|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
Read this article this morning and it made me wonder: http://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-pat...ppolos-contract
Of course Garoppolo was a major topic for the Browns before the draft. Now we will be in different waters.
We drafted Kizer. According to reports he is progressing. We have to first rounders and two second rounders in next years "rich" quarterback draft (from what is being reported).
Garoppolo will be a free agent. The Patriots options are limited. Sign him or franchise him. Unless he is franchised the decisions is his.
Of course Brady could get hurt. Maybe decide to retire. Or show his age and play that way.
Where does all this leave the Browns?
The way I see it (maybe I'm wrong) Kessler and Osweiler have back-up written all over them. I don't see either guy as a franchise quarterback.
Kizer has the potential. However, potential is often a dirty word. There are no guarantees he reaches his "potential".
The more we see of him the better we will be able to tell. He has to show he can be the man. He has to show it on the field, in the class room, in the huddle and off the field. There is no fooling the players. They will know. The coaches and Sashi should know.
We don't know where we will be drafting. We don't know yet who will come out (rumors are that Darnold may stay in). As stated we are draft rich in capital.
But it sure would be nice to use our picks on BPA and get very talent rich.
Quarterback talent is something that you can never have enough of like pitching in baseball.
It is not beyond reason that Garoppolo and the Browns may still be dance partners.
I was in the camp to get Garoppolo bigly. I truly believe he will be a franchise quarterback. If he is not franchised and is on his own; and unless Kizer studs out I say push them money in front of him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275 |
I wouldn't be surprised if the Browns were still interested in JG. I won't be surprised if the Browns take a QB with their 1st Rd pick next year. That's regardless of how well our current 3 guys perform this year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805 |
This is simple.
I'd bet anything that Bellicheck tells Brady, Thanks for a good run. Time to move on.
Garoppolo takes over in 2018. Much like Luck for Manning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
I see no reason to fall in love with a guy another franchise holds the rights to. (Jeanene Garoppolo, she made some movies about 12 years ago, holds political left wing views, may have done stand up comedy; was the only person I could think of.) ( Was Garoppolo the Pat's tight end, I guess there's that I've heard the name but I couldn't think of his first name for Nothing; was the 2nd thing I thought of.) oh, time passes, Jimmy Garoppolo, the Patriots back up quarterback that many DT'ers wanted to hype as he should come to the Browns in this off-season to become the linch-pin <(can't be the right spelling) to lift the Browns out of the doldrums of the AFC North. So, I'm supposed to believe he will not only come to Cleveland, but do something in Cleveland that he didn't do in New England. Hope springs eternal. 
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
This is simple.
I'd bet anything that Bellicheck tells Brady, Thanks for a good run. Time to move on.
Garoppolo takes over in 2018. Much like Luck for Manning. And Brady goes where to lead them to a Super Bowl?  Denver?  Wait? I've said in the past that Brady would have been nothing without Belichic, Bellichic's the juggernaut not Brady. Actually, by this point they're probably in a symbiotic type relationship. Tom Brady in Denver!  x 3: Oh my freaking goodness! EDIT! Bellichic could be the guy who cut Kosar, and Brady!! talk about going down in history!!
Last edited by THROW LONG; 07/08/17 12:09 PM.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
Here's my opinion after having 2-3 months since the draft to think ... I'm good with letting Kizer try to develop now. Early returns/reports are positive. He might end up being better than Jimmy G.
Worst case scenario: we suck, Kizer sucks, and we're back to the same spot next spring ... high draft picks, ammo, and Jimmy G as a possibility
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
" I've said in the past that Brady would have been nothing without Belichic" ==============================
So that is your take on Brady??
I highly doubt any GM in the NFL would agree.
Does Belichick make the decisions post snap and make the throws?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984 |
Joe Thomas #73
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,419 |
I have a feeling that Kessler is going to start, and will surprise a lot of people, in a good way.
We'll see what happens.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
None of u guys got it right AFTER last season ended ... so why your speculating now BEFORE TC has even started much less the season seems like a wild ass guess at best ... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
" I've said in the past that Brady would have been nothing without Belichic" ==============================
So that is your take on Brady??
I highly doubt any GM in the NFL would agree.
Does Belichick make the decisions post snap and make the throws?
When I was Putting that on there I wanted to "qualify" the word "nothing" but I didn't want to disrupt the way it reads. Nothing, or not quite as good as he is, how about, he's great now, but early in his career he wouldn't have become as great without Bellichic and that Bellichic's genius in teaching, playcalling, and out thinking other coaches by knowing what to do offensively by giving a play that was set up to work really brought Brady along much of his early career. I think Brady showed something on his own, comebacks in the 4th quarter and such around the year 2014 and more recently; and that's not saying he wasn't great(ish) before that. By this point, Bellichic and Brady are probably helping each others greatness together, But I didn't want to qualify the word with a long read that is a hard point to understand, and just hoped to move on; I don't care that much about the Pat's team.
