Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg

The big thing I worry about is with the coaching change, does he even know what he needs to work on in the offseason? He probably knows to hit the weights, but did anyone give him specifics about his pad level?


I'm hoping/would be surprised if Joe Thomas and Schwartz haven't told him this. Maybe Schwartz and Mack didn't because free agency, but I doubt that. Either way, all we need is Joe Thomas. At least, that's what I hope the situation is (Although with our line success, I wouldn't doubt it).

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,180
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,180
Agreed.
If us fans can see it, you know it has shown up and come up in the film room.... and everyone in that room is REALLY big on technique, so I'd expect that part to get resolved regardless of coaches.

Heck, with the group we have, I wouldn't be surprised is OLine Coach is the easiest job on the team. They all strike me as the type that are close-knit and help each other with all of this.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Strength is his 2nd biggest problem.

Pad Level is his biggest problem IMO and it makes his 2nd biggest problem look worse.

The big thing I worry about is with the coaching change, does he even know what he needs to work on in the offseason? He probably knows to hit the weights, but did anyone give him specifics about his pad level?


I think almost any coaching change will help him.. didn't he lose his Offensive Line Coach during Preseason ?


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,138
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,138
Originally Posted By: Halfback32
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Strength is his 2nd biggest problem.

Pad Level is his biggest problem IMO and it makes his 2nd biggest problem look worse.

The big thing I worry about is with the coaching change, does he even know what he needs to work on in the offseason? He probably knows to hit the weights, but did anyone give him specifics about his pad level?


I think almost any coaching change will help him.. didn't he lose his Offensive Line Coach during Preseason ?


Pad level and strength? The recipe calls for deep, heavy A to G squatting.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
So.......the guys on this message board could see his weaknesses, but the coaches on the team could not? But, the new coaches will because they are not as dumb as the previous coaches and are almost as smart as the posters on this board?

Got it!

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
So.......the guys on this message board could see his weaknesses, but the coaches on the team could not? But, the new coaches will because they are not as dumb as the previous coaches and are almost as smart as the posters on this board?

Got it!


The Browns knew Erving's weaknesses before they drafted him...this but one example of a scouting report on Erving...

WEAKNESSES: Could be a more consistent technician. Gets by on tremendous athletic ability. Footwork can be sloppy in pass protection and he bends the waist to catch the rush instead of absorbing with his lower half. When engaged tries to win with his upper body rather than his lateral swiftness. Aggression can work against him. Fails to adjust when blocking on the move when not focused. Most weaknesses are correctable with NFL coaching.
link

AND THIS ONE...

WEAKNESSES

Erving has been on the offense for just three years and is still very raw. That’s a concern more at center than tackle, because he’ll be expected to make line calls and be required to be more cerebral.

Erving is a work in progress with upside but also comes with the risk of never fully developing. He likes to catch pass-rushers at center and has to learn to use his arms there like he did at tackle. He’s not yet comfortable as a combination blocker and hasn't fully grasped the concepts of angles and leverage on the inside.
link


Last edited by mac; 02/10/16 10:08 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,202
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,202
Why does everyone keep saying we need to re-sign Mack? He is signed through 2018 at 8 mill a year.

Plus...

After the 2015 season is over, Mack will have the option to void the final three years of his contract. However, if he decides to void his contract, he loses out on $8 million that is guaranteed. According to Joel Corry of CBS Sports, that $8 million becomes fully guaranteed on April 5, 2016. If Mack wanted to opt out of his deal, he would do so long before that so he could take part in free agency.

http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2014/4/12/5608798/breakdown-of-alex-macks-contract-with-the-browns


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Alex Mack's opt-out deadline is March 4th per contract expert Joel Corry.

http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-foo...heyre-important

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,357
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,357
In other words Mac, he had too many flaws to be drafted where he was. Am I correct in this assumption?

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: Homewood Dog
In other words Mac, he had too many flaws to be drafted where he was. Am I correct in this assumption?


Home...the scouting reports were accurate...yet Farmer felt using a first round #19 pick on Erving was justified.

Farmer no longer works for the Browns...

Until Erving proves himself on the field, there is no way I would "count on him" to fill a starting position. He needs to do a ton of work on his lower body strength in the off season.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
You're acting like the Browns drafted a 5th rounder at #19.

