Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper
Don't worry about the lack of veteran depth on the skill position side of things ?
If Britt is lost to injury then who on the depth chart
Can step in right away ?
If the rookie TE from Miami goes down then who behind him can fill the void ?
This team is awfully young at TE WR and to a extent QB.


So we should have another Vet in case the first Vet goes down.

What if the second one does?

Ok we'll bring in another.

What if he gets hurt?

Alright fine, one more..

Well we're up to 4 vets... Better cut some rookies and 2nd year guys..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Too bad we kept Payton over Gabriel last year. But, I guess keeping all your rookies "works out."

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,047
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,047
I'd take Vincent Jackson or Stevie Johnson over Jordon Payton right now
Jordan Payton is Paul Hubbard 2.0

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
jc...

The Browns present WR situation is 100% the work of the Browns front office.

The wrs drafted, free agents signed and not signed.


GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,344
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,344
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
They never just drafted 4 guys and rode w/them. Think about all the guys they have brought in. Off the top of my hea:



Not specifically four, no... but they also didn't have to. When Belichick arrived, they already had Terry Glenn, Vincent Brisby, and Troy Brown.

Then, they drafted a TE in 2000.
Then, they drafted two TE's in 2001.
Then, they drafted a TE in the 1st round in 2002, along with two WR's (Daniel Graham, Deion Branch, David Givens).
Then, they drafted a WR and a TE in 2003
Then, they drafted another 1st round TE and a WR in 2004, etc, etc, etc...

They continually invest every year in those positions and have not been shy about going big in a single draft to bolster things when needed. The difference for them is that when Belichick started to build his team, he already had a bit of a foundation to work with - we tore ours down completely.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,237
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,237
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

The Browns present WR situation is 100% the work of the Browns front office.

The wrs drafted, free agents signed and not signed.
The present WR situation of every team in the league is 100% the work of their front offices.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Too bad we kept Payton over Gabriel last year. But, I guess keeping all your rookies "works out."



So we should cut rookies in favor of inconsistent players that get hurt a lot?

OR is that only AFTER they go and produce on another team?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,502
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,502
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Too bad we kept Payton over Gabriel last year. But, I guess keeping all your rookies "works out."



So we should cut rookies in favor of inconsistent players that get hurt a lot?

OR is that only AFTER they go and produce on another team?


Hindsight is always 20/20

Last edited by Damanshot; 06/28/17 01:27 PM.

#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Originally Posted By: DeaconDawg
Originally Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper
The list is endless
Travis Wilson was the real deal in rd 3
Nick Speegle was a steal out of N.M State
David Veikune was gonna be a stud
Martin Rucker was gonna be a game changer
And if you didn't agree with the homers it was
YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT FOOTBALL.
Then when these draft picks didnt pan out
It was the coaches fault the homers would say


You made me snicker..... rofl


Made me wonder who said any of that.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
Originally Posted By: jfanent
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

The Browns present WR situation is 100% the work of the Browns front office.

The wrs drafted, free agents signed and not signed.
The present WR situation of every team in the league is 100% the work of their front offices.


jfan...really?

Not every team is setup with their front office in full control of the 53 man roster. The most successful franchise in the NFL puts coach in charge of the 53 man roster.

The Chiefs also have their HC in charge of the 53 man roster and the Eagles have given the control of their 53 man roster to both HCs Reid and Kelly.

The Browns have the least experienced front office in the NFL in charge of their 53 man roster. Again, the Browns present WR group is 100% the work of analytics in action judging draft talent and deciding which free agent wrs fit and getting rid of those free agents who don't fit.

If the Browns are lacking in the area of WR talent and turning to free agency to upgrade the team's wr talent...what does that say about the judgement of the Browns front office and their use of analytics to identify superior wr talent in the draft?


GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,237
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,237
I'd like to see a WR contract negotiated and signed by Reid or Kelly...or even Belichik for that matter. Sure, they give a lot of input as to what they want on their roster, and then the FO goes out and signs them. You have no clue as to how much input Hue, Al or any of the coaches have on our FO decisions.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
H
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
H
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
I wish people would stop bringing up Gabriel. There is NO reason that his success in Atlanta would be in any way indicated here. Your thinking goes along the line of "Well chopped onions taste good on a hot dog, so they must taste good on a cupcake."