Last edited by THROW LONG; 07/08/17 01:45 PM.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
The link and article provided I thought was interesting.
It is something to talk and speculate about.
Is there something wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,468 |
these constant threads of jimmy G reminds me of when lebron was a year from hitting FA, and the knicks and fans did nothing but talk non stop about ways to get him to NY.
only to be completely disappointed in the end.
the drafting of Kizer all but shut the door on jimmy g coming here. let it go.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
The link and article provided I thought was interesting.
It is something to talk and speculate about.
Is there something wrong with that?
Not even a little bit .... specualation is all we have on almost everything right now ... speculate away sir ....  ... With that said .. no need to speculate with me here .... u guys just don't realize how lucky u are to have me around ..  One of two things will happen .... 1. They cut Brady .... 2. They assign the franchise tag to JG and then work out a trade for him ... this is the option i called from day 1 LAST OFF SEASON that everyone LAUGHED AT ME FOR when i first suggested they may not let him go ... I think it will be #1 ... but that depends on what they think of JG ... we really don't know that yet ... all keeping JG this year meant was they didn't think Brissett was ready to be Brady's back up ... thats really all we can glean from that RIGHT NOW ... if they let Brady go after the year ... then it means they really liked JG ....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635 |
At this stage, I'm convinced if it didn't happen day one of the draft combined with the extremely firm reports provided by Adam Sheftner (one of few to actually believe a little) - that it just is not ever going to happen.
I buy into Adam's fling and NE is just interested in keeping this guy. They find ways to extend the people they want, so I doubt they'll have any issues extending JG.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331 |
One of two things will happen ....
1. They cut Brady ....
2. They assign the franchise tag to JG and then work out a trade for him ... this is the option i called from day 1 LAST OFF SEASON that everyone LAUGHED AT ME FOR when i first suggested they may not let him go ...
I think it will be #1 ... but that depends on what they think of JG ... we really don't know that yet ... all keeping JG this year meant was they didn't think Brissett was ready to be Brady's back up ... thats really all we can glean from that RIGHT NOW ... if they let Brady go after the year ... then it means they really liked JG ....
I dunno if they could just cut Tom Brady. I mean the PR ramifications from that get tricky. Brady is absolutely loved in the NE area. But I did see number 2 coming as a major possibility. I don't know when I recognized it in the offseason, maybe when the Pats traded for Brandin Cooks, but the Patriots are going for another Superbowl run, and Jimmy G is the ultimate insurance policy. I mean, if Brady goes and breaks his collarbone mid to early-season, they need someone that can hold down the fort. Brissett didn't show himself to be that guy last year. I sort of looked at what they did with Cassel and figured it'll be the same scenario. Plus, demand for QBs isn't going away ANY time soon. Next year, there will be an even bigger market, as the BigBen/Rivers/Eli class gets a year older, and as Carson Palmer gets older, and other teams find themselves needy at QB/the general needy ones (Browns, Jets, 49ers, Jacksonville, etc). No reason not to wait till next year and trade him under the franchise tag. Pushes the Brady/Garapollo question off a year, in case Tommy Terrific falls off a cliff. But do you really think they can just cut Tom Brady? Really?
UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,810 |
if they let Brady go after the year ... then it means they really liked JG .... The Patriots are not going to "let Brady go"...
Brady might decide that it is time to go, but as long as he can play and wants to play, he will play for the Patriots.
As for JG..I'm glad he is out of the picture for the Browns and that we have finally drafted a QB with the basic qualities to build upon. I view JG as a Belichick system QB with potential durability issues..and too much of a risk for the Browns.
The Browns are setting in a position where they can add more QB talent next year if necessary. I see no need to even consider JG.
FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL
Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
If they believe in JG .... ya ... i can see that happening ... Billicheck is all about today and tomorrow ... he's proven that over and over .... not sure why people would think this was different ....
Now ... thats worse case ..... IF they can give JG a 5 year deal or something like that and they tell him Brady has one year left then the teams yours ... then Brady plays 2 more years and he can leave hopefully still near the top of his game .... he can talk til hes blue in the face ... he'll be 41 or 42 in two more years ...... Mother Nature appplies to him also ...
I also don't know exactly what they think of JG ... we know they wanted him as their back up this year ... thats all we know at this point ....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,856 |
BB will do whatever he thinks he needs to do for the betterment of the team, Tom Brady's iconic statue notwithstanding.
