|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
I can't see the team willing to give up two firsts. For me if you want a franchise QB and you're not in position to get one, which we are not, then you should do whatever it takes.
Lets say its the 12 this year. Then it's a conditional pick next year based on how Jimmy does for us with it being a minimum for a 4th round pick up to a first round pick if say he throws for 4,000 yards and 30 TDs. Those numbers on a team like this say he IS that franchise QB and then he was worth every bit of what we paid for him.
I mean a franchise QB is worth 2 firsts any day of the week. On a show me trade I would do it but I would not for do it strait up.
Of course that is all IF Jimmy was willing to sign a fat contract.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
‪ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/07/report-browns-would-trade-12th-overall-pick-for-jimmy-garoppolo/‬ for someone who's played like 3 games and Bill B. would feel comfortable trading? beware Yet, others would prefer to pin their future on a kid who has played 13 college games. I don't know man....both are gambles, I hear ya. But, I would prefer to roll the dice on JG than Trubisky. And then JG won't sign long term with Browns what then?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
i'm all for drafting garrett, maximizing picks 12 and 33 via draft or trade, signing 3-4 good FA's and drafting the usc guy next year. if i had to choose one qb for next year i'd say tyrod instead of jimmy G (if it meant giving up #12)
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001 |
IF and that's a big IF Jimmy G. doesn't want to be traded and won't resign once he does then you just have to move on. He is not a slave and has a right to choose who he plays for on his second contract. I think if Jimmy gets to meet with Hue though he would love playing for him.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
IF and that's a big IF Jimmy G. doesn't want to be traded and won't resign once he does then you just have to move on. He is not a slave and has a right to choose who he plays for on his second contract. I think if Jimmy gets to meet with Hue though he would love playing for him. That's the only thing about the trade that worries me if he re-signs before the trade then go for it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292 |
That's pretty much where I'm at, pdx.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145 |
Is sign and trade an option in the NFL? Even if there is, did he do that well in college to rate giving up high picks like this?
He's only played what, 3-4 professional games?
WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM my two cents...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Thanks for answering.
I don't agree w/your take, but different opinions are cool.
I do think that if we sign Taylor, we are just prolonging the agony. No way he becomes a top-tier qb. We'll still have a problem at the most important position on the field.
I think that Jimmy G is our best chance to finally solve the QB position. I think it's hard to put a price limit on that.
Now..........you and others might believe that Jimmy sucks because he is not a starter in the league, NE is willing to trade him, other NE qbs have failed, he was drafted in round 2, he has too many syllables in his last name, and cfrs doesn't like his nickname...LOL...........and that is all good.
Just a difference of opinion.
I hope we can make this deal because I think he is our best shot at solving a problem that has been here since the return.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145 |
Wait, does syllable amount matter? Nah it can't, Garropolo has the same amount of syllables as Rothlesburger. 
WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM my two cents...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
I agree with you in that he's our best chance to find "the answer" at QB in terms of right now. Is Tyrod the answer? No. Is Trubisky/Watson/Mahomes? No. (in my opinion at least).
JimmyG would be our best shot at a franchise guy right at this moment ... but it's a steep price financially and draft pick-wise. I don't think that juice is worth the squeeze.
But, I see exactly what you mean.
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
And I get your reluctance, too. It's certainly a gamble, as are almost all qb moves. Thanks for responding w/class. You have a legit point and very well could be right. I have a legit point and could be right. Good discussion w/no BS! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
And I get your reluctance, too. It's certainly a gamble, as are almost all qb moves. Thanks for responding w/class. You have a legit point and very well could be right. I have a legit point and could be right. Good discussion w/no BS! 
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Mary Kay Cabot has been saying this for awhile. I don't think she has any clue what she is talking about.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
JimmyG would be our best shot at a franchise guy right at this moment ... but it's a steep price financially and draft pick-wise. I don't think that juice is worth the squeeze.
