bruce needs to remember that he's a LEFT TACKLE. The position that is as rare as a QB in the NFL and a position that Savage has stated is a skill position.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:13 PM
Comments that haven't gone unnoticed by the parties that count I am sure..
Posted By: Rishuz Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:21 PM
Quote:

Um, Bruce needs to remember that he's a LEFT TACKLE. The position that is as rare as a QB in the NFL and a position that Savage has stated is a skill position.




This is why I don't understand Savage's comment per this article about comparing him to other 'skill' positions.

If I had to guess, the Browns are the bottleneck here, not Thomas and his agent.
I can honestly say in the Thomas and Quinn negotiations, from what has been leaked out, the Browns are trying to screw these kids. Thomas wants #3 money, because he was picked there.........imo that's fair. Quinn wants to be paid like a starting QB in years 4 and 5............and imo if he's the starter then he should be. Bro, both of these guys contracts should be done or close to it by now. Give Joe his 3 pick money, and give bonuses in years 4 and 5 so that if Quinn is the established starter and performing well he'll be paid like it. If these guys aren't in on time I got to say the FO is at fault imo, becuase these guys aren't making outragious demands imo.
Quinn's contract should be #22 money with incentives to make it a bigger contract.... Thats just how I see it in a simple mind.

Thomas should get #3 money, I don't care what position he plays, he was picked third.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:31 PM
I agree.......and just to add.....it is this way most of the time....not just with us.....all teams.


Not to say all.....but I rarely blame a player or his agent in a contract dispute. In most cases the players go in with reasonable, market based demands and the teams start hammering away at that point.

Give it a day or two and you will hear the talking heads on the radio or TV talking about guys falling way behind and never being able to catch up this year.
Posted By: Rabidfan Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:33 PM
I just hope we would get these guys, all 3 of them, signed very soon.
That's pretty much what both are asking for............and again this is just the info that has been leaked by the media so it could be wrong. However, if the Browns don't want to give Joe 3 money then he shouldn't sign.........if they won't give Quinn incentives to make sure he's getting paid like an established NFL QB in years 4 and 5 (and remember these are incentives IF he's an established starter) then he shouldn't sign. We always dog the athletes and agents for not being in on time, but from everything I've heard (again if accurate) then we are trying to lowball those guys........and if I was their Dad I would tell them not to sign.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:37 PM
We might get Wright soon.

right now they are just holding out a while knowing the browns are going to have to post up some good information pretty soon to sooth the fans.

They will get what they want because the team needs some good PR right now.


Good move by his agent I might add.
I've seen players come in with crazy demands bro..........remember KWII wanting # 1 pick money because several teams having him BPA??? In this instance however, it seems we are trying to see how cheap we can get them, becuase we know both WANT to be in at camp on time so that they can start. We are basically using the threat of a holdout against them...lol.
the nfl needs, in three words: rookie salary cap
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:41 PM
Like I said...it is not all....and we are talking the Postons here....those flunkies were decertify.

I am surprised those morons were able to pass a bar exam.

Take it in the context of maybe 80-85%.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:47 PM
Quote:

the nfl needs, in three words: rookie salary cap




I agree to an extent. The down side is then we would see many 2-3 year contracts for rookies.....I don't know that I want to see that.

You couldn't keep a guy in a rookie contract for 7 years.
Posted By: CalDawg Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:49 PM
Thought this might have some bearing worth discussing:

Lions | C. Johnson likely a holdout
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:58:35 -0700

ESPNews reports Detroit Lions first-round draft choice WR Calvin Johnson will likely hold out of training camp.

KFFL
Posted By: Ralphie Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:52 PM
Wright signs next...Thomas gets paid big money up front as a signing bonus OK money on the 4 year deal. Quinn gets big bonus money like Thomas but loaded with reachable money triggers and less per year guaranteed.
Thats Just Crazy

This Just Justifies Freeney's Contract Even More

They Dont Need a Cap, They Could Just Slot The Money Per Draft Position

I Cant Even Beging To Think What Thomas Is Going To Sign For
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/24/07 11:54 PM
I see it more the guys below Thomas......Our talks could have bearing all around the league.

If Thomas gets last years #3, why would Calvin want less??

Really....why should he want less?? I wouldn't. You wouldn't.
Quote:

Um, Bruce needs to remember that he's a LEFT TACKLE. The position that is as rare as a QB in the NFL and a position that Savage has stated is a skill position




I think it was Savage that said something to the effect that LT can almost be classified with QB and Receiver and RB in terms of being Key positions and Skill positions,,

If I have that right, those words may come back to haunt him.,,,,,
Does Savage Or McCracken Come Up With The Figures?
I'm honestly not sure.
Quote:

We might get Wright soon.




Hey Peen, just curious what you are basing this off of - any inside info, or are you thinking just because he was picked last out of our unsigned guys?