There is no doubt in my mind if he thinks its time for Brady to go, there will be a wink wink nod nod agreement between them tat will allow TB to leave "on his own terms".
I could see the above scenario happening just like Diam laid it out
JMO
#gmstrong
A smart person knows what to say.
A wise person knows whether or not to say it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,129
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,129 |
+1, if you've never seen Football Life of Bill & Brady it is an unreal relationship...AND Brady knows Bill is all for good of team....JMHO, Garoppolo should not be on Browns radar, to much time spent with NE- and only tested some.....time will tell IF Browns still interested.....GO Browns!!!!
"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
2. They assign the franchise tag to JG and then work out a trade for him ... this is the option i called from day 1 LAST OFF SEASON that everyone LAUGHED AT ME FOR when i first suggested they may not let him go ...
That is not how it went down. You kept saying that and I tried to correct you because you came to the discussion late, but you refused to listen. I've let you go on this incorrect statement repeatedly, but you really need to stop making it. It isn't the truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858 |
I just don't believe there is any interest in JG by the Browns.
You said it yourself, we have Kizer,,, Potential. We have Oswieler, Who knows. If we get the guy that played for Denver, we might have a winner there. And we have Kessler.. Not bad, but not the stud we want.
And we have 2 firsts and 3 seconds in the next draft, (or is it 2 Seconds) and it's supposed to be a QB Rich draft.
We suddenly find ourselves in a very nice position. Why go after JG... Doesn't make sense to me.
Not to mention, if JG is all everyone thinks he is, and if Belichick thinks so also, he's not going anywhere.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331 |
I just don't believe there is any interest in JG by the Browns.
You said it yourself, we have Kizer,,, Potential. We have Oswieler, Who knows. If we get the guy that played for Denver, we might have a winner there. And we have Kessler.. Not bad, but not the stud we want.
And we have 2 firsts and 3 seconds in the next draft, (or is it 2 Seconds) and it's supposed to be a QB Rich draft.
We suddenly find ourselves in a very nice position. Why go after JG... Doesn't make sense to me.
Not to mention, if JG is all everyone thinks he is, and if Belichick thinks so also, he's not going anywhere. I doubt we'll see anything this year. But maybe in the offseason. Like I've said, no benefit to trade JG at this point. But once the offseason next year starts, the Pats will evaluate Brady and make their decision what to do with JG (who will be put under the franchise tag). Lots of QB needy teams coming up next year. And there's a major supply and demand issue here. Just look at the age of the NFL Starters at this point. At least the good ones........ Theres gonna be a major change of the guard. Luckily we have all these picks. That gives us options. We can trade up for a rookie. We can sign a guy like AJ McCaron or Kirk Cousins. We can trade for JG. Or we can draft a guy through one of our picks. EDIT: Or we can recognize we already have our guy on the team, and just use our five 1st & 2nd round picks for other things than the QB position. lol
Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 07/10/17 09:13 AM.
UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
Can't say I agree with you.
Osweiler and Kessler both have low ceilings. That leaves Kizer.
Although I am somewhat optimistic about Kizer this season hopefully will reveal his potential. At least give the Browns an indication if he can be their guy.
If that does not happen or questions remain the Browns should still be in the quarterback hunt.
If that is the case I would rather pursue Garoppolo and use the draft picks on BPA. I say that at this point in time.
That is because I have no idea where we are drafting and who would be there when we draft.
So the main point is all about Kizer and what he shows. If the Browns are still looking during FA then Garoppolo should be a consideration.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,858 |
Can't say I agree with you.
Osweiler and Kessler both have low ceilings. That leaves Kizer.
Although I am somewhat optimistic about Kizer this season hopefully will reveal his potential. At least give the Browns an indication if he can be their guy.
If that does not happen or questions remain the Browns should still be in the quarterback hunt.
If that is the case I would rather pursue Garoppolo and use the draft picks on BPA. I say that at this point in time.
That is because I have no idea where we are drafting and who would be there when we draft.
So the main point is all about Kizer and what he shows. If the Browns are still looking during FA then Garoppolo should be a consideration.
Kessler and the low ceiling comment is probably accurate. But I don't know what we have in Oswieler. Do we have the one from Denver or Houston. All I know is that John Elway was acting pretty ticked off that when Brock took the Houston offer. As for Kizer, yeah, I agree.. I think he's got a high ceiling. But until we see him in action, we won't know. that still leaves us with a low ceiling guy on the cheap (kessler), A guy that has had success in this league but is rather expensive (Oswieler) and a rookie. On top of that, we still have all those picks in the 1st two rounds next year. I think we are actually in good shape for the long run, but short term, this could hurt.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,533
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,533 |
J/C...
