Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
"Solid players" tend to get released, traded, or let go in FA when there are constant changes in the coaching staff and FO.

Thus, as long as the Browns continue to fire people almost every single year, they are destined to lose and no amount of false bravado and posturing is going to change that FACT!

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 610
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 610
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Thus, as long as the Browns continue to fire people almost every single year, they are destined to lose and no amount of false bravado and posturing is going to change that FACT!


Some deserved firing. Typing in capital letters while sharing your opinion as though it were a fact still only renders your statement as an angry hyperbole.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
To think, I used to try and defend that guy.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
He thinks he can win some posters over by going at you...I'm telling you the guy is a troll. Always has been wink


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,086
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,086
Back to the thread: After deep thought, I think it may involve some combination of Rottehurler retiring, an act of God, and a QB.

But I don't want to catch them; I want them beaten soundly, please.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,153
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,153
Sweet, had to look up Hyerbole...our coaching change over does stink, like the number of QBs is astounding, but some of our coaches were best available---even with worst ever record I think Hue MIGHT be the answer....GO Browns!!!!


"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
..jc...

How do the Browns catch the Steelers?.....hmmmm.

It starts with ownership and their ability follow a plan and make the proper adjustments to the plan, while continuing to pursue the goals of that plan.

Haslam came to Cleveland talking about his experience with the Steelers as a co-owner for 4 yrs, but the fact is, he only talked about "the Steeler Way" and has been unwilling to follow the Steelers model.

Haslam refuses to hire experienced football people to supplement his analytics department even though his head coach has asked for more balance in the front office. So far, Haslam is unwilling to give up on his "hands on" approach.

Once Chuck Noll was hired, it only took Dan Rooney two years to figure out that being a "hands on" owner was not the best approach. Dan Rooney hired a qualified GM who had previous experience with the Steelers and then allowed Noll and Haley to do their jobs. It was Haley and Noll who built the Steelers into winners.

How long will it take the Browns owners to understand their "hands on" approach is not helping?...good question.

jmho


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
Mac, if I recall Noll's first year in '69, he gutted the '68 team keeping only half a dozen players finishing the season 1-13. I believe Art Rooney was GM/Owner. Noll was the 14th HC. Prior to Noll, no coach lasted more than 3 years. Team was founded near 1933. Ask any Steeler fan none can recall their existence prior to 1970! Thank goodness the bumblebee jersey brings light to those dark days!

I do recall Andy Russle. I hated the Steelers, but Andy was a damn good player.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: bugs
Mac, if I recall Noll's first year in '69, he gutted the '68 team keeping only half a dozen players finishing the season 1-13. I believe Art Rooney was GM/Owner. Noll was the 14th HC. Prior to Noll, no coach lasted more than 3 years. Team was founded near 1933. Ask any Steeler fan none can recall their existence prior to 1970! Thank goodness the bumblebee jersey brings light to those dark days!

I do recall Andy Russle. I hated the Steelers, but Andy was a damn good player.


Dan Rooney... link

bugs...as you can see, Dan Rooney was the GM when Chuck Noll was hired in 1969.

The time period when the Steelers resembled the current Browns was from the time Art Rooney bought the team in 1933 to/including 1968. The son, Dan Rooney began taking on more of the responsibilities for running the Steeler franchise that included the hiring of Chuck Noll and holding the position of the Steelers General Manager, beginning in 1969.

Art, who was 68 yrs old in 1969 remained the face of the Steelers franchise but his involvement in the decision making process was transferred to Dan Rooney.

Dan remained the Steelers GM for only 2 yrs before Dick Haley replaced Dan as GM in 1971. Once Dan Rooney became more "hand off", the franchise blossomed under the control of Chuck Noll and Dick Haley.

I still believe Haslam needs to follow the Steelers model and not just talk about it. Getting his hands off the control over personnel and hiring a qualified GM with a background "in football"...that would be an example of how the Steelers manage their franchise.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Originally Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper
stating the obvious the Steelers are the Kings of the North
but where do the Browns begin to make that journey?
I think they have to create a offense that can compete
with the Steelers big 3 of Bell Rothlisberger Brown.
I think the offensive side has to be built first
the trouble is it can't be addressed in one off season
theirs holes all over the offense
but does the front office realize this?


I just read or saw the title of this thread for the first time.
" So how do the Browns catch up to the steelers?"
and
1. rofl rofl rofl
and
2. They are not trying to! The Cleveland Browns are not trying to catch up to the Steelers!

3. If what I say is so wrong, then Show me how the Browns are not acting like a triple A baseball club,

With not only some under talented young guys not good enough for the big time...

but also a couple of washed up ex major-leaguers.

