Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.
Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,387
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,387
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.
Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


What really is number #1 value? That's different for every team.


Congratulations to our 2016 NBA Champion CLEVELAND CAVALIERS!!! Greatest comeback in sports history... Hail to the King!

The great QB guru and the Moneyball group: 1-15
Record of Criminal Haslam owned Browns: 20-60 (0.250)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.


Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


That's not how it works.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.


Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


That's not how it works.
If you go BPA , that is exactly how it works


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.


Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


That's not how it works.
If you go BPA , that is exactly how it works


Right, but every team does not have the same board.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
So if the best available QB is the 7th best player, overall. Do we still take him?


It depends on Manziel. If he plays poorly, I say yes.


Well if that is the case then trade down. You gotta get #1 overall value from that pick, not #7 overall


That's not how it works.
If you go BPA , that is exactly how it works


Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.
Ok, how low would the best QB available have to be ranked that you would still take him #1 overall? Especially considering this is a deep QB draft and we would be picking first in the second round


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.
Ok, how low would the best QB available have to be ranked that you would still take him #1 overall? Especially considering this is a deep QB draft and we would be picking first in the second round
And NE lost their 1st rounder, so the first pick in the 2nd round is #32 in the draft...jus sayin.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,551
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,551
2016 NFL Draft order: Cleveland Browns hold on to No. 1 pick

By Dan Kadar

@MockingTheDraft on Nov 22, 2015, 11:56p +
Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

The Browns didn't even play this week, but they remain holders of the top selection in next year's draft.
Tweet Share (22)
Pin

Despite being on bye this week and the teams in the 2016 NFL Draft order around them losing, the Cleveland Browns maintained their hold on the No. 1 pick.

If the Browns finish with the top pick, it's likely they'd take a quarterback. Although Johnny Manziel has six more games to prove himself as the future with the Browns, a fresh start in Cleveland would likely involve a new starting quarterback. That's why it's so noteworthy that current Browns general manager Ray Farmer was in attendance at the Cal/Stanford game on Saturday night. The main attraction there was Golden Bears quarterback Jared Goff, who had an impressive showing in a loss.

You have to wonder what the Chargers will do next year. San Diego is currently slotted to pick second overall. Would 2016 be the year where they find the successor to Philip Rivers? Even though they lost this week, the Tennessee Titans drop down a spot.

The draft order is based on record, and then overall strength of schedule. If those are the same, conference record then division record are used. If all of that is equal, a coin flip takes place at the NFL Scouting Combine in February.

Here is the current 2016 NFL Draft order (will be updated after Monday's game):

1. Cleveland Browns: 2-8 (.500 strength of schedule)
2. San Diego Chargers: 2-8 (.513 SOS)
3. Tennessee Titans: 2-8 (.519 SOS)
4. Baltimore Ravens: 3-7 (.494 SOS)
5. Detroit Lions: 3-7 (.519 SOS)
6. San Francisco 49ers: 3-7 (.531 SOS)
7. Dallas Cowboys: 3-7 (.544 SOS)
8. Miami Dolphins: 4-6 (.481 SOS - 2-5 in conference)
9. Oakland Raiders: 4-6 (.481 SOS - 4-3 in conference)
10. Jacksonville Jaguars: 4-6 (.487 SOS)
11. St. Louis Rams: 4-6 (.506 SOS - 3-4 in conference)
12. Washington: 4-6 (.506 SOS - 4-3 in conference)
13. Chicago Bears: 4-6 (.513 SOS)
14. Philadelphia Eagles: 4-6 (.525 SOS)
15. New Orleans Saints: 4-6 (.531 SOS)
16. New York Jets: 5-5 (.474 SOS)
17. Seattle Seahawks: 5-5 (.488 SOS)
18. Kansas City Chiefs: 5-5 (.491 SOS)
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 5-5 (.500 SOS)
20. Houston Texans: 5-5 (.525 SOS)

Projected to make the playoffs:

21. New York Giants: 5-5 (.506 SOS)
22. Indianapolis Colts: 5-5 (.531 SOS)
23. Buffalo Bills: 5-4 (.513 SOS)
24. Pittsburgh Steelers: 6-4 (.497 SOS)
25. Atlanta Falcons: 6-4 (.500 SOS)
26. Green Bay Packers: 7-3 (.469 SOS)
27. Minnesota Vikings: 7-3 (.488 SOS)
28. Cincinnati Bengals: 8-2 (.447 SOS)
29. Arizona Cardinals: 8-2 (.450 SOS)
30. Denver Broncos: 8-2 (.478 SOS)
31. New England Patriots: 9-0 (.468 SOS) - PICK FORFEITED
32. Carolina Panthers: 10-0 (.463 SOS)
linky dinky

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Other than Baltimore and maybe San Francisco, I can't see us winning another game.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.
Ok, how low would the best QB available have to be ranked that you would still take him #1 overall? Especially considering this is a deep QB draft and we would be picking first in the second round


This is how I would determine it:

Is this QB at least a league average starter? If yes, draft him. If no, don't draft him.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.
Ok, how low would the best QB available have to be ranked that you would still take him #1 overall? Especially considering this is a deep QB draft and we would be picking first in the second round


This is how I would determine it:

Is this QB at least a league average starter? If yes, draft him. If no, don't draft him.
You would be ok with using the #1 overall pick on a guy who is a average starter?!