Everyone had Erving going at least in the high second round.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
You're acting like the Browns drafted a 5th rounder at #19.

Everyone had Erving going at least in the high second round.


that...Erving is not starting material for any position on the OLine and #19 pick in the second round would have been more in line with scouting reports, imo.

If a team is picking a center or guard at #19 that fella better be a stud and a starter, imo.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: mac
that...Erving is not starting material for any position on the OLine and #19 pick in the second round would have been more in line with scouting reports, imo.


That's why we picked him to be a backup. Duh.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Homewood Dog
In other words Mac, he had too many flaws to be drafted where he was. Am I correct in this assumption?


He was drafted right about where all the experts said he would go.

Kiper had him at #25 on his big board.

Mayock had him at #26.

Walter football shows that his average Mock draft ranking was #26

He was drafted right where he should have been drafted.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,893
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,893
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
You're acting like the Browns drafted a 5th rounder at #19.

Everyone had Erving going at least in the high second round.


Drafted in the first round, plays like a 5th rounder.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
He was drafted right where he should have been drafted.


Just by the wrong team (you know the one with an All-Pro center and every offensive line position already filled).

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac
that...Erving is not starting material for any position on the OLine and #19 pick in the second round would have been more in line with scouting reports, imo.


That's why we picked him to be a backup. Duh.


NFL teams do not spend first round picks for centers and guard, to be backups. Those first round centers and guards should be starting at some point in the season.

Erving was drafted in a slot where he should have been starting material. Had he been drafted at #19 in the 2nd round, I would agree that he was drafted as a backup.

One of the centers ranked just under Erving came on in the last half of the year for the Bears, starting 8 games for them...drafted with the 7th pick of the 3rd round.

Erving had 4 starts at OG this season and was terrible, replaced by a career backup.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
j/c:

Farmer's gone now. You guys can stop defending his dumb picks. smirk

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
j/c:

Farmer's gone now. You guys can stop defending his dumb picks. smirk


vers...where did I "defend" Farmer?


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You didn't. And I put "j/c" to acknowledge that fact.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Right. That's why he was taken to be a backup and not be a starter.

When you're team has tons of holes all over the roster, you should always reinforce the offensive line. Always. Just ask eotab.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right. That's why he was taken to be a backup and not be a starter. Duh.


cfr...let me say this another way...it's damn stupid of the Browns to waste their #19 pick on a guy who wasn't starting material.

Good teams use first round picks such as the #19, on Offensive lineman who will start at some point in the season.

To draft a "backup" center at #19 is stupid!


Last edited by mac; 02/10/16 02:00 PM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right. That's why he was taken to be a backup and not be a starter. Duh.


cfr...let me say this another way...it damn stupid of the Browns to waste their #19 pick on a guy who wasn't starting material.

Good teams use first round picks such as the #19, on Offensive lineman who will start for them.

To draft a "backup" center at #19 is stupid!


Yeah, but what about Mack, he was hurt, so we needed a backup center in the first round. You can't even draft centers after the first round anyway.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Right. That's why he was taken to be a backup and not be a starter. Duh.


cfr...let me say this another way...it damn stupid of the Browns to waste their #19 pick on a guy who wasn't starting material.

Good teams use first round picks such as the #19, on Offensive lineman who will start for them.

To draft a "backup" center at #19 is stupid!


Yeah, but what about Mack, he was hurt, so we needed a backup center in the first round. You can't even draft centers after the first round anyway.


You forgot the purple...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
He was drafted right where he should have been drafted.


Just by the wrong team (you know the one with an All-Pro center and every offensive line position already filled).


Would that still be the case if he was playing lights out last year? We are still looking at both Schwartz and Mack walking out the door right now.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Yes. The problem all along wasn't the pick. Erving is a solid prospect and I still have a lot of high hopes for him despite his early failures. It was that he was picked by us. The move, at worse, has forced Mack out of the door and barred us from a, much needed, starter last year. They than ran amok of his development, but that's thoughts for another post.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
j/c....
I don't trust posters memories, even my own...lol laugh

So I checked 2015 Mocks...most wiped out or after 5 seconds switches automatically to 2016.

But the ones that have them still. Cameron Erving taken:
Football's Future: #28 Denver
GBN Report: #28 Denver
Draftcountdown: #17 Chargers
Draft King: #16 Texans
Walter Football: #18 Chiefs
My NFL Draft: #18 Chiefs.

