|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693 |
Whether he becomes the next T.O. or not, he'll be available next year and we can bid for his services just like anyone else. In that sense, this story isn't over. (Not that I think we'll go after him, but he will be available to sign if we were to become interested.)
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/hfMNC7T.jpg) "I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski "Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield #gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Ya know what.. I agree with mac.
We should focus more on keeping the players we drafted, instead of signing guys off the street.
Like Pryor.
Wait.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,340
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,340 |
Ya know what.. I agree with mac.
We should focus more on keeping the players we drafted, instead of signing guys off the street.
Like Pryor.
Wait. 
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877 |
3. On losing Terrelle Pryor to the Redskins Brown pinned Pryor’s departure on him and his agents, Drew and Jason Rosenhaus, after they turned down the Browns’ offer of $8 million per year for four years. "First we feel good about having Kenny (Britt) added to our team,’’ Brown said. “We did try to work with Terrelle to try to find common ground and we just didn't. Terrelle decided he wanted to take a one-year deal. We had discussions with his representatives throughout. They were respectful. We wish Terrelle the best. He's not on our roster. In some ways, that's unfortunate. But in many ways, that's a decision that he (made)." Interesting...on losing Pryor, Sashi puts the blame totally on Pryor and his agents.
Two years in a row, Sashi has failed to get our top free agents signed...but the front office has no problem throwing crazy money at someone else's free agent...
I don't know how the Browns ever build a winning team using the business model that Sashi and Jimmy they are using. Until they making re-signing our own free agents a higher priority than signing other teams free agents...they will never truly have a team..a group of guys who stay together and develop a bond with a central goal..to win a championship.
jmo..mac Assuming what he said was true, what should he have done any differently?
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
That is a big assumption.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Well obviously we should of offered more money than Cleveland did...
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877 |
That is a big assumption. That's true, Vers. Absolutely true, especially after the Schwartz debacle last year. From what I gathered, though, Mac seemed to have a problem with it regardless, and I'm trying to figure out what his justification is.
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Just to be clear, I am not bashing the FO over this. I'm just tired of how people bash mac for being one-sided, when dozens and dozens of them have the same mentality as he does, but in their eyes, it's always the player's fault and the FO is blameless.
I can't get on-board w/either side. I don't think negotiations and life are full of absolutes. I just get annoyed because there really is only one mac, but again, there are so many on the other side that I almost feel the need to speak up to try and create some sense of balance.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
It may be "everyone vs mac"
But he posts enough about the same things over and over that it actually balances out.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,479
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,479 |
It may be "everyone vs mac"
But he posts enough about the same things over and over that it actually balances out. The dude is on a roll today!
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877 |
I'm certainly not intending any sort of piling on as you typically find me staying out of most controversy. I used to try and fight the good fight, but there's too much "blindness" to contend. I'm honestly trying to get a deeper sense of Mac's position on this one.
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,091
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,091 |
I'm certainly not intending any sort of piling on as you typically find me staying out of most controversy. I used to try and fight the good fight, but there's too much "blindness" to contend. I'm honestly trying to get a deeper sense of Mac's position on this one. "Blindness"? Don't you mean testosterone?
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,231
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,231 |
3. On losing Terrelle Pryor to the Redskins Brown pinned Pryor’s departure on him and his agents, Drew and Jason Rosenhaus, after they turned down the Browns’ offer of $8 million per year for four years. "First we feel good about having Kenny (Britt) added to our team,’’ Brown said. “We did try to work with Terrelle to try to find common ground and we just didn't. Terrelle decided he wanted to take a one-year deal. We had discussions with his representatives throughout. They were respectful. We wish Terrelle the best. He's not on our roster. In some ways, that's unfortunate. But in many ways, that's a decision that he (made)." Interesting...on losing Pryor, Sashi puts the blame totally on Pryor and his agents.
