Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
cfrs15 #1068210 01/19/16 12:29 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Well if Hue truly thinks there is the QB of the future in the draft, he likes big armed QB's that are mobile


Like Dalton? Or Palmer?

I don't think we know what Bootyskin likes. We just have to hope he likes good QBs.


He wasn't the one that picked those guys.

He just developed them.


He traded for Palmer with the Raiders.

Also, if he hasn't picked anyone, how do we know what type of QB he likes?


His offense. He likes to take off the top in the passing game to open the run and his love of trick plays needs a QB with mobility. It's one reason why he was a Kaepernick fan. He was thinking about the QB sweep and the double reverse flea flicker and the QB throwback. Pryor is going to love him.


I don't see it. That is just because he has Andy Dalton.

It's almost like he built the offense around his QBs skillset.


Andy Dalton does not have a big arm. Dalton is mobile but on the small side so they don't want him taking a lot of hits. He isn't the best fit so Hue adapted. If he gets that big armed mobile QB, then he'll open it up even more.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188

"Okay........you are acting like one of the turds on this board. Show me where I have said that the Browns "are set at quarterback."
=====================================================

Gee you are going to damage my self image.

You keep saying don't draft any of these quarterbacks. You want to address higher needs.

So what is your plan at quarterback?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
If 5 years down the road, it turns out that there was a hall of fame quarterback in this draft and we passed on him in the #2 spot, would anyone say in 5 years it was the right move to pass on him?

cfrs15 #1068230 01/19/16 01:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Going off my gut, I would say that Goff/Wentz/Lynch would rank somewhere around the Bortles/Bridgewater/Carr group.


So Cook must be in that Andrew Luck Group... grin


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1068232 01/19/16 01:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Originally Posted By: eotab
Going off my gut, I would say that Goff/Wentz/Lynch would rank somewhere around the Bortles/Bridgewater/Carr group.


So Cook must be in that Andrew Luck Group... grin


or that Jimmy Clausen group.


#GMSTRONG
Tulsa #1068236 01/19/16 01:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Tulsa
Originally Posted By: eotab
Going off my gut, I would say that Goff/Wentz/Lynch would rank somewhere around the Bortles/Bridgewater/Carr group.


So Cook must be in that Andrew Luck Group... grin


or that Jimmy Clausen group.


or that Ryan Mallett group.

cfrs15 #1068241 01/19/16 01:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Tulsa
Originally Posted By: eotab
Going off my gut, I would say that Goff/Wentz/Lynch would rank somewhere around the Bortles/Bridgewater/Carr group.


So Cook must be in that Andrew Luck Group... grin


or that Jimmy Clausen group.


or that Ryan Mallett group.


So then, definitely not in the Weeden grouping? naughtydevil

Last edited by bbrowns32; 01/19/16 01:29 PM.

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
bonefish #1068254 01/19/16 01:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
[quote

You keep saying don't draft any of these quarterbacks. You want to address higher needs.

So what is your plan at quarterback?[/quote]

I am not sure they are "higher needs." I just don't believe in overdrafting guys because you have a need.

I had a plan at qb. Remember Teddy? LOL

Look, I think we probably do need a qb. The odds of Manziel being the guy are minuscule right now. I am NOT saying that we are set at qb. I am not saying we aren't going to need one. I just don't like the guys at the top of the draft. That doesn't mean I am right. It's simply how I feel.

devicedawg #1068256 01/19/16 01:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: devicedawg
If 5 years down the road, it turns out that there was a hall of fame quarterback in this draft and we passed on him in the #2 spot, would anyone say in 5 years it was the right move to pass on him?


That's not a very good argument. If 5 years down the road, it turns out the qb we take at #2 is a crap qb and out of the league, would anyone say it was the right move to pass on him?

Or, what if the guy we passed on at #2 becomes the most dominant pass rusher in the entire league, would anyone say it was the right move to pass on him for a journeyman qb?