Please, stop.

As to the WRs, Higgins, Louis, and Payton are all LATE ROUND PICKS. LATE ROUNDERS. If you get a player from the FOURTH ROUND that contributes, IT IS GREAT.

Please, stop.

People on this forum seem to lose their sense when it comes to just being realistic about what you should expect from late round draft picks.

You guys made me use all caps, and I hate using all caps.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
Originally Posted By: mac


If the Browns are lacking in the area of WR talent and turning to free agency to upgrade the team's wr talent...what does that say about the judgement of the Browns front office [/color]


It says exactly the same thing as EVERY team in the NFL. At least to my knowledge every team at some point in time dips it's toes into the FA market - whether it's Belichick signing Randy Moss, Michael Floyd or Andrew Hawkins - or any other team signing any WR / Player.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,298
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,298
What Mac doesn't understand is that in this day and age, the HC is considered a part of the FO. He has a big office just like the others do. He has the owners ear just like the others do, but Mac somehow thinks the HC is still stuck off out in the fieldhouse behind the endzone with little input to anyone but the players and groundskeeper.

Head Coach is every bit a management position inside a football operation. Mac better start hating them too, because in his world, all front office brass are evil.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: ThatGuy
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Too bad we kept Payton over Gabriel last year. But, I guess keeping all your rookies "works out."



So we should cut rookies in favor of inconsistent players that get hurt a lot?

OR is that only AFTER they go and produce on another team?


Are you being serious or are you just being snarky?

Should I reply in the same manner?

Let me try:

So we should keep rookies who haven't done squat and ended up having as many suspensions as catches over a guy who actually had a pretty darn good year ago in the year we won 7 games?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Hamfist
I wish people would stop bringing up Gabriel. There is NO reason that his success in Atlanta would be in any way indicated here. Your thinking goes along the line of "Well chopped onions taste good on a hot dog, so they must taste good on a cupcake."

Please, stop.

As to the WRs, Higgins, Louis, and Payton are all LATE ROUND PICKS. LATE ROUNDERS. If you get a player from the FOURTH ROUND that contributes, IT IS GREAT.

Please, stop.

People on this forum seem to lose their sense when it comes to just being realistic about what you should expect from late round draft picks.

You guys made me use all caps, and I hate using all caps.


Wait, you don't want people to express their opinions if they disagree w/you? LOL

Gabriel actually had a productive year when Shanny was here. How did you forget that? You really don't remember all the deep passes where he was wide open? Seriously?

Please STOP telling me how to post!

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
What Mac doesn't understand is that in this day and age, the HC is considered a part of the FO. He has a big office just like the others do. He has the owners ear just like the others do, but Mac somehow thinks the HC is still stuck off out in the fieldhouse behind the endzone with little input to anyone but the players and groundskeeper.

Head Coach is every bit a management position inside a football operation. Mac better start hating them too, because in his world, all front office brass are evil.


I agree. And that's in a traditional structure where there is a GM as well - in cases where the HC is has more power, they are even more "the FO".


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You guys are letting mac suck you in again.

By now, you should know that he is going to try and make the FO look bad at every turn..........just like others get upset at those of us who try to objective and only want to "hear" positive comments. Both sides are whacked. Ignore him and he'll fade away....

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
Originally Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper

Jordan Payton is Paul Hubbard 2.0


How did you come to this conclusion?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:
Gabriel actually had a productive year when Shanny was here. How did you forget that? You really don't remember all the deep passes where he was wide open? Seriously?


He did. With Shanny. And then the next season he fell off with that OC we got from the Raiders. He had less receptions and significantly less yards.

Then preseason came around, Hue's first year as coach, and he was dropping the ball when he wasn't injured.

In all fairness, Vers. What would you expect Hue to do? I remember this time. Many of us expected Gabriel to be cut. And I don't remember many of us screaming about it. It's too bad the rookie WR's didn't show more this year.

