|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
While clever, in reality, not really.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Here's the problem I'm seeing right now.
First, did Clinton even send or receive those emails? Good questions, all around. Let's take this one first: We don't know. What we think we MIGHT know is Huma got e-mails with info that weiner wasn't supposed to have, and somehow they ended up on weiner's computer, from huma - and possibly from Clinton. That is supposition at this time. We won't know what we know or don't know until the investigation is complete.
Seems like the evidence says no. Some are saying yes.
See above.
Here's the question: is there even anything in those emails? See above. We don't know. The FBI does, apparently.
As much as conservatives who hate Hillary are on for the witch hunt, well the FBI didn't have much of anything on her the first go around.
Very possibly because these e-mails may very well be some of the 30,000 that hillary deleted? We know, from Hillary's own words, that she deleted some 30,000 from her own server. It's not beyond doubt that some of those 30,000 got sent to Huma. And there is some evidence that Huma forwarded those e-mails, whatever they were about, to her (Huma's) yahoo account from her secure .gov account. Gotta let the fbi do it's work. (although, with clinton owning the doj, I"m sure nothing will ever come about)
So I'm sitting here wondering....what's the bombshell?
Is the bomshell only that they found another batch of emails?
Don't know. No one but the fbi does, and they don't know yet. Hillary has demanded that they all be released. I thought they were hillary? Oh, except for the ones that Huma may have forwarded from a secure account to her personal account, that somehow ended up on her husbands computer. Hillary deleted all evidence she had. She forgot to delete evidence huma sent to huma's personal account? We don't know. But I sure as hell won't take hillary's word on it. Nor Huma's.
or is it that y'all are actively hoping that there's SOMETHING in those emails?
I will freely admit, I hope there's something, or a lot of something, there. That is my hope. However, I also hope the fbi is allowed to do their job, with NO backside interference from the clinton power.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
So you're actively hoping that something negative happens to Hillary.
I have never once hoped that something negative would happen to trump, as I want as little issues with either candidate as possible.
That's kinda creepy of you, dude.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
And I find it ingenuous that Hillary and her campaign are demanding that the e-mails be released when: She knows she has no say it it, AND, she knows the DOJ will not prosecute her unless it's some bad, bad stuff.
Politics to a tee.
I demand the investigation be made public (which does nothing but make her look good because she can't demand anything. Point: Hillary)
(and MY doj won't do anything about it anyway, if they want a job if I win)
And "I demand that I get to see all the stuff the investigation is about, right now" (knowing that's not how it works - but still, making her look good in the public's eye, knowing it won't happen. But if it did, it would give her time to lie her way out of it. Think: I demand to know what tomorrows lottery numbers are, so I can falsely claim I won by luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,773
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,773 |
The polls are now tightening, anybody's race again! The email thing hit Hillary HARD.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195 |
While clever, in reality, not really. Depends upon your reality I suppose.
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
So you're actively hoping that something negative happens to Hillary.
I have never once hoped that something negative would happen to trump, as I want as little issues with either candidate as possible.
That's kinda creepy of you, dude. No, I'm just hoping that something finally sticks to hillary. And remember, she wouldn't go out with me - she chose you. Actually - what I'm hoping for, is the real, ACTUAL truth to be known. I'm hoping for her lies to be exposed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,632
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,632 |
Why do you keep saying it is HER D.O.J.?
She's no longer in charge of anything. She hasn't been for years now.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
Bro here is the difference I see in your posts and others (including mine) Everybody admits Trump is a idiot, who has done and said many things he never should have said or done. He is a pig, and most people who are voting for him acknowledge that. But he also stands up for something, or a few things that they believe in. Hillary is no better or way worse in almost every Trump voters mind, yet you just seem to keep denying that and treating her like she is a saint. Not only do you gloat about it, but you seem to love rubbing others posters nose in it, just because they don't agree with you. If there is one thing I hope you can take to heart and learn to do from this election it's to become a gracious winner. You need lots of work on that my friend.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
The polls are now tightening, anybody's race again! The email thing hit Hillary HARD. This election season is like the ultimate reality show.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Why do you keep saying it is HER D.O.J.?
