DawgTalkers.net
Posted By: bonefish alex jones - 09/24/22 03:22 PM
In many ways I don't how the parents of the Sandy Hook murders can contain themselves.

I try to put myself in their shoes. I drive my 10 year old grandson to elementary. school. I just can not put to rest what these people have suffered at the hands of this vile creature.

I see this bag of pus and I want revenge. I want justice. I want him stripped to the bone of everything he owns and put into a cell till he is dead.

It hard to even imagine a person like him. trump comes close.

But jones is even beyond trump because he knows the pain he causing and he continues the assault.

If there is hell I want him there at the bottom of it.
Posted By: Damanshot Re: alex jones - 09/24/22 05:28 PM
Jones needs to be committed to a home for the insane. He's just not right in the head.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/24/22 05:48 PM
Of course he is. He makes a living off of lies and far fetched conspiracies. He finds the weak minded and exploits them.

Posted By: PortlandDawg Re: alex jones - 09/24/22 06:18 PM
Mush brained simpletons with rage issues flock to their own.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/24/22 06:30 PM
Super Brown guru
Posted By: SuperBrown Re: alex jones - 09/24/22 07:15 PM
My hero!!!!!
Posted By: WooferDawg Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 02:58 AM
I will just say that the justice that Alex Jones deserves is illegal.

But yes, they can be compensated for the money that Alex Jones made by trolling them.

I hope Alex is penniless for the rest of his life.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 11:19 AM
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.
Posted By: Damanshot Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 12:53 PM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
My hero!!!!!


Yeah, we know. and it's disgusting.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 12:59 PM
It figures. I have him blocked.

He is the worst poster on this Board. His posts are all the same. Same kinda sick comments. I am thankful there is an ignore capability so I don't have to see his logo or posts.
Posted By: BADdog Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 03:50 PM
Originally Posted by bonefish
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.

or lack there of
Posted By: PortlandDawg Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 03:59 PM
Originally Posted by Damanshot
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
My hero!!!!!


Yeah, we know. and it's disgusting.

Trolls troll. See him/it for what it is and it makes its posts more understandable. That said I have it on ignore too. As I do other board trolls. Nothing gained by reading their dreck. If by chance it’s not a troll, and it truly is a Jones fan it’s better that I don’t read it’s banal garbage anyway. Bullet dodged on both sides.
Posted By: SuperBrown Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 07:47 PM
Originally Posted by bonefish
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.

Imagine the kind of mind that is lost in fake news never to see the real truth. That is true filth of intelligence.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/25/22 11:44 PM
The families of those people from Sandy Hook they deserve justice.

To profit from the lies and the harm caused to those people.

Is as repulsive as the scum that listen and support a pus bag like jones.
Posted By: Clemdawg Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 12:29 AM
Quote
Of course he is. He makes a living off of lies and far fetched conspiracies. He finds the weak minded and exploits them.

Quote
Imagine the kind of mind that is lost in fake news never to see the real truth. That is true filth of intelligence.


"Well, the truth is different these days... it's more of a hunch that you're willing to die for-"
-Homer Simpson, 9/25/2022
Posted By: Damanshot Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 01:48 PM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
Originally Posted by bonefish
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.

Imagine the kind of mind that is lost in fake news never to see the real truth. That is true filth of intelligence.


OK, I'm listening.. Tell me something that is fake news Just one item will do but if you got more, go for it.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 01:52 PM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
Originally Posted by bonefish
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.

Imagine the kind of mind that is lost in fake news never to see the real truth. That is true filth of intelligence.


filth of intelligence rofl

No bro "ignorance" and "misinformation" is the filth of intelligence and you seem to be flush with it.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 02:16 PM
Given that super brown believes that Sandy Hook was a hoax.

Obviously intelligence is not a factor when it comes to anything he would post.



His shelves are probably filled the supplements jones hawks. Bleach and hydroxychloroquine are probably taken right after swallowing the pills.

Covid is a hoax and the vaccine will make you sterile.

But oh, oh, those pills jones sells sure make super smrt.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 04:10 PM
The suppression of people like Alex Jones has me on notice. Project Veritas as well, like I don't buy most of what they are blabbering about but the attempt at full scale silencing them is a problem. When investigative journalists went full woke, the vacancy was filled with less educated, less desirable people, that's on them. Get back to actually investigating, and yeah your own partisans as well and these people never have a voice.

One finger pointing out, 4 pointing back.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 04:25 PM
Hard to be an investigative reporter in a world where actual facts don't matter and only bias-confirming reporting is held in regard as gospel. And this is why these people are being silenced. Their spreading of lies and hate are very harmful to our democracy. And they only do it for easy money.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 04:29 PM
I don't get woke talk.

There is truth and lies. jones and veritas are nothing more than lies for profit. Period. They know it and know it well.

When they direct lies at innocent people and those people are directly harmed as a result of their lies. They must be held accountable.

trump directed the attack on the capitol. It is the same thing. The results were illegal and caused harm.

alex jones needs to held accountable. It is not about free speech
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 04:58 PM
Who is it that's trying to "silence them"? What is happening is they are being held accountable to the law. Free speech does not give you the right to commit slander, defamation or libel against someone.

Or are you suggesting privately owned platforms do not have thew right to refuse to allow people to post on their social network when they break the terms of service they have agreed to? Often multiple times after being warned. From my perspective it's more that you're advocating they be allowed to break the rules, break the law and virtually go unchecked.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 05:34 PM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Hard to be an investigative reporter in a world where actual facts don't matter and only bias-confirming reporting is held in regard as gospel.


