|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I dont think he will tread any where near Brett Favre territory..
But a month is not a really long amount of time to decided whether or not you want to quit playing football.
I think he SHOULD. But that doesnt mean he wants to..
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,927
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,927 |
Going after O is a waste of time. It's not going to happen. Sure hope this is a rumor because it shows a lack of FO smarts if they don't know that. How does looking into every possibly option show a LACK of smarts? By looking into an impossible option. Brock Oswieler is currently scheduled to be a FA. FAs are allowed to be signed by other teams. We are another team. What, at this time, is impossible about that? It's not going to happen plus it's a waste of valuable time & resources. We have better chances on a couple of others.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
I dont think he will tread any where near Brett Favre territory..
But a month is not a really long amount of time to decided whether or not you want to quit playing football.
You think he hasn't already put a considerable amount of thought to this?
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I dont think he will tread any where near Brett Favre territory..
But a month is not a really long amount of time to decided whether or not you want to quit playing football.
You think he hasn't already put a considerable amount of thought to this? Its one of those things, I think that either you decide before the SB yes or no.. But if you cant decide, then it takes time.. Using the game itself, win or lose, to help you decide is IMO a terrible idea. (Not saying he would)
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
It makes no sense for him to retire before March 9th.
On March 9th his entire $19 mil salary becomes fully guaranteed for a $21.5 mil cap hit to the Broncos.
Also Manning just earned $4 mil in bonuses for making it to and winning the Superbowl and I don't think that was counted in the original $10 mil of free cap money. So what you are saying is that Manning could royally screw the Broncos if he wants to. The Broncos would release him before that would happen. Which would be a $2.5 mil cap hit. (Not sure how the $4 mil bonus he just earned figures in to that though) So that $10 mil they have would be $26.5 mil or maybe only $22.5 mil if they cut Peyton. (depending on if they have to still account for the bonus) I could see Peyton decide that he still wants to make multiple millions and wait for Denver to cut him and sign a 1 or 2 year deal with the Rams or Texans at $25 mil per year. Why not? He could still decide to retire later if he wanted to.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,927
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,927 |
I dont think he will tread any where near Brett Favre territory..
But a month is not a really long amount of time to decided whether or not you want to quit playing football.
You think he hasn't already put a considerable amount of thought to this? Its one of those things, I think that either you decide before the SB yes or no.. But if you cant decide, then it takes time.. Using the game itself, win or lose, to help you decide is IMO a terrible idea. (Not saying he would) He's decided. He's just not going to take away the spotlight from Denver or his teammates right now. He'll announce his retirement soon enough. He's the ultimate pro.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Another thing I should mention is that Peyton has to take a physical between Feb 23 and March 4 if he still wants to play. If I remember right he had a clause in his contract about it being void if he failed the physical because of his neck. I'm not sure if that clause was just for the beginning of the contract or for the entire contract, but I am sure Denver could find a doctor to fail him if they wanted to stoop that low.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,982
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,982 |
I feel like that was part of his first contract w/ Denver but was it also part of the second one he signed in early 2015?
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
He's decided. He's just not going to take away the spotlight from Denver or his teammates right now. He'll announce his retirement soon enough. He's the ultimate pro. +1 It makes perfect sense that he wouldn't want his retirement announcement to be the #1 story immediately after the Super Bowl. He'll let the team party for a few days, attend the parade, and then announce he's quitting shorty thereafter. Unless, there's a team out there willing to give Manning a ton of money to play one more year with the hopes he'll eventually transition into their offensive coordinator. Funny, I could see Haslam thinking that would be a good idea, but I think every new hire we have would walk out the front door if he tried it. As far as Brock goes, I watched a few games of his and wasn't that impressed. He wasn't bad, but I don't think he was very good either. Remember, the Broncos went back to Manning as soon as he could play and he was having a horrible season. Meaning, Brock didn't play well enough to keep a QB on the bench that had thrown 9 TDs and 17 INTs for the season. I know the QB was THE Peyton Manning but he's shell of himself at this point.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I have a pretty high opinion of Manning, so I don't see him hanging out until after the deadline and then retiring. He's got the cash socked away, and he'll have a lucrative gig waiting for him.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
Archie already said in an interview that if Peyton plays again, it will be for somebody other than Denver. My guess is he's already had this conversation with Elway and they know Denver isn't going to keep him and pay him his contract value.