Two years in a row, Sashi has failed to get our top free agents signed...but the front office has no problem throwing crazy money at someone else's free agent...
I don't know how the Browns ever build a winning team using the business model that Sashi and Jimmy they are using. Until they making re-signing our own free agents a higher priority than signing other teams free agents...they will never truly have a team..a group of guys who stay together and develop a bond with a central goal..to win a championship.
jmo..mac 
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263 |
3. On losing Terrelle Pryor to the Redskins Brown pinned Pryor’s departure on him and his agents, Drew and Jason Rosenhaus, after they turned down the Browns’ offer of $8 million per year for four years. "First we feel good about having Kenny (Britt) added to our team,’’ Brown said. “We did try to work with Terrelle to try to find common ground and we just didn't. Terrelle decided he wanted to take a one-year deal. We had discussions with his representatives throughout. They were respectful. We wish Terrelle the best. He's not on our roster. In some ways, that's unfortunate. But in many ways, that's a decision that he (made)." Interesting...on losing Pryor, Sashi puts the blame totally on Pryor and his agents.
Two years in a row, Sashi has failed to get our top free agents signed...but the front office has no problem throwing crazy money at someone else's free agent...
I don't know how the Browns ever build a winning team using the business model that Sashi and Jimmy they are using. [color:#33CC00]Until they making re-signing our own free agents a higher priority than signing other teams free agents...they will never truly have a team..a group of guys who stay together and develop a bond with a central goal..to win a championship. jmo..mac [/color] Okay, I'll play. I know we've been warned to not feed the trolls, but is just so silly that I can't help myself. Pryor was NEVER OUR FREE AGENT. We did not draft him, we really cut him and then signed him to a 1 yr. contract to try out at WR. He was never ours to begin with.  Get with the program
Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180 You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow #GMSTRONG
I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 177
Practice Squad
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 177 |
Any time we can get information from the front office, it gives us a better idea on how the Browns front office operates. Agreed 6. Is Jackson is driving the bus on the QB decision this year Although Jackson is expected to have a bigger voice on QB, the buck still stops at Brown’s desk. “We’d reach that decision collectively,’’ Brown said. “At the end of the day it’s my decision on who we pick, but Hue and I talk constantly. We’ll have a lot more discussions between now and the night of the 27th, 28th and 29th to see what’s available there. If there’s a player on another team, that could be something that we look at as well. We’ll have a lot of those conversations and chop it up between the two of us to get to the right decision for our team." He wouldn’t concede that Jackson has more input this season than last, when the Browns drafted a quarterback in Cody Kessler who didn’t fit his prototype. “No, and I wouldn’t say he had too little, too much or anything like that,’’ Brown said. “I just wouldn’t compare it. We’re working well together is the way I’d characterize it.’’
#6 seems odd: I assume this commentary is mary kay's "He wouldn’t concede that Jackson has more input this season than last, when the Browns drafted a quarterback in Cody Kessler who didn’t fit his prototype." I thought the consensus was ("trust me") Hue wanted Cody. Is she trying to stir it up or is this just revisionist history by her?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I wasn't clear. Sorry about that. I certainly wasn't putting you in that group.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877 |
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990 |
jc...
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making.
Does the Sashi Brown front office put a higher priority on signing other teams free agents?...
...or does the Sashi front office put a higher priority on signing our own players when it is time to negotiate a new contract?
FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,479
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,479 |
jc...
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making.
Does the Sashi Brown front office put a higher priority on signing other teams free agents?...