We can play the "what if" game all day long.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
If you deem a QB has franchise QB potential. Should you not take him as soon as possible? Why risk letting the one guy go because of some made up "value" on a draft chart.

QBs have their own value in the draft, they are incomparable to any other position.

So, do you feel like any of these QBs have any potential to be Franchise QBs?

If you wouldn't take a guy at #2, how good do you really think he is if youre "hoping" he's still there at 32?

Any other teams have a young QB we can steal?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Draft aside, is there anyone out there off the top of your head, FA or otherwise, that you might think could at least be solid for us until we do see someone in the Draft?

No one really knows for sure what kind of QB Hue prefers, but it does appear he has a pretty good rack record of getting more out of his QBs. Just to throw a name out there, but do you think there might be a guy like Mike Glennon who he could turn in to Andy Dalton 2.0?


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
ThatGuy #1068274 01/19/16 02:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
If you deem a QB has franchise QB potential. Should you not take him as soon as possible? Why risk letting the one guy go because of some made up "value" on a draft chart.


I am not sure why so many people are misunderstanding what I am saying????

I do NOT deem any of this year's QBs as a franchise QB. If I did, I would be all for drafting that guy.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Maybe Glennon? Maybe Oseiler? Maybe roll Josh, Johnny, and Austin one more year? Or, maybe Josh, Austin, and lower round pick this year?

Not trying to be evasive. I just don't really know.

And again...........I could be dead wrong about guys like Goff. Who knows. It's just my opinion that I don't think any of this year's top-rated QBs are worth a first round pick. Of course, teams will take a chance on them. I just wouldn't do it.

I think each one has a hole or holes in their game that are most-likely going to be hard to overcome.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
I wasn't necessarily asking you specifically.

General thoughts.

J/C, Etc.

I have no idea about any of these QBs, and am not really interested in spending the time to research them yet..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
devicedawg #1068286 01/19/16 02:15 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: devicedawg
If 5 years down the road, it turns out that there was a hall of fame quarterback in this draft and we passed on him in the #2 spot, would anyone say in 5 years it was the right move to pass on him?


If that guy was drafted in the 4th round, I may be upset that we didn't get him, but I would have wanted us to have picked him with our 4th rounder and used that #2 on another player.


Last edited by DeputyDawg; 01/19/16 04:30 PM.
ThatGuy #1068289 01/19/16 02:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Okay.....

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Maybe Glennon? Maybe Oseiler? Maybe roll Josh, Johnny, and Austin one more year? Or, maybe Josh, Austin, and lower round pick this year?

Not trying to be evasive. I just don't really know.

And again...........I could be dead wrong about guys like Goff. Who knows. It's just my opinion that I don't think any of this year's top-rated QBs are worth a first round pick. Of course, teams will take a chance on them. I just wouldn't do it.

I think each one has a hole or holes in their game that are most-likely going to be hard to overcome.


Ok, just curious thumbsup


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,305
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,305
I know picking Cardale sounds kind of crazy, since he wasn't starting for his college team, but I think if Devin Smith was still there or Noah Brown hadn't gotten hurt right before the season started, Cardale would have been the QB all season. The threat of his deep balls opened up all sorts of space for Zeke during the championship run. He seems to fit Hue's stated philosophy of pounding the rock and vertical passing game. I think Cardale is better suited for the pro game than he was for Urban's offense. He obviously has some developing to do, but he'd cost a lot less than the top rated QBs now who also would have their own share of developing to do. From everything I've seen and read, Cardale has come a long way since his infamous tweet, and I think he gets a bad rap for a teenage lapse in judgement which involved less than 140 characters.

If we re-sign Benjamin and Gordon returns to form, I think Cardale is the guy to get it to them deep.

I want to wait till after pro days to get a better feel for all the prospects, but this is where I stand now.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188

Fair enough.

But since you agree that there is a need who would pick where?


Bull_Dawg #1068316 01/19/16 02:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Boy,, Cardale Jones. This time last year, he was all the rage wasn't he.