She's no longer in charge of anything. She hasn't been for years now. Because I (capitalized and stressed) feel she, the clintons, are extremely feared. There.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Bro here is the difference I see in your posts and others (including mine) Everybody admits Trump is a idiot, who has done and said many things he never should have said or done. He is a pig, and most people who are voting for him acknowledge that. But he also stands up for something, or a few things that they believe in. Hillary is no better or way worse in almost every Trump voters mind, yet you just seem to keep denying that and treating her like she is a saint. Not only do you gloat about it, but you seem to love rubbing others posters nose in it, just because they don't agree with you. If there is one thing I hope you can take to heart and learn to do from this election it's to become a gracious winner. You need lots of work on that my friend. Funny, I seem to be the only one around here consistently calling Hillary a snake since day one. Which makes your entire post completely false. Nothing new I guess. And gracious winner? Bro, you're voting for a guy who is basically telling you that you personally suck at life, you don't win anymore, and since he's a winner, he can make your life suck less and finally start winning more. You suck, unless you vote for him. That's your candidate. Let's not talk about graciousness. You don't have a leg to stand on.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Funny, I seem to be the only one around here consistently calling Hillary a snake since day one.
You didn't really say that, did you?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Funny, I seem to be the only one around here consistently calling Hillary a snake since day one.
You didn't really say that, did you? You better ask around.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
The polls are now tightening, anybody's race again! The email thing hit Hillary HARD. What polls?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Funny, I seem to be the only one around here consistently calling Hillary a snake since day one.
You didn't really say that, did you? You better ask around. I'll ask. And if you've been saying it since before me, link to it, please. Might have to go back some time though.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
I've been saying it since the election started.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
I've been saying it since the election started. Dude.......in my best "c'mon man" voice: Come on man!!! I've been saying it for years and years! She's been a snaky, "all about me", money hunting mongrel since she got into politics. Correction: since her husband got into politics.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Well I guess that's the difference between me and you.
I'm not obsessed like some psycho ex boyfriend over Hillary. So I don't spend every waking moment of my life finding ways to trash her. The voodoo doll doesn't work bro. Take it back to New Orleans.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Are you kidding me? You post Trump articles all day long. You ARE obsessed.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
Funny, I seem to be the only one around here consistently calling Hillary a snake since day one.
Oh Lord your making Stevie wonder look like he has 20/20 vision bro Which makes your entire post completely false. See my and your comment's above buddy. And gracious winner? Bro, you're voting for a guy who is basically telling you that you personally suck at life, you don't win anymore, and since he's a winner, he can make your life suck less and finally start winning more. You suck, unless you vote for him. Bro your voting for a woman who will lie, cheat, and screw you over every damn chance she gets, and she has done so for 30 years. That's your candidate. Where the difference is needs explained to you. I have never once bashed you about Hillary winning. If she wins I will tell you congrats on getting your wish. I have never said there was anything wrong with you voting for Hillary. Yet you continue to attack the moral caracture of those who vote for Trump. It's really sad bro, as I believe your better than that.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Never been to N.O. No voo doo doll.
Yup, I guess that IS the difference between you and I.
I"m not obsessed with her - other than her lying, cheating, using ways. Some see it. Too many don't. They take the sound bytes and run with it. She is a skilled politician.
How else do you get away with saying something like "well, there's what you say to one group, and what you actually do. You need to be able to tell people one thing while doing the opposite."
$10,000 into $100,000 in 9 months in cattle futures trading, one of the most difficult futures trading markets there is?
But, he governor husband, and her links, had nothing to do with it, right?
She's as corrupt as any politician this country has ever seen. She'll set you up, and BAM, take your money like you never saw it coming.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Not really. Lately I've been trying to talk about other things.
Like the future.
Besides, I've made it clear I don't dislike trump. I just don't seem him as a president. He's cool as the reality tv guy.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
You just described every politician since the beginning of time.
So again, did Hillary write mean things in your high school year book or something? It's really odd.
Last edited by Swish; 10/31/16 04:30 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
I'm not obsessed like some psycho ex boyfriend over Hillary. So I don't spend every waking moment of my life finding ways to trash her. The voodoo doll doesn't work bro. Take it back to New Orleans. Your obsessed with defending her like a psycho ex boyfriend IMO. What I find disturbing is that you deny it.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
I'm not obsessed like some psycho ex boyfriend over Hillary. So I don't spend every waking moment of my life finding ways to trash her. The voodoo doll doesn't work bro. Take it back to New Orleans. Your obsessed with defending her like a psycho ex boyfriend IMO. What I find disturbing is that you deny it. Report: a Hillary supporter defends his choice for POTUS. News at 11.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
You just described every politician since the beginning of time.