Sorry, I want our #1 overall pick to be a beast, at whatever position he plays.


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right, but every team does not have the same board.


Who said they did? I am referring, obviously, to our board. If a QB is our BPA, then we draft him. I just don't like the thought of taking the best of a certain position. That causes you to reach and take a player who is not worth that pick.


Things change when it comes to the quarterback position. Also, no one stays strictly with the best player available strategy. Everyone considers need when making picks.
Ok, how low would the best QB available have to be ranked that you would still take him #1 overall? Especially considering this is a deep QB draft and we would be picking first in the second round


This is how I would determine it:

Is this QB at least a league average starter? If yes, draft him. If no, don't draft him.
You would be ok with using the #1 overall pick on a guy who is a average starter?!

Sorry, I want our #1 overall pick to be a beast, at whatever position he plays.


I said at least an average starter at QB. Finding a guy like that puts a team in playoff contention. If he's better than average the team can be very good.

Bridgewater, Carr, Tannehill, Stafford, Cutler, etc. are all very average. Any NFL team, that needs a QB, would take a 22 year old version of those players first overall no questions asked.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Huh?? Most of those guys were found farther down


You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Huh?? Most of those guys were found farther down


Really? Is what I said that hard to understand?

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: kingodawg
Sorry, I want our #1 overall pick to be a beast, at whatever position he plays.


Yeah, like Ja'Daveon Clowney.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189

Ranking? Whose ranking?

At this point in time ranking is all speculation.

You will never see the GM's ranking. You will be able to see "analysts" ranking and "mocks".

"This is a deep QB draft"?

Meaning what? That there are plenty of quarterbacks in this draft?

A deep quarterback draft to me means that there are 3 or more who would be in the top half of the draft.

From what I have seen this year I don't see that.

Last year Winston and Mariota went one and two. I seriously doubt that the top two picks will be quarterbacks.

There is no quarterback in this draft that in my mind is as good as Mariota was last year.

Cook, Lynch and Goff are right now considered the best in this draft. Lynch and Goff may remain in school.

Ranking in general is very subjective especially when made by one person.

Taking a quarterback number one in the draft is complicated. If you have a Peyton, or Luck, and a need then the choice is easy. If not then more factors come into play.

How often do you get the chance at the first player in the draft? In our case who knows? Most times not often hopefully.

What is the Browns status? First it is my belief that quarterback is our first priority. Manziel is playing better. Is he the solution at quarterback? I don't trust Manziel as a franchise quarterback for numerous reasons even if he plays well in the last six games.

Who is the best player in the draft? Some say Joey Bosa. I do not know. Maybe yes maybe no.

As I look today at the top three quarterbacks I like Cook best. That could change between now and the draft.

If I were the man tasked to draft the first player in this draft for the Browns by the time the draft came I would be ready. I would also be prepared to take a quarterback number one even though I may rank some players higher. Quarterback takes priority just by position alone.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,556
Originally Posted By: GraffZ06
Originally Posted By: Day of the Dawg
3) Big WR - I know we get Josh Gordon back next year ...


This is not a forgone conclusion. We don't just "get him back". He has to apply for reinstatement to the league before he's eligible to become a Brown again, which they can deny. There's a very real possibility Josh Gordon will never step foot on an NFL field ever again.

Similar to how we went into last off-season not being able to count on ever having Manziel, we have to do the same this off-season with Gordon (not that it matters with these buffoons running the org - but still).


I don't see it as a real possibility assuming he stays clean. No way the NFL simply says he can't play anymore. Much depends on when he can apply. It's not like the NFL is simply going to stop the presses to hear his appeal. He might not be ready to go game 1. I can see that.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
assuming he stays clean.


That's a very large assumption.

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
San Diego won today, leaving only Tennessee with as bad a record as the Browns. They have had an easier schedule, so the Titans have to win again for Cleveland to land the 1st overall. (Or the Browns, as inept as they are, could actually win, and remove themselves from the chance.)


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189

After watching Saturdays games I am very encouraged.

Both Goff and Cook played very well.

Have not yet seen the Memphis game. Hopefully I can see it on the Draft Breakdown site. Not a big fan of the Memphis offense.

I believe that the quarterbacks in this draft if Goff and Lynch come out will be good.

Cook is closer to the NFL game because of the offense at Michigan State.

Both Goff and Lynch have good upside once they are acclimated to the NFL game. It will take patience.

The Browns can take the guy that they like the best and there wont be pressure to start him.

It has taken till today to really believe that these quarterbacks are actually good prospects.

But I do feel much better about getting one of these guys.

