While I'm certainly in support of reporters being able to keep their sources private, CBS did not order her to turn over those records. A judge did. Shouldn't people be more concerned about the court ruling?
I mean "many people believing" seems to be a common theme these days. But believing it was CBS who is at fault here when in fact it was a court who ordered she turn over those records seems like a rather weak foundation to place your beliefs in.
Who says people aren't concerned about the court ruling?
Feels like you are kind of missing the point. The "news organization" she worked for should be just as adamant about journalistic integrity as she is. Her "employer" should be supporting her first amendment rights instead of rolling over for an overzealous government that is disregarding the Constitution.
At least that's the argument.
It's much harder to sue the system. Judges don't often make rulings that would effectively lessen their own authority. The system is rather incestuous that way.
Now if this case finds her rights we're violated by CBS, the ruling could be used as evidence in going after the "government"/court.
Sadly, the court seems aware of that logical conclusion and is misusing its power to avoid that outcome as seems a more and more regular occurrence.
Again, I'm not positive on the specifics, but that seems to be the broad strokes of the situation from her perspective.