Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
I love this article. It's so bizarre! Trading Cam Erving is a tanking move? Did the author mean playing Cam Erving is a tanking move?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I love this article. It's so bizarre! Trading Cam Erving is a tanking move? Did the author mean playing Cam Erving is a tanking move?


I get the premise of the article, I just don't think it's well executed (there was no mention of us signing Zeitler and Tretter).

It's written by a Football Outsiders guy, which makes it even more weird.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 750
K
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
K
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 750
Somebody had to pee in their cereal that morning.


Go Irish!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Very weird. Especially considering how the NFL has some of the worst parity in any sport. I also wonder how he likes the Jaguars moves this off-season, as they were the first money ball team. They have even deployed into the third stage, where they are just signing expensive FA'S, despite not having a cheap QB to build around.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,058
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,058
j/c:

Articles like these will continue to be written until we win. It's as simple as that no matter how much we disagree with it's content or accuracy.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

Opinions are like fingerprints and a-holes everybody has one.

The problem is this author is clueless. If he really knew the insides of the roster and decisions made then it would be different.

When I read the article this morning it reminds of when an announcer covers a game and knows next to nothing about the teams.

These decisions made by losing teams are not done in a vacuum. Careers and lots of money go along. They are not taken lightly.

The author would do well by putting more effort into research.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: bonefish
When I read the article this morning it reminds of when an announcer covers a game and knows next to nothing about the teams.


I read the article and had a similar thought. This is a good way to describe it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,882
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,882
Peyton Manning and Tom Brady caused more 'damage' to the competitive balance of the league over the past 15 years than moneyball.
JMHO


[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
According to the fans on this board, reporters and others have been "dumb" for years when evaluating the Browns.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
According to the fans on this board, reporters and others have been "dumb" for years when evaluating the Browns.


lol and yet the national media tends to be accurate every single season. but come on bro we're fans, which means we all have homerism.

Last edited by Swish; 09/05/17 01:21 PM.

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
LOL I get that. It just seems weird for people to call others "clueless" when the opposite has proven to be true.

I don't know........maybe it's my background, but when I played, I loved talking trash. Big-time trash. But dawg, I didn't say boo-peep when we were losing. Talkin' trash when you suck is pretty lame. LOL

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

This is not just about the Browns.

It is a knock against losing teams trying a different approach.

In the end it may be right. However, in the meantime the assumptions are any team taking this new "approach" has it all wrong.

Time will tell. I just don't like it when someone not on the inside or truly in the know about the decisions made by the teams mentioned make it sound like they are wrong.

If he knew the complete roster of the teams and how they came to their decisions on the 53 man roster then I would place more credence on his article.

At the end of the 2018 season know will know alot more about the decisions the Browns have made with "moneyball".

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Sorry bonefish. Wasn't trying to ruffle your gills. I like you as a poster. I was just sayn'.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Also no mention that in previous years the Browns did what the article is essentially promoting... overpaying for talent to keep the brand name players in house. Haven't we been doing that for years? And spending our monies on over the hill free agents and trading for unwanted "low character" prima donna players... ?

The Browns are not tanking and anyone who writes an article about it or believes it is foolish.

I especially liked the comment that the NFL is set up for a quick turnaround. If it's that easy Mr. article writer why don't you do it?

Funny to read, but this article is wrong in a lot of places... but thanks for trying to pile on.

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,921
I
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
I
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,921
Bozos being a very popular term.
If a reporter didnt gush and embrace the Browns front office and moves it made he was labeled a bozo or inept at his profession

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
And I don't see what the Jets are doing as the same as what the Browns did last year. Browns didn't "tank" last year either, but the Jets very well might be. The Jets have the look of a team that thinks they know what the Browns are doing and want to copy. There's more to the Browns plan than releasing aging vets and young talent for future draft picks. The Jets on the other might very well be trying to copy what the Colts did a few years back.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

No problem Vers.

As Browns fans we have faced the ugly over and over again.

I have no idea how this will all turn out. There are plenty of decisions to question.

But I tell you this is the first season in a long time that I am looking forward too.

There are some players that I really want to watch play on this roster.