First part of this is actually hilarious. Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. You're not throwing the shade you think you are, you're agreeing with me.
Posted By: PerfectSpiral Re: alex jones - 09/26/22 07:09 PM
Suppression of Alex Jones? GMAFB nobody can suppress him! rofl even his own lawyers can’t suppress him. rofl
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 02:59 PM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
Originally Posted by bonefish
Imagine the kind of mind and person it takes to buy into the filth that is alex jones.

Imagine the kind of mind that is lost in fake news never to see the real truth. That is true filth of intelligence.

What are your views on Sandy Hook?
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 03:05 PM
Originally Posted by BpG
The suppression of people like Alex Jones has me on notice. Project Veritas as well, like I don't buy most of what they are blabbering about but the attempt at full scale silencing them is a problem. When investigative journalists went full woke, the vacancy was filled with less educated, less desirable people, that's on them. Get back to actually investigating, and yeah your own partisans as well and these people never have a voice.

One finger pointing out, 4 pointing back.

I agree that there is a problem with investigative reporting and things of that nature that are confronted by cancel culture - and that is any kind of investigative reporting, regardless of the "partisanship" you mention.

Alex Jones losing a prima facie defamation case, however, is not "silencing" him. It's applying basic common law principles that have been around for a long time.

These people won't go away because they've already captured and brainwashed a certain subset of society that they make tons of money off of. People are too entrenched in their fear and anger. I don't know what the solution is, honestly.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 03:11 PM
Originally Posted by dawglover05
Originally Posted by BpG
The suppression of people like Alex Jones has me on notice. Project Veritas as well, like I don't buy most of what they are blabbering about but the attempt at full scale silencing them is a problem. When investigative journalists went full woke, the vacancy was filled with less educated, less desirable people, that's on them. Get back to actually investigating, and yeah your own partisans as well and these people never have a voice.

One finger pointing out, 4 pointing back.

I agree that there is a problem with investigative reporting and things of that nature that are confronted by cancel culture - and that is any kind of investigative reporting, regardless of the "partisanship" you mention.

Alex Jones losing a prima facie defamation case, however, is not "silencing" him. It's applying basic common law principles that have been around for a long time.

These people won't go away because they've already captured and brainwashed a certain subset of society that they make tons of money off of. People are too entrenched in their fear and anger. I don't know what the solution is, honestly.


Agreed, like there are people who actually believe there was an insurrection. There is no solution, my mother is one of these people. She hates who she is told to hate.

I've tried for decades to help her understand balance, perspective and logic. Doesn't work, there is moreso an intellectual disparity in this country combined with fear and lack of courage. Some people just want to be liked, regardless of who it's by.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 03:17 PM
Completely agree. I'm at the same position with my family. It absolutely blows my mind and deeply concerns me.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 08:32 PM
Originally Posted by BpG
Originally Posted by dawglover05
Originally Posted by BpG
The suppression of people like Alex Jones has me on notice. Project Veritas as well, like I don't buy most of what they are blabbering about but the attempt at full scale silencing them is a problem. When investigative journalists went full woke, the vacancy was filled with less educated, less desirable people, that's on them. Get back to actually investigating, and yeah your own partisans as well and these people never have a voice.

One finger pointing out, 4 pointing back.

I agree that there is a problem with investigative reporting and things of that nature that are confronted by cancel culture - and that is any kind of investigative reporting, regardless of the "partisanship" you mention.

Alex Jones losing a prima facie defamation case, however, is not "silencing" him. It's applying basic common law principles that have been around for a long time.

These people won't go away because they've already captured and brainwashed a certain subset of society that they make tons of money off of. People are too entrenched in their fear and anger. I don't know what the solution is, honestly.


Agreed, like there are people who actually believe there was an insurrection. There is no solution, my mother is one of these people. She hates who she is told to hate.

I've tried for decades to help her understand balance, perspective and logic. Doesn't work, there is moreso an intellectual disparity in this country combined with fear and lack of courage. Some people just want to be liked, regardless of who it's by.


You don't believe there was an insurrection on January 6th? Ain't you got eyes? Can't you see? And anyone silencing trash like Jones or Project Veritas should be given medals and treated like patriots for defending democracy. Screw those pieces of crap fascists.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 09:28 PM
What would you call jan 6th?
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/28/22 09:31 PM
Crap, I just realized I read the comment as "wasn't an insurrection" instead of "was."
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 12:52 PM
I read a lot of history covering written history and pre-history.

Justice has been handed out in many different ways over the years gone by.

alex jones deserves justice. It is to bad that he is living in a time where he is protected by courts.

I wish that the pain and suffering he caused to the families of the Sandy Hook tragedy could be delt back in equal measure.

People like super brown and the others that feed jones are as guilty as he is. They give him air.
They are as repulsive as jones is.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:18 PM
Originally Posted by bonefish
What would you call jan 6th?


A riot at most. It was a bunch of deranged losers taking pictures and stealing things from offices. Insurrectionists don't take and pose for pictures, they kill, murder and mame government officials.

An insurrection example is the civil war. If you can't figure out the disparity, I don't know what to tell you.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:34 PM
The objective of a riot isn't to stop a presidential election from being certified.

What is the real meaning of insurrection?

insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt.

Words have meaning.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:46 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
The objective of a riot isn't to stop a presidential election from being certified.

What is the real meaning of insurrection?

insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt.

Words have meaning.

They sure do.

"an organized and usually violent act of revolt"

a cop, some guy suffering a heart attack, a rioter trampled. Zero public officials murdered or harmed.


Such a violent insurrection. That's partisan nonsense.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:49 PM
Well, just googled it and came up with this:

in·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: insurrection; plural noun: insurrections
a violent uprising against an authority or government..