...or does the Sashi front office put a higher priority on signing our own players when it is time to negotiate a new contract? I have no idea how you can come to a conclusion one way or the other. Last year, it looks as though the FO let Mack, Benjamin, and Gipson walk. They made the best offer to Schwartz in an attempt to re-sign him and he chose free agency. He found out he wasn't as valuable as he thought (the Browns saw that too) and the offer was removed. He ended up signing elsewhere. This year, the team extended Bitonio, gave a second round tender to Crowell, and extended Collins after trading for him (which was the plan all along). They made the best offer to Pryor in an attempt to re-sign him and he chose free agency. We all know what happened after that. They signed three players- Britt (most likely as a result of Pryor walking), Zeitler, and Tretter. Speculation on my part.....I expect them to extend Kirksey as well. Nothing in two offseason really leans dramatically in one direction or the other. There were clear signs of trying to re-sign Schwartz and Pryor. And they extended players already on this roster. And yes, they picked up three players in FA. Seems almost split down the middle at this point, no??
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818 |
jc...
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making.
Does the Sashi Brown front office put a higher priority on signing other teams free agents?...
...or does the Sashi front office put a higher priority on signing our own players when it is time to negotiate a new contract? If I had to choose, I'd say the FO puts a higher priority on signing on our own players. Although I don't think there is a priority in this regard. I think the priority is to build a team now and for the future (moreso for the future). Fact is in the case of Pryor we wanted him here for the long term. Pryor didn't want that, he wanted to chase the money. Plain and simple. It's not anyone's fault that the two entities were on different pages. And nothing says either page is the wrong page.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 |
jc...
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making.
Does the Sashi Brown front office put a higher priority on signing other teams free agents?...
...or does the Sashi front office put a higher priority on signing our own players when it is time to negotiate a new contract? No, I'm pretty sure everyone at this point knows exactly what you're saying. Sashi Brown is actively and purposefully working against the best interests of the Cleveland Browns. It's what Jimmy pays him to do so that he can pocket player salaries like he did with Schwartz's money. That is why there was such a hustle to be #1 in salary cap space. I mean sure, we could get better players here, and pay them more money, but then we'd be maxing out the cap and he'd have less money to steal. Plus, it's not like there's any money to be made in a fielding a competitive team anyway. Oh the best part? Jimmy's even scamming Sashi! He's paying him in rubber checks and wooden nickels lol He's depositing the real money in an off shore account in the Caribbean. Clearly.
"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things." -Jack Burton
-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,877 |
jc...
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making.
Does the Sashi Brown front office put a higher priority on signing other teams free agents?...
...or does the Sashi front office put a higher priority on signing our own players when it is time to negotiate a new contract? Mac, listen, I'm not trying to pile on here, but this is exactly what you said: Interesting...on losing Pryor, Sashi puts the blame totally on Pryor and his agents.
Two years in a row, Sashi has failed to get our top free agents signed...but the front office has no problem throwing crazy money at someone else's free agent...
I don't know how the Browns ever build a winning team using the business model that Sashi and Jimmy they are using. Until they making re-signing our own free agents a higher priority than signing other teams free agents...they will never truly have a team..a group of guys who stay together and develop a bond with a central goal..to win a championship.
jmo..mac You actually use the phrase "Sashi failed." Then you go on to skew it that Sashi is somehow making it a higher priority on signing other team's free agents. So I'm asking, how could Sashi have handled the Pryor situation differently? Look, I'm not an unabashed fan of Sashi. I think the Schwartz mishap was bad. I'm not sure how much of the draft last year was on him, but I wasn't a big fan of most of the picks. I do think he's done some good though, and try to judge each of his actions on its own merit. I'll answer your latest question, though. I don't think Sashi makes either one of those more of a priority. My speculation based upon everything I've seen is that Sashi sets a value range for each of our free agents and each of the free agents from other teams, but refuses to move beyond that value range, as we saw with both Pryor and Schwartz. Now, can you answer my question? What should Sashi have done differently with the Pryor situation?
