Some of y'all Christians are hilarious. Out here handing out bible verses to these kids.
Jeez
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Unfortunately no. Just straight lil pocket verses.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I'm glad Kasich didn't go along with the circus. Stuck to his stance. He looks like a solid front runner for 2020.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I predict by 2020 we will no longer be a single Nation at all.
The Country is so split at this point I think a Trump victory will calm things a bit while a Clinton victory will not even be recognized by 30 percent of the people.
If Trump wins it probably wont be recognized by 70% of the people. At least not in our nations largest cities where the population resides.
Some of y'all Christians are hilarious. Out here handing out bible verses to these kids.
Jeez
Glad you find humor in it my man. That would annoy me, big time. But, now I remember that GM thinks I am Damian for not wanting an evangelical to be our Prez. So, maybe that is why it would annoy me?
As far as I can tell, it comes from Hillary going on a Twitter rampage.
It's hard to blame her. As we say on here, deflect deflect, deflect-- really, anything to keep eyes off of the active FBI investigations of both Hillary and the Clinton foundation, and Wikileaks which has been steadily releasing damning corruption in the Democratic party and collusion with media (among other things.)
Like your boy does, to keep people talking about his trump university fraud case, or his child rape case, or him not releasing his tax returns?
Last edited by Swish; 10/31/1606:58 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
It's just one thing after another with Hillary - she is completely corrupt. She is so bad (at least in my eyes) I almost feel like voting for Trump.... But I won't vote for him either.
It's too bad we cannot vote for "none of the above," as there are so many people who can't stand our presidential candidates I bet that would win.
Like your boy does, to keep people talking about his trump university fraud case, or his child rape case, or him not releasing his tax returns?
- We'll see what comes of the Trump University case. I don't particularly care about that though
- We'll see what his taxes show, if/when he releases them. This matters more than the above but let's put it this way: I probably don't care about it as much as you do.
- The child rape thing is obviously a huge deal and could, in theory, be a game changer. That remains in theory though because as far as I can tell, that is an accusation with zero evidence. CHS had this discussion a while back, which I will reproduce below to show everybody how baseless that is.
CHS: And there is actual proof that Donald Trump raped a 12 year old girl and told her to have an abortion.
Haus: What is the actual proof that happened?
CHS: Her word and the person who witnessed DJT rape a 12 year old that, his friend and fellow Child Rapist, Jeffery Epstein recruited for him.
Haus: Ok, but what is the actual proof?
Is there DNA evidence (from the baby, fetal tissue, or the kind that led to Bill Clinton being impeached)?
Is there video?
Was there a police report filed at the time that contains any evidence or testimony?
Is there anything other than a civil lawsuit filed more than 20 years after this incident allegedly occurred, with one witness to corroborate it? I mean, what's really the difference between that and say, two people who hate Hillary making some wild accusation against her?
Please forgive the questions, but it is a big accusation and I'd like to get all the facts before making any conclusions.
CHS: No, there was no police action taken as DJT and Epstein threatened to murder her and her family if she were to inform law enforcement. Honestly, there's really no more evidence than what Juanita, Paula Jones and Kathleen Wiley have against Clinton.
Haus: I've tried to avoid the Juanita/Jones/Wiley accusations as I don't really know what happened in those situations, either. Others can duke that out if they wish. I did bring up the Kathy Shelton situation before, I think that is reasonable as Hillary Rodham actually was the defense attorney in that case. Indeed, she did her job and she did her job well. However, some might say that is that is the type of thing that gives lawyers a bad name (getting a 41 year old who raped a 12 year old and beat her so brutally that she was in a coma for 5 days off based on technicalities, attacking the mental health of the girl, etc.)
Which, by the way, for the record, I believe the accusations we are talking about in regards to Trump were actually about a 13 year old girl. I do not point this out to say that would be any more acceptable, but rather as an informational thing so we can keep all this stuff straight (others might get this accusation confused with the case that I described above.)