We have the coin and we have the extra 1st rd pick....if he proves to be the guy then it will be worth it. If not, well, just another sorry tale in the history of the Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I am not trying to convince 4Life or anyone else, but you raise an interesting point.
You talk about our cap space and plethora of draft picks. If there was ever a time to make a bold move on a player you really desire............this would be that time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
Couldn't agree more. This is, of course, assuming we use the 12.
If it gets crazy like the #1 I am less enthusiastic as Garrett solidified his spot. But, if the team are thinking of the #1 on one of the rookie QBs I would prefer they again, roll that dice on JG.
Again, if he pans out it will all be worth it. But, we have been snakebitten so often that it is a serious worry, concern if things get crazy like the #1.
#12? Yep...DO IT!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I wouldn't give the first overall either.
I am not really good at determining value, so I really don't know if giving up the 12th pick is right or not. I will say that if people are willing to take a qb w/the 12th pick in the draft, then they should be okay w/trading it for Jimmy G, because I think he is a better prospect than any qb in the draft.
Oh well..........it's all opinion and who knows who is right or wrong....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447 |
Well if you think about it even if we traded 12 and 53 for jimmy it would essentially be wentz for jimmy and like half our draft class from last year. Id take Jimmy straight up over wentz so for me it's a win
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
Well if you think about it even if we traded 12 and 53 for jimmy it would essentially be wentz for jimmy and like half our draft class from last year. Id take Jimmy straight up over wentz so for me it's a win Question....would you take JG over Watson or Trubisky? If so, if SF are willing to trade their #2 would you trump them and use the 1? I don't even know how I feel about this....big question. I only pose this conundrum as this is the one position we can't get right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,854
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,854 |
Yes, I would take Jimmy Garrapolo over both Mitchell Trubisky and Desahun Watson.
No, I would not trade the #q overall for Jimmy Garrapolo.
If I was the Browns front office I would take Myles Garrett and then do what needs to be done to get a QB.
Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
Yes, I would take Jimmy Garrapolo over both Mitchell Trubisky and Desahun Watson.
No, I would not trade the #q overall for Jimmy Garrapolo.
If I was the Browns front office I would take Myles Garrett and then do what needs to be done to get a QB. Fair enough. Would you use a #1 for Sam Darnold?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
‪ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/07/report-browns-would-trade-12th-overall-pick-for-jimmy-garoppolo/‬ for someone who's played like 3 games and Bill B. would feel comfortable trading? beware Yet, others would prefer to pin their future on a kid who has played 13 college games. I don't know man....both are gambles, I hear ya. But, I would prefer to roll the dice on JG than Trubisky. And then JG won't sign long term with Browns what then? Well, if he's good. Franchise him. And I feel he's good here. He'll most likely sign long term
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331 |
I am not really good at determining value, so I really don't know if giving up the 12th pick is right or not. I will say that if people are willing to take a qb w/the 12th pick in the draft, then they should be okay w/trading it for Jimmy G, because I think he is a better prospect than any qb in the draft. Agreed. I'd give the 12 for Jimmy. Definitely not the No. 1 though. Just not enough info on the guy as of recent, plus paying him a veteran salary. But the 12 pick and a 3rd or 4th, I could go for. It is what it is. We need to improve our QB situation. I think Kessler played well for a rookie last year, but I also think he clearly has a ceiling lower than Garapolo. We'd get our starter for the season and check that box off. But I think if anything is gonna happen, it's gonna happen soon. Cause if Tyrod becomes available, we're gonna have to start negotiating for him. And if he doesn't, we'll begin negotiating with other guys as well
UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
‪ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/07/report-browns-would-trade-12th-overall-pick-for-jimmy-garoppolo/‬ for someone who's played like 3 games and Bill B. would feel comfortable trading? beware Yet, others would prefer to pin their future on a kid who has played 13 college games. I don't know man....both are gambles, I hear ya. But, I would prefer to roll the dice on JG than Trubisky. And then JG won't sign long term with Browns what then? Well, if he's good. Franchise him. And I feel he's good here. He'll most likely sign long term And then he won't resign the next season? He gets an offer from the Pats?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
But I think if anything is gonna happen, it's gonna happen soon. Cause if Tyrod becomes available, we're gonna have to start negotiating for him. And if he doesn't, we'll begin negotiating with other guys as well
One of the NFL beat writers...Rapaport, Silver etc. said it may drag on until the first day of the draft! I don't like the sound of that. But, these guys are often guilty of sharing info they get via rumors so who knows.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Some men you just can't reach
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.
Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.
Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold. Because you know you will have them through their rookie contract JG could refuse to re-sign and you waste your pic on a one year rental.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292 |
If we didn't have Myles Garrett in our laps, and if the QB crop is as questionable as this year's is said to be, maybe you do trade 1st overall.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.
Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold. Because you know you will have them through their rookie contract JG could refuse to re-sign and you waste your pic on a one year rental. If they were to sign him, even with the 12, they need to lock him up for longer than one year. I suspect they would.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
If we didn't have Myles Garrett in our laps, and if the QB crop is as questionable as this year's is said to be, maybe you do trade 1st overall. If Shanny doesn't get Cousins he may well be thinking the same with the 2. Made all the easier assuming we take Garrett before him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292 |
You're right. That's a possibility also.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
If people are willing to use a #1 on an unproven rookie (inc Sam Darnold) why not a guy who has been coached and tutored for a few years by the best? Somebody who only has a few starts, but, has at least seen pro-defensive schemes, pro playbooks and has made that transition from college ball to pro ball.
Again, I only throw this out as devils advocate. I AM NOT advocating we use the 1 for JG. But, it is a valid argument if we are happy to say things like "fail for Cardale", "suck for Luck" and then talk about grabbing an unproven college guy like Watson, Trubisky, Goff, Wentz or Darnold. Because you know you will have them through their rookie contract JG could refuse to re-sign and you waste your pic on a one year rental. If they were to sign him, even with the 12, they need to lock him up for longer than one year. I suspect they would. If he was locked and wanted to play here good if not it's a waste.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
If he was locked and wanted to play here good if not it's a waste.
Of course.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I am an advocate of making the trade for Jimmy G, bro....but, let's make it real:
To me, it's all about skill set when it comes to QBs. We have posters on here who pontificate about production and systems. But, at the end of the day...........you gotta look at a guy's skill set and keep it independent of other variables.
Jimmy G doesn't quite check all the boxes like an Andrew Luck. However, I think he checks a lot of them. I'll provide a run down for whoever is interested:
--Accuracy: Superb. I think this is one of the most important attributes a qb can have. I remember Razor pimping the guy a few years ago when I wanted Teddy....so, I started researching Jimmy G........mostly in order to discredit him. LOL...yeah, I admit it. But man, the guy won me over. I think he has a couple of question marks and I still liked Teddy better, but Jimmy impressed the hell outta me. His accuracy is supreme.
--Quick Release: Again, it's outstanding. Probably the best in that class and that was a great class.
--Reading defenses pre and post snap: I didn't get a good feel of his pre snap reads in college, but in NE, you could see him making the right reads and checking into the right plays. His post snap reads have always been outstanding.
--Arm strength: Above average. Not Rodgers like, but he can make every throw.
--Decision making: This was my concern. I thought he was a bit of a gunslinger. He would trust his arm too much and fire balls into tight windows. It worked in college, but I worried that it might lead to picks in the NFL where the players are faster and more instinctive.
--Size: Adequate. Nothing more, nothing less.
--Pocket presence: Very good. Feels pressure. Will stand in there.
--Leadership: Very strong.
--Anticipation: One of the few younger qbs who has demonstrated the ability to throw before the receiver makes his break. Some concern about anticipating the coverage.