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Good post. The only thing I will add is that the only thing that Sashi could have done different w/Pryor is perhaps wait it out a bit instead of signing Britt, which probably ended negotiations w/Pryor.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Good post. The only thing I will add is that the only thing that Sashi could have done different w/Pryor is perhaps wait it out a bit instead of signing Britt, which probably ended negotiations w/Pryor. I don't disagree with that. But then we could of possibly ended up with neither.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112 |
Good post. The only thing I will add is that the only thing that Sashi could have done different w/Pryor is perhaps wait it out a bit instead of signing Britt, which probably ended negotiations w/Pryor. But, perhaps not, though I do understand your point. Perhaps we could have waited a day more.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112 |
Obviously some have not a clue what I'm talking about and did not take the time to read and understand the point I'm making. I read what you wrote and don't have a clue as to the point you are trying to make.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
That is why I used the word "perhaps."
I realize that Sashi has a long track record of being one of the best GM's in the entire NFL and that it is heresy to even consider that he and the rest of the Brown's deep thinkers might have made a mistake or two, but some people do like to keep an open mind even though the Brown's have had such a great won/loss record.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,610
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,610 |
Sashi has made both good and bad moves so far. He deserves neither praise nor ridicule at this time, for his work so far.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,467
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,467 |
After 8 pages of posts , this really sums it up ! I'm a bottom line kinda gut ..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112 |
After 8 pages of posts , this really sums it up ! I'm a bottom line kinda gut .. Fair enough. Time to shut this on down for good.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Hmmmm..........no outrage about someone suggesting we shut down a FO thread, yet I got drilled for suggesting we wait until Gordon got reinstated before we started debating what to do w/him.
This place is so consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990 |
After 8 pages of posts , this really sums it up ! I'm a bottom line kinda gut .. Fair enough. Time to shut this on down for good. As long as the Browns front office "makes news", it makes sense to have a Front Office thread, imo.
Some of the comments that come out of the Browns front office, you just have to shake your head at.
Stuff like this from Sashi Brown, the Browns GM in charge of the 53 man roster..."We’re not in position at wide receiver to turn down a guy like Josh if we feel he’s settled himself."
Sashi can say this after failing to re-sign the Browns best WR?...Sashi could use a full length mirror!
I never heard a word about the Browns WR position being an issue/concern/weakness when the front office said they were attempting to re-sign their best wr...but now that the front office failed to get their top wr re-signed, suddenly the Browns wr position "is not in a position to turn down a wr like Josh Gordon."
I just shake my head in disbelief...if the Browns suddenly have needs at WR, so much so that they welcome back the franchise's most suspended player hoping he can fill the void....
Understand this, if there is a player(FA)the Browns front office "wants to sign", they do "whatever it takes" to get that player signed.
...this year, the Browns front office was willing to make an OG the highest paid in the NFL at his position... why? ..because Jimmy Haslam and Sashi Brown "wanted him".
...this year, the Browns front office saw a need for another 2nd round draft pick (even a 2018 pick), they were willing to take on the $16 million contract of Brock Osweiler, to get that 2nd round draft pick from the Texans ...why?...because Haslam, Sashi and Depo wanted that deal to happen.
Is there any doubt that the standard set by this franchise is..if they want a deal to happen..they do all they can to make it happen..including spending extra cash to insure the deal gets done.
The Browns GM is in charge of the Browns 53 man roster and if there is something Sashi, Haslam or Depodesta wants...they get it done.
Hue Jackson is just the Head Coach...
jmo
Last edited by mac; 04/02/17 08:23 AM.
FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
mac, a few things:
--What if Pryor didn't want to be here?
--What about the Browns re-signing Collins and extending Bitonio?
--I think it very clear that Hue Jackson has a big say in what moves the Browns are making.
I find very little objectivity when reading most of these posts. It's either........the FO is completely to blame or the FO deserves zero blame.
Like almost everything else in life, things are way more complex than simply dividing things into two polar categories.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818 |
After 8 pages of posts , this really sums it up ! I'm a bottom line kinda gut .. Fair enough. Time to shut this on down for good. As long as the Browns front office "makes news", it makes sense to have a Front Office thread, imo.
Some of the comments that come out of the Browns front office, you just have to shake your head at.