So again, did Hillary write mean things in your high school year book or something? It's really odd. Nah, she's almost my mom's age. Nice attempt at a dig though. But, you fail again. You though, are so far up her rear end it makes me wonder. And sorry, no every politician has screwed over their constituents for one thing and one thing only: Money. Hillary has that won, hands down. Money,and power. Swish, don't doubt for a minute that she'll send you down the river if she can make a buck off you. Look into the Clinton foundation. Look into "pay for play" concerning the foundation. I'm wasting my breath, I know.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Here's the sand. Bury your head deeper in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Here's the sand. Bury your head deeper in it. You spend about as much time obsessed over me supporting her as you do trashing her. Did I dunk on you at a basketball court or something? I don't remember seeing that on instagram.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
I'm not obsessed like some psycho ex boyfriend over Hillary. So I don't spend every waking moment of my life finding ways to trash her. The voodoo doll doesn't work bro. Take it back to New Orleans. Your obsessed with defending her like a psycho ex boyfriend IMO. What I find disturbing is that you deny it. Report: a Hillary supporter defends his choice for POTUS. News at 11. I have no problem with you defending her. Really I don't bro. That's your right and I respect it. What I have a problem is you bashing people who support Trump instead of her. Just look back and see how many threads I started bashing her.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Everybody bashes everybody around here.
You guys clown me on a regular for supporting obama.
This isn't anything new.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
I agree that many people have bashed you for supporting Obama. However I don't think you can point out any posts I made saying that. We have disagreed on many things but we have always done it with respect for each other.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
I respect everybody here.
Yes, even arch. Sometimes.
Last edited by Swish; 10/31/16 05:00 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
Here's the sand. Bury your head deeper in it. You spend about as much time obsessed over me supporting her as you do trashing her. Did I dunk on you at a basketball court or something? I don't remember seeing that on instagram. I don't think so, as: 1. I'm not on instagram. 2. I'm 20 years older than you, so we didn't ever play against each other, and 3. No one dunked on me. Ever. (other than Sean Kemp. He did, I'll admit it) - but not even Steve hall (r.i.p. bud.) (played for Wayne Trace h.s. - then at Ohio State. Played him in summer league, and in the state regional finals - although in the finals, I didn't play much) Deflect all you want. Our whole conversation started with you saying you were the first to call hillary a snake. I simply said you weren't the first. And swish, you weren't.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
I respect everybody here.
Yes, even arch. Sometimes. At least you have that going for you. Well, other than when you threatened to bash my head in. Other than that, you've been somewhat respectful.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
I will slice a ham for a sandwich while Arch makes the Swish Cheese!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,652 |
I respect everybody here.
Yes, even arch. Sometimes. You see I believe that you do really respect everybody here. I just believe that the way you post that it does not come across that way to everybody.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,913 |
https://www.yahoo.com/news/warrant-search-newly-found-emails-obtained-fbi-075041519--election.htmlFBI review involves thousands of newly discovered emails Whitehouse spokesperson Josh Earnest: "He's in a tough spot, and he's the one who will be in a position to defend his actions in the face of significant criticism from a variety of legal experts, including individuals who served in senior Department of Justice positions in administrations that were led by presidents in both parties," Earnest said Is that a threat? From Huma (she'll be the scapegoat here) The fact that another cache of emails potentially important to the investigation has only recently been discovered raises an immediate question: How could Abedin have been unaware of their existence?
The answer is not yet clear, but it's possible that either she did not know about the emails on the computer of her estranged husband, forgot about them or for some other reason did not turn them over.
In a sworn deposition taken in June as part of a lawsuit filed by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, Abedin was asked about what devices she had used to send or receive messages from her account on the clintonemail.com server. As part of the process in 2015 of returning her work-related emails to the State Department, Abedin said she "looked for all the devices that may have any of my State Department" work and provided two laptops and a Blackberry to her lawyers for review.
Abedin made no mention of there being additional devices where her emails might have been saved. Weird. When Huma transitioned her e-mails, she lost some. Not all. Just some. In an April interview, Abedin told FBI agents that after she left the State Department in 2013, Clinton's staff transitioned to a different email sever and she "lost most of her old emails as a result." She said she had only accessed her clintonemail.com account through a web portal and that she "did not have a method for archiving her old emails prior to the transition." At least, that's what she told investigators, right? And here, Huma seems to think that "well, I gave them everything I thought I had".........forgetting that everything you thought you had didn't include the deleted e-mails you and hillary thought you deleted." A person familiar with the investigation said the device that appears to be at the center of the new review belonged only to Weiner and was not a computer he shared with Abedin. As a result, it was not a device Abedin searched for work-related emails at the time of the initial investigation, according to the person, who said of Abedin that it was "news to her" that her emails would be on a computer belonging to her husband. Somebody got's some splaining to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Hurry up and vote early before more evidence against Hillary comes out!
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Election Season Thread, Hopefully
The Last One
|
|