Starting with Kizer. I expect bumps but I like this young man and maybe just maybe we have our guy.

Garrett and Peppers are two more that I want to watch. I believe these guys have talent.

Schobert is another guy that has caught my attention. And I expect Coleman to break out as a receiver.

If Kizer progresses as the season moves along next year the true suffering may end. We have high draft prospects and money to spend. I don't have high expectations as far as wins but I like the upgrade of talent.

This season at least their are players to watch that actually have talent.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
The author probably evaluates Quarterbacks by how pretty their girlfriends are. tongue

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:
To Cleveland followers. I believe in Browns philosophy same thing we did in 13. It's right way, but do question some of the execution. Relax


https://twitter.com/JoeBanner13/status/905156313918910464

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Cleveland Browns cutting veterans? The bottom line -- Terry Pluto (video)
Updated on September 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM Posted on September 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM

http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/index.ssf/2017/09/cleveland_browns_cutting_veter.html



By Terry Pluto, The Plain Dealer

terrypluto2003@yahoo.com

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Look at all the veteran players cut by the Cleveland Browns?

They're tanking! They don't want to win!! They are throwing away talent!!!

I received an email from a fan about the Browns cutting John Greco as being the same as Mitchell Schwartz going to the Kansas City Chiefs.

Not even close.

After the 2015 season, Schwartz was a 26-year-old free agent. He was coming off a rookie contract. He had never missed a snap.

I thought the Browns blew it by allowing him to go to the Chiefs for a relatively modest contract. He is a solid right tackle.

But this is not Schwartz all over again.

Greco is 32. He is coming off major foot surgery. He was healthy in training camp, but not close to being a starter.

The Browns kept Austin Reiter and Marcus Martin instead of Greco. Both are younger and they are interior linemen.

For Greco's sake, I hope he is eventually signed. But no team has rushed to sign him.

The Browns cut Desmond Bryant a few weeks ago. They cut Gary Barnidge a few months ago. Neither is with an NFL team.

The only veteran cut by the Browns who had an immediate demand for his skills was Joe Haden.

I can easily make a case for the Browns keeping Haden, even though he is no longer a Pro Bowl caliber cornerback worthy of his $11 million salary.

My sense is the Browns believe Jamar Taylor is better than Haden.

But the NFL spoke, several teams were interested in Haden. The defensive back-desperate Pittsburgh Steelers signed Haden for $7 million.

The Browns did offer Haden $7 million to stay. But seldom does it work for a player to take a paycut to remain with his original team. It tends to create hard feelings.

Brock Osweiler was signed by Denver as a backup.

Can we take a deep breath and a logical look at what the Browns have done?

Let's talk about it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
According to the fans on this board, reporters and others have been "dumb" for years when evaluating the Browns.

Well, the Browns have had 2 decent seasons out of what, 17 since their return... they have been doing this analytics thing for one year.. obviously that is NOT what is causing the competitive imbalance.

The bigger contributor to the competitive imbalance is that they have jacked the rules around so that it's almost impossible to win without a really good QB... there are 32 teams and only about 10-12 really good QBs...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,850
another article created to keep casual fans laughing at us


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,361
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,361
[quote=cfrs15]http://bleacherreport.com/articles/27313...amming-national

and we should listen to anything this asshat types WHY????????????

"My name is Mike and I write Greg Schiano jokes for food. Long ago, I taught mathematics in suburban South Jersey. During standardized test sessions, I wrote articles for Football Outsiders and the New York Times. Eventually, schools began giving so many standardized tests that I was a full-time writer who proctored tests as a side job. So I quit proctoring tests. I covered the NFL for Sports on Earth for two years. Now I am at Bleacher Report, sharing statistical nuggets and offbeat observations while waiting for Congress to appoint a Poet Laureate in the category of Johnny Manziel Tweets. 'Cuz I like my odds. "


JC why is it that so many folks around here think anybody who posts on the internet is smart???????? banghead banghead banghead


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,797
S
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
S
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,797
Originally Posted By: HotBYoungTurk
another article created to keep casual fans laughing at us


That's the way journalism is now. It's like the younger generation, respect is history. Kids are taught to care about themselves only. Me,me,me...

