Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Government Report Finds Drastic Impact of Climate Change on U.S.

By LISA FRIEDMANAUG. 7, 2017

WASHINGTON — The average temperature in the United States has risen rapidly and drastically since 1980, and recent decades have been the warmest of the past 1,500 years, according to a sweeping federal climate change report awaiting approval by the Trump administration.

The draft report by scientists from 13 federal agencies, which has not yet been made public, concludes that Americans are feeling the effects of climate change right now. It directly contradicts claims by President Trump and members of his cabinet who say that the human contribution to climate change is uncertain, and that the ability to predict the effects is limited.

“Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans,” a draft of the report states. A copy of it was obtained by The New York Times.

The authors note that thousands of studies, conducted by tens of thousands of scientists, have documented climate changes on land and in the air. “Many lines of evidence demonstrate that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse (heat-trapping) gases, are primarily responsible for recent observed climate change,” they wrote.

The report was completed this year and is a special science section of the National Climate Assessment, which is congressionally mandated every four years. The National Academy of Sciences has signed off on the draft report, and the authors are awaiting permission from the Trump administration to release it.

One government scientist who worked on the report, Katharine Hayhoe, a professor of political science at Texas Tech University, called the conclusions among “the most comprehensive climate science reports” to be published. Another scientist involved in the process, who spoke to The New York Times on the condition of anonymity, said he and others were concerned that it would be suppressed.

The White House and the Environmental Protection Agency did not immediately return calls or respond to emails requesting comment on Monday night.

The report concludes that even if humans immediately stopped emitting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the world would still feel at least an additional 0.50 degrees Fahrenheit (0.30 degrees Celsius) of warming over this century compared with today. The projected actual rise, scientists say, will be as much as 2 degrees Celsius.

A small difference in global temperatures can make a big difference in the climate: The difference between a rise in global temperatures of 1.5 degrees Celsius and one of 2 degrees Celsius, for example, could mean longer heat waves, more intense rainstorms and the faster disintegration of coral reefs.

Among the more significant of the study’s findings is that it is possible to attribute some extreme weather to climate change. The field known as “attribution science” has advanced rapidly in response to increasing risks from climate change.

The E.P.A. is one of 13 agencies that must approve the report by Aug. 18. The agency’s administrator, Scott Pruitt, has said he does not believe that carbon dioxide is a primary contributor to global warming.

“It’s a fraught situation,” said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geoscience and international affairs at Princeton University who was not involved in the study. “This is the first case in which an analysis of climate change of this scope has come up in the Trump administration, and scientists will be watching very carefully to see how they handle it.”

Scientists say they fear that the Trump administration could change or suppress the report. But those who challenge scientific data on human-caused climate change say they are equally worried that the draft report, as well as the larger National Climate Assessment, will be publicly released.

The National Climate Assessment “seems to be on autopilot” because of a lack of political direction, said Myron Ebell, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

The report says significant advances have been made linking human influence to individual extreme weather events since the last National Climate Assessment was produced in 2014. Still, it notes, crucial uncertainties remain.

It cites the European heat wave of 2003 and the record heat in Australia in 2013 as specific episodes where “relatively strong evidence” showed that a man-made factor contributed to the extreme weather.

In the United States, the authors write, the heat wave that broiled Texas in 2011 was more complicated. That year was Texas’ driest on record, and one study cited in the report said local weather variability and La Niña were the primary causes, with a “relatively small” warming contribution. Another study had concluded that climate change made extreme events 20 times more likely in Texas.

Based on those and other conflicting studies, the federal draft concludes that there was a medium likelihood that climate change played a role in the Texas heat wave. But it avoids assessing other individual weather events for their link to climate change. Generally, the report described linking recent major droughts in the United States to human activity as “complicated,” saying that while many droughts have been long and severe, they have not been unprecedented in the earth’s hydrologic natural variation.

Worldwide, the draft report finds it “extremely likely” that more than half of the global mean temperature increase since 1951 can be linked to human influence.

In the United States, the report concludes with “very high” confidence that the number and severity of cool nights have decreased since the 1960s, while the frequency and severity of warm days have increased. Extreme cold waves, it says, are less common since the 1980s, while extreme heat waves are more common.

