|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023 |
On offense it looks like the starters are pretty well set.
TE - Njoku, Akins, Bryant RT - Conklin RG - Teller C - Pocic LG - Bitonio LT - Wills QB - Watson RB - Chubb WR - Cooper, DPJ, Moore, (Bell, Tillman)
The defense will have some rotational starters and we will play nickle, and dime packages.
DE - Myles DT - Tomlinson DT - Winfrey, Elliott, Hurst, Ika, Hill DE - Smith, Ogbo, Wright OLB - JOK, Kunaszyk MLB - Walker, Taki, Phillips CB - Ward, Newsome, Emerson S - Thornhill, Delpit, McLeod
Overall looking at 11 starters on both sides of the ball on paper we should compete.
Until we play it is hard to say. The NFL has lots of talent. Every year there are new stars. Some players decline, some are injured, some retire. Teams churn a third of their rosters.
Every team gets tested with injury and depth comes into play.
One thing for sure about the 2023 roster. I have seen way worse Cleveland Browns rosters.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510 |
I continue to be worried about the thinness of our LB corps. Our starters are average at best and their backups are worse lol. But, I understand why they aren’t and can’t be a priority
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,570 Likes: 815
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,570 Likes: 815 |
I continue to be worried about the thinness of our LB corps. Our starters are average at best and their backups are worse lol. But, I understand why they aren’t and can’t be a priority LB's are kind of like the Njoku's of the D. You'd like better, but it is what it is. They are good enough. LB just isn't a premier position any longer. They are tweeners....not big enough to play on the defensive front and not fast enough to play in the backfield.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83 |
Maybe Winfrey won't even make the team, I thought they brought , in fact, I think it's pretty sure they brought in Tomlinson to start, b/c of the money/contract. Trysten Hill, is competing with Elliott for the left dt , I'd figure But Tomlinson and Hurst might be DT side by side ... and the Hill/Elliott position will both be on the bench for that time, so, going left from Myles, I think, Myles Then, Tomlinson, then Hurst, ... starters
Ika, = Tomlinson or even Hursts backup. then, to the left of that, if they don't have small DE's in on a particular play, would be Hill, the left outside, inside Dt. ... and, Elliott competing to regain his spot he played last year, 2nd string behind Hill. then, after you have 3 groups, for the two interior positions of a 4 man front, you'd have the left DE, wait, going back,... to the right of Myles you had the 'takk McKinley' wild card spot, which doesn't exist if the players aren't on the roster and they weren't until they brought in Ogbo, who'll start there?
then, back to left end, DE, Alex Wright was there and... when they brought in Ogbo to be ahead of Wright on the left, and then they also brought in Smith, to compete with Ogbo, to both be ahead of Wright on the left DE, and then, at another time, WHEN, Wrights DE position exists on the field, whether it be on the left or the right Wrights position consists of Wright, and the two Isaiahs, Isaiah Thomas, and Isaiah McGuire competing for that role, or sometimes more than one of them on the field for that position at a certain particular time.
I don't think Denzell Ward should necessarily start, .. after 2022, Yep, I know how objectionable that sounds given him being a seventh overall pick. I'll double down, I don't think D. Ward, CB should necessarily start, b/c it looked clear, a. teams were picking on Ward in the final 6 games of 22, the ones' where Watson played. and b. in those times it looked clear that the Browns D, got off the field when Ward got off the field, which leads me to think that Denzell Ward does not necessarily have to start, have to be given, automatically, a start.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,570 Likes: 815
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,570 Likes: 815 |
Winfrey will make the team. If he is a day one starter is questionable.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,188 Likes: 209
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,188 Likes: 209 |
Revisiting team needs, I see the following. In my order of importance:
1, Swing Tackle. Wills is hurt a lot even if he doesn't miss a lot of games Conklin gets hurt a lot too. Is anybody comfortable with Hudson getting a lot of playing time?
2, Defensive tackle While we have made tremendous improvements over last season we could still use more improvement
3, Linebacker As stated, none of our guys are that good But in addition few are healthy - Fields and Kunaszyk
4, Rb depth Chubb is awesome, Ford is solid, I like Kelly But Ford and Kelly don't have much game day experience Running backs get injured
Other than that I don't see any real weaknesses with the roster.
Don't blame the clown for acting like a clown. Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023 |
Every team has question marks.
That is why you bring in competition.
The offense is in good shape. We have the starters and some depth.
The defense is where there has been big changes. Schwartz will bring a different scheme. We have brought in a lot of big bodies on the line. We have way better rotational depth.
I am less concerned about the linebackers than others. Of all the units they were the ones who were hung out to dry the most last year. The defensive front four as a unit were horrible. The linebackers paid the price. We have some experience at linebacker and I think the unit play will improve under Schwartz.
The big changes in the secondary is at safety. Thornhill and McLeod were handpicked to play under Schwartz. We have damn good corners.
The big thing to see is how they play together. We will not know till we see them play. IMO this will be a career year for Myles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83 |
I think the offense is not in good shape, and hasn't been since at least The Tim Couch years? ... seven and ten 2022 eight and nine 202I eleven and six 2020 six and ten 20I9
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344 |
I'm thinking players and the teams who have them such as Fred Warner with the 49er's, Darius Leonard with the Colts, Demario Davis with the Saints and Eric Kendricks with the Vikings would all disagree. Even long time veterans such as Bobby Wagner with the Rams and Lavonte David with the Bucs would take exception. Then there's always Micah Parsons with the Cowboys.