Watch these shows on NFL network. You got former players mocking present players. They all chuckle, and the kids think that is cool. Bashing someone used to be frowned upon, today it's a national pastime.

FA is what killed the NFL. No loyalty to a team, only rare cases. Rosters turn over every couple years, except the few elite teams. FAs turn down teams to play for contenders, then when they get older they prey upon losing teams to pay them big bucks because of their name recognition, then dog it foir a year and retire.

I feel this regime, is doing what needed done since '99. They are building a foundation, a team to grow together. I hope it works, but know it will take a few years.


RIP, Jim
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Well, the Browns have had 2 decent seasons out of what, 17 since their return... they have been doing this analytics thing for one year.. obviously that is NOT what is causing the competitive imbalance.


Never said that.

I said that the fans on the boards have been lambasting journalists and anyone else who criticizes the team for years.

Heck, look at some of the recent posts on this very thread. What makes these posters so smart? They've been wrong every freaking year and they still speak in a haughty manner.

Very annoying.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Slanted. Presumptive. Disjointed. Poorly written.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,361
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,361
Quote:
I said that the fans on the boards have been lambasting journalists and anyone else who criticizes the team for years.


Here is the problem bro. So many people listen to SO CALLED journalists and take what they say to heart, and never ever vet what those asshats are saying.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 118
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 118
I don't know why this article rubbed me wrong but it did!
I guess I'm sick of getting beat down from the outside. Grant it, until we actually prove something on the field we have to take this crap.
But it sounded like this guy really didn't know how this works. ( maybe none of us do) and it was the Browns fault for starting moneyball.
For the Browns, we needed to try something innovative, outside the box thinking.
However, we have not played just "moneyball" outside of the Oswaller trade.

As far as the recent moves, I was an absolute Joe H.fan. But for the past two years he couldn't stay healthy and still was getting burnt in pre-season,
Bottom line his skills diminished. He will probably be rejuvenated which I say go for it Joe.

As for Greco, I thought he was an excellent back up. But he was not starting. It will not cause us to have a losing season because he was let go.
Erving, jeez, we actually got a 5th round!- Good for Sashi!

I can't figure out why I get a sense of so many folks are giving up on the long term strategy.
This team cannot be fixed in a year.
Think about it, this is the FO first full offseason. I think there were more good moves than bad.
For this team, that is a major improvement. We knew this was not the year for any playoff runs.

Lets see what this young quarterback can do. I for one saw a quarterback, for the first time I remember pass they eye test.
My prediction in the other thread is 5-11 and that is being optimistic, but in no way am I ready to abandon what is in motion.


If I only knew then what I know today...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
Quote:
another article created to keep casual fans laughing at us



like some of the threads created on this board... Bad thing is..It's by so called fans.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Objectivity is a terrible, terrible thing.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
when used for dispassion..

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,513
Originally Posted By: PortlandDawg
Peyton Manning and Tom Brady caused more 'damage' to the competitive balance of the league over the past 15 years than moneyball.
JMHO


Pretty much....


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 610
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 610
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
Quote:
I said that the fans on the boards have been lambasting journalists and anyone else who criticizes the team for years.


So many people listen to SO CALLED journalists and take what they say to heart, and never ever vet what those asshats are saying.


So many people listen to SO CALLED knowledgeable posters and take what they say to heart, and never ever vet what those asshats are saying.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
yeeaaa....

when I got to the part where the Bills cutting Cardale Jones is in part the Bills are taking and playing "moneyball". I just had to stop there.


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I love this article. It's so bizarre! Trading Cam Erving is a tanking move? Did the author mean playing Cam Erving is a tanking move?


Summed up right there lol.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Strangely, this reminds me of another time in our history where the media and fans went bananas...


https://www.si.com/vault/1993/11/22/1299...t-bernie-kosar#


That regime was fired as the team moved and the Browns returned in 1999 and sucked ever since... The coach of that regime went on to do great things with his method of madness. And then the Browns hire a front office with a similar philosophy only to be told it won't work by the media and several fans.... let's see how this turns out.

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum NFL Moneyball Is Hurting the Browns, Jets, Bills and Competitive Balance

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5