As far as Trump, what you are basically saying is that there is no proof of that alleged rape having occurred. You claim that the victim was threatened into silence; is it fair to assume that there is no evidence that DJT was involved in that, either? I would have to think that if there were evidence for that, you would have included that in your actual proof that DJT was involved in the initial crime although it's possible I'm jumping to conclusions on that. What do you think?
CHS: Well, there has yet to be posted proof about DJT's rape, but the case still hasn't hit the courts yet. I'm sure over the next 6 months we'll see a lot more come out. This just got its court case in December. But yes, there's no tangible proof in her case yet... Just like in Bill Clinton's cases.
Haus: Right. It seems like what we have here is an accusation. What comes of it remains to be seen.
As far as Bill Clinton's cases, others can comment on those. I haven't done enough research to have a meaningful opinion on them.
Like your boy does, to keep people talking about his trump university fraud case, or his child rape case, or him not releasing his tax returns?
Spoken like a true Clinton apologist.
Or, like someone that wouldn't care regardless.
Or, more like someone that is a bit afraid that finally Clinton will be nailed.
Excuses. Deflection.
Hey, relax bud, she's probably still going to win. She has the Clinton mafia behind her. No way they're going to let anything get in their way. She'll see to it.
(I wouldn't be surprised if Comey or those doing the investigation aren't hiring security right now).
But you go on with "I love my lady Clinton" and all your bad self. Gotta rock it, right?
It's funny watching you whine like a 12 year old about Hillary.
Not my fault your ideology sucks and couldn't produce a better candidate to beat Hillary. You should spend less time running your mouth toward me and spend more time grilling your fellow conservatives as to why you guys put up a craptastic candidate
Last edited by Swish; 10/31/1607:22 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
It's just one thing after another with Hillary - she is completely corrupt. She is so bad (at least in my eyes) I almost feel like voting for Trump.... But I won't vote for him either.
It's too bad we cannot vote for "none of the above," as there are so many people who can't stand our presidential candidates I bet that would win.
P.S. Halloween rocked tonight. I loved it.
-PPS: GO TRIBE!!!!!
Wait - there can't be anyway POSSIBLE that the long arm of the Clintons were able to get questions before hand. Hillary is a true lady.
Or, people were afraid of having unfortunate accidents if they didn't comply with the demands of Hillary.
No voter fraud anywhere, either, right? (look into who has rights to supply voter machines in 16 states). It's not a republican.
I honestly think Hillary supporters are a bit nervous.
Hell, we have one hillary supporter on here that's calling it a landslide for hillary......but he/she is getting nervous apparently.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I think we should all think about why Hillary was so "prepared" for the debates, and why so many of her answers sounded like short, canned speeches and not regular discussion.
Accusing Trump of "voter intimidation". In 4 states. Ironically, it's in swing states. Trump must be dumb - why wouldn't he intimidate voters everywhere, not just the swing states.
I wonder if the dem's remember the "new black panthers" standing outside polling booths with billy clubs and telling white people they can't vote.
Dem's are in crisis mode. They lady is struggling. One lie becomes 12, which becomes so damn many she can't even keep up.
Bleach the e-mails.............but damn, someone else has them on their computer.
A win is a win. You're salty cause your ex- cougar crush is about to be in the WH.
Don't take your bloodlust out on me homeboy lol.
Like I said before, don't be salty. If your crap ideology would've but up a better candidate, we'd be having different discussions right now.
But you can't help but take your unhealthy anger out on me for whatever personal issues you got going on. It really isn't my problem dude. Talk to a shrink about it.
But of course you won't check your fellow conservatives for putting up a trash candidate. All you can do is run your mouth toward me.
Your tears. It's glorious. Such a big ass baby lmao
Last edited by Swish; 10/31/1607:51 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Yup. Definitely spoken like a guy that is nervous about the election.
I laugh.
Hey, if your crap party would have put up someone with no past history of lying, cheating, deceiving, and saying "screw the rules", this election would've been over by now.