Then I pulled the thread on uprising:

an act of resistance or rebellion; a revolt.

Then I pulled the thread on resistance:

the refusal to accept or comply with something; the attempt to prevent something by action or argument.

Dug down to Merriam Webster:

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

Pulled the thread on revolt:

an attempt to put an end to the authority of a person or body by rebelling.

Pulled the thread on rebel (verb):

rise in opposition or armed resistance to an established government or ruler.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I think insurrection is proper, or at least attempted insurrection. It obviously failed.

You can talk to a difference of scales, but the nomenclature I think still fits. The Civil War was a straight up war for independence. Nobody is calling this a war. Were there people there taking selfies? Yeah, of course there were all kinds of bumbling idiots. There were also people there building nooses and walking around with zip ties, with chants to hang the VPOTUS.

By comparison, check out the Wilmington Insurrection of 1898, which actually succeeded. Nobody I know of has ever argued against that nomenclature. 2,000 angry white men...where have I seen that before...?
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:52 PM
More than 140 police officers were injured. I understand you don't think that's violence. And there certainly were far right wing groups that did make plans to do this. The rest were instigated by speakers at a rally and sent there in an attempt to overturn our election. Can you attempt to make any point without using the word partisan? I think the very word partisan clouds your views because that's your go to idea to dismiss any facts counter to your own thoughts.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:54 PM
Looked it up, even this grainy photo from 1800's shows this was a fully armed insurrection, you're proving my point.

[img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/Wilmington_vigilantes_B.jp[/img]

Can't upload to the site, sorry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilmington_insurrection_of_1898#/media/File:Wilmington_vigilantes_B.jpg
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 02:56 PM
So now you're stuck on "fully armed" which is no part of the actual definition. Even the definition of the word means nothing to you.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 03:03 PM
You do not need to tell me a thing.

Your answer tells me.

You do know that militia groups were involved right? You do know their goals were not taking pictures.

You can look up the number of injuries that occured.

You do understand what was behind Jan 6th and what the goal of trump was right?

I don't need a dictionary. I have eyes, ears, and the ability to understand what took place.
Posted By: BpG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 03:05 PM
According to you I'm "stuck on" it and the "Definition of the word" means nothing to me.

According to me I'm using my eyes to see that the gun loving,2A, far right extremists apparently showed up, planned an insurrection in advance but didn't show up in full force with guns. But using the definition of the word "Violent" could be a officers being injured. The historical context of insurrection apparently means nothing when it doesn't fit your narrative.


People die, government officials are murdered, countries go to war during insurrections. It is just partisan nonsense to call ideologues getting riled up and pushing their way into the capitol an insurrection. You can convince yourself otherwise however you want I'm done with your nonsense.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 03:07 PM
They keep being convicted of assaulting police officers by juries in courts of law and you keep living in denial. Carry on.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 03:07 PM
You're moving the goal posts, my friend, and trying to use a picture vs the narrative. At the very least, it's sure a hell of a lot more comparable to Jan 6th than the Civil War.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 04:05 PM
Intent to overthrow the government and stop the transfer of power was the objective of many in that crowd.

Not all but it certainly was for Stewart Rhodes and the militia groups.

Their planning and execution are on trial.

Follow the judges and read their assessments.

It is all about context. It is not measured in deaths (although people died). It is about intent.

In days gone by all over the world. Those people would have been rounded up and lined up against a wall.

What do you Putin or Kim Jong Un would have done?

You would never hear of those involved again.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 08:28 PM
Originally Posted by BpG
According to you I'm "stuck on" it and the "Definition of the word" means nothing to me.

According to me I'm using my eyes to see that the gun loving,2A, far right extremists apparently showed up, planned an insurrection in advance but didn't show up in full force with guns. But using the definition of the word "Violent" could be a officers being injured. The historical context of insurrection apparently means nothing when it doesn't fit your narrative.


People die, government officials are murdered, countries go to war during insurrections. It is just partisan nonsense to call ideologues getting riled up and pushing their way into the capitol an insurrection. You can convince yourself otherwise however you want I'm done with your nonsense.


JUST STOP. Stop trying to justify or downplay what those traitorous asshats did. It was an insurrection and an attempted coup, period. I don't give a damn what you think it was, it was an insurrection. And I don't need right-wing media talking points downplaying it to feel good about it. It was an attack on the Capitol specifically to stop a government function. And unlike anything seen during any of our lifetimes. It is, was, and will continue to be a very serious problem. If Dems had done this, all those downplaying it would be demanding justice at any cost.

Personally, I think they should all be lined up and shot, every one of them that acted violently. That would excuse the looky-loos and those who had no violent or destructive intent, who only entered and walked around watching. They should all pay dearly, from the people who smeared feces on the walls down to the handcuffs guy and those that beat others, broke crap, or did anything remotely violent. They are not Americans, they are traitors. And we need to make strong examples out of them to prevent this from happening again, anytime soon.
Posted By: archbolddawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 08:42 PM
Did you feel that way about the riots last summer?
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 08:53 PM
Nope. Not the same at all. Thanks for playing but I know what I believe without your input or silly questions. Cops killing black Americans disproportionately is the reason they marched. Much of the violence and destruction was caused by hate-filled right wing groups trying their damnedest to start a race war. Next.
Posted By: archbolddawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 09:13 PM
Incorrect.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 09:17 PM
I already knew you were, but thanks for confirming.
Posted By: archbolddawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 09:25 PM
You seem like a violent person what with all your "shoot them, hang them, I hope they rot in hell" rhetoric. It does appear, you are full of hatred for those that don't agree with you.