Not sure if there is a problem between his ears or is he just not all that and a bag of chips.

Another guy with Physical tools for sure. What's missing?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Bull_Dawg #1068318 01/19/16 02:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Well one thing is a fact. IF Manziel truly ditched his session and was in Las Vegas...he will not be a QB option here. Jackson has made that clear and he has no ties in sticking with Manziel for a length of time...not his guy of choice.

If we KNOW there is a Franchise QB out there we will not mess around and trade back I think we will go get him. Whoever we do get I hope we bring him up slow with no rush as long as we have options at QB, we do know McCown is an excellent mentor.

I'd like to hear of a meet with Manziel n Hue...that should be the determining factor. But what we do know...if he ditched us for Las Vegas...Hue doesn't want anything to do with him.

jmho - Oh and did I say Cook is our best shot wink I know all dislike him but I'd like to know why. Physically and talent wise he is the best of the bunch. Head stuff don't know and nobody has shared why? I know some will naturally hate him cause of his history against OSU. I'm pretty good at assessing QBs.



Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1068333 01/19/16 03:04 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: eotab
Well one thing is a fact. IF Manziel truly ditched his session and was in Las Vegas...he will not be a QB option here. Jackson has made that clear and he has no ties in sticking with Manziel for a length of time...not his guy of choice.

If we KNOW there is a Franchise QB out there we will not mess around and trade back I think we will go get him. Whoever we do get I hope we bring him up slow with no rush as long as we have options at QB, we do know McCown is an excellent mentor.

I'd like to hear of a meet with Manziel n Hue...that should be the determining factor. But what we do know...if he ditched us for Las Vegas...Hue doesn't want anything to do with him.

jmho - Oh and did I say Cook is our best shot wink I know all dislike him but I'd like to know why. Physically and talent wise he is the best of the bunch. Head stuff don't know and nobody has shared why? I know some will naturally hate him cause of his history against OSU. I'm pretty good at assessing QBs.



Did you watch the Alabama game at all?

DeputyDawg #1068335 01/19/16 03:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Yeah and...two days before the game he couldn't pick up the ball due to the injured shoulder. You want to assess him on a game against one of the best college defenses around with an injured throwing shoulder. Really, if that is what you are going on I feel more secure in my evaluation of him.



Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
DeputyDawg #1068336 01/19/16 03:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:
he likes big armed QB's that are mobile,

As opposed to those coaches that like weak QBs that are slow?


yebat' Putin
eotab #1068342 01/19/16 03:29 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: eotab
Yeah and...two days before the game he couldn't pick up the ball due to the injured shoulder. You want to assess him on a game against one of the best college defenses around with an injured throwing shoulder. Really, if that is what you are going on I feel more secure in my evaluation of him.



The guy has been inconsistent his entire career. Did he suddenly re-injure his shoulder between the Iowa Game and Alabama because it was fine when he played Penn St and Iowa? He also said that he could have played the OSU game.

The secret to Cook is easy. He caves under pressure. If you want more examples go back to the Michigan game or when he faced Central Michigan. The guy hasn't had one season where his completion percentage has been above 60 percent. It's not like this guy plays on a bad team, he is surrounded by talent.

Hackenberg is getting the same stats surrounded by nobody's.

DeputyDawg #1068348 01/19/16 03:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
stats

Yep yep the tell all - stats. But I agree with you completion percentage should have been better which he has to learn to check down more often. Now I don't know about his work habit history. If he works hard and we don't have the need to start him right away. I think he will benefit the most of all these QBs and should start in year 2. Goff Haven't seen enough to make a 100% opinion of him. but guys who cannot hit the deep out should not be close to top 5 picks...just a no no. Can he strengthen his arm??? Don't know.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1068356 01/19/16 04:05 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: eotab
stats

Yep yep the tell all - stats. But I agree with you completion percentage should have been better which he has to learn to check down more often. Now I don't know about his work habit history. If he works hard and we don't have the need to start him right away. I think he will benefit the most of all these QBs and should start in year 2. Goff Haven't seen enough to make a 100% opinion of him. but guys who cannot hit the deep out should not be close to top 5 picks...just a no no. Can he strengthen his arm??? Don't know.