Just like Bart Simpson described triple A baseball several years ago.
If the Browns would stop acting like a triple A baseball team, I'd have to stop calling them a triple A baseball team.

They want to catch the Steelers? Keep their own team together!

Consistently haven't since 2006.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Knight. you say

1. Keep Hue, No matter what.

I don't agree with this, I think the continuity is important, but I have no feeling that Hue will ever be the answer that Pettine and Farmer could have been.

In fact, as I was thinking about it, I thought if they even went so far as to bring back Pettine and Farmer, or even only Pettine,

If they did that "today"! I think the future would be brighter than it already is, as I think we have to wait for Hue to get fired for losing and wait until the next rebuild, and then hope that group

hope that group can get about 18 months of a foundation,

until we'd reach the point we'd be at if they even brought back Pettine and Farmer, Today!

But none of that is going to happen,

1.So I have to either hope that I'm wrong about Hue, who can't even give a backbone answer in a post game interview!

2. or admit that it's going to be another 2 and a half years plus, before this team reaches the point wherein you could argue they have a shot to win even "half" of their scheduled games.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: bugs
Mac, if I recall Noll's first year in '69, he gutted the '68 team keeping only half a dozen players finishing the season 1-13. I believe Art Rooney was GM/Owner. Noll was the 14th HC. Prior to Noll, no coach lasted more than 3 years. Team was founded near 1933. Ask any Steeler fan none can recall their existence prior to 1970! Thank goodness the bumblebee jersey brings light to those dark days!

I do recall Andy Russle. I hated the Steelers, but Andy was a damn good player.


Dan Rooney... link

bugs...as you can see, Dan Rooney was the GM when Chuck Noll was hired in 1969.

The time period when the Steelers resembled the current Browns was from the time Art Rooney bought the team in 1933 to/including 1968. The son, Dan Rooney began taking on more of the responsibilities for running the Steeler franchise that included the hiring of Chuck Noll and holding the position of the Steelers General Manager, beginning in 1969.

Art, who was 68 yrs old in 1969 remained the face of the Steelers franchise but his involvement in the decision making process was transferred to Dan Rooney.

Dan remained the Steelers GM for only 2 yrs before Dick Haley replaced Dan as GM in 1971. Once Dan Rooney became more "hand off", the franchise blossomed under the control of Chuck Noll and Dick Haley.

I still believe Haslam needs to follow the Steelers model and not just talk about it. Getting his hands off the control over personnel and hiring a qualified GM with a background "in football"...that would be an example of how the Steelers manage their franchise.



I thought Dan Rooney took over later than that. I still like the Steelers back than when they got pounded!!

All I know is if I bought a team I'd be very hands on. It would take me a little time with a lot of hard knocks education.

I think people get so hung up on the textbook approach building a team. They forget there are so many ways to do it. I've always taken the approach the road less traveled bears the better fruit but at a higher cost. If you follow the lead, your view never changes. Doing what everyone else is makes it difficult getting the best choice.

Take a long look what Jerry Jones is doing in Dallas and Pete Carol in Seattle. I find it fascinating how both teams landed their QB. You don't have to agree with their approach, but it is dang hard discrediting their results.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
All I know is if I bought a team I'd be very hands on. It would take me a little time with a lot of hard knocks education.

I think people get so hung up on the textbook approach building a team.


bugs...the problem with the "hands on" approach...we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in, coming off the worst season in history...how do you think Haslam's "hands on" approach is working out for the Browns and their fans?

Haslam did not follow the Steelers model and his "hands on" approach has been a historic disaster for the Browns franchise...and Haslam still refuses to add an experienced GM to work in conjunction with Hue Jackson.

Looking back to the Steelers turn around..when GM Dan Rooney fired himself and hired a real GM, the Steelers turned their franchise around.

Let's just hope that Haslam and his analytics boys do not screw up this draft.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
Originally Posted By: mac
Quote:
All I know is if I bought a team I'd be very hands on. It would take me a little time with a lot of hard knocks education.

I think people get so hung up on the textbook approach building a team.


bugs...the problem with the "hands on" approach...we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in, coming off the worst season in history...how do you think Haslam's "hands on" approach is working out for the Browns and their fans?

Haslam did not follow the Steelers model and his "hands on" approach has been a historic disaster for the Browns franchise...and Haslam still refuses to add an experienced GM to work in conjunction with Hue Jackson.

Looking back to the Steelers turn around..when GM Dan Rooney fired himself and hired a real GM, the Steelers turned their franchise around.

