Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
eotab #1319338 09/22/17 09:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,103
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,103
Originally Posted By: eotab
Things will settle down as all get on the same page and comfort level!


Exactly, eo! We must be patient; cohesiveness will develop as the season progresses barring setback due to injuries...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
bbrowns32 #1319345 09/22/17 09:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,752
H
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,752
Goff played well last night. Remember how bad he looked last year? That's why we have to be patient with our Browns and DK. It well take time and it won't be pretty but we need to be patient and let things come together.

Homewood Dog #1319346 09/22/17 09:53 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,758
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,758
Originally Posted By: Homewood Dog
Goff played well last night. Remember how bad he looked last year? That's why we have to be patient with our Browns and DK. It well take time and it won't be pretty but we need to be patient and let things come together.


I agree. And the same can be said with every young player in the NFL.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
dawglover05 #1319357 09/22/17 10:08 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: dawglover05
I agree with the last several posts. By the way, how is Jared Goff looking so far this year vs last year with some talent infusion at the WR position, and some time under his belt?


The time definitely helped as does the wr upgrade ... no doubt ... there HUGE ...

AND so is the HC/OC change ... that maybe bigger ... last year the D's knew what play they were running when they came to the line ... it was documented by opponents as well as several rams O players ... they basically said it was a grammar school offense that was very predictable ..

they also upgraded the OL ...

Goff looks like a new man .. he also played Indi and SF's D's ... very interested to watch him ...

i'm going to have fun watching Goff, Wents, Kizer, Watson this year ... and Mitch more than likely at some point this year .. i'm going to enjoy watching those guys and will be very interested to see who develops into what ...




bbrowns32 #1319358 09/22/17 10:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: bbrowns32
"Putrid"? I prefer to use the word "inexperienced"...


*LOL* ... its not often those two words are interchangeable ...




eotab #1319364 09/22/17 10:26 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Originally Posted By: eotab
too many teams worse than us...I will be surprised if we are picking top five. We will not be close to getting the best QB in the draft.

jmho...Kizer is our best franchise QB prospect - he is here not some pie in the sky dream. He has probably the best talent from this draft as a QB. We have to "HOPE" that he progresses to be the QB we hope he can be. We know he will work hard for it so that is a plus.

Back to shifting...it helps a young QB in his pre-snap reads.
It also can bring numbers to the a position we feel is weak on our side or their side for that matter especially in the run game. Also for every action there is a reaction...if they shift with our shift what plays do we have planned to offset their reaction. Offense we have to control the action not the other way around. Shifting is important. I don't see Kizer being confused. I see Posters maybe being confused??? I also see a player or two that needs redirection by Kizer as maybe they are confused. Things will settle down as all get on the same page and comfort level!

jmhobservation


I don't disagree with anything u say tabber ... nothing .. I just don't think Kizer is ready for this ... its to much ... he's a rookie that wasn't close to ready ... he needed to sit and u know it ... hue decided to play him ... and that's OK .. the lack of talent at the QB position made rushing the rookie a viable option ..... so what now ..

Hue's decided to do what your scenario states and give him everything at once ... well in nfl football readiness Hue has put Kizer in the last calcuus class you take to get your chemical engineering degree when Kizer should be taking Algebra ...

Lets hope it works .. we'll see and know in a few years ...

it should get better short term ... I expect over the next 3 to 4 weeks he'll make mistakes but he will show those throws that only a few can make ... his play and the entire O's play will be sporadic but much better than last week ..




eotab #1319459 09/22/17 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 14,031
Quote:
jmho...Kizer is our best franchise QB prospect - he is here not some pie in the sky dream. He has probably the best talent from this draft as a QB. We have to "HOPE" that he progresses to be the QB we hope he can be. We know he will work hard for it so that is a plus.


Let's hear the doubters argue EO's point above...

I agree..Kizer is everything the Browns have been looking for..but he is lacking in experience, preferring to get his needed experience in the NFL instead of college.