The study examines every corner of the United States and finds that all of it was touched by climate change. The average annual temperature in the United States will continue to rise, the authors write, making recent record-setting years “relatively common” in the near future. It projects increases of 5.0 to 7.5 degrees Fahrenheit (2.8 to 4.8 degrees Celsius) by the late century, depending on the level of future emissions.

It says the average annual rainfall across the country has increased by about 4 percent since the beginning of the 20th century. Parts of the West, Southwest and Southeast are drying up, while the Southern Plains and the Midwest are getting wetter.

With a medium degree of confidence, the authors linked the contribution of human-caused warming to rising temperatures over the Western and Northern United States. It found no direct link in the Southeast.

Additionally, the government scientists wrote that surface, air and ground temperatures in Alaska and the Arctic are rising at a frighteningly fast rate — twice as fast as the global average.

“It is very likely that the accelerated rate of Arctic warming will have a significant consequence for the United States due to accelerating land and sea ice melting that is driving changes in the ocean including sea level rise threatening our coastal communities,” the report says.

Human activity, the report goes on to say, is a primary culprit.

The study does not make policy recommendations, but it notes that stabilizing the global mean temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius — what scientists have referred to as the guardrail beyond which changes become catastrophic — will require significant reductions in global levels of carbon dioxide.

Nearly 200 nations agreed as part of the Paris accords to limit or cut fossil fuel emissions. If countries make good on those promises, the federal report says, that will be a key step toward keeping global warming at manageable levels.

Mr. Trump announced this year that the United States would withdraw from the Paris agreement, saying the deal was bad for America.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/climate/climate-change-drastic-warming-trump.html


Read the Draft of the Climate Change Report

A draft report by scientists from 13 federal agencies, which has not yet been made public but was obtained by The New York Times, concludes that Americans are feeling the effects of climate change right now. The report was completed this year and is part of the National Climate Assessment, which is congressionally mandated every four years.

AUG. 7, 2017

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017...ial-Report.html

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Queue the 'Fake News' dolts. Trump's agencies leaking to bypass the admin and get the truth out!

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
I'm not informed enough to argue for or against the legitimacy of climate change .. and unlike U and most of your lib buddies I won't go google for two articles that back my side so I can act like i know more on the subject than I do ....

What i do know is that the Paris climate accord was a joke on many levels and appeared to me to be just another way for us to give more money to the rest of the world ....

The climate change gang LOSES ALL CREDIBILITY with me when they champion a BS deal that is voluntary and a JOKE at best .... just like their leader Mr. Climate Change Gore ... when u back something like the Paris accord ... U LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY and u LOSE MY ATTENTION ....




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
I'm not informed enough to argue for or against the legitimacy of climate change .. and unlike U and most of your lib buddies I won't go google for two articles that back my side so I can act like i know more on the subject than I do ....

What i do know is that the Paris climate accord was a joke on many levels and appeared to me to be just another way for us to give more money to the rest of the world ....

The climate change gang LOSES ALL CREDIBILITY with me when they champion a BS deal that is voluntary and a JOKE at best .... just like their leader Mr. Climate Change Gore ... when u back something like the Paris accord ... U LOSE ALL CREDIBILITY and u LOSE MY ATTENTION ....



Well I respect your right to believe what you want. I just hope your grandkids and great grandkids can live with your decisions too.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
U want to talk about the deal OCD ... prolly not ... cause FACTS are FACTS ... and there all on my side on this one ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
U want to talk about the deal OCD ... prolly not ... cause FACTS are FACTS ... and there all on my side on this one ...


I think Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord was not a good thing. I'm not familiar with the 'unfair' economics of the plan but if Trump is such a great negotiator he could of changed those numbers.

At the end of the day, we walked away from a commitment to do everything we can to preserve the planet for our kids. How much is that worth? I'd say you can't put a price on it.

Now the bit about the deal not having teeth... It was meant to be a global commitment to take steps forward on dealing with climate change, not a detailed plan of action. However many countries are stepping up, and China is making us look bad here... CHINA!

So you and Cult Trump can justify this stupid move anyway you want, but this will go down in history as an epic fail on the part of Trump.

Last edited by OldColdDawg; 08/08/17 07:21 AM.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
It sounds like your unfamiliar with a lot ... have u actually looked at the deal or u just running your mouth based off what the cnn talking heads are telling u ...

