DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump-Russia Pt.2

It's the same reason why Hillary - rightfully so - received a ton of scrutiny and blame when she messed all the security classification stuff up. The SOS has broad powers as well when it comes to discerning classified information, but as we all saw (or rather should have seen), they can get in a lot of trouble.

Trump would like to meet with Putin and see if a compromise can be hammered out but you and your kind cry every time he tries to speak with them.

Then the transcripts of the meeting are leaked before the ink is dry and the Press runs with it. Next you and yours start crying that Trump has given away secrets and crap.

Russia is not near the problem as the enemy within America.

You can't say something so disgusting then try to SHAME me! lol You sir are shame epitomized.

CNN accepts resignations of 3 involved in retracted story

NEW YORK – CNN accepted the resignations Monday of three journalists involved in a retracted story about a supposed investigation into a pre-inaugural meeting between an associate of President Donald Trump and the head of a Russian investment fund.

The story was posted on the network's website on Thursday and was removed, with all links disabled, Friday night. CNN immediately apologized to Anthony Scaramucci, the Trump transition team member who was reported to be involved in the meeting.

The story's author, Thomas Frank, was among those who resigned, according to a network executive who requested anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss personnel issues. Also losing their jobs were Eric Lichtblau, an assistant managing editor in CNN's Washington bureau, and Lex Haris, head of the investigations unit.

CNN, in initially taking down the story, said it didn't meet its editorial standards. The episode is a damaging blow for a network that Trump has frequently derided as "fake news," and for a story that never even made it onto any of CNN's television networks.

The story had been quickly questioned both internally and externally, including by the conservative site Breitbart News. It was determined that the story was posted without going through the expected checks and balances for a story of such sensitivity, the executive said.

The failure to follow proper procedures is what led to the resignations, the CNN executive said.

It's not immediately clear what in the story is factually incorrect, or whether CNN will continue to report on the issue. The retracted story had said the Senate intelligence committee was looking into a January 16 discussion between Scaramucci and Kirill Dmitriev, whose Russian Direct Investment Fund guides investments by U.S. entities in Russia. Scaramucci, in the story, said he exchanged pleasantries in a restaurant with Dmitriev.

The report also said that two Democratic senators wanted to know whether Scaramucci had indicated in the meeting whether sanctions against Russia would be lifted, a decision that could impact the investment fund.

Following the retraction, Scaramucci tweeted that CNN "did the right thing. Classy move. Apology accepted. Everyone makes mistakes. Moving on."

Haris, in a statement to CNN's "Reliable Sources," noted that he'd been with CNN since 2001, "and am sure about one thing: This is a news organization that prizes accuracy and fairness above all else. I am leaving, but will carry those principles wherever I go."

Project Veritas and James O'Keefe have never mislead anyone or put out BS... give it a rest. This guy is FAKE NEWS CENTRAL. He's in the same realm as infowars or lower.

Help me remember here.. what trouble did she get in exactly?

A new study from the Media Research Center shows just how obsessed network news is with the ongoing Russia investigation.

The study looked at every ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscast from the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller on May 17 to June 20.

It found a whopping 353 minutes of airtime devoted to the Russia probe. Meantime, the networks only spent 47 minutes on climate change, 29 on fighting terrorism, 17 on repealing and replacing ObamaCare and a mere five minutes on the economy and jobs.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/28/ne...cil-study-shows

After 7 months of investigation where everything is leaked.
After every investigating unit except Muellers has said there is zero evidence.
After the FBI, NSA, and CIA heads said there is nothing to this.
After months of talking Impeachment.
After the Press gets caught lying about Russia/Trump with them admitting on video that it is all for profits.
After Nancy and Schumer and Dem Senators admitting there is zero evidence, having to back their constituents down.

You say there is still a chance they will find something.
Well good luck with that, for there is a chance in hell.

You say there is still a chance they will find something.
Well good luck with that, for there is a chance in hell.

There is a chance that a sitting president, while running for that office and perhaps some of his campaign staff and some that are now in his admin, may have colluded with Russia to rig the election or at least tamper with it in some fashion.

There is also a chance that there are financial shannigans that may have taken place.

That's part of what's being investigated by Mueller and other bodies.

Like it or not, that's a big deal. Are you suggesting that the media shouldn't cover it?

What I will say is there is zero evidence against Trump and his crew but thanks to the Left and their underhanded play, the investigations are moving into the past administrations corruption and its taking off like a rocket.
They have bitten their own arse!

The other thing the Left has inadvertently done is taken the great American underdog in this past election and made him an even greater underdog going forward.

I talk to a lot of people as you learned during the election and more of them than ever say Trump is getting a raw deal.

Americans LOVE to root for an underdog!

You don't have a clue what Mueller has uncovered yet.

They want to keep it in the spotlight as much as Trumps want to keep it out of the spotlight.

Neither do the networks.. which is what makes their obsession with it particularly odd.. if they knew something, if they had actual news to report, it would be one thing.. but they don't.

Neither do the networks.. which is what makes their obsession with it particularly odd.. if they knew something, if they had actual news to report, it would be one thing.. but they don't.

while you spout your BS.

*Crickets*