I have no idea why Peyton would want to come back and go out on a 4-12 season instead of just using this and walking away.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I don't see going after Brock as a waste of resources. He's the best bet for addressing a huge need on our team, and even if we don't land him, we could drive up his price for the Broncos, potentially requiring them to jettison one of their talented defenders.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Archie already said in an interview that if Peyton plays again, it will be for somebody other than Denver. My guess is he's already had this conversation with Elway and they know Denver isn't going to keep him and pay him his contract value.
I have no idea why Peyton would want to come back and go out on a 4-12 season instead of just using this and walking away. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 |
My guess is that one of Miller or Osweiler gets a long term deal, the one who doesn't gets tagged. They're going to lose some talent regardless. Vernon Davis, Malik Jackson, Danny Trevathan, I believe both RBs and a few Dbs are all FA. They're going to lose a lot - they need to decide which guys they want to keep and which they gamble on. Interestingly, they have no 3rd QB and non on the practice roster. That makes me agree that Osweiler stays in Denver.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
My guess is that one of Miller or Osweiler gets a long term deal, the one who doesn't gets tagged. They're going to lose some talent regardless. Vernon Davis, Malik Jackson, Danny Trevathan, I believe both RBs and a few Dbs are all FA. They're going to lose a lot - they need to decide which guys they want to keep and which they gamble on. Interestingly, they have no 3rd QB and non on the practice roster. That makes me agree that Osweiler stays in Denver. If they keep both Miller and Osweiler, they are going to have to find another $10 mil to $15 mil somewhere. That's without signing anyone else. Miller's going to get at least $20 mil and Brock is going to get $15 mil.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419 |
Well, I don't think it is as simple as the Broncos letting him leave. They may not have a choice. According to over the cap, Denver has $10MM in available cap space for 2016. That's without addressing Von Miller, probably heading for a franchise tag, or Danny Trevathan, Evan Mathis, CJ Anderson, Hillman, among others. Plus the rookie pool. Osweiler is probably higher on the list than many of those players considering he's the QB, but Denver still has decisions to make with little money. Cuts may happen as well.
If he's not franchised (which I can't imagine he would be), it may come down simply to Osweiler testing the market to see his value. Than any team has a shot at that point. Won't Manning retiring open up some space? It makes no sense for him to retire before March 9th. On March 9th his entire $19 mil salary becomes fully guaranteed for a $21.5 mil cap hit to the Broncos. Also Manning just earned $4 mil in bonuses for making it to and winning the Superbowl and I don't think that was counted in the original $10 mil of free cap money. Besides Brock, about half of their defense is in Free Agency as well. If you tag Brock, then you are letting Von Miller walk for example. The Broncos have some cap hell to figure out and they have about a month to do it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NFL salaries are not guaranteed in retirement. Manning might receive a roster bonus if he were to hang around, but not his guaranteed salary. Even that seems unlikely to me though. Manning has tons of respect throughout the league, and is probably worth hundreds of millions. Is it worth blowing his good image to pick up a couple of millions? I doubt it. Manning has a chance to write his perfect exit from the league, in a graceful and dignified manner. I doubt he wants to go out appearing to chase the last buck. Manning will pick up his Super Bowl bonus, and that will count against the Broncos 2016-17 cap, but I don't see him doing anything beyond that.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
Well, I don't think it is as simple as the Broncos letting him leave. They may not have a choice. According to over the cap, Denver has $10MM in available cap space for 2016. That's without addressing Von Miller, probably heading for a franchise tag, or Danny Trevathan, Evan Mathis, CJ Anderson, Hillman, among others. Plus the rookie pool. Osweiler is probably higher on the list than many of those players considering he's the QB, but Denver still has decisions to make with little money. Cuts may happen as well.