Folks need to lighten up a bit, knowing this kid is going to work his tail off to improve his game.

Just relax, Browns fan !


GM strong...

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
DiamDawg #1319481 09/22/17 12:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,290
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,290
I don't have an issue with Kizer starting. . . and continuing to start if he struggles.

My issue is with regard to what he is asked to do.... last year Hue had a 3rd round, weak armed QB and managed the play calling to make him look serviceable and put up good numbers. . . . What Hue has done with Kizer so far is exactly like your analogy of giving him calculus when he needs to be learning algebra. I know the play calling has been discussed somewhat - but if Kizer aint getting it ... then dumb it down. Give the guy a chance to succeed.... don't ask him to throw it so much and so deep against a defense like Baltimore.... And if Kizer isn't listening to the coaching staff when they tell him to stop looking for the big play on every drop back... they need to find a way to make him listen. That is not going to help him develop imo. That's asking for him to get hurt and asking for the interceptions we saw vs Baltimore. . . . We finally saw some effective screens in preseason ... have we called one since? Flaco was killing us - absolutely killing us - with the roll out .... where did Kizer once do that and use the ability we have seen to throw on the run??? And I said it in the pregame forum ... we need to accept that it's a battle for field position and sometimes we might be 3 and out ... but you can't abandon the run.

Hoping for a confidence boosting performance vs the Colts ... But after a better than expected 16-13 performance vs the Cardinals - I am almost preparing myself for a board meltdown and a loss.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
mgh888 #1319482 09/22/17 12:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Hoping for a confidence boosting performance vs the Colts ... But after a better than expected 16-13 performance vs the Cardinals - I am almost preparing myself for a board meltdown and a loss.


The Cardinals are also terrible.

cfrs15 #1319561 09/22/17 02:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341
D
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
D
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341
Agreed. A friend of mine is a Cards fan and they think they are soft with Palmer and Fitz on way out. All we can do is lay it out there and see where the chips fall. If we play like we did against the Steelers we'll beat them. No doubt in my mind.

Last edited by drobs; 09/22/17 02:39 PM.
willitevachange #1319580 09/22/17 02:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
I am not writing Kizer off. I just think Darnold will be much better.

DiamDawg #1319595 09/22/17 03:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Diam what I think and want is not what I ever get...lol laugh just giving the situation that we have here.

1. I wanted Kizer to sit and learn.
2. I wanted Kizer to have a dummied down playbook (which doesn't mean cut out the shifting).
3. I wanted Kessler to start cause I thought he was the safest and least likely to make mistakes.
4. I thought #3 was important cause I had a feeling that our D could have been dominant where a QB who didn't make mistakes would have us in a winning situation against strong teams...like the last two we played.

I'm not always right and probably not in the above 1-4.
Just letting you and anyone else who were wondering what my position was on this subject...laid it out there for all to see.

Kizer: as long as he doesn't become damaged goods, physically and mentally I'm ok with it. As long as he progresses I'm fine with it. I'm sure he will take a step back from time to time but as long as he continues and progresses forward.
as always jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1319618 09/22/17 03:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
Originally Posted By: eotab
Diam what I think and want is not what I ever get...lol laugh just giving the situation that we have here.

1. I wanted Kizer to sit and learn.
2. I wanted Kizer to have a dummied down playbook (which doesn't mean cut out the shifting).
3. I wanted Kessler to start cause I thought he was the safest and least likely to make mistakes.
4. I thought #3 was important cause I had a feeling that our D could have been dominant where a QB who didn't make mistakes would have us in a winning situation against strong teams...like the last two we played.

I'm not always right and probably not in the above 1-4.
Just letting you and anyone else who were wondering what my position was on this subject...laid it out there for all to see.

