Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
C
CoachB Offline OP
Poser
OP Offline
Poser
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070706/NEWS06/70706033

Federal appeals court overturns wiretap ruling
July 6, 2007

By NIRAJ WARIKOO

FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

A federal appeals court panel today vacated an order by a federal judge in Detroit that ruled that the Bush Administration's wiretapping program was unconstitutional -- a move that concerned local civil rights advocates and Muslim leaders.

In a 2-1 vote, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati said that the plaintiffs, which included local Muslim and Arab-American groups, could not prove they have been harmed by a National Security Agency spying program created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Advertisement


The Bush administration argued that such a program was legal and necessary to defend the nation from terrorism.

But the American Civil Liberties Union, along with groups and attorneys based in Michigan, filed a lawsuit in Detroit in January 2006 saying that the government’s surveillance program was unconstitutional and interfered with their jobs.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit ruled in favor of the plaintiffs last August.

The U.S. Justice Department then appealed the case to the Sixth Circuit Appeals Court.

Kary Moss, head of the Michigan branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, said “it’s a really unfortunate decision.”

She said that one of the reasons the plaintiffs had difficulty proving they were being adversely affected was that the government has kept information about the wiretapping program a secret.

Moss said they are considering appealing the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations, one of the co-plaintiffs, said: “It’s a shame that the court overturned the decision... what the executive branch was doing was unconstitutional.”

Contact Niraj Warikoo at nwarikoo@freepress.com or 248-351-2998.

.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Quote:

Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations, one of the co-plaintiffs, said: “It’s a shame that the court overturned the decision... what the executive branch was doing was unconstitutional.”





Appearently not.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:

a move that concerned local civil rights advocates and Muslim leaders.

.




That part interested me.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
c'mon, Dilwad knows the constitution better than the appeals court justices...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Well the constitution seems to change everytime we get a new president appointing justices. That's why I shy away from most dems.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Because it's a living breathing document?


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
More like it's that hat the magicians (dem judges) pull rabbits out of.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,217
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,217
Quote:

More like it's that hat the magicians (dem judges) pull rabbits out of.




In this case,Republican judges "pulled it out of their *something*"

3-judge panel splits along party lines over Bush’s surveillance program

CINCINNATI - A federal appeals court ordered the dismissal Friday of a lawsuit challenging President Bush’s domestic spying program, saying the plaintiffs had no standing to sue.

The 2-1 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel vacated a 2006 order by a federal judge in Detroit, who found that the post-Sept. 11 warrantless surveillance aimed at uncovering terrorist activity violated constitutional rights to privacy and free speech and the separation of powers.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19632877/


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
C
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
Quote:

Quote:

Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations, one of the co-plaintiffs, said: “It’s a shame that the court overturned the decision... what the executive branch was doing was unconstitutional.”





Appearently not.



No. Just that the groups bringing suit lacked standing to contest it. They said nothing about its constitutionality or lack there of. Just that the ACLU and AIR were not the right plaintiffs to question it.

Of course it being completely secret wiretapping begs the question, if you don't know you are being tapped, and the gov'ment won't tell you they are tapping you, how do you know if you have standing to contest it? Ahh... the riddles of unconstitutionality...


Original Dawg Talkers Pick'ems Champion
2008
2010


Dawg Talk Member Since: 08/24/01
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Dude, don't confuse me with facts.


#gmstrong
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Federal appeals court overturns wiretap ruling

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5