It's be nice to see some more 2nd rounders in the league signed to give us more of a starting price. The only signed 2nd rounders I can think of are Bazuin, and Woodley (I'm sure there are more though)
Was Always Wondering Who Sets The Figures, Thanks For The Response..
Wish I could have been more help to you man,,, but I just don't know the answer
Hopefully Someone That Does Know, Lets Us Know
Quote:


I usually agree with a lot of what Bruce Drennan says, however I completely disagree with him on the Joe Thomas negotiations. He says Thomas needs to remember he's an offensive lineman.

Um, Bruce needs to remember that he's a LEFT TACKLE. The position that is as rare as a QB in the NFL and a position that Savage has stated is a skill position.




I completely disagree. While a Left Tackle is as rare as a QB in the NFL, he is still an offensive lineman. I'm not saying an LT is any less important than skill positions, but he needs to face reality. And reality is... Lineman, even if they are LT's, do NOT get paid as much as skill position players. Take your fat contract for an offensive lineman and get into camp. It doesn't matter what skill positions are getting paid... You're an offensive lineman!
This is what I would do.

Pay Thomas #3 money. We have the room and the $$$.

Sign Quinn to a 3-year deal With appropriate pro-rating of S.B. $$$ at what the #20 - #22 player would get. He would be a RFA at the end of the contract and we could either A) re-sign him at starting QB money if he's our starting QB or B) get a 1st-rounder from somebody else if he's not. He's made it painfully clear he wants to be the QB in Cleveland, and we'd only want to keep him around if he looks like he'll pan out... so why not? He WANTS to be a Brown, and he wants to be fairly compensated. We don't want unhappy players on the team. What's wrong here?
Posted By: BigC Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 12:57 AM
I hate rookie holdouts, but usually they end up meaning next to nothing outside of a guy's rookie year. I just want to see Joe in pads...I want buy his jersey till he signs.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 01:13 AM
No inside info.....just basing it on where my mind leads me when thinking about the possible angles.
Why not a rookie salary cap, or slots, then like the NBA allow the players current team to match or exceed any offer if they want? So say a luxury tax for busting your cap for your own player, but not to sign someone elses (ie you can't do it....you have to stay within your cap) ?
Quote:

the nfl needs, in three words: rookie salary cap




Totally agree - this situation has gotten totally out of hand. This would definitely help all NFL teams.
The NFL already works on a slot sytem of sorts. What usually occurs is a guy gets the money the previous player picked in his slot got....plus 10%. It's been going on like that for years now...........that's all Thomas is wanting the status quo of slot money.
Quote:

and be ready to spend a big portion of the cap on these two guys.



I know you mean overall n stuff...but do u know how much our rookie pool is this year? wonder how much they will have to back load the contract
Quote:

the nfl needs, in three words: rookie salary cap




I thought there is something like that...called the rookie pool...they only get to spend certain amount of their cap space on the rookies this year...
Posted By: lampdogg Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 03:04 AM
Quote:

However, such potentially tricky negotiations -- measuring Thomas' worth with skill position players like Young, Edwards and Fitzgerald -- could slow down the process.




Franchise LTs are harder to get than franchise 'anything'.
LT is a skill position, just ask any QB who's had a crappy one. Pay him Phil and stop messing around.
Posted By: Loki Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 03:39 AM
My guess are numbers around these :

Thomas: 7 yrs 60 million 27 mill guaranteed

Quinn: 4 years 13 mill 3-6 mill guaranteed
( I remember Clayton saying that years 3-5 are the sticklers)
i don't think he doesn't wanna pay him...he just doesn't want to over pay him....i don't care how long it takes i think everyone is just waiting for each other to sign so they can sign their player at a fair deal...

Say phil signs Joe before #1 #2 and #4...what if it's higher than the #2 n #1?(prolly not possible since #1 was a QB)
Posted By: Loki Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 03:55 AM
Well me personally, I wouldn't mind overpaying my guy 2-5 mill extra if it ensured that he would be in on time ( Besides we do have the most cap space if I remember correctly, so 2-5 mill should be a non-issue spread over 7 years)
There is a reason we have the most cap space(besides the fact that we don't really have big money in 1 skill guy yet lol)

Phil is wise...let him do his thing...and the dude that is crunching the #s for cap space....i forget his name?
Posted By: Loki Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 04:10 AM
Savage is part of the reason but not he whole reason. The real reason that we have all kinds of cap space is the fact that Couch, Warren, Green, Brown, and Faine are no longer on the team. Usually big cap eaters are your really good draft choices,which, we have very few of.

And yes I will give Savage credit that he did cut the dead weight, but we have a lot of cap space for one and one reason only and that reason is BAD DRAFTING
However, if the Browns don't want to give Joe 3 money then he shouldn't sign.........if they won't give Quinn incentives to make sure he's getting paid like an established NFL QB in years 4 and 5 (and remember these are incentives IF he's an established starter) then he shouldn't sign.

