First, your title isn't close to the subject of your video. I dunno if you did that on purpose or not, but i thought you'd be better than that. this is what i get for thinking the best of people on this board, apparently.
Second, this video is so flawed. first, he knew what he was doing. he intentionally made sure to leave out the subject matter, or context of the questions.
third: i want to point out to the board that this video is being filmed in a busy campus area, and when he's away from the campus, looks like a fairly big city. definitely a metro area.
When people are talking about the voter ID's, these laws affect mainly people in rural areas, where the communities are poorer and access to the DMV and such isn't readily available.
as a matter of fact, they even closed some DMV's in major black dominant areas, coincidentally around the time Voter ID laws came into effect, like in Alabama:
Alabama, Where ID Is Required to Vote, Closes DMVs in Most “Black Belt” Counties
so i wanted to point something out about these voter ID laws. here's an excerpt:
In North Carolina, the legislature requested racial data on the use of electoral mechanisms, then restricted all those disproportionately used by blacks, such as early voting, same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting. Absentee ballots, disproportionately used by white voters, were exempted from the voter ID requirement. The legislative record actually justified the elimination of one of the two days of Sunday voting because “counties with Sunday voting in 2014 were disproportionately black” and “disproportionately Democratic.”
So, absentee ballots, mostly used by whites, are actually exempt from these voter ID laws, or ID's period.
interesting.
however:
The documents acceptable for proving voters’ identity in North Carolina were the ones disproportionately held by whites, such as driver’s licenses, U.S. passports, and veteran and military IDs, and the ones that were left out were the ones often held by poor minority voters, such as student IDs, government employee IDs and public assistance IDs. The Texas voter ID law was designed the same way: There, officials accepted concealed-weapon licenses but not student or state employee IDs. The Texas legislature was repeatedly advised of the likely effect on minority voters but rebuffed nearly all amendments that would have eased its harsh impact.
___________________
So Eirk, if what you're implying is remotely correct, why are courts having to strike it down?
you see, the problem is that these new Voter ID's laws changed the game. people who have been voting for years with one form of ID are now required under new Voter ID laws to get another form of ID, as the one they were ALREADY using is now, out of nowhere, unacceptable.
And like i previously pointed out. states are trying to make a new form of ID required, but then turn around and shut down DMV's that provide those forms of identification under the guise of "budget cuts".
So you can play your silly games all you want. we all know what kinda crap you're trying to pull with your BS title.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
i want to point out to the board something as well:
Absentee ballots, the most COMMON form of voter fraud, is used primarily by whites, have been exempt from Voter ID laws.
but the ID's used by minorities for years to voter at the booth, the LOWEST form, and rarest form of voting fraud, has been targeting by republicans by Voter ID laws.
man oh man, just like how the drugs primarily used by whites carry a lesser jail sentence than drugs primarily used by blacks.
it's obvious who these laws target, and who they don't. but conservatives, keep telling yourself otherwise.
yet another reason in a very long list of reasons why conservatives and republicans can't get the minority vote. y'all make it plain as day to the world you only cater to bitter white guys.
And Erik is just another bitter old white guy.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
i want to point out to the board something as well:
Absentee ballots, the most COMMON form of voter fraud, is used primarily by whites, have been exempt from Voter ID laws.
but the ID's used by minorities for years to voter at the booth, the LOWEST form, and rarest form of voting fraud, has been targeting by republicans by Voter ID laws.
man oh man, just like how the drugs primarily used by whites carry a lesser jail sentence than drugs primarily used by blacks.
it's obvious who these laws target, and who they don't. but conservatives, keep telling yourself otherwise.
yet another reason in a very long list of reasons why conservatives and republicans can't get the minority vote. y'all make it plain as day to the world you only cater to bitter white guys.
And Erik is just another bitter old white guy.
There's a thread for this ...