No and that is the big thing with him. He is Lower risk but lower reward. Goff's got great accuracy and is smart but he can't make all the throws.

Bull_Dawg #1068369 01/19/16 04:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I am a huge fan of the Buckeyes, but I don't like Cardale as an NFL qb.

He has the physical tools, but his mental games is lacking.

A few things I noticed:

--Doesn't read defenses pre-snap. Rarely checks out of a play.

--Processes what he is seeing very slowly. Gets confused by coverages.

--Does not throw w/anticipation.

--Footwork is poor which leads to many off balance throws that then leads to loss of accuracy.

--Struggles to play up-tempo ball. The game clock is always close to zero by the time he gets the snap.

I had hopes for him last year, but I think he was exposed this year.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,197
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,197
Any of those fixable ?

DeputyDawg #1068373 01/19/16 04:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Cook is one of those guys I was talking about that has holes in his game.

You mentioned Hackenberg. I like him even less. Great physical skills, but man, this guy is frustrating to watch. He does not value possessions. He plays w/very little heart. He makes terrible decisions. I realize the talent around him was poor, but he has his own flaws.

One play kinda sums it up w/this guy: Penn State was trying to come from behind late in the game. He throws the ball way out of bounds. He then puts his head down and walks towards the sideline. They had to tell him it was only 3rd down on that previous play. Incredible on two levels:

1. He was not aware of the down on a potential game-winning drive, and...

2. He would have purposely throw the ball out of bounds if it was 4th down and not even give his team a chance to win.

DeisleDawg #1068375 01/19/16 04:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Footwork can be improved and that should help accuracy.

I doubt they can speed up his processing skills.

You could teach him to make better pre-snap reads. Lot's of film study, recognizing tendencies, looks, etc.

Hard to teach reading coverages post-snap. It's related to the processing skills.

Throwing w/anticipation is also more of a natural gift, although hard work, timing w/WRs, and film study can help here, too.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am a huge fan of the Buckeyes, but I don't like Cardale as an NFL qb.

He has the physical tools, but his mental games is lacking.

A few things I noticed:

--Doesn't read defenses pre-snap. Rarely checks out of a play.

--Processes what he is seeing very slowly. Gets confused by coverages.

--Does not throw w/anticipation.

--Footwork is poor which leads to many off balance throws that then leads to loss of accuracy.

--Struggles to play up-tempo ball. The game clock is always close to zero by the time he gets the snap.

I had hopes for him last year, but I think he was exposed this year.


Yep, and that is why I think he's a 3rd rounder. If he had the mental side to his game, he would have been the 1st pick off the board. His talent level is that high. Right now you don't know if you are getting Big Ben or Jamarcus Russell.

DeputyDawg #1068378 01/19/16 04:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am a huge fan of the Buckeyes, but I don't like Cardale as an NFL qb.

He has the physical tools, but his mental games is lacking.

A few things I noticed:

--Doesn't read defenses pre-snap. Rarely checks out of a play.

--Processes what he is seeing very slowly. Gets confused by coverages.

--Does not throw w/anticipation.

--Footwork is poor which leads to many off balance throws that then leads to loss of accuracy.

--Struggles to play up-tempo ball. The game clock is always close to zero by the time he gets the snap.

I had hopes for him last year, but I think he was exposed this year.


Yep, and that is why I think he's a 3rd rounder. If he had the mental side to his game, he would have been the 1st pick off the board. His talent level is that high. Right now you don't know if you are getting Big Ben or Jamarcus Russell.


Third rounder? He has no track record of success and is limited in other capacities.

Brett Hundley was twice the prospect Cardale Jones is and he went in the fifth round.

