|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
If Manziel looks good in Seattle I'm giving him another year. Not too many QBs can accomplish that task.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
If Manziel looks good in Seattle I'm giving him another year. Not too many QBs can accomplish that task. One game sample! One game! Novemver 28th, 2010 - Matt Cassel, 22/32, 233 yards, 4 TDs. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201011280sea.htmNovember 27th, 2011 - Rex Grossman, 26/35, 314 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201111270sea.htmNovember 3rd, 2013 - Mike Glennon, 17/23, 168 yards, 2 TDs. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201311030sea.htmNovember 22nd, 2015 - Blaine Gabbert, 22/34, 264 yards, 1 TD http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201511220sea.htmIt will be very exciting if Manziel plays well. It will also mean almost nothing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802 |
CFRS15, you keep saying that no matter what Johnny does over the remainder of the season, it is too small a sample size and you point to bad QBs who have strung together a few good games. But this would not be Johnny having four good games somewhere in the middle of a pedestrian career, this would be him stepping up exactly when he needed to show something. Given all of the variables on this team, and putting aside last year, he hasn't had a terrible start yet. He has gotten better with each start. And if, and it is a big if, he finishes strong, it will be much more than a random streak of good performances.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,544 |
last year is part of his body of work. just can't throw it out....
being a browns fan is like taking your dog to vet every week to be put down...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
Sometimes I really don't get what your point is.
You keep saying it's too small of a sample size with Manziel, but then what to draft QBs who could very well bust show exactly the same as Manziel.
At what point are we finally gonna stick to a QB and find out whether he's a franchise or not?
If we stick with Manziel, we can get some weapons with our 1st round pick.
If we don't, we get a QB, but end up in the same situation as our QB doesn't have any weapons, and then, just like every season, we'll be talking about drafting another QB, because for some reason he didn't work out.
Bortles is playing better because he has weapons.
Tannehil gets better and better because he actually get game experience, and they get him weapons Carr is playing better because *gasp* they got him weapons.
Teddy is playing better because he has weapons. Hell, they calling him a game manager. Ok, he's managing that team to a wild card birth.
Cam newton is playing better because he has weapons, and game experience.
Andy freaking dalton is playing good football because he has weapons.
Maybe we should stick to our first round QB for a change, get him some weapons, and then evaluate whether he's good enough or not.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum More on Manziel
|
|