Did your TEARS make u click on the wrong thread ... or u looking to DEFLECT DEFLECT DEFLECT!!!
i want to point out to the board something as well:
Absentee ballots, the most COMMON form of voter fraud, is used primarily by whites, have been exempt from Voter ID laws.
but the ID's used by minorities for years to voter at the booth, the LOWEST form, and rarest form of voting fraud, has been targeting by republicans by Voter ID laws.
man oh man, just like how the drugs primarily used by whites carry a lesser jail sentence than drugs primarily used by blacks.
it's obvious who these laws target, and who they don't. but conservatives, keep telling yourself otherwise.
yet another reason in a very long list of reasons why conservatives and republicans can't get the minority vote. y'all make it plain as day to the world you only cater to bitter white guys.
And Erik is just another bitter old white guy.
Whaaaaaa ... Whaaaaaa ... Whaaaaaa
translation: you can't refute any of it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
i want to point out to the board something as well:
Absentee ballots, the most COMMON form of voter fraud, is used primarily by whites, have been exempt from Voter ID laws.
but the ID's used by minorities for years to voter at the booth, the LOWEST form, and rarest form of voting fraud, has been targeting by republicans by Voter ID laws.
man oh man, just like how the drugs primarily used by whites carry a lesser jail sentence than drugs primarily used by blacks.
it's obvious who these laws target, and who they don't. but conservatives, keep telling yourself otherwise.
yet another reason in a very long list of reasons why conservatives and republicans can't get the minority vote. y'all make it plain as day to the world you only cater to bitter white guys.
And Erik is just another bitter old white guy.
Whaaaaaa ... Whaaaaaa ... Whaaaaaa
translation: you can't refute any of it.
*LOL* .. THATS FUNNY COMING FROM U ..
Hysterical ....
I've asked u 50 questions and you've answered 2 of them at most ...
I've all ready posted 5 or 6 VOTING FRAUD articles in the PROPER THREAD!!!
again, obviously it makes a difference, as you still believe half the crap out there.
not my fault you're voting for trump. i didn't make you do it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Libs love blacks. The hipsters all want black housing downtown. Kick them out and gentrify the area.
So liberal blacks love blacks?
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Bill Clinton was reported to be outraged that Senator Ted Kennedy endorsed Barack Obama as a candidate in 2008 over Hillary.
“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Bill yelled at Kennedy. So much for equality.
During Hillary’s 2008 campaign, the book noted: “Bill Clinton’s main assignment was continuing to make phone calls to super delegates, in which he pressed the case for Hillary and against Obama aggressively – at times too aggressively. Clinton’s message, sometimes implicitly, sometimes explicitly, was that the country wasn’t ready to elect an African American president. Some recipients of the calls found them discomforting, others embarrassing; few found them effective".
I dunno. That's why I'm asking you. Libs love blacks lol. You know you do too, eve. I know you have Beyoncé on your playlist.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
New Yorker's Lizza: Nothing Racial About Clinton's 'Obama Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'
THIS PARTS CLASSIC ...
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: You talk about, I guess where President Clinton said "a couple of years ago, he'd be carring our bags." And some people said that was just a comment about the age of President Obama and lack of experience, others said, that's a racial comment.
LIZZA: I don't think it's racial. I don't think Bill Clinton has a racist bone in his body.
Those are kids at Berkeley that believe blacks are incapable of getting an ID by themselves, are incapable of using the internet, and incapable of understanding anything government. Don't forget, Berkeley is a liberal bastion of a university. This is the nonsense they fill these worthless little brains with.
I miss the days when we posted websites and links I heard of and not some liberal / conservative triggered buzzfeed that probably acts as a source for Alex Jones.
And you branded it as "what do libs think of blacks".
Come on.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I miss the days when we posted websites and links I heard of and not some liberal / conservative triggered buzzfeed that probably acts as a source for Alex Jones.
*LOL* ... DEFLECTION DEFLECTION DEFLECTION ..
Just like with the wiki-leaks stuff .. not one time have i heard ... I DIDN'T WRITE THAT E-MAIL ..
Oh wait .. i guess i did .. then within two days she was PROVEN A LIAR ... Hi Donna ..
Your PEEPS, your NON RACIST HEREOS said these things .. regardless of where i pULLED THE ARTICLE FROM ...