As to the topic, if people want to march in protest, I'm good with that. But when they start burning stuff, and looting stuff? Nah, not good with that.

I've called out the people that stormed the capital. They are getting what they deserve right now. You've done nothing but ask for their heads on a platter, while at the same time, exactly as you just did, you 'excuse' the violence and destruction of the rioters, and NOW even go so far as to blame others for it.

A joke is a joke, and you, person, appear to be one.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:09 PM
Those riots and Jan 6th are not the same.

Other than criminal activity took place. There is no excuse for violence, trespassing, the destruction of property, and looting which is theft.

Anyone who does those things deserve prosecution and due process.

Jan 6th was not a riot. It was not a protest gone bad. It was a planned insurrection with the intent to do harm and stop a valid election.

The intent of the militia groups and organizers was to stop Biden from taking office. And to seek out and harm targets.

It is mistake to try and draw a parallel.
Posted By: archbolddawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:17 PM
At some level, I agree. At another level, destruction of personal property, lighting fires, looting - is damn close. Think what you will
Posted By: FrankZ Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:19 PM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Nope. Not the same at all. Thanks for playing but I know what I believe without your input or silly questions. Cops killing black Americans disproportionately is the reason they marched. Much of the violence and destruction was caused by hate-filled right wing groups trying their damnedest to start a race war. Next.

Was the CHOP/CHAZ insurrection?
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:30 PM
There is no connection. They are not alike at all.

If a protest starts and criminals seize an opportunity to commit arson, destroy property, and steal.

It is not the same as when people are intending to disrupt and stop a valid election. As well targeting specific individuals like Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence with harmful intentions. Those people could not accept trump lost and their plan was to stop Biden from taking office.

How is that the same as some punk criminals starting fires, breaking windows and looting stores?
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:45 PM
Is that from Iron Chef?
Posted By: FrankZ Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 10:58 PM
Originally Posted by dawglover05
Is that from Iron Chef?

I do like your sense of humor...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Hill_Occupied_Protest
Posted By: archbolddawg Re: alex jones - 09/29/22 11:51 PM
Depends, right? I'm already on record as saying those that stormed the capital need punishment.

Now, in riots and looting, what if it was YOUR business, or YOUR home. Oh, yeah, dem's have already said "they got insurance"

Sorry, if a person on here wants to hang those for Jan. 6th, he might be man enough to say "hang those for the riots and personal property losses" He's not man enough to say that though.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 12:25 AM
I made no bones about criminals. Crystal clear.

Trying to stop the election and and targeting people you oppose or Pence. Not the same.

There were people who got caught up in mob mentality. They will what the law spells out. The militia groups throw them in prison for full sentence and when they get out. Exile them. Revoke their citizenship. For those who which to overthrow the constitution. Leave.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 01:29 AM
Originally Posted by archbolddawg
Depends, right? I'm already on record as saying those that stormed the capital need punishment.

Now, in riots and looting, what if it was YOUR business, or YOUR home. Oh, yeah, dem's have already said "they got insurance"

Sorry, if a person on here wants to hang those for Jan. 6th, he might be man enough to say "hang those for the riots and personal property losses" He's not man enough to say that though.

If we could find those right-wingers that started the violence and rioting, I'd buy the rope. But some aren't man enough to acknowledge that it was the right-wing instigators who started MOST of those problems.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20200610/110775/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf Educate yourself.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 12:05 PM
Originally Posted by archbolddawg
Depends, right? I'm already on record as saying those that stormed the capital need punishment.

Now, in riots and looting, what if it was YOUR business, or YOUR home. Oh, yeah, dem's have already said "they got insurance"

Sorry, if a person on here wants to hang those for Jan. 6th, he might be man enough to say "hang those for the riots and personal property losses" He's not man enough to say that though.

This isn't hard.

Prosecute people according to the law. Rioters and looters need to face the law for their crimes. But those crimes don't carry a penalty that includes hanging. Treason is a different matter.

""Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.""

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim

Do I think anyone and everyone who was at the Capital Building on Jan 6th is deserving of being prosecuted for Treason? NO. There's a whole lot of stupid folks got swept up in lies and emotion that were following a crowd. There are however - undoubtedly - a sub set who had a specific goal of stopping the legal transfer of power. Who attacked police officers and who would have done worse to some of our political leaders. And then there are those the orchestrated and stroked the flames and got that crowd to be there, armed, and ready to fight. . . . and yes, those folks committed treason.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 03:13 PM
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by dawglover05
Is that from Iron Chef?

I do like your sense of humor...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Hill_Occupied_Protest

Same, my friend. If we lived closer, I'd offer to grab a beer.

To answer your question, even though it wasn't asked to me, I did know about that incident, but didn't know about the acronym(s). I have to get my head wrapped around all the facts, but it doesn't appear it was an insurrection. It does appear to be a bunch of idiots who should spend a long time in jail, combined with people who were lawfully protesting. It also doesn't help that some of them were shot at and run over by cars during the actual protest phase. I doesn't appear that they went in there with the intent to take over or remove the police department branch office. It appears the police moved out due to good will. Let me know if I'm off.

What in your mind would make it an insurrection, by definition?
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 03:55 PM
Pretty clear right?

The militia groups planned an attack. They executed it. People were killed and many injured. Others escaped because of security measures. What would have happend if they were captured?

These goons in body armor with weapons using formations. Training for assault. What is that if not treason?

Stewart Rhodes is the leader of Oath Keepers.

The Oath Keepers are an anti-government, right-wing political organization committed to supporting and defending their interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.

"Their interpretation." Their views on law and order.

They have rules on what they will not obey. They feel they can create their own laws.