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
The opponent Memphis faced, SMU, was embarrassingly over matched. The halftime score was 56-0 and Lynch had something like 9 completions, 7 for TD. He was throwing to wide open receivers. Lynch didn't even play in the second half, the final was 63-0.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
It was reported (not officially announced) that Memphis's HC, Justin Fuente, will replace Beemer at SC. Earlier reports were that Lynch intends to stay in school, but if his HC is leaving, that probably increases the chance he comes out.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
The only way he stays now is if the offensive coordinator is named the new HC.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


I want Lynch to come out just so we have two choices at QB (him and Goff). That way if a team trades in front of us we still can get a guy that is pretty good.

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


I want Lynch to come out just so we have two choices at QB (him and Goff). That way if a team trades in front of us we still can get a guy that is pretty good.
With SD winning today, and assuming we don't blow it by winning another game, the only other team with 2 wins is Tennessee.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: W84NxtYrAgain
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


I want Lynch to come out just so we have two choices at QB (him and Goff). That way if a team trades in front of us we still can get a guy that is pretty good.
With SD winning today, and assuming we don't blow it by winning another game, the only other team with 2 wins is Tennessee.


Don't worry, we'll find a way to screw this up.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
B
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,234
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


Are all of his receivers ridiculously below average height? wink

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I hope lynch comes out. I think that so far he is the QB I like the best. He definitely leads his receivers with the ball the best.


I want Lynch to come out just so we have two choices at QB (him and Goff). That way if a team trades in front of us we still can get a guy that is pretty good.


I want zero part of Goff.

Lynch or nothing.


LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Originally Posted By: Rishuz
I want zero part of Goff.

Lynch or nothing.
I was initially unimpressed by Goff. The first I saw was the game vs. Utah in which he was picked off 5 times. I think I saw another game that didn't change my mind. However, in his last 3 games he has looked much better. Much more knowledgeable people have pointed out his release, accuracy, pocket presence, and mobility all project well to the NFL. With what I've seen recently, I am inclined to agree. That said, I am still more fascinated with Lynch.

We have, in this discussion, gotten away from talking about QBs other than Lynch, Goff and Cook. I still have not seen Wentz play (will have to look at draft breakdown) and I think that, given time to develop, Jones has an NFL future. Should the Browns go another direction in the first round, those are guys we might be able to target later.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189

Last year I watched Goff and saw some good things. This year he was up and down and I kind of soured on him a little.

After Saturdays game he gave me hope. He is still a young guy and I believe he will fill out and gain some strength.

I have learned over time that you have to forecast some players more than others. How will he look in two or three years. Mariota is a good example. Loved what I saw in college but I could see that in time he will be a great player.

Goff has a lot of natural ability. He will need time in the NFL to mature and grow both physically and mentally. There is a good chance he will develop into a very good player.

Cook has been good in every game I have seen him this year. He makes NFL plays now.

What is hard to get a handle on is what these prospects are like as people. Their leadership qualities, work habit, and ability to absorb information.

Lynch is an interesting prospect but he has the most to learn.

Without getting to know the guy or getting verifiable first hand information it is difficult to assess these prospects mental capabilities.

Over time in leading up to the draft more and more information comes out about these guys. Maybe by April I will know more.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 114
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 114
None of these QBs are for sure 1st round talents, I want Bosa in the first and transition the defense to a 4-3 and play him all over the line like Houston does with Watt.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Bosa is a bonehead, at one point I thought he would be JJ Watt, but I dunno now. People seem to forget he was suspended for smoking pot. He LOVES LOVES EDM and goes to festivals frequently.

He is the perfect example of a million dollar body and a ten cent head.The penalties in the State game are absolutely inexcusable. Taking him and passing on Goff could likely lead us to "Braylon over Rodgers" territory.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Rumors are that Cook is not a good leader/teammate (that info comes straight from some MSU players that I personally know) ... FWIW


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Thanks. That has been the suspicion about a Senior Qb not being named a captain. Good to get some "concrete" evidence, even if it is in the opposite direction of what we would prefer to hear.

I, and I think most of us, would love some examples if you are able to dig any up.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Just my 2 cents on a few items above:

Bosa has a great motor and skills. I think he'll end up being a super pro. But I'm not sure he's a 3-4 DE or 3-4 OLB. As such, I'm torn on taking him if we had the first pick.

Early in the season, I was up for Goff as a potential early pick, but watching him against good teams was enough for me to drop him from my list as a top 5 choice.

Cook I like more and more as I watch him play more. But, I'm not sure I'd take him #1 or #2 overall.

I haven't seen Lynch play to say anything either way, but from what I've read, there are mixed reviews from teams.

One guy I really like as a mid rounder is Kevin Hogan from Stanford. A friend of mine is their Equipment Manager so I watch a lot of Stanford. He has issues with accuracy on occasion, and a throwing motion that needs adjusted, but the kid plays hard on every play, is smart, can make all of the throws, and a leader.

Not sure what I'd do yet with the first or second overall pick yet...trade down is where I'd go today.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,189

Interesting.

What exactly did they say?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: dawgpound19
None of these QBs are for sure 1st round talents, I want Bosa in the first and transition the defense to a 4-3 and play him all over the line like Houston does with Watt.


If you don't have a QB, then you need a QB.

Also, Watt plays is a 3-4.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum The #1 draft pick

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5