Let's just hope that Haslam and his analytics boys do not screw up this draft.


Mac, in the current state define a real GM. Football changed because rules changed college football changed.

Today you have a real problem with kids lacking technique and knowledge. One advantage players have today is they are much more athletic. I think the NFL draft looks very similar to NHL. You must predict how players will develop. Sad NFL has no established development league.

I do think the term "analytical boys" is misleading. People are fooling themselves thinking all other teams haven't fully embraced. I believe the Browns have fallen way behind in analytics. It is why DePodesta was hired to help catch up. The analytical world in football, just like business, has become a major component getting a leg up on competition. I will bet more teams use Browns approach building a Front Office as oppose to traditional methods used just a few years ago.

As we watch Sashi keep close tabs on Chris Ballard in Indianapolis. Remember Chris has a leg up since he already has a franchise QB.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
I believe the Browns have fallen way behind in analytics.


I doubt that. Joe Banner was one of the biggest advocates of analytics. It was he who hired Sashi. I think Farmer was a dunce who ignored such stuff, but there were guys in the building who believed in analytics.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Quote:
I believe the Browns have fallen way behind in analytics.


I doubt that. Joe Banner was one of the biggest advocates of analytics. It was he who hired Sashi. I think Farmer was a dunce who ignored such stuff, but there were guys in the building who believed in analytics.


While Farmer was in charge, I don't see signs he used analytics. Yea, they had analytics. A group not used grows how? Here is where I think we fallen behind.

It's good having real discussion again.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in

Just not true mac...go rethink that. What I will get is some attempt to state how you are correct...Gosh forbid you should ever say MY BAD... saywhat


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: eotab
we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in

Just not true mac...go rethink that. What I will get is some attempt to state how you are correct...Gosh forbid you should ever say MY BAD... saywhat


EO..not sure what you are attempting to get at?

From the day Haslam was approved as the Browns owner, he stated that he would be a "hands on" owner. For 5 years the Browns have been owned by Haslam who is carrying out his idea of being a hands on owner.

Dispute that all you want...but it's a fact.

Last edited by mac; 02/19/17 10:39 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
I'm not sure there is any more a vague and subjective term as "hands on".

This could mean anything from micromanaging every decision his people make, making decisions instead of empowering his people to make them, sitting in the weekly meeting just to listen, observe, ask a few questions to keep up with the pulse of the team.

Heck, he could go work the hot dog stand on Game Day or follow Swagger with a poop bag.

All of that could be considered "hands on".


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,175
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: eotab
we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in

Just not true mac...go rethink that. What I will get is some attempt to state how you are correct...Gosh forbid you should ever say MY BAD... saywhat


EO..not sure what you are attempting to get at?

From the day Haslam was approved as the Browns owner, he stated that he would be a "hands on" owner. For 5 years the Browns have been owned by Haslam who is carrying out his idea of being a hands on owner.

Dispute that all you want...but it's a fact.


Explain how Jerry Jones failed? Why is it wrong for any owner who is passionate not to be involved in his company? How many years does it take a new owner to learn the business?

I can assure you Kraft, Rooney, and Allen are very involved. Al Davis was very involved and had much success.

Haslam is learning just like any other rookie. It is pretty redundant but Jimmy is correct. You need to hire the right mix of people who can work together. Do to Haslam's inexperience. He didn't make good hires. They not only have to reflect his personality but also the business. Tall order when one lacks the business knowledge.

I know patients is a bad word. It is what it is.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: eotab
we have been living Haslam's idea of being "hands on"...5 years in

Just not true mac...go rethink that. What I will get is some attempt to state how you are correct...Gosh forbid you should ever say MY BAD... saywhat


EO..not sure what you are attempting to get at?

From the day Haslam was approved as the Browns owner, he stated that he would be a "hands on" owner. For 5 years the Browns have been owned by Haslam who is carrying out his idea of being a hands on owner.

Dispute that all you want...but it's a fact.


And then he put everything in Banner's hands cause he had to attend to the family business and reorganize things there.

I am disputing what you said cause its only FACT in your HEAD...not the truth. not fact. incorrect. But you will still NEVER EVER, REMOTELY say you are wrong.

rolleyes


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,921
I
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
I
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,921
Word out of Pittsburgh is that they may let Leveon Bell test the free agent waters.
If that's the case if this front office serious about turning this team around give Bell a blank check and weaken the Steelers and strengthen you

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think that quite a few people are not stating facts in this case.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Sign of the times I guess...lol laugh


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum so how do the Browns catch up to the Steelers ?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5