Kizer: as long as he doesn't become damaged goods, physically and mentally I'm ok with it. As long as he progresses I'm fine with it. I'm sure he will take a step back from time to time but as long as he continues and progresses forward.
as always jmho


If the Browns could run the ball effectively, Kizer would probably be looking much better. Since they cannot run the ball, or Hue just is lying about wanting to run it, Kizer's inexperience is showing and costing us games (I am not saying Hogan or Kessler would have led us to wins). I think our "D" is very, very good. If we do not progress offensively to the point of winning at least 6 games, I do think we should look at Darnold. He seems pro ready right now, he would not need nearly as much development as Kizer. Ship Kizer for a middle round draft pick, and who knows maybe even a second rounder.

pfm1963 #1319622 09/22/17 03:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
pfm...against good D's we got to hit on the Vertical passes...then you will get 2 deep and a running game going. We had a couple of shots and have missed, especially with Kizer in there who was a dynamo with the long ball in Preseason.

Until that happens we will have 8 in the box and 1 or more close by. We definitely need to spread out the D but if you notice when Kizer is in unless its a passing down we got 2 TE and all congested making it tough to run and Crowell just is not a runner to go lateral. Wish we had Metcalf...he was ahead of his times.
jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1319636 09/22/17 04:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
P
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,541
Originally Posted By: eotab
pfm...against good D's we got to hit on the Vertical passes...then you will get 2 deep and a running game going. We had a couple of shots and have missed, especially with Kizer in there who was a dynamo with the long ball in Preseason.

Until that happens we will have 8 in the box and 1 or more close by. We definitely need to spread out the D but if you notice when Kizer is in unless its a passing down we got 2 TE and all congested making it tough to run and Crowell just is not a runner to go lateral. Wish we had Metcalf...he was ahead of his times.
jmho


I miss Metcalf too. And Greg Pruitt.

Plus our WR's are absolutely no help to Kizer. My point, and I do not disagree with you, is that in my humble opinion, Darnold is a special prospect and we cannot pass on him. I like Kizer, a lot actually, but I do think Darnold would provide an upgrade that we could ill afford to pass on at the QB position. If we drafted him and S. Barkley out of Penn State, then I think a lot of our offensive woes would be solved. And since we have multiple picks, getting a true #1 WR and OL depth along with Darnold and Barkley would be my draft strategy for 2018.

mgh888 #1319668 09/22/17 08:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Deep passes are not all that risky. They are one of the safest passes a qb can throw.

Blaming Hue for our problems is wrong.

Teams are bringing an extra guy in the box. I get that some of you won't believe me, but is Bitonio a liar? They know that Crow is our best offensive player and are gearing to stop him.

Hue is calling the right plays. But Kizer and the inept receiving corps are not getting the job done.

I do not think it has anything to do w/it being too complicated. It's about a lack of execution.

cfrs15 #1319682 09/22/17 09:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,705
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,705
https://www.dawgsbynature.com/2017/9/20/...inst-the-ravens

If you watch these 10 runs at least 7 of the runs are vs. an 8 man front from the Ravens. 8 man fronts are designed to stop the runs. Usually, a safety running free at the RB. That player was Tony Jefferson more often than not. I know the Browns need to establish a running game but it is tough vs. 8 man fronts even with a good Oline.

As Vers says it is up to Kiser and the receivers to keep that extra safety out of the box.


"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
cfrs15 #1319713 09/23/17 05:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Kizer needs to sit an learn the off. first.

over 3 seconds to throw the ball??? while the great and damn good ones are around 1.3 seconds...wish I could find stats on Hogan's time. looked but couldn't find it.

Over 3 seconds to throw the ball means

1). he is taking too long to read the field.

2). holding the ball too long (doesn't really know the offense or can't read the defense_.

3). 3 seconds means the O-line is doing a damn good job of pass protecting.

4). Kizer throws a laser ball...that goes in random places. (huge arm talent, just no accuracy).


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
cfrs15 #1319714 09/23/17 05:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
but then again Branden Weeden had huge arm talent too...just saying


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
dawgpound101 #1319719 09/23/17 05:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Kizer has a long, long way to go.