But, "ya'll" party came up with a liar, cheater, deceiver, and someone that gives as much a care about you as she does what her dog eats. (I wonder if she knows if she has a dog or a cat?)
"Ya'll lady" is not what "ya'll" thought. She will probably win, but it won't be a landslide like "ya'll" have been proclaiming.
But, you're now at "a sin is a win". Wow. You've changed in just the last few days. From "landslide. She's got the women's vote, she has the black vote, she has the minority vote" to "hey, a win is a win".
I live down here in Virginia, very close to Washington DC and I can tell you from my experience, the only thing that works right, came in under budget and on time, is Trumps new hotel.
Interesting piece from Scott "The Dilbert Man" Adams about risk assessment with a particular focus on drinking alcohol. Hillary has long been known as a heavy drinker, and I've been tempted to post about this in the past as a risk factor although I'm a social drinker myself. Then again, I'm not and wouldn't be in charge of the nuclear codes.
Imagine you lived in a world in which no one except one senior citizen ever drank alcoholic beverages. Would you think it is a good idea to choose this one person – the only drinker in the world – to be in charge of the nuclear arsenal?
No, that would be crazy. We know alcohol impairs judgment. And a president is on-call for emergencies 24-hours a day. Alcohol plus life-and-death decisions is a dangerous combination.
The only reason social drinking (or worse) is not automatically disqualifying for the Commander-in-Chief job is because … wait for it … many of us also drink alcohol. Or most of us do – at least enough to consider it normal behavior and socially acceptable.
We Moist Robots like to judge the world through filters that assume we are the standard for normal and sensible behavior. And because many of us drink – as do most of our role models – we figure it must be okay for a President to drink.
It isn’t.
Because of nuclear codes and terror attacks and whatnot.
In most presidential elections, voters have a choice of one social drinker or the other social drinker. Risk-wise, that’s a tie. But this election features a candidate who is known to like her alcohol versus a candidate who has reportedly never had a drink, an illegal drug, or a cigarette. And that means alcohol can be considered in the risk assessment.
I would argue that alcohol consumption is the biggest risk differential in this election. We’re just blind to that risk because alcohol is socially acceptable. But even in your own life, you see alcohol being the force behind unwanted pregnancies, drunk driving, bar fights, domestic abuse, sexual abuse, and just about every bad decision you’ve ever made. If we humans were even a little bit objective we would never select a leader who is likely to be impaired by alcohol several hours per week, including the workday. (Allegedly.)
Here’s a quick summary of the other risks, organized by candidate. I’ll rank them from 1-10 with 10 being “drinks alcohol.”
Trump Risks
1. No political experience in office (4)
2. Might say something insulting to another leader (3)
3. Might go nuts for the first time in his 70-year life. (2)
4. Aggressive negotiating stance might cause trouble (5)
5. Might institute some racist/sexist/homophobic policies (0)
6. Doesn’t do his homework on the issues (3)
7. Health problems (5)
8. Budget deficit expands to deadly proportions (6)
9. Might cause a race war (3)
Clinton Risks
1. Perpetual scandals and investigations. (5)
2. Health problems for Hillary Clinton (7)
3. Health problems for Bill Clinton that become distractions. (7)
4. Scandals for Bill that distract (8)
5. Big donors to Clinton Foundation rely on wars to make money (9)
6. Clintons are relatively easy to blackmail. (8)
7. Budget deficit expands to deadly proportions (8)
8. Immigration policies are more likely to allow in terrorists (9)
9. Drinks alcohol (10)
I didn’t include Climate change in the risk assessment because neither candidate is likely to do much about it.
You can do your own risk assessment and play with the estimates. This is subjective stuff. My only point is that the consumption of alcohol is the biggest risk variable.
—
Video of Clinton allegedly drunk in the morning.
Video of Clinton allegedly drunk while wondering why she isn’t 50-points ahead.