The teams that have elite LB'ers seem to feel very happy and feel fortunate to have them on their roster. Those who don't make up reasons why they're not important to have.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,809 Likes: 51
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,809 Likes: 51 |
I'm thinking players and the teams who have them such as Fred Warner with the 49er's, Darius Leonard with the Colts, Demario Davis with the Saints and Eric Kendricks with the Vikings would all disagree. Even long time veterans such as Bobby Wagner with the Rams and Lavonte David with the Bucs would take exception. Then there's always Micah Parsons with the Cowboys.
The teams that have elite LB'ers seem to feel very happy and feel fortunate to have them on their roster. Those who don't make up reasons why they're not important to have. Since the Browns have been back LB is position like WR and QB the Browns have really bad at drafting wise. Even in free agency I can't think of that 1 elite LB They have acquired Most playoff teams have that 1 really good LB That just makes plays over and over and over. Come think of it have the Browns ever drafted a LB And he got a 2nd contract with the Browns ? I think DQwell Jackson maybe it was him ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344 |
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,941 Likes: 69
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,941 Likes: 69 |
4, Rb depth Chubb is awesome, Ford is solid, I like Kelly But Ford and Kelly don't have much game day experience Running backs get injured . I was disappointed when D'Earnest Johnson wasn't retained. IMO he was very underestimated and was a near plug-in for Chubb. I much preferred him over Kareem Hunt....
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
1 member likes this:
lampdogg |
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023 |
The Browns are going to be an offense based upon throwing the ball.
Chubb's carries will not change much. We will be for the most part a one back offense. The touches Hunt got in the past will now be passes.
We will use more 3 and 4 WR's sets. We will thow to the TE's as well.
Chubb will get his usual carries.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83 |
Is that based on more than speculation? I don't know what the Browns plans are for the offense.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,861 Likes: 49
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,861 Likes: 49 |
Browns O.....Whatever Watson wants--got to play to his strengths....Chubb impacts games.....Watson MUST own the games.
"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,839 Likes: 274
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,839 Likes: 274 |
It still bothers me a bit that we let D’Ernest go
gmstrong ----------------- 2023: The year we got a legit D.
|
1 member likes this:
AZBrown |
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,506 Likes: 1023 |
I don't think it is speculation. The Browns pushed their chips to the center and are all in with DW.
They have traded for Moore. Drafted Tillman. Have Cooper and DPJ. Signed Akins.
DW is involved in play design to develop plays that should work for him. All of that was done to feature a quarterback who can throw all over the field.
We were a run based offense before because that was the strength of the team and there were limitations at quarterback.
So we are going to throw the ball more than we have before.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys This. We've been focusing on improving the defensive line and the defensive backfield. I think that the thinking is if those units are winning their respective battles then we can get by with serviceable LBs.
How does a league celebrating its 100th season only recognize the 53 most recent championships?
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,394 Likes: 1364
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,394 Likes: 1364 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys This. We've been focusing on improving the defensive line and the defensive backfield. I think that the thinking is if those units are winning their respective battles then we can get by with serviceable LBs. It's my opinion, but I think it is where the league is headed as well, is the LB is the least important unit on the defensive side of the ball. It's also the position group within the Browns D that has been allocated the least amount of resources. DE, DT, CB, S all have more resources allocated than LB since Berry has joined, but even before that, really. The LB unit is what the RB unit is to the offense.
Tackles are tackles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys This. We've been focusing on improving the defensive line and the defensive backfield. I think that the thinking is if those units are winning their respective battles then we can get by with serviceable LBs. It's my opinion, but I think it is where the league is headed as well, is the LB is the least important unit on the defensive side of the ball. It's also the position group within the Browns D that has been allocated the least amount of resources. DE, DE, CB, S all have more resources allocated than LB since Berry has joined, but even before that, really. The LB unit is what the RB unit is to the offense. There’s no doubt. What will be interesting is to see how teams who historically have strong LB units adjust. Teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore historically invest high picks in that unit
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,394 Likes: 1364
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,394 Likes: 1364 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys This. We've been focusing on improving the defensive line and the defensive backfield. I think that the thinking is if those units are winning their respective battles then we can get by with serviceable LBs. It's my opinion, but I think it is where the league is headed as well, is the LB is the least important unit on the defensive side of the ball. It's also the position group within the Browns D that has been allocated the least amount of resources. DE, DE, CB, S all have more resources allocated than LB since Berry has joined, but even before that, really. The LB unit is what the RB unit is to the offense. There’s no doubt. What will be interesting is to see how teams who historically have strong LB units adjust. Teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore historically invest high picks in that unit Base D may be a factor, like a 3-4,where you label edge rushers "LBs" but the prototype we've come to know over the years simply does not factor in as much as other defensive positions.
Tackles are tackles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,647 Likes: 510 |
Agreed … LBs is the one area of the D that you can have serviceable guys This. We've been focusing on improving the defensive line and the defensive backfield. I think that the thinking is if those units are winning their respective battles then we can get by with serviceable LBs. It's my opinion, but I think it is where the league is headed as well, is the LB is the least important unit on the defensive side of the ball. It's also the position group within the Browns D that has been allocated the least amount of resources. DE, DE, CB, S all have more resources allocated than LB since Berry has joined, but even before that, really. The LB unit is what the RB unit is to the offense. There’s no doubt. What will be interesting is to see how teams who historically have strong LB units adjust. Teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore historically invest high picks in that unit Base D may be a factor, like a 3-4,where you label edge rushers "LBs" but the prototype we've come to know over the years simply does not factor in as much as other defensive positions. it’s funny when you watch old games (from the 90s and 80s) and see how BIG and SLOW the LBs are. It was such a different game and approach.
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,787 Likes: 1344 |
Is that based on more than speculation? I don't know what the Browns plans are for the offense. Maybe it's more a matter of common sense than it is speculation. Why would you sign a QB to a 230 million dollar guaranteed contract if you didn't plan to throw the ball more?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The Starters
|
|