I am not sure if anyone values my opinion or not, but I have more hope for Kizer than I ever did for Weeden.

Last edited by Versatile Dog; 09/23/17 05:58 AM.
Versatile Dog #1319729 09/23/17 07:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,034
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,034
Weeden had a million dollar arm and a 10 cent head. We are still waiting to find out about Kizer"s head.

Besides, as a rookie, wasn't Weeden ten years older then Kizer is currently? (I know that is a slight exaggeration)


The difference between Jesus and religion
Religion mocks you for having dirty feet
Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
pfm1963 #1319741 09/23/17 08:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I just saw film on Britt last week. There were 9 plays that he was open and not targeted. At least 3 that I saw were deep passes as he had a step on his defender. In most progression the Deep Pattern is the first priority.

That is just Britt. I'm sure others had gotten open and not targeted. We got a rookie QB the game has not slowed down for him and he has a lack of NFL experience.
jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1319921 09/23/17 08:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Good points. However, a lot of our fans will tell you it's all about play calling. rolleyes

Versatile Dog #1319994 09/24/17 07:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Probably the most common beef among fans of all teams. Again...its all about EXECUTION not play calling.

I don't care what our fans think...just know what I know its up to them to agree or not.

I don't like the fact that our first series is so well CRAPPY Cause most teams will script a certain amount of plays to start out a game. Practice those plays game planning against our Opponents. In the past with worse talent on Offense we would have a couple of good series moving the chains before a complete meltdown.

A rookies best friend is usually their TEs. I do like the fact he has targeted them in games. I also like our TEs Njoku actually has surprised me. Devalve I have always liked.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Versatile Dog #1320014 09/24/17 08:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Good points. However, a lot of our fans will tell you it's all about play calling. rolleyes


It's EXECUTION of said play calling.

Man some fans irritate the hell out of me.

People don't THINK.

We are potentially sitting on a GOLD MINE with Jackson and Williams.

Think about this. Our OC is our HC. He won't be going anywhere unless he's forced out. Therefore we will not lose our OC to a HC position elsewhere. Same with Williams. He's not going anywhere either. I don't think he's even interested in a HC position.

That can pay HUGE dividends in the future. SAME Offense. SAME Defense for multiple years.

kwhip #1320020 09/24/17 08:34 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,666
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,666
That cohesion and continuity is what it will take to make us finally become a winning team. And the fans seem to know that all during the off season. Then we play two games and in their frustration, they forget all about it.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
cfrs15 #1320073 09/24/17 09:37 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,165
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,165

Kizer has played two games. Two games against two very good defenses.

He has had very little time to develop any chemistry with his receivers. Remember there was a quarterback competition.

The receivers are inexperienced and the ones that have some experience are not that great.

We do not have a premier running back. Crowell is average. Duke is not a work horse heavy carries guy.

The OL although improved is still learning to play together.

We have to have patience with Kizer plain and simple.

Expect some good and some bad because that is what we are going to get.

bonefish #1320082 09/24/17 09:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
we need a derrick henry or leonard fournette next draft. that would help Kizer out tremendously.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
PitDAWG #1320084 09/24/17 09:46 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,236
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,236
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
That cohesion and continuity is what it will take to make us finally become a winning team. And the fans seem to know that all during the off season. Then we play two games and in their frustration, they forget all about it.


I could not frickin' believe that we had "fire the coach" and "start Hogan" threads after the second game. I knew they would come, but not after 2 games.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Versatile Dog #1320134 09/24/17 10:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,290
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,290
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Deep passes are not all that risky. They are one of the safest passes a qb can throw.

Blaming Hue for our problems is wrong.

Teams are bringing an extra guy in the box. I get that some of you won't believe me, but is Bitonio a liar? They know that Crow is our best offensive player and are gearing to stop him.

Hue is calling the right plays. But Kizer and the inept receiving corps are not getting the job done.

I do not think it has anything to do w/it being too complicated. It's about a lack of execution.