If he's not franchised (which I can't imagine he would be), it may come down simply to Osweiler testing the market to see his value. Than any team has a shot at that point. Won't Manning retiring open up some space? It makes no sense for him to retire before March 9th. On March 9th his entire $19 mil salary becomes fully guaranteed for a $21.5 mil cap hit to the Broncos. Also Manning just earned $4 mil in bonuses for making it to and winning the Superbowl and I don't think that was counted in the original $10 mil of free cap money. Besides Brock, about half of their defense is in Free Agency as well. If you tag Brock, then you are letting Von Miller walk for example. The Broncos have some cap hell to figure out and they have about a month to do it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NFL salaries are not guaranteed in retirement. Manning might receive a roster bonus if he were to hang around, but not his guaranteed salary. Even that seems unlikely to me though. Manning has tons of respect throughout the league, and is probably worth hundreds of millions. Is it worth blowing his good image to pick up a couple of millions? I doubt it. Manning has a chance to write his perfect exit from the league, in a graceful and dignified manner. I doubt he wants to go out appearing to chase the last buck. Manning will pick up his Super Bowl bonus, and that will count against the Broncos 2016-17 cap, but I don't see him doing anything beyond that. Manning knows he can make another $50 mil signing another 2 year contract and knows that Denver can't afford to pay him what becomes a fully guaranteed contract on March 9th. This has most likely been discussed between Manning and Elway. So if Manning announces his retirement, he gives up $19 mil in Denver, but Denver retains his rights and he couldn't sign elsewhere. If he simply waits for them to cut him before March 9th, he can entertain offers from other teams. The cap hit for Denver would be $2.5 mil (plus the $4 mil bonus if that was not allocated) He won't be viewed as screwing Denver because both sides know that Denver can't afford him. He just gets cut on March 9th and has more time to decide. All he has to say is I'm not sure I want to retire yet and I know Denver can't wait." I don't care how much money you have, $50 mil is enough incentive to keep your options open till you are sure you want to retire. I doubt he cares what the next team's record would be, I do think that he cares how he personally performs. If he thinks he has more left in the tank then he has $50 mil reasons to keep playing. The Rams would pay him that just to gain fan interest before the move to LA. His agent is sure to point this out to him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643 |
J/C
There were a couple of his passes that looked like they were in slow motion, like they would never get to the receiver. I think he is done. I also think he is smart enough to know he is done and that their defense has been winning the games, not him. He is just classy enough to not overshadow their victory with his retirement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
My guess is that one of Miller or Osweiler gets a long term deal, the one who doesn't gets tagged. They're going to lose some talent regardless. Vernon Davis, Malik Jackson, Danny Trevathan, I believe both RBs and a few Dbs are all FA. They're going to lose a lot - they need to decide which guys they want to keep and which they gamble on. Interestingly, they have no 3rd QB and non on the practice roster. That makes me agree that Osweiler stays in Denver. If they keep both Miller and Osweiler, they are going to have to find another $10 mil to $15 mil somewhere. That's without signing anyone else. Miller's going to get at least $20 mil and Brock is going to get $15 mil. The Broncos currently have nearly $11 million available going into the off -season. http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-spaceIf they just cut Manning and Ryan Clady they will have nearly $39 million in cap room. http://overthecap.com/calculator/denver-broncos/The cap will also go up a bit (probably about $10 million). So that's $49 million. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/12/05/nfl-salary-cap-will-rise-above-150-million-in-2016/The Broncos won't be able to re-sign some of their players, but Miller and Osweiler will be on the Broncos next year one way or another.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419 |
Manning was not a top QB this past year.He lost his job at one point. He is as close to being done as a player can be.
If the Broncos have to start a rebuild. why would they delay it with a broken down, old QB? Why handcuff themselves for the next 2 years, when they can eliminate the cap consequences of Peyton's last contract this season?
I don't make bets, but if I did, this would be one I would put a whole lot of money on. I see no way that the Broncos give Manning a 2 year deal worth $30 million, let alone $50 million.