But Gabriel had a great rookie season, a lesser second season, and going into training camp of his third season he looked lousy.... Then we cut him, then he gets signed by the Falcons, put in Shannahan's system, and has a good year.

It's easy to Monday Morning QB the thing, and I don't remember specific folks opinions on this board about cutting him (or even if you were on a hiatus or posting on here at that time), but I do remember that most posters weren't that pissed that we replaced Gabriel for one of the rookies.

A few were wondering why we drafted so many rookies that we would likely have to replace Gabriel...... But, once the rookies were drafted, we knew he had to do well in camp, and he just didn't.........


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Monday Morning QB? Am I guilty of that? Are you saying I never talk about our moves ahead of time? Because, if you are, just scroll up in this thread and look at my thought about what I think about this group and the upcoming season.

I have two or three other things to say:

1. I thought Gabriel might be cut. I even discussed it w/YTown. Him or Hawk. However, I didn't think it was the "right" move. Rather, I figured the FO would want to keep "their" guys. And that is the problem w/constantly changing regimes. Good players get discarded for lesser players because they were not chosen by that regime. Now, if you wanna bash me...........bash Joe Thomas, too. Because he has said the same damn thing. Is he an idiot, Monday Morning QB, too?

2. The "in all fairness" comment rubs me the wrong way. I am not trying to be "unfair." I am trying to be fair. I am not taking extreme sides. I try very hard to be objective. And when someone says to me "in all fairness," that implies that I am not being "fair." I resent that implication because I think I am much more "fair" than just about anyone on here.

3. No matter how bad Gabriel ever looked, it was never worse than what Payton gave us last year. I don't see how that is even an argument, but I won't trash you if you believe that Payton had a better season than Gabriel's worst year by saying stuff like "in all fairness."

4. Oh, one more thing. You bring up many of us not screaming about Gabriel getting cut. You are absolutely correct. But...........who cares? Is it about posters being right or wrong? Or, should it be about what's best for the team? Who has a better look at the players? Fans like you and I.........or the coaches? Who gives a flying f.......if a poster is wrong or right? What should matter is if the FO/coaching staff is right or wrong? Saying that posters were wrong does NOT exonerate dumb decisions by the team.

Look, I have a lot better feel for this FO than I did a year ago. I like a lot of their moves and have said so........but, I do not like what they have done w/the WR position and that is what we are discussing here. That doesn't make me a "unfair" or a "Monday Morning QB," and I really wish that we don't make this personal, but instead stick to the facts and even voice our opinions w/out all the BS personal stuff.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,336
Quote:
Look, I have a lot better feel for this FO than I did a year ago. I like a lot of their moves and have said so........but, I do not like what they have done w/the WR position and that is what we are discussing here. That doesn't make me a "unfair" or a "Monday Morning QB," and I really wish that we don't make this personal, but instead stick to the facts and even voice our opinions w/out all the BS personal stuff.


This is where written word gets confusing. I was just writing a post off the cuff. I didn't edit, proof read, or whatever. I was inbetween doing stuff for work (Dawgtalkers is an incredible distraction, even in the dead time of the year).

So yeah, trust me. I didn't call you a "Monday Morning QB" or at least I didn't mean to. If I did, I used a poor choice of words.

Nor did I mean that anything was "Unfair" when I said "In all fairness", or imply that you were being unfair or whatever. It was just an expression I wrote, that I didn't put too much thought into, so please don't put too much thought into that either.


So no, let's not make anything personal, because that's not what I'm here for, and it's not what I intended when I wrote my post. I was just trying to make a point about Taylor Gabriel and explain why I thought what happened, happened.



But on to the post..............

Quote:

1. I thought Gabriel might be cut. I even discussed it w/YTown. Him or Hawk. However, I didn't think it was the "right" move. Rather, I figured the FO would want to keep "their" guys. And that is the problem w/constantly changing regimes. Good players get discarded for lesser players because they were not chosen by that regime. Now, if you wanna bash me...........bash Joe Thomas, too. Because he has said the same damn thing. Is he an idiot, Monday Morning QB, too?