I have no problem with deep passes. Unless that is the "only" throw that is ever made because Kizer can't execute the short or medium throw and is holding on to the ball too long.

As for Hue calling the right plays ... I think that's inaccurate or something that can't be determined. We have not executed - the QB, the WR's, the TE's or the RB's .... so hard/impossible to say that they have been the right play call. And that's the issue for me.

It's really simple - I blame Hue as the OC for not being able to draw up plays and call them in game situation that the team can execute. Simple as that. Period. Yes Kizer is a rookie and inaccurate. Sure the WR's seem to be struggling some. . . . so it's the Offensive Coordinator's job to create and call plays that the people he has available can execute. . . . and he's not doing that. I am not blaming Hue coz I think he's a jerk or I want him fired. . . . I am saying we need a OC who is dedicate 100% to drawing up plays and gameplans without any other responsibilities. If Hue is the HC and the OC .... how much time is he spending being one or the other. If he is not spending 100% of his time doing one or the other .... does anyone think that has no impact?

Simply - on a young, learning, building team. Having a guy do two roles and split time as HC and OC means he isn't being as effective as he could be with all energies and time spent doing one role. I think that shows on game days.


The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
jfanent #1320135 09/24/17 10:42 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,697
L
Legend
Online
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,697
Yes. Fans have to be patient with this team. People can think and post what they want - I really don't care - but knee-jerk reactions aren't admirable.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

lampdogg #1320172 09/24/17 11:19 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,380
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,380
j/c

Listening to Donovan and Dieken in the pre-game on the Browns app. Dieken made two points that I thought were interesting:

He basically is surprised that Hue is not regularly including a checkdown option to Kizer. He stated that a checkdown would go a long way to helping Kizer - the young rookie - get the ball out.

He also stated that part of the reason why the opposing TE's are killing us is due to the depth of the FS.

FWIW.

WSU Willie #1320179 09/24/17 11:23 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
i know people trip about the safety playing way too deep, but to be fair, as of right now we're tied for 7th fewest plays of 20+ yards or more on defense.

we've allowed 4.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
cfrs15 #1320695 09/24/17 01:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Ignore everything I just said. We've already allowed 4 plays over 20 in the first half so far.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Swish #1320766 09/24/17 01:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,758
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,758
Poor Kizer with all this lack of talent. He has some learning to do.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
cfrs15 #1321496 09/24/17 03:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,135
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,135
I didn't want Kizer, still don't. I see no future with a QB that has zero touch on his passes, holds the ball too long because he doesn't see the field well, and just flat out wretched ball placement.

Will some of that be fixed over time? Sure. Most of it won't though. He shouldn't be starting and we all know that.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
cfrs15 #1321505 09/24/17 04:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,279
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,279
Kizer....he's it for sure. The QB guru says so.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
WSU Willie #1321527 09/24/17 04:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
j/c

Listening to Donovan and Dieken in the pre-game on the Browns app. Dieken made two points that I thought were interesting:

He basically is surprised that Hue is not regularly including a checkdown option to Kizer. He stated that a checkdown would go a long way to helping Kizer - the young rookie - get the ball out.

He also stated that part of the reason why the opposing TE's are killing us is due to the depth of the FS.

FWIW.


And Peppers is a bad safety

Razorthorns #1321528 09/24/17 04:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,928
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,928
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I didn't want Kizer, still don't. I see no future with a QB that has zero touch on his passes, holds the ball too long because he doesn't see the field well, and just flat out wretched ball placement.


0 touch on his passes? At times. Other times, perfect passes.

Holds the ball too long? Some times, yes, absolutely.

Wretched ball placement? At times, yes.


Rookie. Those things can and should be improved. But, it takes............get this.............some time.

That's one thing, time, that qb's in Cleveland don't get from fans.

cfrs15 #1321565 09/24/17 05:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
I think Brock challenged him on how many INTs can be thrown.

Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Kizer

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5