I suspect that Manning will announce his retirement within 2 weeks. Noe many guys get to go out on top. Elway, who Manning reportedly respects, was one who did. I think that Manning follows suit.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Remember, the Broncos went back to Manning as soon as he could play I don't think that is true. Here is an article about it: Peyton Manning expected to return Sunday with new job he's never hadAfter seven weeks off, Broncos quarterback back Peyton Manning is expected to return to the field Sunday. However, he won't be getting his old job back. Broncos coach Gary Kubiak announced Wednesday that Manning will serve as the Broncos' backup quarterback against the Chargers if he doesn't have any setbacks with his health this week. "[Manning] being healthy is a great thing for this football team, him being available," Kubiak said via the Broncos website. "It's the next step we need to take. He hasn't played in [nearly two] months." THE LATEST FROM SPORTSLINE Week 17 picks As recently as three weeks ago, Kubiak had said that Manning would be the starter when he returned; however, that won't be the case. The Broncos coach made it clear that there's no quarterback controversy in Denver and that Brock Osweiler will remain the team's starting quarterback. "Brock's our quarterback -- nothing has changed from that standpoint," Kubiak said. "[Osweiler's] our guy. He's doing a hell of a job. We'll keep moving forward." The move means that Manning will serve as a backup quarterback for the first time in his 18-year career. Manning has been the starter in each of the 265 regular-season games in which he has played over that span. Not to mention, at $15 million, Manning will be an expensive backup. Kubiak's decision to make Manning the backup Sunday could obviously backfire if Osweiler struggles against San Diego. The Broncos have a lot on the line -- they could drop to the AFC's sixth seed with a loss -- and if Osweiler were to throw one or two interceptions in the first half against the Chargers, fans might start booing him and start clamoring for Manning. The Broncos were in a similar situation in Week 10. Manning was benched for Osweiler after a disastrous two-and-a-half quarters against the Chiefs where he threw four interceptions. As for this week, Manning sounds like he's ready to accept his new role. "I will do what I can to help Brock and the team," Manning said on Wednesday. Over the weekend, Manning had said he would like to start, but he also added that he would do what's "best for the team." "I got to do whatever coach feels is best for the team," Manning said. "It's been an interesting year, I'm not going to lie about that. I've had a good attitude about it. ... I've learned a lot about myself. I've been a good teammate. I've tried to help Brock in anyway I can. It's new to me. It's new to me. So I'll do whatever is best for the team come next week." Although Osweiler might not get benched during the game Sunday, Kubiak did leave the door slightly open for a possible Manning return in the postseason if Osweiler should struggle. "If something would change, the players would know first and you all would know second," Kubiak said Monday. "I told you guys that this week, but our football team is moving forward. Our mindset right now goes to San Diego and we've got to get ourselves good and freshened up, ready to play." The bottom line though is that unless Osweiler gets hurt, we've probably seen the last of Manning as a starter in a Broncos uniform, which means he's going to have to decide if it's time to retire or try and give it one more season with another team. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foot...b-hes-never-had Here is the link to another article about Manning being benched for Osweiler: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foot...tart-in-week-11
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Manning played because Osweiler was injured and not playing well. If Osweiler never faltered, then Manning would have never seen the field again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I hope this thread gets back to the premise of the original post---------which is the Browns having interest in Osweiler. I think discussing Manning's potential retirement would be best discussed in a thread of its own.
Signing Osweiler would be significant. Extremely significant. That would almost guarantee that the Browns don't draft a QB w/the second overall pick. Uhmmmmmmmm.....yeah....that's certainly worthy of conversation.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
My guess is that one of Miller or Osweiler gets a long term deal, the one who doesn't gets tagged. They're going to lose some talent regardless. Vernon Davis, Malik Jackson, Danny Trevathan, I believe both RBs and a few Dbs are all FA. They're going to lose a lot - they need to decide which guys they want to keep and which they gamble on. Interestingly, they have no 3rd QB and non on the practice roster. That makes me agree that Osweiler stays in Denver. If they keep both Miller and Osweiler, they are going to have to find another $10 mil to $15 mil somewhere. That's without signing anyone else. Miller's going to get at least $20 mil and Brock is going to get $15 mil. The Broncos currently have nearly $11 million available going into the off -season. http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-spaceIf they just cut Manning and Ryan Clady they will have nearly $39 million in cap room. http://overthecap.com/calculator/denver-broncos/The cap will also go up a bit (probably about $10 million). So that's $49 million. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/12/05/nfl-salary-cap-will-rise-above-150-million-in-2016/The Broncos won't be able to re-sign some of their players, but Miller and Osweiler will be on the Broncos next year one way or another. Don't forget Peyton's $4 mil bonus and $2.5 mil cap hit if cut. So let's say they have $22.5 mil if the cut Peyton. They could gain another $8.9 mil by cutting Clady. That gives them $31.6 mil and again I think it's going to cost them about $35 mil to keep both Miller and Brock. Yes the cap might go up by about $10 mil, but that money will be spent signing their draft class. It's not as easy as you think and they will probably have to make a lot more tough decisions like cutting Demarcus Ware or someone else and they'll have a lot of holes created in FA to fill.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Teams restructure contracts all the time to get more cap room.