Completely agree with you and Joe Thomas. It's a reality unfortunately, as many coaches like guys they feel they know and can trust. But it is one of the things that really sets us back. It's also how guys leave who are successful on other teams, like the Mike Adams', Tashaun Gipsons, Mitchell Schwartz's, K'Wuann Whatever-His-Name-Was (who played nickel with Pettine for two seasons, and then had some issues with the new coaching staff this past year)

Quote:
3. No matter how bad Gabriel ever looked, it was never worse than what Payton gave us last year. I don't see how that is even an argument, but I won't trash you if you believe that Payton had a better season than Gabriel's worst year by saying stuff like "in all fairness."


Oh, I agree with this. Jordan Payton didn't bring anything to the table last year. Not sure if it's because he missed OTA's and stuff because of UCLA's Graduation or what, he did nothing. But we cut Taylor Gabriel before the season even started. I'm not sure if the coaching staff thought he'd be more valuable over the long-term or if they thought he'd have brought more to the table last year (in which they were clearly wrong, lol). But yeah, Taylor Gabriel in his second year here was much better than Payton's. I'm not sure, production-wise, how you could have a worse season than Payton.......


Quote:
4. Oh, one more thing. You bring up many of us not screaming about Gabriel getting cut. You are absolutely correct. But...........who cares? Is it about posters being right or wrong? Or, should it be about what's best for the team? Who has a better look at the players? Fans like you and I.........or the coaches? Who gives a flying f.......if a poster is wrong or right? What should matter is if the FO/coaching staff is right or wrong? Saying that posters were wrong does NOT exonerate dumb decisions by the team.


Oh, I agree, it was not the right decision. I just think that with what they knew then, it wasn't that ridiculous of a decision (at the time) to cut 5'8 165 LB Taylor Gabriel, an unfamiliar player, coming off a lousy second season. Would I suspect that Hue wishes he could take that back, of course. And would I bet that Paul DePodesta wishes that he could have chosen one less WR in the draft so that he could keep Gabriel on the team, of course........


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Okay..........I apologize. I misinterpreted your intent. I'm probably gun-shy. LOL My mistake.

Hopefully, one or two of the young guys will have a breakout year.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
It's funny to read some of these posts today and to look for what type of posts they were making during the draft and offseason. Some of the armchair GMs on here were loving the Payton pick and trashing Gabriel for his bad season two years ago. It really puts things in context (some people just want to be right).

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Make believe world.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You guys are letting mac suck you in again.

By now, you should know that he is going to try and make the FO look bad at every turn..........just like others get upset at those of us who try to objective and only want to "hear" positive comments. Both sides are whacked. Ignore him and he'll fade away....


Pro Football Focus says WR corps is Cleveland Browns biggest weakness


Analytics website Pro Football Focus believes the Cleveland Browns still possess one of the bottom five rosters in the NFL, and the WR corps is a big reason why.
The Cleveland Browns wide receiving corps wasn’t great in 2016–and then the organization lost its 1,000-yeard receiver to free agency.

Cleveland replaced Terrelle Pryor with Kenny Britt, but the move is not viewed as an upgrade.

Additionally, the Browns have second-year Baylor product Corey Coleman, in addition to his fellow members of the 2016 NFL Draft class Ricardo Louis, Rishard Higgins and Jordan Payton.

Add it all up, and the Browns receiving corps could be in a world of trouble come September.

Check out this blurb from PFF, via ESPN.

The Browns have invested heavily in young receivers — they picked five in the 2016 draft — but have yet to see significant returns on the group. Outside of Kenny Britt, their receiving corps remains more potential than production. Terrelle Pryor, who signed with the Redskins in free agency, had almost double the targets of the rest of the receiver corps combined last season.
Minicamp was filled with positive stories about Ricardo Louis and Hollywood Higgins, but PFF nailed it in its potential versus production comment.

These players were not first round picks in 2016 for a reason, so they should’ve been given the opportunity to get their feet wet in the NFL.

But now they’re a year into their career. If Louis, Higgins and Payton are to have long NFL careers, they’ve got to start showing something on the field.