Stuff like this from Sashi Brown, the Browns GM in charge of the 53 man roster..."We’re not in position at wide receiver to turn down a guy like Josh if we feel he’s settled himself."
Sashi can say this after failing to re-sign the Browns best WR?...Sashi could use a full length mirror! I think failed is the wrong word here... And his comments obviously reflect that. They tried to re-sign Pryor. It didn't work out. We weren't going to pay him more dollars just for the sake of paying him more dollars. And to that I say, at least they went out and signed someone to replace him, unlike last year with Mack or Schwartz. Browns made a fair offer, Pryor declined. I don't think it gets any more cut and dry than that... I guess maybe some people think you have to overspend to keep players. I don't believe in that at all and when people say that I just shake my head.... I don't believe you'll ever win if that's the precedent. The Browns-Pryor situation is unfortunate. I wanted to keep Pryor, but I don't think the front office failed or that we are doomed because he signed somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,994
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,994 |
Sashi can say this after failing to re-sign the Browns best WR?...Sashi could use a full length mirror! [/color]
There's no point in having a conversation Mac ... you see the world through a different lens. Pryor has been discussed ad nauseam .... the Fo made a fair offer - the best offer he received for a multi-year deal. Apparently You wanted the Sashi to cough up whatever it took to pay Pryor to play for the Browns. Pay him like he was already a top 5 WR in the NFL instead of what they (and the rest of the NFL) thought his value is.... That is the ONLY interpretation of how you think the FO should run this team. Based on that impossible scenario to debate with you - yeah the thread should be shut down. And instead of coming here to spin your version of reality when you want to bash the the Harvard Boys - reinventing history as you go -- we can have a single thread discussion the actual topic at hand whether it's the brilliant trade for Collins, or the brilliant trade of a punter or the brilliant trade of Mingo and Gilbert .... or Pryor betting on himself with a 1 year deal which is totally not what the Browns need while building a team for the future. ... whatever the topic is. Give it a separate real thread where the BS can be kept to a minimum.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,990 |
--What if Pryor didn't want to be here? vers...seriously?...you write that as an excuse for the front not getting the job done?--What about the Browns re-signing Collins and extending Bitonio? Again, if there is a deal that this front wants to happen...they get it done and Collins and Bitinio are two more examples.--I think it very clear that Hue Jackson has a big say in what moves the Browns are making. Hue Jackson is not in charge of anything within the front office...that is clear!
If Hue had final say over the 53 man roster and an "equal say" within the front office during contract negotiations, the Browns would not have lost Mitch Schwartz last year and Pryor would likely be on the team this year.
jmo
FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,218
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,218 |
--What if Pryor didn't want to be here? vers...seriously?...you write that as an excuse for the front not getting the job done? No mac, using failure not signing Pryor is an excuse to fault Sashi. Prove Pryor truly wanted to stay in Cleveland and money wasn't what he was seeking. Not signing one player to a contract no one in the league offered cannot mean failure.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Spend 40 minutes with DePodesta. He’s crafty. Very friendly, but crafty. I still don’t know what he does with the Browns. https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/848728864469782528Me: “What translates between baseball and football?” DePodesta: “I’ve actually been struck by how many similarities there are." https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/848729529082425344I'd anticipate a pretty good chunk on the Browns in King's MMQB. (Side note: King later said that DePodesta did not reveal what he does, not that he has no plan/doesn't do anything.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Fun Stuff. http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2017/04/03/cleveland-browns-paul-depodesta-nfl-draft-peter-king“I think part of that maybe is intentional,” said DePodesta, 44, in shorts and a T-shirt, sitting on a folding chair in a garden at the classic old Arizona Biltmore Hotel. “I’m trying to think of the most succinct way to put it. I really focus on process as much as anything else: process for how we evaluate players, process for how we make decisions, process even for how we hire people internally, process for how we go about integrating our scouting reports with guys watching tape in the office. It is really about how we do the things we do. I think part of the reason they brought me in is because I am completely naive about the National Football League. I have no preconceived notions about how things ought to be done or how they have been done in the past, and I can look at it with a fresh set of eyes.” “I don’t know,” DePodesta said. “We are trying to develop things that ultimately will give us a competitive advantage and will get us back onto the landscape in terms of those competitive teams that are playing in January every year. So, I am hesitant to give away too much of what we’re trying to do. The other reason I think it’s hard is because it is really collective. We have a lot of people in our office who are very bright and have been around the game for a lot longer than I have, who had a lot of these ideas before I ever showed up.” “We’ve looked ourselves in the mirror and said, ‘Do we think that we are actually superhuman when it comes to picking players?’ And we pretty easily answered that with a resounding no. So how are we going to increase our chances? We need to have more picks. So, if we have the same number of picks every year as everyone else, we don’t expect do better than anyone else.”