Miller is not going anywhere, that's a given.
Osweiler is probably not going anywhere either.
With that said, why do we even want Osweiler? What has he proven to deserve the money he is about to get?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
I'm not sure I would want him. I know I wouldn't want him for $15 mil. I don't blame the Browns if they are checking out all of their options though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059 |
I hope this thread gets ... ...real. Osweiler is going nowhere. It would be an absolute stunner if it were otherwise.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189 |
I dont think he will tread any where near Brett Favre territory..
But a month is not a really long amount of time to decided whether or not you want to quit playing football.
You think he hasn't already put a considerable amount of thought to this? I think his mind is already made up to retire. But for now, keep the talk on winning the Superbowl and relax for a while basking in knowing that he's going out on top with two rings. Things could have gone so bad for him if Carolina punked him like everyone was saying they would. Right now I'm sure Manning is so full of gratitude he just wants to let it all sink in. When all the Superbowl talk dies down then he can announce his retirement.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
When all the Superbowl talk dies down and all the attention can be focused on him then he can announce his retirement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
With that said, why do we even want Osweiler? What has he proven to deserve the money he is about to get?
He's sat on the bench for 3.5 years, bro. Pretty much a guaranteed all-pro. We gotta get this guy before someone else benches him!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674 |
I hope not. There are better options out there then Brock...but they are a different topic.
I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
With that said, why do we even want Osweiler? What has he proven to deserve the money he is about to get?
He's sat on the bench for 3.5 years, bro. Pretty much a guaranteed all-pro. We gotta get this guy before someone else benches him! Nah, all guys should start week one. According to an expert smarter than Fox Sports, sitting a guy turns him into Jim Sorgi.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,554 |
It makes no sense for him to retire before March 9th.
On March 9th his entire $19 mil salary becomes fully guaranteed for a $21.5 mil cap hit to the Broncos.
Also Manning just earned $4 mil in bonuses for making it to and winning the Superbowl and I don't think that was counted in the original $10 mil of free cap money. So what you are saying is that Manning could royally screw the Broncos if he wants to. The Broncos would release him before that would happen. Which would be a $2.5 mil cap hit. (Not sure how the $4 mil bonus he just earned figures in to that though) So that $10 mil they have would be $26.5 mil or maybe only $22.5 mil if they cut Peyton. (depending on if they have to still account for the bonus) I could see Peyton decide that he still wants to make multiple millions and wait for Denver to cut him and sign a 1 or 2 year deal with the Rams or Texans at $25 mil per year. Why not? He could still decide to retire later if he wanted to. No doubt, but Manning has been above board since his college days. It's not going to come to that. If he decideds to retire, it will happen in the next week or three. If he decideds to play, he knows it won't be with the Broncos and will publicly ask for his release so the Broncos don't look like the bad guy.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
No doubt, but Manning has been above board since his college days. Except for when he sexually harasses people or sends goons to shake down people.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
OS never looked all that impressive to me. Either way I don't care that much. I don't see peyten not retiring but then again I could see him take on a back/mentor role with a team just to keep playing for the love of the game. Mostly I think he will just retire, take a year off, and find some new way to make 100s of millions doing something else.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
I wouldn't be surprised to see Denver make a run at Sam Bradford and let Brock walk.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
For those that watched and paid attention:
When Osweiler was in there, how much of their continued winning was Brcok vs. that sick defense?
Was he perhaps looking better than he might be simply because of circumstances?
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915 |
Well, our line is better than denvers.
I wonder thought if hue can do something about his mechanics? He's so tall that when he throws to the WRs, the ball is always getting there low. Working out perfectly for our "smurf" receiving corp 
#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101 |
Maybe the Browns are putting the interest out there so Denver spends their money on Brock, and some of their FA defenders slip through the cracks?
It is silly season, after all. As I said in another thread, they have to figure out how to keep Miller, and if Manning is retiring, keep Osweiler as well. Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan are the guys for the Browns to target. Either would be good, both would be great.
1. #GMstrong 2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb 3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa 4. ClemenZa #1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,341
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,341 |
I think if the Broncos let Brock leave, that would tell me all I need to know about the guy. Jiggs, glad to see you made it over from the other board. You were always one of my favorites to read over there...
#gmstrong.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Peter King Hearing Buzz That
Browns Could Go After Osweiler
|
|