Please tell me how china is making us look bad .... and don't tell me its because they support it and we don't .... of course they support it ... it's a much better deal for them ... go take a look at the DETAILS and don't just regurgitate the talking points ...

And u proved my point right out of the gate ... u know diddly about the economics yet u spout off on the entire deal while admitting u have no clue on one of the major aspects ... But my guess is u know very little about the actual DETAILS of it and what was required in it ...

This wasn't just bad financially ... it was a bad deal in every regard to us ... if u actually want to educate yourself and learn something for a change as opposed to just running your mouth ... I'll even give u a hint ... ONE of the key words is BASELINE ....




Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
They were growing corn and beans in Indiana 125 years ago. Did the same 50 years ago. And 25 years ago were growing it again. Just last week I was driving down the road and to my surprise I saw more beans and corn fields. In fact according to reports we are growing more beans and corn then anytime in history.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: teedub
They were growing corn and beans in Indiana 125 years ago. Did the same 50 years ago. And 25 years ago were growing it again. Just last week I was driving down the road and to my surprise I saw more beans and corn fields. In fact according to reports we are growing more beans and corn then anytime in history.


Its cause they do well in warm weather ... rofl ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
It sounds like your unfamiliar with a lot ... have u actually looked at the deal or u just running your mouth based off what the cnn talking heads are telling u ...

Please tell me how china is making us look bad .... and don't tell me its because they support it and we don't .... of course they support it ... it's a much better deal for them ... go take a look at the DETAILS and don't just regurgitate the talking points ...

And u proved my point right out of the gate ... u know diddly about the economics yet u spout off on the entire deal while admitting u have no clue on one of the major aspects ... But my guess is u know very little about the actual DETAILS of it and what was required in it ...

This wasn't just bad financially ... it was a bad deal in every regard to us ... if u actually want to educate yourself and learn something for a change as opposed to just running your mouth ... I'll even give u a hint ... ONE of the key words is BASELINE ....



China is proactively cutting carbon emissions. They are pouring money into green energy development, producing carbon filtering clean air buildings, etc.

We are promoting the use of COAL. SAD.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
If there was something in there about the Paris Climate accord ... i missed it ...

Get back to me when u want to talk about the Paris Climate accord ...

Nice job deflecting Mr. SPINMASTER ... thumbsup




Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
I am not sure if Winston would be proud or ashamed that the masses buy into political sponsored reports.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
If there was something in there about the Paris Climate accord ... i missed it ...

Get back to me when u want to talk about the Paris Climate accord ...

Nice job deflecting Mr. SPINMASTER ... thumbsup


I'm talking about doing something about global warming, not just calling it fake news. done with this with you.

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
This article has to suck the life out of some.....

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160825113235.htm

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Make a statement ... given some facts ... deflect ... deflection challenged ... deflect some more ... challenged again ... Can't defend your original statement ... run and hide ...

Par for the course ... thumbsup




Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Originally Posted By: teedub
This article has to suck the life out of some.....

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160825113235.htm


WOW....Scientists believe that the Suns contribution to past and future climate change may thus be larger than merely the direct changes in radiation. Not the gotcha moment you thought you had there. But OK.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
Make a statement ... given some facts ... deflect ... deflection challenged ... deflect some more ... challenged again ... Can't defend your original statement ... run and hide ...

Par for the course ... thumbsup


Much like you did when you wouldn't answer the question I asked "if you thought Transgenders serving in the Military was immoral? Which you deflected over and over by saying you didn't care. Which is par for the course.

Look in the mirror.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
It is when you realize that increased solar activity and reduced cloud formation coincide with popular time lines of "man made global temperature rise".

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
Make a statement ... given some facts ... deflect ... deflection challenged ... deflect some more ... challenged again ... Can't defend your original statement ... run and hide ...

Par for the course ... thumbsup


Much like you did when you wouldn't answer the question I asked "if you thought Transgenders serving in the Military was immoral? Which you deflected over and over by saying you didn't care. Which is par for the course.

Look in the mirror.


Do i need to explain the difference between DEFLECTING and NOT CARING to U? .. please tell me u at least understand that .. cause based on your post u clearly don't even understand that basic concept ... *shrugs* ...