“Sounds like Jimmy Johnson’s philosophy,” I said. “You aware of that?”
“Yes,” he said, smiling.
“Had any conversations with him?” I said.
“I’ll keep that to myself. I’ll say this: I’m a big admirer of what he’s done.” Yes, Johnson has spoken with the Browns. He just won’t say about what. But it’s no deep, dark mystery. Just as acquiring all these picks wasn’t deep and dark. The Browns in 2016 traded the second pick in the draft to Philadelphia’s eighth slot in the round, and then again to Tennessee at 15. That netted Cleveland seven picks over multiple drafts in the first four rounds.
“That’s good,” Johnson said from Florida on Friday. “There’s strength in numbers. I always wanted to have more picks in the middle rounds and at the end, because you can build a good team with the role players you get in the third, fourth and fifth rounds. With the Browns now, with all those picks, really, you’re one free-agent class and one draft from being a contender.
“But I’ll tell you, here’s the danger of having so many picks: You think, ‘We’ve got so many picks, let’s move up and take that guy with a little risk.’ You think you’ve got so many picks and you can afford to waste them on guys. I never looked at it that way. You have to look at every pick like it’s the only one you’ve got. Like I’ve told Bill Belichick, ‘You don’t have to use ’em this year. Bank ’em. Trade ’em.’ He knows. One time he told me he had a good team, and he had some extra picks, and he was afraid the guy they’d take might not be good enough to make his team. Fine. You don’t like what’s there? You can always find someone to take your four this year for a three next year. Like I said, bank ’em.” Said DePodesta: “We don’t get any points or win any games for having the most picks. We need to turn that into talent. It’s part of the reason we are so excited for this April. I think our team will look fundamentally different in May than it does right now.” I asked DePodesta why they’ve lost key players who they probably should have kept.
“Great question,” he said. “I’d say going back a year when we did have a handful of free agents and we allowed them all to sign elsewhere, that was a moment in time. That is not something that we want to do continuously. Again, that was a situation that we felt like we really do need to rebuild the foundation of this organization and it is almost like redoing a house, you need to rip down all the walls and get it down to the studs. Now, when you do that and you tear out all the walls and the floors and all you have left are the studs, you look at it and go, wow this looks terrible. We never want to go through this again and I think that is our attitude.
“Even as we got into the season last year, there was a monumental shift in our organizational evolution and it was when we traded for [New England linebacker] Jamie Collins. What we were trying to show everyone in our organization hopefully, and all our fans, was that that is now behind us and we are adding to this and building; this is not going to be about tearing it down all the time. This offseason we were able to re-sign Jamie, we were able to re-sign [guard] Joel Bitonio and we added free agents this year. We feel like we’ve got a handful of players that will be part of our core going forward, and our goal is to now build out that core and ultimately, when it comes time, retain it. It did come time right now, with guys like Bitonio and Jamie, we had to retain them and we did. And we will have more players that will be like that.”
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,112 |
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The Front Office...continued
|
|