I think it falls somewhere in the fact Thomas is a linemen..and they don't feel they want to overpay for him..but guess what?
If he's going to be the starter for 7-10 years...U better pay him..
Quote:

Phil is wise...let him do his thing...and the dude that is crunching the #s for cap space....i forget his name?




I believe you're talking about Trip McCracken.

IMHO, we'll see holdouts by both these guys until the guys around them sign. I just hope that Oakland doesn't give Russell a ridiculously huge contract, because that will have a trickle down effect.

I really wish we had slot salaries for rookies. But, like someone else said (Peen?), that would lead to 3 year contracts, and in the NFL, it can take a good 2 or 3 years for the guy to truly start shining.

I don't really blame either party. The player is coming in trying to get what he wants (which is the most possible). The team is coming in trying to get what they want (which is the least possible). It's just like any contract negotiation. The two sides will meet somewhere near the middle. As long as the team isn't ridiculously low in its offer and ticks the guy off so much that he holds a grudge and gets out of Dodge after his first contract, things will work out.

Maybe something like baseball arbitration would work? In that, it's my understanding that the two sides submit their number to an arbitrator, and the arbitrator makes the decision based on what he/she feels is most fair. There is no negotiation, it's one number or the other. That way, the player comes in a little lower and the team comes in a little higher.

JMHO
Each side can be as mercenary as they like, but the bottom line is it will be enough on a guarantee. If you look at what we would have needed for a Pace-type in FA, just about ANYTHING can be within reach. This is his shot at the gold ring; we pulled the trigger, so he owes the FO nothing if this was a dumb "impulse" buy. And to shovel it to Quinn? nah. This s not a round to subsidize the club in his 1st campaign. Make your money by selling an extra QB or three; we got plenty IMHO. But this guy, in camp, day one, is a priority. And if you are a bit rich, hey, pebbles in the pond. Sets the bar to cripple every other unsigned out there. Get this done. It will matter in games later one way or the other. You cannot "spend" losses.
Meanwhile, go Browns! And may the Elf be with you!
Quote:

Quote:

the nfl needs, in three words: rookie salary cap




I agree to an extent. The down side is then we would see many 2-3 year contracts for rookies.....I don't know that I want to see that.

You couldn't keep a guy in a rookie contract for 7 years.




Yes but hopefully, after 2-3 years you have seen enough to know if this rookie has what it takes, then you give him a new contract.

How many millions are paid out to guys that don't really make it, or are not worth their perceived value at the time they were drafted.
No. 3 pick should get No. 3 pay
By Terry Pluto
Joe Thomas was the No. 3 pick in the draft, so the Browns should pay him like the No. 3 pick.

That might sound obvious, but the NFL can be twisted at this time of year, when other teams pressure you to pay your draft picks less while refusing to be frugal with their picks.

Thomas is a left tackle, and left tackles are not supposed to be drafted that high. Or if they are, then you shouldn't pay them as much as, say, a quarterback or receiver.

That's because those are ``skill'' positions.

A left tackle, well, he just blocks, as if that takes about as much skill as, say, dragging your garbage can to the curb.

This is not to suggest the Browns believe that, but it's the prevailing NFL attitude. All teams preach the gospel of blocking, but very few pay like it. So they play hardball with linemen, and genuflect at the altar of the quarterback.

Ask Tim Couch or Ty Detmer or Kelly Holcomb or any other Browns quarterback of recent seasons what it would mean to have even an average line.

``You mean I can play a few games without a concussion?'' they'd say. ``Nah, never happen in Cleveland.''

General Manager Phil Savage seems determined to change that philosophy that has doomed this franchise -- and its quarterbacks -- since its return in 1999. He has poured major money into veteran offensive linemen such as LeCharles Bentley, Eric Steinbach and Kevin Shaffer.

If the other general managers don't like the idea that the Browns would pay a left tackle like a No. 3 pick, here's what Savage should say: ``Go run your own team. I'd like to keep my quarterback out of the hospital this season.''

Bringing Thomas into camp soon is crucial because true teamwork is the heart of any offensive line. The only starters returning from last year are center Hank Fraley and Shaffer, the 2006 left tackle.

There is talent but little continuity. Left tackle is the key spot on the line, much as a closer is in a baseball team's bullpen. The left tackle protects the blind side of a right-handed quarterback, and he usually is matched against the opponent's best pass rusher.

If Thomas can play even an average NFL left tackle as a rookie, that's a huge advantage for the Browns. It matters more that he comes to camp on time than it matters for Brady Quinn because the rookie from Notre Dame is not projected to start at quarterback.

Thomas is a big deal, a major block in building a line. Let's not call it ``rebuilding'' because that implies the Browns once had a good offensive line. Maybe they did -- in the 1980s for a franchise that now plays in Baltimore.

