|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
Week 2:
Teddy Bridgewater 14/18 153 yards (including 49 on an underhanded flip to the best RB since Barry Sanders), 1 TD, 0 INT
+4.0
Week 3:
Aaron Rodgers 24/35 333 yards, 5 TD, 0 INT
-0.7
/PFFfft Exactly, I'm done with them. Not that I ever went to their site, but if someone on this board said player X had a good game because PFF graded them a +4.0 I would have believed them. As of now, PFF is as credible as Brian Williams.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/Punchsmack/punch.gif) “...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I think they are useful for some things... they track snap counts and tendencies and stuff like that, but their evaluation metric is absurd.
*edit* And I think the acme of foolishness that I saw for them was last year, calling the Browns (who were 32nd in the league against the run) the best-tackling team in football. I mean... come on.
Last edited by clevesteve; 09/30/15 02:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,331 |
Because 2/5ths of the OLine is 90% of the problem? LOL.. I just envisioned you dropping the mic and walking off stage.   
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
Packers should dump Rodgers, can't even get a positive score with PFF?
OK, I'll give them any player on our team for Rodgers, except Joe T. They really need to dump their QB and move on to find a QB who could score positive numbers.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
*edit* And I think the acme of foolishness that I saw for them was last year, calling the Browns (who were 32nd in the league against the run) the best-tackling team in football. I mean... come on. I think it was the best tackling secondary. But you could be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085 |
Gimme ice skating scoring for reliability. This subjective stuff is ludicrous. Except we were really, really bad in spots. Seems brutal to assign a number to lousy.
Fix something this week. Too much jawbone.
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
*edit* And I think the acme of foolishness that I saw for them was last year, calling the Browns (who were 32nd in the league against the run) the best-tackling team in football. I mean... come on. I think it was the best tackling secondary. But you could be right. Team-by-Team Defenses Rank Team Snaps Missed Tackles Missed Tackles/Snap 1 Cleveland Browns 1188 102 0.086 2 San Francisco 49ers 1072 94 0.088 3 Chicago Bears 1065 97 0.091 4 Philadelphia Eagles 1207 111 0.092 5 Houston Texans 1150 110 0.096
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
*edit* And I think the acme of foolishness that I saw for them was last year, calling the Browns (who were 32nd in the league against the run) the best-tackling team in football. I mean... come on. I think it was the best tackling secondary. But you could be right. Team-by-Team Defenses Rank Team Snaps Missed Tackles Missed Tackles/Snap 1 Cleveland Browns 1188 102 0.086 2 San Francisco 49ers 1072 94 0.088 3 Chicago Bears 1065 97 0.091 4 Philadelphia Eagles 1207 111 0.092 5 Houston Texans 1150 110 0.096 "We can't tackle, but when we do, we really tackle."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
*edit* And I think the acme of foolishness that I saw for them was last year, calling the Browns (who were 32nd in the league against the run) the best-tackling team in football. I mean... come on. I think it was the best tackling secondary. But you could be right. Team-by-Team Defenses Rank Team Snaps Missed Tackles Missed Tackles/Snap 1 Cleveland Browns 1188 102 0.086 2 San Francisco 49ers 1072 94 0.088 3 Chicago Bears 1065 97 0.091 4 Philadelphia Eagles 1207 111 0.092 5 Houston Texans 1150 110 0.096 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595
All Pro
|
|
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 595 |
The point isn't whether it's subjective or not, it's whether it's consistent. If Rodger's game will always grade out to a slight negative +/- a reasonable margin of error then the methodology can be relied upon for comparative analysis.
Last in, first out, the sign of a true champion!![[Linked Image from i301.photobucket.com]](http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn59/Stetson1376/c8f5fed9-fc01-4b87-bda3-b2b53f0b16cb_zpse708e05e.jpg)
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2015 NFL Season Looking Back: Browns 20 Oakland
27 PFF Grades
|
|
