Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: EveDawg
As a woman I find this new rule degrading. Who wants to be a token interview? People should be interviewed and hired based on their qualifications. Be it a man or a woman.


I can certainly see the extra benefit of "getting the job yourself" sorta mentality that's on display here. It's certainly the most gratifying of experiences. However, it doesn't always happen as quickly as it should. Now, we can argue about how "nothing happens as quick as it should" and everyone would probably come to the consensus that, nothing really does happen as quickly as it should. I digress. Kathryn Smith spent 13 years in the NFL before being given a full time coaching job as a Special Teams Quality Control coach. Essentially, after spending a decade+ in the NFL, she'll be charting, analyzing and compulsively looking over the Special Teams of the Bill's. The position for Quality Control is usually dished out to the newcomers of the NFL, not 10 year vets. Please don't take this as me saying, she shouldn't have to pay her dues, just that she should have paid them close to a decade ago. And while her situation doesn't represent this rule change, it does show the hiring trends of women in a male dominated industry. Even the most vetted candidates still cannot catch a break over their less distinguished male peers.

There's a certain negative connotation with required interviews, naturally. However, is it better to be interviewed this year or in a decade, after someone's had no career advancement for that time?

That said, I certainly think the NFL is only doing this to give itself, one of their mechanical, inhuman "pat on the backs", that only Goodell can coldly execute. Despite all of this, I cannot genuinely believe that the NFL gives a damn about women in the league. It's really no surprise, that at their first(!) Women's Football Summit that they didn't even mention domestic violence. Again, showing that they only really care about PR... A paradox, which lessens their PR move's effectiveness. Honestly, I think there is a lot of parallel's between how the NFL carries themselves, and how Hillary carries herself. A certain impersonal caring.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Does the Rooney Rule require people to interview Minority Candidates for Executive positions? Or just HC positions?

I feel like I dont here about it as much whenteams are looking for a new CEO or GM or whatever.

If not, are we saying Women are better Executives than Minority men?

This is all very confusing and unnecessary, IMO.

Last edited by ThatGuy; 02/07/16 03:29 PM.

Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: JulesDawg
This rule is shear silliness.

Put your application in Jules... go for it. I dare you. tongue


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 220
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 220
So, Goodell is saying hiring women, as coaches, with absolutely no playing experience, will be be a good thing for the team(s) hiring them. Roger Goodell, is the worst thing that has happened to the NFL.


We are terrible
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
Originally Posted By: Goose7
So, Goodell is saying hiring women, as coaches, with absolutely no playing experience, will be be a good thing for the team(s) hiring them. Roger Goodell, is the worst thing that has happened to the NFL.


No, he' saying he wants them interviewed for executive/front office positions.


There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do.
-Derek Jeter
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: JulesDawg
This rule is shear silliness.


Or is it Sheer silliness?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
j/c

Sheer is good, in fact, breathtaking!


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,153
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,153
+1....Whoopi or Upton....eye of the beholder....Go Browns!!!


"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:
NFL to extend Rooney Rule to Women for Executive Positions

I didn't know making sandwiches was an executive level position.. but whatever.


yebat' Putin
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
I just realized that Mike Holgrem is somewhere plotting a comeback wearing a dress right about now.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,102
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,102
Oh, jeez.....


Thanks for that mental image.
Thanks SO much.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
I just realized that Mike Holgrem is somewhere plotting a comeback wearing a dress right about now.


Do you wanna lay odds on if he keeps the 'stache vs. clean shaven?


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
General Question:

Just how many women involved with an NFL franchise are qualified to have these types of positions anyway? Personally I could careless if we hired women so long as they could do the job. But a) I can't imagine there are that many women in these organizations to start and b) does this mean we'll end up seeing a lady strength and conditioning assistant being called in for executive level interviews just to check the box?


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
I would think front office jobs would have plenty of qualified women. There are lots of varying office jobs you have never heard of that would lead to a career path on the business side of it at least.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
The Browns have given a ton of power to Sashi Brown and that baseball guy. What separates them from intelligent women, other than their physical anatomy?

Hell........the Browns could say they already have two women in high positions.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 376
V
1st String
Offline
1st String
V
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 376
This whole thing is a sick joke. The Rooney rule is a joke. Interview a candidate for a position based on the color of their skin? Now interview a candidate for a position based on their gender? Why not sexual preference? What about marital status? What about age? How about stop trying to create equality and start creating excellence. You have/had a good old boys club because they did not have the competition for positions. Now as competition for competent people increases and they are not good old boys, the walls will crumble down on their own. I find Goodell to be a hypocrite. Let me compete with other businesses for talented people, yet let me keep my special tax status. How fair is that to women executives, gay executives, any aspiring executive? What a joke this who thing is. It is almost embarrassing.