Expel them from the United States. We have a Constitution. They want their own.
Posted By: PerfectSpiral Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 04:32 PM
Originally Posted by archbolddawg
At some level, I agree. At another level, destruction of personal property, lighting fires, looting - is damn close. Think what you will

You’re right. Planned armed insurrection and white hate groups going around lighting fires and destructing personal property - is damn close.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 09/30/22 05:34 PM
Somehow he can't seem to differentiate that seditious conspiracy is a much more serious crime by definition and the parameters of the punishment than looting.

Both are criminal offenses and should be dealt with accordingly. Also what he seems to avoid discussing is the riots broke out at night and usually after the peaceful protests were over and that over 95% of the protests across the country remained peaceful. But concentrating on the almost 5% that didn't is much more beneficial to their cause.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/05/22 01:07 PM
Listening to the testimony at the jones trial.

The parent of a six year old murdered at school. Tells what has happened to her because jones.

My blood boils. I do not considered myself a hateful person. Until trump and this scum appeared on the scene.

These are truly evil people. People who do things with the intention of causing pain to others.

The world produces people like this. It can not be avoided. However, these people need to be caught and held accountable for their actions.

jones can only be forced to pay when in fact he deserves equal punishment to what he has done to others.

I can only hope that somehow karma catches this bag of pus and he faces justice.
Posted By: PerfectSpiral Re: alex jones - 10/05/22 02:15 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Somehow he can't seem to differentiate that seditious conspiracy is a much more serious crime by definition and the parameters of the punishment than looting.

Both are criminal offenses and should be dealt with accordingly. Also what he seems to avoid discussing is the riots broke out at night and usually after the peaceful protests were over and that over 95% of the protests across the country remained peaceful. But concentrating on the almost 5% that didn't is much more beneficial to their cause.

I believe he is just purposely evil to attract attention. I never take anything from him seriously. Kinda like that devil on your right shoulder giving horrid advice.

And looky here…

At least 11 anti-fascists face counts based on conspiracy to commit a riot; they’re also charged with assaults and using tear gas

BY ALEX RIGGINS
DEC. 6, 2021 8:57 PM PT
SAN DIEGO — Prosecutors on Monday charged at least seven people, described as self-identified anti-fascists, in connection with eight alleged assaults that occurred in January during a Pacific Beach “Patriot March” organized by supporters of then-President Donald Trump.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...at-violently-countered-p-b-patriot-march
Posted By: PerfectSpiral Re: alex jones - 10/05/22 02:31 PM
When Alex Jones dies there is no doubt his followers will blame the victims of Sandy Hook. Sad.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/12/22 08:08 PM
One billion to the plaintiffs.

I hope it ruins his life. That he can't afford toilet paper.

One of the most disgusting repulsive creatures on the planet.
Posted By: SuperBrown Re: alex jones - 10/12/22 09:47 PM
InfoWars.com
Posted By: SuperBrown Re: alex jones - 10/12/22 10:26 PM
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 10/12/22 10:34 PM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown

Nope - they just want you to pay for lying, continuing to lie, double downing again while trying to cheat the system.

It's too bad - this should ruin his life - but no doubt somewhere, somehow there is probably a Trumpian, sleazy way for him to hide and conceal his money. If does that and it's illegal I hope he is found out and sent to jail in addition to losing whatever money is due.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 01:26 AM
Bankruptcy.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 10:56 AM
The pain and suffering he caused to innocent families can not go unpunished.

I am glad they are taking his money. I hope an example is made of him and his type of scum.

It is a shame that he can find those weak minds to support him. Selling garbage products to people like sb.

Maybe now some of his followers will sprout brain cells after their ring leader is broken.

I doubt it though. They will most likely go looking for bigfoot.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 12:35 PM
Well sadly we have seen one of his flock already try to promote the idea he is being censored and cancelled and somehow this is about freedom. I wouldn't hold out much hope that any of his followers will suddenly see the light - despite this being about Alex lying for years... I've seen comments by people who promoted his lies, and I have no doubt they will continue to support him much like the Trump patsies do.
Posted By: Jester Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 12:43 PM
Alex Jones Gloats After Jury Slaps Him With $1 BILLION Bill for His Sandy Hook Garbage
2.4k
Josh Fiallo
Wed, October 12, 2022, 3:51 PM·6 min read

A jury decided Wednesday afternoon that Infowars founder Alex Jones must pay $965 million for spewing lies that the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting was a hoax and that the grieving parents involved were paid actors.

The money will go straight to the pockets of family members who lost children in the massacre, and to an FBI agent who was harassed by Jones’ listeners. There were 15 plaintiffs in total.

But in a livestream that aired as the jury’s verdict was read out, Jones showed no remorse, instead mocking jurors and the Sandy Hook parents who wept as the damages were read out.

“Fifty-seven million, $20 million, $50 million, $80 million, $100 million, blah, blah,” Jones said, according to NBC News reporter Brandy Zadrozny. “You get a million, you get $100 million, you get a $50 million... Do these people actually think they’re getting any of this money?”


Jones refused to hand over financial data from his businesses before or during the trial, and simultaneously filed for bankruptcy protection from creditors earlier this year for Infowars and its parent company, Free Speech Systems. Around the same time, he reportedly transferred some property ownership to his wife. In his Texas trial, he said any damages above $2 million would tank InfoWars—but a forensic economist put his company’s worth at between $135 and $270 million.

Despite appearing to be on the brink of bankruptcy, Jones indicated Wednesday that he doesn’t plan to stop spreading insane conspiracies about mass shootings.

“They want to scare us away from questioning Uvalde or Parkland,” he said. “We’re not going away. We’re not going to stop.”