U guys can wrap WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE around ANYTHING ..
That was a really good speech!! Thanks for posting that bro!! I knew you was a Hillary supporter!!
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
And you branded it as "what do libs think of blacks".
Come on.
Actually, he interviewed Berkeley students that are currently being trained in this type of group thought. I'm absolutely sure he got his expected responses from them.
My views are simple. If you're too stupid, lazy, or incompetent to carry a simple state ID then IMHO you're not qualified to vote. Many states REQUIRE an ID just to live in the state and be a citizen of that state. I mean seriously if you can't handle this extremely minor act of responsibility then you have no business influencing what affects my future. No excuses.
Now anything beyond asking for ID to prove who you are is flat out wrong. No questions should be asked about race or sex ... PERIOD. If they don't trust the process that they issue their state IDs then they need to fix that instead of asking inappropriate questions.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
I'm sorry but, this brings nothing intellectual nor constructive to the table. In fact, just by reading some of the comments it is completely destructive.
My views are simple. If you're too stupid, lazy, or incompetent to carry a simple state ID then IMHO you're not qualified to vote. Many states REQUIRE an ID just to live in the state and be a citizen of that state. I mean seriously if you can't handle this extremely minor act of responsibility then you have no business influencing what affects my future. No excuses.
Now anything beyond asking for ID to prove who you are is flat out wrong. No questions should be asked about race or sex ... PERIOD. If they don't trust the process that they issue their state IDs then they need to fix that instead of asking inappropriate questions.
It's even more than that.
It is illegal to work without 2 forms of ID, 1 being a photo ID. The federal form I-9 requires documents that prove both the employee's identity, and legal right to work in the country. Do people break the law? Of course. Should the fact that people break the law be justification for not requiring an ID? Not to rational people.
If you want to open a bank account, you are required to show ID.
If you want to join a union, you need a photo ID.
If you want a loan, you need to show an ID.
If you want to rent a home, apartment, car, or anything else, you need a photo ID.
If you want food stamps, welfare, and so forth, you need a photo ID.
But, for some reason, some people think that it is somehow too difficult for people to bring an ID to vote.
It's just amazing. Actually it's also kind of insulting. They are saying to people "We don't think that some people are capable of handling going to a license bureau once every 4 years to get a photo ID." A photo ID costs $8.50, once every 4 years, in Ohio. It's $10 in Michigan, and it can be waived. If someone doesn't have an ID, then they can't legally work, or do much of anything else ..... so it's not like such a person doesn't have time to get an ID.
There are so many excuses why we should not have photo ID laws for voting, but they are all hollow, and are actually insulting to many people, saying that they are no capable of getting a $10 ID (waived in some states for those with lower incomes) once every 4 years. It is ridiculous.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
I'm sorry but, this brings nothing intellectual nor constructive to the table. In fact, just by reading some of the comments it is completely destructive.
That is because it asks what Libs think of Blacks. If the question was what Conservatives think of Blacks, I could chime in with an intellectual or constructive comment like...
As a Conservative I find most Blacks to have darker skin color than me. Darker than Native Americans skin color and Asians skin color as well. From the videos he posted a while back, I would say Swish has darker colored skin than me but then I remembered he is half Turkey, which disqualifies him from consideration.
Voter fraud exists. The problem is 90% of it is by Dems, so it's no wonder "they" don't care.
All I can do is shrug and understand that this country is populated by a majority of pinheads. When i want a laugh, after I hand a "cashier" my money and he/she rings it up, I say wait, I have some change, then watch them stand there looking confused because they can't make change with the aid of their cash register. Try it sometime! It's funny.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
You need to provide links to back up your horsecrap numbers.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
LOL. I don't have to provide crap. All you have to do is open your eyes, look around, and process information. Others have posted articles and vids on voter fraud, but many refuse to take a look.
I can't make you open your eyes my friend. You want to walk around in the dark? That's ON you.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Segregation isn't coming back. Nobody likes racism, sexism, and xenophobia
I love the new United States.
Ya know the key word: united.
If you don't like it...move. I'm sure Putin would love to have you.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”