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 32
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 32
Originally Posted By: Voleur
This whole thing is a sick joke. The Rooney rule is a joke. Interview a candidate for a position based on the color of their skin? Now interview a candidate for a position based on their gender? Why not sexual preference? What about marital status? What about age? How about stop trying to create equality and start creating excellence. You have/had a good old boys club because they did not have the competition for positions. Now as competition for competent people increases and they are not good old boys, the walls will crumble down on their own. I find Goodell to be a hypocrite. Let me compete with other businesses for talented people, yet let me keep my special tax status. How fair is that to women executives, gay executives, any aspiring executive? What a joke this who thing is. It is almost embarrassing.


I agree and disagree with some of what you said here.

The "women based" arm of the Rooney Rule is foolish, on in the fact that it will be used exactly like the current Rooney Rule. As another poster stated, women will get token interviews and maybe one or two (every now and then) will get a chance. But it won't mean much.

Where I disagree is that the current system as it stands is fair and balanced. There was a study put out (I believe it might have been in ESPN the Mag...I'm sorry but I don't have a link) that states despite things like the Rooney rule, the overwhelming majority of hires on all levels of the NFL are white males. Sure to some that seems like they are just choosing the best candidates but often times they are only choosing from the candidates they want to see.

For example, An owner wants to hire a HC. He talks to people he trusts (presumably other rich white men...since they predominate the Ownership in the NFL) and gets some suggestions. Now, since the majority of the people in management are also white men, you will, naturally, get a pretuberance of white male candidates suggested. "These are the best of the best, boss". So the owner will not even see the minority candidate (black, latino, woman, etc.) because he may have been told that, while good, they are not as good as "these candidates".

So an owner may never even see diversity as something needed because he never sees diverse candidates.

This trickles down to the fact that many minority assistant coaches (or aspiring coaches) never can get themselves to that pinnacle so it saps their spirit to continue. Maybe they've seen a lesser coach get a Coordinator job because of subtle favoritism or "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" agreements, rather than, as you say, competence and merit.

This happens all the time. So if you are a minority candidate who sees guys passing him over for no "competence or merit" reasons, what would you think is happening?

If you're a minority candidate who sees a coach like Lovie Smith replaced in Chicago after a winning season, for a coach who barely lasted a year, what kinda of message does that send?

I think the essence of the Rooney Rule is valid. Give more exposure to coaches who may not (and, historically, did not) have such exposure before. They can now prepare themselves for when the opportunity arises that they may get an interview, instead of just knowing that coordinator is as far as they go. They can look at the Todd Bowles', and Mike Tomlin's, and Hue Jackson's as something that could happen, as opposed to the past where it would never happen.

Now opponents will say, "If there were good black coaches out there, they would get the jobs!" But that's a backward way of thinking. If they never get a sniff, no one will even know.

It's only a joke to people who never had things withheld from them, even unintentionally.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 376
V
1st String
Offline
1st String
V
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 376
I could debate your entire assertion Timmy as I see flaws in your logic. I will just ask one question and want you to answer it to yourself truthfully. Do you think Hue Jackson was hired by the Cleveland Browns because of the Rooney Rule?

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: DevilDawg2847
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
I like the ruling. I hope it brings more diversity to a league that desperately needs it. With more female inclusion perhaps the NFL will finally take a stand against domestic violence and sexual assault.

EO you ask what their qualifications are? What are Sashi Browns qualifications? Was he a ball boy? Did he "earn" his football cred? You telling me there are no female lawyers from Harvard with big brains and no real football experience?

The more women involved in the league the better the league will be.


So no one should be worried about Dee Haslam being involved in the FO then right?

(I'm not)


I'm not. She couldn't do any worse than hubby Jimmy has the last couple years. Besides, one would assume the candidates in question would have an exemplary collegiate record in law or business. Not sure what Dee's background is in that regard.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: Voleur
I could debate your entire assertion Timmy as I see flaws in your logic. I will just ask one question and want you to answer it to yourself truthfully. Do you think Hue Jackson was hired by the Cleveland Browns because of the Rooney Rule?


I know before there was the rule he never would have been interviewed. Things have changed but not THAT much. There is still a HUGE disparity in hiring. So if you want to go back to the good old days when blacks weren't even considered.... kill the Rooney rule. The league will get very white very fast.

Women aren't considered now. When is the last time we interviewed a woman for a front office position? Have we EVER interviewed a woman to be GM? Yes, at first the interviews will be "token" interviews. As the interviews of blacks were to start and sometimes still are. Still blacks are at least considered now. Prior to the Rooney rule they weren't. The same should hold true for women. At first they won't get any jobs, hopefully after a while someone will break through and then they WILL be considered.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,368
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,368
I am filing a lawsuit tomorrow for age discrimination. The NFL does not have one single player over 50 on their rosters, and not a single one has ever been drafted. I say they have to sign a player over 50 at each position, and give them the right to compete for the job. catfight


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
The NFL does not have one single player over 50 on their rosters...


The oldest I recall offhand is George Blanda....48 when he retired in 1975. Anyone else...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,342
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,342
That would be the "Gordie Howe Rule".


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum NFL to extend Rooney Rule to Women for Executive Positions

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5