Jones is a sixth round or later guy.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
He also lacks that quick, compact release you'd like to see in an NFL QB, and his fundamentals are horrible. In addition to the things you mentioned, he doesn't always step into his throws, or square up to throw. He trusts his arm way too much, like that is the only tool he possesses.

Cardale Jones has all of the physical traits you would look for, but man, he really needs built from the ground up.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Cook is one of those guys I was talking about that has holes in his game.

You mentioned Hackenberg. I like him even less. Great physical skills, but man, this guy is frustrating to watch. He does not value possessions. He plays w/very little heart. He makes terrible decisions. I realize the talent around him was poor, but he has his own flaws.

One play kinda sums it up w/this guy: Penn State was trying to come from behind late in the game. He throws the ball way out of bounds. He then puts his head down and walks towards the sideline. They had to tell him it was only 3rd down on that previous play. Incredible on two levels:

1. He was not aware of the down on a potential game-winning drive, and...

2. He would have purposely throw the ball out of bounds if it was 4th down and not even give his team a chance to win.


Hackenberg is frustrating for me to figure out because he is playing with a bunch of Pop Warner guys and it doesn't look like he is being coached fundamentals. I'm betting that the coaches there are too busy putting out other fires, but bad fundamentals become bad habits quickly and habits become hard to break. (See Johnny Manziel)

Trent Dilfer loves him and sees Troy Aikman, which makes me even more wary.

I like his arm though and decision making can be improved. He's a guy that I could change opinion on up or down easily once I see more.

cfrs15 #1068391 01/19/16 04:58 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am a huge fan of the Buckeyes, but I don't like Cardale as an NFL qb.

He has the physical tools, but his mental games is lacking.

A few things I noticed:

--Doesn't read defenses pre-snap. Rarely checks out of a play.

--Processes what he is seeing very slowly. Gets confused by coverages.

--Does not throw w/anticipation.

--Footwork is poor which leads to many off balance throws that then leads to loss of accuracy.

--Struggles to play up-tempo ball. The game clock is always close to zero by the time he gets the snap.

I had hopes for him last year, but I think he was exposed this year.


Yep, and that is why I think he's a 3rd rounder. If he had the mental side to his game, he would have been the 1st pick off the board. His talent level is that high. Right now you don't know if you are getting Big Ben or Jamarcus Russell.


Third rounder? He has no track record of success and is limited in other capacities.

Brett Hundley was twice the prospect Cardale Jones is and he went in the fifth round.

Jones is a sixth round or later guy.


Chip Kelly wouldn't have even ranked Brett Hundley as twice the prospect of Jones and he likes read option QB's. Everything crumbled when he tried to be more of a Pro Style QB his senior year. He was a lost at that point. Lots of panicked decisions under pressure. He could run fine but didn't throw on the run very well. He held the ball way too long in the pocket if his first read wasn't open. Yes he had a lot of athletic ability, but not the arm or size of Jones. Switching to more of a Pro style exposed his flaws to scouts and he was drafted right about where he should have been.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Footwork can be improved and that should help accuracy.

I doubt they can speed up his processing skills.

You could teach him to make better pre-snap reads. Lot's of film study, recognizing tendencies, looks, etc.

Hard to teach reading coverages post-snap. It's related to the processing skills.

Throwing w/anticipation is also more of a natural gift, although hard work, timing w/WRs, and film study can help here, too.


That was really well written.

DeputyDawg #1068396 01/19/16 05:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I don't know where Jones will be drafted, but I agree w/you on Hundley.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Not to get off the subject for a second. Was listening to Steve Young on ESPN last night. He was talking about BB and the Pat. He has that team thinking and getting involved in learning, processing. He'll give them an entirely new play book and tell them all he wants them to know it by Tuesday and they all go and study together to get it right. They are so prepared, absorbed into learning the game. Just that last train of thought made me think about it.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1068414 01/19/16 05:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yeah, he is amazing!

Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum QB choices

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5