Quite frankly I don't recall the question or me answering it as I HARDLY EVER read much less reply to your BS ... but I'll answer it now ... pay attention now and think about it before u respond ...

Do i think transgenders serving in the military is immoral? ... not at all ... not even a little bit ...

There's the answer to your question ... what I'm about to do is expand on my answer and give u more info than u asked for .. u understand that concept? ...

If we don't have to pay for the transition I have zero probs with TG's in the military ... and if they meet the same standards as men (its BS they've lowered the standards for women for many things .. its also DANGEROUS .. ) ... they should be allowed to do anything they want in the military ..

What I think is COMPLETE and UTTER BS is the US Military (that would be our tax dollars) paying for the transition ....

How's that for an answer and expansion of an answer ... thumbsup




Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Originally Posted By: teedub
It is when you realize that increased solar activity and reduced cloud formation coincide with popular time lines of "man made global temperature rise".


And not surprising that you still haven't realized that increased solar activity and reduced cloud formation coincide with those "man made time lines", that climate change is shown to have accelerated even more. But whatever.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg


Do i think transgenders serving in the military is immoral? ... not at all ... not even a little bit ...


How's that for an answer.



Great. You can continue your belittling of me and others now. thumbsup



"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,469
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,469
Quote:


Hall of Famer

Registered: 11/06/06
Posts: 5370
I'm not informed enough to argue for or against the legitimacy of climate change


Perhaps you should have stopped there then.

But no

Quote:
What i do know is that the Paris climate accord was a joke on many levels and appeared to me to be just another way for us to give more money to the rest of the world .


Perhaps you are less informed than you think you are?


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
Ask the dinosaurs if it is as hot as it used to be. Let me know their answer willynilly


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
I'm not informed enough to argue for or against the legitimacy of climate change ..


No, but, the Scientists who have dedicated their lives to studying and researching it are and all the science points to it happening right here, right now.


Quote:
and unlike U and most of your lib buddies I won't go google for two articles that back my side so I can act like i know more on the subject than I do ....


The difference I think you may find is us "libs" and our "lib buddies" are listening to the Scientists who are the experts, who are in the field, who are looking at all the evidence and are making educated, informed decisions based on the analysis of years and years of research. That, to me, seems like the best and wisest thing to do.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,171
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,171
Let's also consider the large number of 'non-libs' who are listening too. I'd consider those folks reasonable people.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,522
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,522
I just hope these people are alive long enough to have to explain to their grandchildren what a hoax they believed this was when Miami and a New Orleans are under water. How they snubbed their nose at the facts and how their own grandchildren are paying the price.

I'd really like to hear that conversation.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Like Al Gore ... rofl ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,235
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,235
Quote:
The report says significant advances have been made linking human influence to individual extreme weather events since the last National Climate Assessment was produced in 2014. Still, it notes, crucial uncertainties remain.


This is the stuff that troubles me. If you read that statement carefully, it really seems that their goal was to link human influence to extreme weather events. Are they even considering other causes? That's not science.

I want to be on record as saying we should be doing everything in our power to effectively stop polluting the planet. Businesses shouldn't be permitted to dump waste into our air or water, period. There's no need to lie or use junk science to get that point across.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: jfanent
Quote:
The report says significant advances have been made linking human influence to individual extreme weather events since the last National Climate Assessment was produced in 2014. Still, it notes, crucial uncertainties remain.


This is the stuff that troubles me. If you read that statement carefully, it really seems that their goal was to link human influence to extreme weather events. Are they even considering other causes? That's not science.

I want to be on record as saying we should be doing everything in our power to effectively stop polluting the planet. Businesses shouldn't be permitted to dump waste into our air or water, period. There's no need to lie or use junk science to get that point across.


It's part of the White House/USDA narrative. They're trying to get away from "climate change" and call it "extreme weather".

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/07/usda-climate-change-language-censorship-emails

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
What ever happened to "global warming" willynilly


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
M
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Originally Posted By: jfanent
Quote:
The report says significant advances have been made linking human influence to individual extreme weather events since the last National Climate Assessment was produced in 2014. Still, it notes, crucial uncertainties remain.


This is the stuff that troubles me. If you read that statement carefully, it really seems that their goal was to link human influence to extreme weather events. Are they even considering other causes? That's not science.