I have yet to see anything that indicates the Browns actually even want Garoppolo.
I still don't get the hype.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,167 |
I, too, would fall into this camp. At this point, he's just a guy - and one that will command an exorbitant salary relative to his experience level while still being pretty much an unknown in terms of capability, especially once you get him outside Belichick's system.
A big, gigantic, expensive Question Mark.
That doesn't strike me as fitting the mold for what this front office has been doing.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,472
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,472 |
I say we roll with what we got this year. We have 3 guys that all need a good look over to see if their games' are something we can use. That's a lot of snaps and throws the coaching staff needs to scrutinize.
I say worry about acquiring QBs after the season ends. The draft could very easily give us what we need, as well as restarting the tired JG conversation.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
There is no question or dispute that nothing will be done until this season ends.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
j/c:
I think the "hype" that surrounds Garoppolo is because he is getting a lot of love from people who really know the game. They have watched his quick release, his accuracy, his ability to make a good decision quickly, his ability to go through progressions, etc.
He's impressed those who actually know the game more-so than guys who just spout things off w/out much knowledge or research.
I remember watching Grudin interviewing Mahommes this past off-season and he was getting on Mahommes a bit about if he could make quick reads and go through progressions. Grudin actually used a video of Garoppolo doing those things and said something like "it don't get any better than that" and he wondered whether or not Mahommes could do those things.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
For those who question Garoppolo's ability they should ask why he was drafted by Belichick and why with all the interest he decided he wanted him on their roster.
When people in the league are asked about him(people like Shanahan)or others in the know all of what I have read were positive about his ability and potential as a franchise quarterback.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Thats the buety of it ... we'll find out over the next 3 or 4 years if not sooner ...
This is such a unique situation ... very curious as to how it plays out ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
No offense Diam but it is my hope that all political reference has no place on this Board.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
No offense Diam but it is my hope that all political reference has no place on this Board. No offense taken .. i dish it out so i expect to take it ... u never have to preface with me ... if i want to bite back it won't help ... *L* .. I am however confused ... what did u take as me being political? ... my last post to U was me pointing out we'll find out just how good JG is over the next 3 or 4 years if not sooner ... cause then we will have a body of work on him either with NE or somewhere else ... I'm guessing you took my post the wrong way ... either that or i just missed something i posted ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Not sure where to put this so i figured this was as good a landing spot as any ...
Kirk Cousins - QB - Redskins
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the "strong indication" is Kirk Cousins will play out this season under the franchise tag.
RapSheet adds, "Both sides are OK with it." They have until Monday to work out a long-term deal, but no one seems to think it will happen. Both Adam Schefter and John Keim of ESPN have called it a "long shot" while NFL Network's Charley Casserly said he does not "see any way" a deal gets done. Considering it would cost Washington $34.5 million to tag Cousins next year, failing to reach a deal now will almost guarantee the quarterback hits free agency next spring.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter Jul 13 - 8:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
And shortly thereafter ..
Kirk Cousins - QB - Redskins
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports the "strong indication" is Kirk Cousins will play out this season under the franchise tag.
RapSheet adds, "Both sides are OK with it." They have until Monday to work out a long-term deal, but no one seems to think it will happen. Both Adam Schefter and John Keim of ESPN have called it a "long shot" while NFL Network's Charley Casserly said he does not "see any way" a deal gets done. Considering it would cost Washington $34.5 million to tag Cousins next year, failing to reach a deal now will almost guarantee the quarterback hits free agency next spring.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter Jul 13 - 8:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
The bottom reference. Nothing in the post.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
If Cousins does not reach a long term deal and enters the market; he would have to be a consideration.
Any quarterback that would be viewed as "the answer" would be fair game.
My first thought about Cousins is he would go to the 49'ers and join back up with Shanahan.
The other part of the equation is Kizer. What kind of season will he have?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Ok .. now i understand .. they won't let me have two signatures so your stuck with it .. sorry ...  Cousins definetly has to enter into the picture .. he an entirely different than JG ... - hes proven it in the NFL over years where as JG is in limited limited starts .. - we won't have to give up any picks ... Granted he'll cost more but we have TONS OF CASH if we want him ... Lots of interesting and unique scenarios ... when was the last time a FA QB of his caliber hit the open market? ..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,928
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,928 |
J/C
I'm not one that's interested in trading for a QB project. JG isn't proven and Cousins, well he's maybe a step up from JG who knows for sure.
Build by the draft, and please stop trading away picks we have in the top 15. We may just get THAT franchise QB or at least we'll get top talent instead of second rate NFL talent like we've been getting for years.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The Patriots and Garoppolo
|
|