Jones’ chaotic trial played out in Waterbury, Connecticut, 20 miles southwest of where 26 people were killed just over a decade ago. Jury deliberations began on Oct. 6. Only compensatory damages owed by Jones were determined on Wednesday, and jurors will decide at a later date whether Jones must also pay punitive damages.

Of the 15 plaintiffs, Robbie Parker, whose 6-year-old daughter was killed at Sandy Hook, received the highest individual payout on Wednesday of $120 million. FBI agent William Aldenberg received the second-highest payout at $90 million.


Nicole and Ian Hockley, who received $73.6 million and $81.6 million respectively, were awarded the highest combined payout stemming from a single victim. Their 6-year-old son, Dylan, was shot to death in the arms of Anne Marie Murphy, an aide at his school who assisted his special needs. Murphy was also killed.

During the trial, Jones struggled to keep his cool while on the witness stand, even blurting out at one point that he was done saying sorry.

“Is this a struggle session? Are we in China?” Jones fumed to Christopher Mattei, an attorney for the plaintiffs, during questioning. “I’ve already said I’m sorry hundreds of times, and I’m done saying I’m sorry.”

Jurors weren’t tasked with determining a judgment in the defamation case, as Judge Barbara Bellis already ruled against the conspiracy theorist when he refused to produce crucial evidence, but were tasked with determining just how much Jones will owe his victims in damages. Jones is now on the hook for a combined amount of just over $1 billion after a separate jury in Texas decided in August that he must pay nearly $50 million in damages to the parents of one of the children killed in the shooting.

Alex Jones Halts Testimony to Cool Off After Disastrous Court Day

The family members who sued Jones in Connecticut said they were tormented by strangers who were inspired by his Infowars webcasts. They argued their harassers were convinced—solely by Jones—that one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history was a massive con ordered by Democrats to build support for gun restrictions.

This harassment added insult to injury for grieving families, they argued, many of whom had just lost their child to senseless gunfire as they sat in their first-grade classroom.

Among those who testified against Jones was Mark Barden, whose son Daniel was murdered in the shooting. He said that wackos began flooding his personal website with hateful comments after Jones called the shooting a hoax, calling him a “liar and a fraud,” the Washington Post reported.

Harassers soon turned up their hate to another level, Barden said, threatening to dig up his son’s grave, which the harassers also claimed to have defiled.

“To hear that people were desecrating it and urinating on it and threatening to dig it up,” Barden said of his son’s grave. “I don’t know how to articulate to you what that feels like. But that’s where we are.”

Barden was awarded $57.6 million by the jury on Wednesday.

Other plaintiffs said they were forced to move multiple times to escape the hate set off by Jones’ lies, which he regularly repeated on his daily shows.

Mattei said Jones created a “lie machine” for profit at the expense of grieving parents.

“He knew his army was coming after them,” he said Thursday. “Every single one of these families was drowning in grief and Alex Jones put his foot right on top of them.”

Under Connecticut law, jurors in a damages trial are tasked to hear evidence about the scale of harm—in this case, the “pain and suffering” inflicted by Jones—and reach a consensus on what fair compensation would be for the victims.

Mattei, in his closing arguments Thursday, focused on the profits Jones’ raked in while spreading lies. As his viewership spiked, so did his sale of products like nutritional supplements and survivalist gear, Mattei said.

Jones and his lawyers countered that he shouldn’t be held responsible for what his supporters do, and have since vowed to keep fighting against ever paying the plaintiffs.

Mattei said Wednesday he anticipated this, and that he plans to pursue full payouts for each victim, no matter how long it takes.

“We are going to enforce this verdict as long as it takes because that is what justice requires,” he said, according to The New York Times.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/jury-orders-alex-jones-pay-195156327.html
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 01:04 PM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Bankruptcy.

I thought the same. But, if it's willful and malicious, it sticks through the bankruptcy filing.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 01:16 PM
There will always be sheep looking for someone to lead them by the nose.

And there always will be wolves ready to feed on them. trump and jones are one in the same. They seek out the weak of mind and feed them garbage to swallow. sb is a perfect example.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 01:26 PM
I know that the other thread talked about comparisons to how Hitler was able to subdue a weakened democracy. In parallel to that thought, I had the chance to go to Dachau a few weeks ago when I was in Munich for Oktoberfest, and the recurring theme for how something so horrific happened was that the blind anger and resentment of a population was stoked so deliberately that they were either willing to go along, or turn a blind eye to truly horrible and false notions and allegations.

As with the other thread, it's not a direct comparison of course, but it shows a similar recipe in manipulating people based on the same underlying premises. Imagine actually believing that a school shooting involving child victims was part of a hoax. I mean, really let that sink in.

It absolutely blows my mind. And I think it's something that a lot of people - including a lot of people on this board - need to step back and really consider as part of the big picture for where people like Alex Jones align themselves and who and what they promote.

Decades from now, people will look back on stuff like this and wonder how people could have been so stupid, just as we're doing to past eras.
Posted By: PerfectSpiral Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 01:46 PM
Feeding the monsters in our society has grave consequences for all. It’s always been that way. The death of these monsters will set us free.
Posted By: MemphisBrownie Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 02:21 PM
j/c:

I don't care about Alex Jones or whether he was found guilty or not. However, the $965M judgement is f'ing laughable.
Posted By: Jester Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 02:34 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
j/c:

I don't care about Alex Jones or whether he was found guilty or not. However, the $965M judgement is f'ing laughable.