So the Browns should pay Thomas according to what a No. 3 pick receives, and make no apology for it. No matter that in the past three years, the No. 3 selections have been two receivers (Larry Fitzgerald and Braylon Edwards) and quarterback Vince Young.

A case can be made that the quarterback has the most responsibility of any player on the field because he handles the ball more often than anyone else.

No doubt, Edwards believes he matters more than any tackle. But Edwards should know that if the tackles don't block, the quarterback has no time to throw Edwards the ball.

Besides, if you are drafted No. 3, then you should be paid like a third pick. Quarterback, wide receiver, left tackle or long snapper, it doesn't matter.

No. 3 is No. 3, and being drafted there means someone thought you were the third best player in the draft -- regardless of position.

If you are drafted No. 22 -- sorry, Brady -- you are a 22nd pick. The Browns correctly determined that Thomas would fill a greater need on this team and would make a bigger immediate impact than Quinn.

Right now, Thomas means more to this team, and the Browns should not worry about other teams when they pay him like it.

link
Good read. It makes sense to me. I hope the Browns aren't totally lowballing the guy, but that this is just negotiation time, not butting heads time.
Posted By: KIDD20 Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 01:30 PM
Agree.. Good read.. Pay the #3 pick, #3 money.. Pretty simple to me.. We need Thomas in camp on Friday, get it done Phil.
If Savage can't get Thomas in camp on time without grossly overpaying, I think that Savage has failed the team...
Quote:

Good read. It makes sense to me. I hope the Browns aren't totally lowballing the guy, but that this is just negotiation time, not butting heads time.



(from the Plain Dealer)
Schaffer characterized the contract talks with the Browns as "good faith, open, honest dialogue."
If Russell signs with the Raiders soon, which there seems some belief that he will,... I think Thomas will fall in right behind him.
If he's not in camp by friday, I think by Monday he will be. jmho
Posted By: ClayM57 Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 05:54 PM
Quote:

If Savage can't get Thomas in camp on time without grossly overpaying, I think that Savage has failed the team...






I wouldnt say fail the team, If he over pays and handcuffs the team in future spending than I would say that,

Really many people afterwards say the money was the easy part, there a thousdands of things both sides need to agree on, teams want control over what commercials the players are in, that has to be agreed upon, will Joe be allowed to speed accross the lake in his new bass boat, not always the safest thing, it's not a will pay you this for this many years, agree and shake hands.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 05:59 PM
Quote:

Schaffer characterized the contract talks with the Browns as "good faith, open, honest dialogue."




I am sure they were. Talks with a player who is free to go anywhere and you are trying hard to get are a bit different than with a person who really has no options for at least a year.
Quote:

My guess are numbers around these :

Thomas: 7 yrs 60 million 27 mill guaranteed

Quinn: 4 years 13 mill 3-6 mill guaranteed
( I remember Clayton saying that years 3-5 are the sticklers)




Just for the record as part of the new collective bargaining agreement picks 1-16 have a maximum length on their contract of 6 years and the rest of the first round can only sign five year deals or less, and everyone after that has a maximum contract length of 4 years. So Thomas will be signing a 6 year deal. And no offense but the Browns will make sure they sign Quinn to a 5 year deal, though it is possible that the final year may be voided.

As for the second article posted it had a very simple point but was the most true article I have read in a while.
Posted By: ddubia Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 08:42 PM
Quote:



Schaffer characterized the contract talks with the Browns as "good faith, open, honest dialogue."

Quote:



I am sure they were. Talks with a player who is free to go anywhere and you are trying hard to get are a bit different than with a person who really has no options for at least a year.









"Thomas is represented by Denver-based All Pro Sports and Entertainment. When he was asked about his choice, he cited the role that his agent, Peter Schaffer , played in the decision-making."


Schaffer is Thomas's agent. The article's not refering to Kevin 'neck-tie' Shaffer, the LT.
Posted By: 1oldMutt Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 08:59 PM

Quote:

Really many people afterwards say the money was the easy part, there a thousdands of things both sides need to agree on, teams want control over what commercials the players are in, that has to be agreed upon, will Joe be allowed to speed accross the lake in his new bass boat, not always the safest thing, it's not a will pay you this for this many years, agree and shake hands.







This would be the MacDonalds "Big Joe" fish sandwich!

As far as the boating stuff...well, this city has been there and I for one don't care to revisit that!
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Thomas' patience being tested by Browns - 07/25/07 10:17 PM
Quote:

Schaffer is Thomas's agent. The article's not refering to Kevin 'neck-tie' Shaffer, the LT.





Well....it should have been!

Thanks for clearing that up for the one of us confused.
Sorry but you just repeated everything i said...instead of being general you are being specific....glad you understand what i was trying to say
© DawgTalkers.net