PFF projects Louis will be start the season in the slot, with Coleman starting opposite Britt on the outside.

I’m a big fan of the preschool approach to PFF. If you see red around a player’s name, starting hollering “DANGER!” Think of it like school. A 100 grade is perfect. A score in the 50s equals a major F. PFF gave Louis a 51 grade, while Coleman graded out slightly better (53.5).

For what it’s worth, the website didn’t do much to factor in rookie David Njkoku into the the Browns’ passing game.
The Miami rookie figures to be key part of Hue Jackson’s offense this fall.
link

Last edited by mac; 06/29/17 06:37 AM.

GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
What Mac doesn't understand is that in this day and age, the HC is considered a part of the FO. He has a big office just like the others do. He has the owners ear just like the others do, but Mac somehow thinks the HC is still stuck off out in the fieldhouse behind the endzone with little input to anyone but the players and groundskeeper.

Head Coach is every bit a management position inside a football operation. Mac better start hating them too, because in his world, all front office brass are evil.


peen...tell us how much input Hue had in the shaping of the 2017 wr unit.


GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,502
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,502
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: jfanent
Originally Posted By: mac
jc...

The Browns present WR situation is 100% the work of the Browns front office.

The wrs drafted, free agents signed and not signed.
The present WR situation of every team in the league is 100% the work of their front offices.


jfan...really?

Not every team is setup with their front office in full control of the 53 man roster. The most successful franchise in the NFL puts coach in charge of the 53 man roster.

The Chiefs also have their HC in charge of the 53 man roster and the Eagles have given the control of their 53 man roster to both HCs Reid and Kelly.

The Browns have the least experienced front office in the NFL in charge of their 53 man roster. Again, the Browns present WR group is 100% the work of analytics in action judging draft talent and deciding which free agent wrs fit and getting rid of those free agents who don't fit.

If the Browns are lacking in the area of WR talent and turning to free agency to upgrade the team's wr talent...what does that say about the judgement of the Browns front office and their use of analytics to identify superior wr talent in the draft?


We aren't at the final 53 yet so at this moment in time, Jfan is absolutely correct.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You guys are letting mac suck you in again.

By now, you should know that he is going to try and make the FO look bad at every turn..........just like others get upset at those of us who try to objective and only want to "hear" positive comments. Both sides are whacked. Ignore him and he'll fade away....


Hey vers...I guess PFF has been reading my posts, showing some of the same concerns about the Browns WR group.

Watching the performance of the Browns 2017 WR group could be a great example of how the Browns use of analytics translates to the football field. Four of the Browns top WRs and a TE were drafted by this front office in 2016 using their method of judging draft talent.

Also, over the past two years this front office shaped the remaining members of the WR group, deciding which free agents to sign and not sign..and I would think that the use of analytics played a role in those decisions, too.

I look forward to watching the Browns 4 wrs and the te from the 2016 draft prove themselves on the field during the 2017 season. I hope all 4 of wrs and the te prove to be superior in talent when compared to the other wrs and te of the NFL...it would sure make believers out of many of the skeptics.


GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,447
Clearly his rookie year was lost but stand by my stance that based off paytons tape he could be a good 2 or 3 wr. Probably less likely now but it is nice to hear he's possi my gotten back on track. I liked his film a lot more than louis and higgins.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You guys are letting mac suck you in again.

By now, you should know that he is going to try and make the FO look bad at every turn..........just like others get upset at those of us who try to objective and only want to "hear" positive comments. Both sides are whacked. Ignore him and he'll fade away....


Hey vers...I guess PFF has been reading my posts, showing some of the same concerns about the Browns WR group.

Watching the performance of the Browns 2017 WR group could be a great example of how the Browns use of analytics translates to the football field. Four of the Browns top WRs and a TE were drafted by this front office in 2016 using their method of judging draft talent.

Also, over the past two years this front office shaped the remaining members of the WR group, deciding which free agents to sign and not sign..and I would think that the use of analytics played a role in those decisions, too.