Please explain why you think that
Posted By: MemphisBrownie Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 02:41 PM
For a variety of reasons, but it can all be encapsulated with the fact it isn't realistic.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 03:00 PM
Based upon what? Is there an appropriate amount for what everyone of the victims families suffered at the hands of jones's lies?

What amount would that be? How would you know? You did not go through what they did.

Damage is based upon what was made off the lies as well as what happened to those families.

Thankfully the ruling is based upon all the facts including the money and how that money was made.

Your opinion is all yours. So be it. But the facts and law are not opinions.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 03:05 PM
j/c

There is a segment of our society that is very confused as to what free speech actually means. It doesn't mean you can just throw out any combination of word vomit you choose to. You can not use speech to incite imminent lawless actions. You can not use it to commit slander on someone. You can not use speech to defame someone or to commit libel. And now often times we see people trying to excuse illegal behavior under the guise of free speech. It's quite sad really.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 03:34 PM
It is sad and often justice is not a given.

jones and those like him that deal in that arena of lies need to be brought to justice. Then maybe just maybe there will be consideration to what penalty may have to be paid.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 04:14 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
j/c:

I don't care about Alex Jones or whether he was found guilty or not. However, the $965M judgement is f'ing laughable.

I actually agree with you. I am just curious however. The words Jones said caused these parents to be threatened, told their children never were victims of a school shooting, that they and their children were simply actors in an attempt to pass gun laws by the government and underwent a lot of abuse at his hands. Just how much do you think that's worth?
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 04:21 PM
Here is a prime example of someone who either doesn't have a clue what the limits of free speech are or is trying to confuse people. Neither is a good thing.....



But then again who didn't expect something like this from her?
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 04:53 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
j/c:

I don't care about Alex Jones or whether he was found guilty or not. However, the $965M judgement is f'ing laughable.

I actually agree with you. I am just curious however. The words Jones said caused these parents to be threatened, told their children never were victims of a school shooting, that they and their children were simply actors in an attempt to pass gun laws by the government and underwent a lot of abuse at his hands. Just how much do you think that's worth?

I **think** (I am no expert - so if I have aspects of this wring, feel free to educate me) -

The punitive damages are for a number of reasons:

- Lying - and doubling down on the lies. Continuing to lie even when beyond any doubt it was a lie. And he benefited financially through growing notoriety because of his Sandy Hook lies. I don't know what portion of his "empire" is built off the back of those specific lies? But a large $$$ amount for sure.

- His "apologies" were insincere and just like the response to the $965M damages verdict - I feel sure he's mocked the apology and used it to further profit from the original lies.

- At every step of the way he has attempted to move monies, hide and lie about his net worth, thwart the system, circumnavigate the system at every step ... much like Trump he is trying to subvert due process.

- We've seen parents talking about their children's grave's being desecrated and urinated on as a direct reaction to Alex Jones lies and spin.... individuals having to move homes/cities. I can't imagine losing a child. I can't imagine mass media telling the world it was a hoax. I can't imagine the resting place for that child being defiled like that.

- It's supposed to be Punitive. He fully deserves to be bankrupt. He won't be.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 05:31 PM
Yeah I always hesitate to react to the sum given for punitive damages in cases like this, because there are a multitude of factors that I just really don't know, or at least don't know yet.

Punitive damages in essence seek not only to punish, but also to deter behavior. In order to do that, the jury has to consider what amount would actually be appropriate to achieve that end goal (hence the whole McDonald's hot coffee case way back when).

They also consider the level of intent. Was it reckless behavior? Was it intentional and malicious? All that comes into play in the consideration.

With all that in mind, we've seen snippets here and there from the news, but I don't actually know what was actually put before the panel where this figure came out as the ultimate decision. For that reason, I am hesitant to criticize it, one way or the other, at least at this point.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 06:05 PM
I am guessing we may learn more - but you hit the nail on the head and framed into legalese ... Recklessness, and actions that were calculated, intentional and malicious with the net aim and result that he would profit: fame/brand, notoriety and financially. Sadly this court case will have not diminished those things.
Posted By: Jester Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 06:28 PM
Not to mention the hundreds of millions of dollars he and infowars got from his douchbagery.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 08:10 PM


Here is a breakdown of how much went to each plaintiff.

And why.
Posted By: SuperBrown Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 10:20 PM
Ugly Precedent Set by Jury in Alex Jones Trial by Awarding Former FBI Agent $90 Million for Getting His Feelings Hurt
By J.D. Rucker • Oct. 13, 2022

The billion dollar verdict dropped on Alex Jones yesterday sent shockwaves that will reverberate for years, possibly decades as a direct attack against freedom of speech as well as freedom of thought. Those who the jury deemed injured by Jones’ accusations of being “crisis actors” were all rewarded with unprecedented paydays. Among those set to get a huge payday is Bill Aldenberg, a former FBI agent who responded to the Sandy Hook mass murder.

Aldenberg also happens to have been lead investigator for John Durham in his alleged attempts to hold Russiagate perpetrators accountable.

According to Daily Wire:

William Aldenberg, who as an FBI agent responded to the December 14, 2012 shooting at a Connecticut elementary school and testified at the Connecticut trial to determine how much Jones must pay in damages, was one of the government witnesses in the trial. He told the jury he was hurt by Jones’ claims the shooting, in which 20 first-graders and six educators were killed, was a hoax perpetrated by “crisis actors.”

“No, no. No, sir,” an emotional Aldenberg testified when attorney Christopher Mattei, who represented families of the victims, asked if there were any actors at the school. “No. It’s awful, awful.”