So it wasn't a REACH pick or a stupid pick as in expectations of a prospect.
I give him a solid look in 2016 before any final thoughts. Want him in ONE POSITION taking most of his snaps.

As for Mack. He has 3 weeks to make his decision no rush I guess but if its March 1st and he has no answer that can only be good for us!

Oh Kiper had #28 Denver but he also had Mariota going #6 to Jets...only on actually the rest had him #2. that I saw

jmho

Last edited by eotab; 02/11/16 01:31 PM.

Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,893
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,893
Originally Posted By: eotab
j/c....
I don't trust posters memories, even my own...lol laugh

So I checked 2015 Mocks...most wiped out or after 5 seconds switches automatically to 2016.

But the ones that have them still. Cameron Erving taken:
Football's Future: #28 Denver
GBN Report: #28 Denver
Draftcountdown: #17 Chargers
Draft King: #16 Texans
Walter Football: #18 Chiefs
My NFL Draft: #18 Chiefs.

So it wasn't a REACH pick or a stupid pick as in expectations of a prospect.
I give him a solid look in 2016 before any final thoughts. Want him in ONE POSITION taking most of his snaps.

As for Mack. He has 3 weeks to make his decision no rush I guess but if its March 1st and he has no answer that can only be good for us!

Oh Kiper had #28 Denver but he also had Mariota going #6 to Jets...only on actually the rest had him #2. that I saw

jmho


not for nothing but usins mocks from a year ago to determine that we didn't go way off base to draft a guy isn't really proving anything.

They are Mocks. That's it. Who knows if Denver would really take him at 28 or if the Texans would have taken him at 16. That's just some scribes thinking out loud and I might add, they are getting paid to guess.

Now, show me John Elway saying we'd have taken him at 28, then you got something.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Well I can guarantee the Texans wouldn't have taken him at 16...


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,865
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,865
Originally Posted By: Damanshot

not for nothing but usins mocks from a year ago to determine that we didn't go way off base to draft a guy isn't really proving anything.

They are Mocks. That's it. Who knows if Denver would really take him at 28 or if the Texans would have taken him at 16. That's just some scribes thinking out loud and I might add, they are getting paid to guess.

Now, show me John Elway saying we'd have taken him at 28, then you got something.


Well, you know how it works. If they agree with you, they suddenly aren't BOZOS anymore.

rofl


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
not for nothing but usins mocks from a year ago to determine that we didn't go way off base to draft a guy isn't really proving anything.

Ok Sherlock...
As long as you were not using it as a base of information then I guess it doesn't really prove anything.

I guess you are an expert on "NOT FOR NOTHING"

rolleyes


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
EO...and I can find a source that projects Erving as 2nd round pick.

DRAFT PROJECTION Round 2
SOURCES TELL US "He plays tough, but I wouldn't call him an intimidator out there. He's a work in progress, but he's going to keep getting better as he learns how to play center." -- ACC defensive line coach

WEAKNESSES High-cut with tapered lower body, lacking power in legs. Pops straight up in pass rush. Susceptible to bull rush. Had issues handling the edge speed of Clemson's Vic Beasley in 2014 and his days of playing tackle are likely over. Relies on lean rather than hip thrust to generate power. Taught to absorb and control as a pass protector and needs to establish more pop in punch. link

I'm judging his actual contribution Erving made during his rookie season with the Browns. The above draft analysis is pretty much spot on. I would hope that the Browns scouting department could see that the kid needs a lot of work before he is NFL ready. He needs to develop himself physically and if he going to play center for the Browns he will need to recognize defensive sets in order to make the line calls.

Can he improve himself enough in the off season to man a starting position on the Browns Oline?...who knows..depends on how hard he works in the off season.

Something no one has mentioned..as a freshman at FSU, Erving missed the season due to a back injury. Just what the injury was, I haven't been able to find info.

Back issues might contribute to Erving's tendency to play too upright...just speculating...hopefully he can become the OLine guy worthy of a first round selection.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
That link is NFL.com and shows his combine numbers.

He was in the top 5 for bench press which leads me to think upper body strength is not an issue. Lower body strength is a little harder to gain than upper body strength.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yeah, it is pretty obvious when watching him that his lower body is weak. Combine that w/him not playing w/good knee bend and not keeping his chest over his thighs and one can understand why he gets bowled over so often.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I didn't cherry pick the sights...everyone had him in the first round.