I look forward to watching the Browns 4 wrs and the te from the 2016 draft prove themselves on the field during the 2017 season. I hope all 4 of wrs and the te prove to be superior in talent when compared to the other wrs and te of the NFL...it would sure make believers out of many of the skeptics.


Browns fans and FO are probably the worst WR evaluators in the league. Actually Wr's should be tabu with the Browns, just look at the the Wr's we have passed this past years, this draft alone.

Not speaking of the Wr's we have drafted.... Colemon is a bust, better face it and move on...

Hope I'm wrong, but Njoku will be in this long list also...

Last edited by rastanplan; 06/29/17 09:29 AM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,237
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,237
Explain the Njoku comment, please. What have you seen that looks so bad already? Looks like a mismatch waiting to happen IMO. What are you seeing there? Curious.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 165
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 165
Hope I'm wrong, but Njoku will be in this long list also...


Based on what?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,105
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,105
We really, really need this year's 1st rounders to pan out. IMO, Peppers and Njoku must be good to consider this a good draft


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,298
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,298
I don't judge a draft by the first rounders only. If they bust out and a few others end up good to better players, I would consider that a good draft.

I don't care where in the draft process we find them.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: Demo44
Hope I'm wrong, but Njoku will be in this long list also...


Based on what?


His ability, or lack, to catch...

Its not only his stats, but on film, and IMHO, he looks very bad catching the ball.

Catching the ball is an intrinsic WR ability/talent, very hard to overcome and that trumps any other skills a WR/TE can have.

Hope I'm wrong, but we had this conversation before regarding other Browns WR's...

He also has problems running routes by the way...

Raw physical ability seldom is enough to make it on the NFL, but I guess we are going to see if that's true with Njoku and Jabrill...

Last edited by rastanplan; 06/29/17 12:09 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Originally Posted By: Demo44
Hope I'm wrong, but Njoku will be in this long list also...


Based on what?


His ability, or lack, to catch...

Its not only his stats, but on film, and IMHO, he looks very bad catching the ball.

Catching the ball is an intrinsic WR ability/talent, very hard to overcome and that trumps any other skills a WR/TE can have.

Hope I'm wrong, but we had this conversation before regarding other Browns WR's...

He also has problems running routes by the way...

Raw physical ability seldom is enough to make it on the NFL, but I guess we are going to see if that's true with Njoku and Jabrill...


I think that saying he has a lack of ability to catch should be qualified. He has very good ability to catch the ball, but has had an issue with "focus drops" (not following the ball into his hands). This is fixable. His drop to target ratio isn't terrible, so with good coaching, growth, attention to detail, and experience, he could improve that number drastically. Also, while his route running isn't particularly refined (another area that will likely improve, particularly under Saunders) he makes good adjustments to the ball. And, he's a physical freak once the ball's in his hands. Here's his PFF scouting report:

What he does well

Tracks ball well downfield.
Good top-end speed.
Strong balance and body control, likely his biggest strength.
Good at using his hands and size to create late separation at the catch point.
Strong hands, tough for DBs to break up passes after he has the ball in his grasp.
Tough to press him with smaller defenders.
Effective option-route runner, uses linebackers leverage against them to create space in zones.
Consistently seals 7-tech to the inside on front side of gap-scheme runs.
Locates well when moving to the 2L in run game.

Biggest concern:

Had seven drops on 71 catchable targets over the past two seasons, majority coming when open, has a tendency to not see the ball all the way in.
Slow acceleration, doesn’t explode off the line.
Not overly elusive, forced many missed tackles in college based off size and balance.
Struggles when tasked with sealing 8/9-tech’s to the outside on front side of gap-scheme runs; often gets beat to the inside forcing RB to bounce the run to the outside.
Can get too tall when moving laterally blocking inline, allows defenders to get under his pads and control the movement.

Link


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,332
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Colemon is a bust, better face it and move on...



We should cut him now.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,837
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,837
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Originally Posted By: rastanplan
Colemon is a bust, better face it and move on...



We should cut him now.


Cut the whole team and start over.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,821
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,821
Again?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum WR Coach Al Saunders on Young Wide Receivers

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5