For Aldenberg to receive compensation from Jones because he was “hurt by Jones’ claims” sets a horrible precedent against free speech. Cops across the country are called far worse than “crisis actor” by people every day. There is absolutely zero justification for awarding him that kind of money, or really any money at all. Aldenberg did not have his career affected. He did not lose money as a result of Jones’ accusations. He did not have to seek expensive psychological treatments or do things that harmed himself or others. He got his feelings hurt and that’s somehow worth a $90 million jackpot.

As I noted in my opening on yesterday’s episode of The JD Rucker Show, this show trial was not about what Alex Jones said but who he is and what he represents. By slapping him with this outrageous verdict and including a former law enforcement officer on the beneficiary list, we are being told that going against the mainstream narrative is anathema. We are being told that we will be punished for speaking out whether we’re right or not.

Get called names by an influencer, produce some tears on the witness stand, and get paid. That’s the play being run by people like Bill Aldenberg against Alex Jones. And an influenced jury in a corrupt show trial helped write the check.

https://thelibertydaily.com/ugly-pr...0-million-for-getting-his-feelings-hurt/
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 10/13/22 10:59 PM
Bro, he lied about kids getting shot, and inspired people to urinate on their graves. Give it up.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 01:54 AM
Oh I forgot about Fox being sued, I bet Murdock is paying attention. Looking forward to any positive changes he may make. Seeing Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham all broke and needing work would make my day.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 01:55 AM
rofl
Posted By: jaybird Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 02:05 AM
Originally Posted by dawglover05
Bro, he lied about kids getting shot, and inspired people to urinate on their graves. Give it up.


Absolutely... dude is a nut job... I'm interested to see if the families actually see any of that money...
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 02:25 AM
If they do, it may take a decade between appeals and bankruptcy. I wonder if his victims will get paid before his creditors in BK proceedings. Does anybody know how that would work?

I'm fairly certain when they are done he will have nothing for the rest of his life. At least in his name. Also, I think if the BK discharge is not allowed, he's on the hook for this for all future earnings/holdings as well. He'll need to play financial cat and mouse to afford McDonald's.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 02:27 AM
Originally Posted by SuperBrown
:
Get called names by an influencer, produce some tears on the witness stand, and get paid. That’s the play being run by people like Bill Aldenberg against Alex Jones. And an influenced jury in a corrupt show trial helped write the check.

Sure. rolleyes
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 02:31 AM
The truly sad part about that statement is that he 100% believes what he is saying. Could you imagine being that far gone?
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 10:40 AM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
If they do, it may take a decade between appeals and bankruptcy. I wonder if his victims will get paid before his creditors in BK proceedings. Does anybody know how that would work?

I'm fairly certain when they are done he will have nothing for the rest of his life. At least in his name. Also, I think if the BK discharge is not allowed, he's on the hook for this for all future earnings/holdings as well. He'll need to play financial cat and mouse to afford McDonald's.

Hard to answer as there are many options that can transpire. Each option leads to a different answer.

The big point is the verdict is largely symbolic. The $billion is far more than jones or Inforwars is worth. The jury could have awarded $50 billion and it wouldn't have mattered.

After that, rarely does the defendant end up with nothing and live out their life as a pauper. IRA's are protected, there are homestead exemptions, as well as several other ways to cushion the final exposure, such as already having things titled in someone else's name. If the transfers are recent, they may be open for litigation.

It will take years to sort through. My guess is the plaintiffs will eventually sell off the verdict award to some sort of hedge fund in order to get something and be done with the the legal aspect of the case.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 12:28 PM
SB is just like his goon guru. He promotes his garbage. That actually puts him on equal footing.

For someone to support and promote jones the light of truth is blinding. He lives in lies.

SB is a wannabe jones. When someone shows who they are; believe that. That is who and what SB is.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: alex jones - 10/14/22 12:57 PM
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
If they do, it may take a decade between appeals and bankruptcy. I wonder if his victims will get paid before his creditors in BK proceedings. Does anybody know how that would work?

I'm fairly certain when they are done he will have nothing for the rest of his life. At least in his name. Also, I think if the BK discharge is not allowed, he's on the hook for this for all future earnings/holdings as well. He'll need to play financial cat and mouse to afford McDonald's.

My guess is he'll go the OJ route with a series of trusts and whatnot set up rather elaborately.
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/15/22 11:40 AM
The families of Sandy Hook are coming at jones like he came at them.

Now they have the law behind them.

Posted By: Damanshot Re: alex jones - 10/15/22 01:12 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
j/c:

I don't care about Alex Jones or whether he was found guilty or not. However, the $965M judgement is f'ing laughable.

There is no such judgement that is laughable in this situation. Do I believe that he will have to pay all that money,,, Of course not. He doesn't have it.

DO I believe they will get most of his assets over time? Yes I do, but as long as there are idiots out there willing to donate to him for being the Ahole that he is, he'll not starve.

I'd just like to know, what causes another human being to treat the parents of a tragedy such as this with such total disregard? Why do it? why say it was fake? Is it just for the money?

Further, what causes followers of this Ass to bother/attack/harass the loved ones of those lost? Can't they do their own research to see that it actually happened? Are they so weak that they can't think.

For Jones to ever speak of Christian beliefs as he does, shows me he's more of a christian on his lips who has Hatred in his heart. Just like Boebert, Green, Trump and so many of these so called TV Preachers and politicians that think the way to get elected is to preach the word of god but act more like the Devil when it comes to helping people.


Words matter, but actions are more important
Posted By: bonefish Re: alex jones - 10/15/22 02:11 PM
Clear picture of a weak sick mind.

"a corrupt show trial."

To call the parents in trial about a tragedy where their children were murdered. "a corrupt show trial?"

A display of super brown's true character.

You are a repulsive creature super brown.
© DawgTalkers.net