Don't anyone of dare, dare use a Draft site as actual reliable info about the draft...smh

Its like I've woke up and I got the Football munchkins on this yellow brick road.

Just forget it. And excuse me for be curious and looking it up. My goodness you guys are something else.

I'm just sick of it.

Lets put it another way - you searched for somebody who put a 2nd round grade on him...did that guy btw do a mock draft? Where did he have him going?


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Mama always said a good lineman has a big arse! If he got a little arse then he ain't no darn good. Mama says that anyways =P And Mama knows BEST!


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,304
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,304
Yo momma was right


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: Damanshot
Originally Posted By: eotab
j/c....
I don't trust posters memories, even my own...lol laugh

So I checked 2015 Mocks...most wiped out or after 5 seconds switches automatically to 2016.

But the ones that have them still. Cameron Erving taken:
Football's Future: #28 Denver
GBN Report: #28 Denver
Draftcountdown: #17 Chargers
Draft King: #16 Texans
Walter Football: #18 Chiefs
My NFL Draft: #18 Chiefs.

So it wasn't a REACH pick or a stupid pick as in expectations of a prospect.
I give him a solid look in 2016 before any final thoughts. Want him in ONE POSITION taking most of his snaps.

As for Mack. He has 3 weeks to make his decision no rush I guess but if its March 1st and he has no answer that can only be good for us!

Oh Kiper had #28 Denver but he also had Mariota going #6 to Jets...only on actually the rest had him #2. that I saw

jmho


not for nothing but usins mocks from a year ago to determine that we didn't go way off base to draft a guy isn't really proving anything.

They are Mocks. That's it. Who knows if Denver would really take him at 28 or if the Texans would have taken him at 16. That's just some scribes thinking out loud and I might add, they are getting paid to guess.

Now, show me John Elway saying we'd have taken him at 28, then you got something.


Guesses, sure. But they are educated "guesses", not something thrown together randomly. Sometimes their predicted draft slot is way off, but generally speaking, they are in the ballpark. I'm siding with eo' on this one as I recall, most (if not all) of the sites I saw had him going in the 1st round. Indeed, at the time, I was very pleased that we selected him...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,828
Originally Posted By: eotab
I didn't cherry pick the sights...everyone had him in the first round.

Don't anyone of dare, dare use a Draft site as actual reliable info about the draft...smh

Its like I've woke up and I got the Football munchkins on this yellow brick road.



eo...it's the nfl.com's draft site...I believe guys like Bryan Billick, Mike Maylock,Gil Brandt..I don't know all of draft analysts they have at NFL's website, but I would say they are creditable.

The guy who wrote the Erving's review for NFL.com was a guy named Lance Zierlein...his dad was once the Browns Oline coach, Larry Zierlein 2001-2004 and was the Steelers Oline coach 2007-2009 and presently an assistant Oline coach for the Cardinals.

Look EO, just because I might have a different opinion than you, there is no reason for you to become upset. It's a message board with a bunch of guys and gals who have varying opinions on many issues.

I happen to believe Erving had a very poor rookie season for a #19 first round Olineman pick. I've said that I hope the guy can improve to the point of being worthy of his #19 selection and if he is willing to work on his issues, he could be a starter.



Originally Posted By: eotab
Just forget it. And excuse me for be curious and looking it up. My goodness you guys are something else.

I'm just sick of it.

Lets put it another way - you searched for somebody who put a 2nd round grade on him...did that guy btw do a mock draft? Where did he have him going?


I believe I'm entitled to have that opinion and don't care if I'm the only person with that opinion. No need to be up set about an opinion that might not be the same as yours..matter of fact, you should expect different opinions.

I did search for "2015 NFL mock drafts"..the very "first" to come up on the search page was NFL.com's draft site. Honestly, I did not have to do a lot of searching.

Yes Lance Zierlein had a mock and Erving was not a first selection of his.

Here is the bottom line..Erving needs to work on his weaknesses in the off season..he could very well prove to be worthy of the #19 pick..it's up to him.


Last edited by mac; 02/12/16 09:52 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Alex Mack: Cleveland Browns going in right direction

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5