--Intelligence: Very high. One of the smarter qbs you will find. His ability to look off safeties is very impressive.
--Ability to go through Progressions: Linked to intelligence. Very good. You could see the guy go from one target to the next.
Summary: I think Jimmy G checks almost all the boxes. I was really concerned w/his gunslinger attitude......let me clarify that......I like a guy who will take chances.....see Big Ben and hate guys who are afraid to make throws......see Kessler.....but, you can't turn the ball over too much. Make sense? Anyway........I thought Jimmy G took too many chances and trusted his arm too much. I thought that that would translate into picks in the NFL. That still may be true, but perhaps the NE thing changed that attitude because I really didn't see it in his limited time in the NFL. What better team to learn the importance of ball security than NE?
What to do? I know there is a risk w/this guy, but I think he is a safer pick than any other option. I know that sounds crazy, but I say that because I think his chance of success far outweighs anyone else who is available. I would do the deal provided it doesn't take the first overall pick.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899 |
I am an advocate of making the trade for Jimmy G, bro....but, let's make it real:
To me, it's all about skill set when it comes to QBs. We have posters on here who pontificate about production and systems. But, at the end of the day...........you gotta look at a guy's skill set and keep it independent of other variables.
Jimmy G doesn't quite check all the boxes like an Andrew Luck. However, I think he checks a lot of them. I'll provide a run down for whoever is interested:
--Accuracy: Superb. I think this is one of the most important attributes a qb can have. I remember Razor pimping the guy a few years ago when I wanted Teddy....so, I started researching Jimmy G........mostly in order to discredit him. LOL...yeah, I admit it. But man, the guy won me over. I think he has a couple of question marks and I still liked Teddy better, but Jimmy impressed the hell outta me. His accuracy is supreme.
--Quick Release: Again, it's outstanding. Probably the best in that class and that was a great class.
--Reading defenses pre and post snap: I didn't get a good feel of his pre snap reads in college, but in NE, you could see him making the right reads and checking into the right plays. His post snap reads have always been outstanding.
--Arm strength: Above average. Not Rodgers like, but he can make every throw.
--Decision making: This was my concern. I thought he was a bit of a gunslinger. He would trust his arm too much and fire balls into tight windows. It worked in college, but I worried that it might lead to picks in the NFL where the players are faster and more instinctive.
--Size: Adequate. Nothing more, nothing less.
--Pocket presence: Very good. Feels pressure. Will stand in there.
--Leadership: Very strong.
--Anticipation: One of the few younger qbs who has demonstrated the ability to throw before the receiver makes his break. Some concern about anticipating the coverage.
--Intelligence: Very high. One of the smarter qbs you will find. His ability to look off safeties is very impressive.
--Ability to go through Progressions: Linked to intelligence. Very good. You could see the guy go from one target to the next.
Summary: I think Jimmy G checks almost all the boxes. I was really concerned w/his gunslinger attitude......let me clarify that......I like a guy who will take chances.....see Big Ben and hate guys who are afraid to make throws......see Kessler.....but, you can't turn the ball over too much. Make sense? Anyway........I thought Jimmy G took too many chances and trusted his arm too much. I thought that that would translate into picks in the NFL. That still may be true, but perhaps the NE thing changed that attitude because I really didn't see it in his limited time in the NFL. What better team to learn the importance of ball security than NE?
What to do? I know there is a risk w/this guy, but I think he is a safer pick than any other option. I know that sounds crazy, but I say that because I think his chance of success far outweighs anyone else who is available. I would do the deal provided it doesn't take the first overall pick. +100!  Brilliant post, Vers!! Best post I have read in here for a long while. Thanks for sharing your detailed thoughts. You have articulated and backed up your thoughts and observations beautifully.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292 |
My "you're right that's also a possibility" post was a close second, I presume?
Lol, that WAS an enjoyable read Vers. If We trade for him - I'm cool with that idea - I hope you're right.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Garoppolo Part Five
|
|