Wikileak email about trying to sober-up Clinton at 4:30 PM.
Video of Clinton allegedly passing out drunk at 911 ceremony.
Images of Clinton drinking socially.
There are some links on that page that I won't embed on here; if you're interested just visit his site.
So Hillary said during one of the debates, and has since repeated on social media, that the president can give the order and have nukes in the air in 4 minutes (by the way, how is that not classified?!) Having an 'impaired' CiC is kind of a big deal.
Also the author points out an angle that I had not seen before-- that Hillary allegedly passed out at the 9/11 memorial because she was drunk! I don't know how much truth there is to that but it would certainly fit the facts. For example, there is one photo of her hugging a small child immediately before or after that happened, which would be an extremely crummy thing to do if she had pneumonia. She also 'recovered' from that pneumonia bout miraculously fast. Like I said, I don't know what happened, but the official story sure seemed like a bunch of crap.
Also the author points out an angle that I had not seen before-- that Hillary allegedly passed out at the 9/11 memorial because she was drunk! I don't know how much truth there is to that but it would certainly fit the facts. For example, there is one photo of her hugging a small child immediately before or after that happened, which would be an extremely crummy thing to do if she had pneumonia. She also 'recovered' from that pneumonia bout miraculously fast. Like I said, I don't know what happened, but the official story sure seemed like a bunch of crap.
Haus, you know I disagree with you politically but, I do actually like how you present your points. THAT SAID, your quoted comment above is all here say and total speculation and I caution you to not jump on the bandwagon without knowing actual facts. This helps nobody and certainly not your cause. It just comes across as more conspiracy theories and rumor milling.
Also, regarding her pneumonia...her doctor quickly came out saying that her pneumonia was bacterial, which isn't contagious. So, we can move past the judgement of her hanging out with her granddaughter after she left the 9/11 memorial ill.
Also the author points out an angle that I had not seen before-- that Hillary allegedly passed out at the 9/11 memorial because she was drunk! I don't know how much truth there is to that but it would certainly fit the facts. For example, there is one photo of her hugging a small child immediately before or after that happened, which would be an extremely crummy thing to do if she had pneumonia. She also 'recovered' from that pneumonia bout miraculously fast. Like I said, I don't know what happened, but the official story sure seemed like a bunch of crap.
Haus, you know I disagree with you politically but, I do actually like how you present your points. THAT SAID, your quoted comment above is all here say and total speculation and I caution you to not jump on the bandwagon without knowing actual facts. This helps nobody and certainly not your cause. It just comes across as more conspiracy theories and rumor milling.
Also, regarding her pneumonia...her doctor quickly came out saying that her pneumonia was bacterial, which isn't contagious. So, we can move past the judgement of her hanging out with her granddaughter after she left the 9/11 memorial ill.
The 'hugging a small child' I mentioned was a photo op on that day. I forget the exact details but I posted about it when it happened and could dig it up if needed.
That was in addition to playing with her grandchildren (which was reported on but not photographed). My google-fu says that bacterial pneumonia is in fact contagious although needless to say, I'm not a doctor. Timing has an effect on that and I'll let the actual doctors sort that out.
I made it pretty clear that I did not know what the facts were and what I was doing was indeed speculating. I think that is fair. We're all adults on here and we can make up our own minds on things.
Are you comfortable with this person being in charge of the nuclear codes?
Pretty much most adults enjoy a drink on occasion. The difference is...is she a total drunk day and night?
And, I lived in England for 14 years....America is very uptight about alcohol in comparison to Europe. A couple beers at the pub after work was the norm. Do that in America and people whisper about you.
But, obviously a social tipple or night cap is one thing...waking up and drinking vodka throughout the day/night is another. I highly doubt she is doing the latter.
The pneumonia thing is done. Finished. Over with. All I am saying is I think you are going on a limb by suggesting she put her grandchild in harms way. She isn't stupid and she had doctors around her. If she was contagious she would have been hospitalized.