I want to be on record as saying we should be doing everything in our power to effectively stop polluting the planet. Businesses shouldn't be permitted to dump waste into our air or water, period. There's no need to lie or use junk science to get that point across.


If the environmental movement started out talking about environmental stewardship with reasonable arguments rather than making prediction after prediction that never come to pass while lighting their hair on fire they'd probably have made more progress toward their goals.


WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM
my two cents...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,469
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,469
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
What ever happened to "global warming" willynilly


Science says it exists.. What's so hard to understand


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,729
Gobol warming turned into, "Climate Change" which will turn into "Extreme weather" which will change into........ "Insert next cute little name they come up with"


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,257
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,257
Originally Posted By: Damanshot
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
What ever happened to "global warming" willynilly


Science says it exists.. What's so hard to understand


Science also said the world was flat.

I doubt that many don't agree that things are warming up. I might even agree that it is possible that some of it is man made, or at least we impact it to a small degree. What I don't like is to think we are the cause of it all and that mother nature doesn't play a BIG role. I mean, few would argue that we didn't have a ice age. Something caused that massive cover of ice to melt, just as something caused it to form. In either case, man had nothing to do with it.

My thinking is we have been warming up for a long time. I mean a long time. Now that the ice is getting thinner and smaller, it melts faster. Put one ice cube in a cooler and place 3 in another. See which one turns to water faster.

I honestly believe that if we were still living as we did in the 1700's, the ice would still be melting. It was melting then. We just didn't know it.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen

I honestly believe that if we were still living as we did in the 1700's, the ice would still be melting. It was melting then. We just didn't know it.


No scientist is denying that there have been natural cooling and warming cycles of the planet. It's the accelerated rate that it is melting that is the worry and science points to the dawn of the industrial revolution as what began to kick it into higher gear and it hasn't slowed since. In fact, it has picked up speed.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,257
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,257
I tried to explain that. As the ice pack gets smaller and thinner, it melts at a faster rate.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,182
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
Originally Posted By: Damanshot
[quote=GMdawg]What ever happened to "global warming" willynilly


Science says it exists.. What's so hard to understand


Quote:
Science also said the world was flat.


Those were "Political" figures not scientists. Real Scientists proved them wrong.

Quote:
I doubt that many don't agree that things are warming up. I might even agree that it is possible that some of it is man made, or at least we impact it to a small degree. What I don't like is to think we are the cause of it all and that mother nature doesn't play a BIG role. I mean, few would argue that we didn't have a ice age. Something caused that massive cover of ice to melt, just as something caused it to form. In either case, man had nothing to do with it.


Your opinion. And the earth has had more than one ice age. Many may not believe or know that either.

Quote:
My thinking is we have been warming up for a long time. I mean a long time. Now that the ice is getting thinner and smaller, it melts faster. Put one ice cube in a cooler and place 3 in another. See which one turns to water faster.


So what you're saying is during all of life's history on earth, green house gases have had no noticeable effect what so ever on global warming or climate change and what we are experiencing today?


Last edited by PerfectSpiral; 08/10/17 10:23 AM.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,044
it took 30 years to get the ozone layer to repair itself from the damage we caused with CFC's and god knows what else.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/06/antarctic-ozone-hole-healing-fingerprints/

Now we got a blithering fool like Trump in office that is doing his best to reverse that...what a fool.

its decisions like these that will lead to another Litte Ice Age

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

Don't think it will be just like a normal winter either...half the country would die today under those kinda conditions and you would have blithering fools like we have in office today to thank for it...

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
[quote=Ballpeen]
Quote:
Science also said the world was flat.


Those were "Political" figures not scientists. Real Scientists proved them wrong.




I think the 15th & 16th century explorers also proved them wrong by not falling off the edge of a "flat" world!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
I'll say it. This report is fake news.

First of all, it's been available on an EPA website since February. It's not a hidden report. The 'news' is trying to stir up crap after the Paris pullout.

Second, they start their stats in 1980, which was the coldest year of the last century. It is no warmer now than the last century. Sea levels have not risen. There are not more hurricanes or tornados.

Please do yourselves a favor and do some reaseach on how the numbers have been manipulated, or remain a blissfully ignorant dupe.


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Government Report Finds Drastic Impact of Climate Change on U.S.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5